Evaluation of the long-term safety and effectiveness of tadalafil once daily in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction: interim results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial

Long-term tadalafil once daily in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction: a 2-year final analysis of a post-marketing, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial

The long-term safety and effectiveness of once-daily tadalafil is crucial, but limited data are available in Chinese patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). In this post-marketing, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial with 2-year follow-up, 635 ED cases were randomized to receive daily oral tadalafil 2.5 mg or 5 mg for 3 months, of whom 580 continued once-daily tadalafil 5 mg for 21 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events in the 12-month and 24-month period were similar, with the most common being viral upper respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. Significant improvement from baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) score was detected at month 12 (least squares mean [LSM] change: 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-8.4, P < 0.001) and was maintained to month 24 (LSM change: 8.6, 95% CI: 8.1-9.0, P < 0.001). The proportions of patients regaining normal erectile function (IIEF-EF score ≥26) were 43.7% and 48.0% at months 12 and 24, respectively. Global Assessment Questionnaire results showed improved erection function in 97.5% of patients and improved ability to engage in sexual activity in 95.9% of patients at month 12; these values were 96.1% and 95.0% at month 24, respectively. The quality of sexual life score based on the Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ) was increased by 52.2% at month 12 and by 55.3% at month 24 (both P < 0.001). The treatment satisfaction score determined by SLQQ (mean ± standard deviation) was 62.4 ± 21.0 at month 12 versus 65.9 ± 20.2 at month 24. Two-year daily application of tadalafil 5 mg in Chinese men with ED showed a favorable safety profile and durable improvement in sexual performance and satisfaction.

Efficacy and safety assessment of traditional Chinese medicine for erectile dysfunction: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Several patients with erectile dysfunction do not accept or benefit from conventional therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; thus, alternative and complementary therapies are in need. Traditional Chinese medicine has been treating erectile dysfunction in China, but its clinical value is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in treating erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from a comprehensive search in the literature published in the past decade from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang, and VIP. We performed a meta-analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores, clinical recovery rates, and testosterone levels using Review Manager 5.4 software. The trial sequential analysis was conducted to check the results.

RESULTS

A total of 45 trials with 5016 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that traditional Chinese medicine effectively improved the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores (weighted mean difference = 3.78, 95% confidence interval: 3.12, 4.44; p < 0.001), clinical recovery rates (risk ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.38, 1.79; p < 0.001), testosterone levels (weighted mean difference = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.59, 3.25; p < 0.001) compared with the controls. The single and add-on applications of traditional Chinese medicine could improve the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire score (p < 0.001). The trial sequential analysis confirmed the robustness of the analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores. A significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the treatment and control groups was not observed (risk ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 1.05; p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Traditional Chinese medicine can gain better responses in improving the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores, clinical recovery rates, and testosterone levels as an alternative and complementary treatment, with no increase in side effects. However, more standardized, long-term, traditional Chinese medicine and integrative therapy clinical trials are needed to support the clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine.

Conservative Non-surgical Options for Erectile Dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aimed to review recent evidence on conservative non-surgical options for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was done. Papers in English language, published from May 2017 until May 2022, were included. Papers reporting basic research or animal research were excluded, as long as reviews or meta-analyses. Congress reports, clinical cases, or clinical trials protocols with no results were also excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found a multitude of different treatment modalities for ED. We must take into account the type of patient, their comorbidities, the origin of their ED, and its severity in order to reproduce effective results using these therapies. Some of the treatments show good results with a good level of evidence (new IPDE5 formulations, intracavernous injections, shock wave therapy, hormonal theraphy, psycho-sexual theraphy). However, others (some new molecules, stem cell theraphy, platelet-rich plasma injections, oxygenation-based therapy, nutraceuticals), although some of them present promising results, require randomized studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up time to be able to establish firm recommendations. Regarding the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction, in recent years, some therapies have been consolidated as effective and safe for certain types of patients. On the other hand, other treatment modalities, although promising, still lack the evidence and the necessary follow-up to be recommended in daily practice.

Tadalafil Alone or in Combination with Tamsulosin for the Management for LUTS/BPH and ED

Purpose of Review

Aim of our systematic review is to evaluate and summarize the efficacy and safety of tadalafil alone or in combination with tamsulosin for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED).

Recent Findings

Daily tadalafil, in particular 5 mg, according to retrieved studies, appears to be both safe and effective in treating LUTS/BPH and ED, compared with placebo or tamsulosin. The combination of daily tadalafil 5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg allows a better improvement of LUTS compared with both the monotherapies, even if with an increased, but acceptable and tolerated, adverse events rate. After discontinuation of tamsulosin or tadalafil in patients previously treated with their combination, the improvement of LUTS retains significance compared with baseline.

Summary

Tadalafil 5 mg should be considered a primary treatment option for patients with LUTS/BPH and ED. Evidence highlight an excellent tolerability, safety, and effectiveness profile, both alone or in combination with tamsulosin 0.4 mg. A better efficacy on LUTS relief has been observed for combination therapy, preserving also sexual function. The further switch to monotherapy allows to preserve LUTS relief, but tadalafil only is able to retain ED improvement. Our results support the evidence for a more and more tailored and modular LUTS treatment.

Practical Approaches to Treat ED in PDE5i Nonresponders

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common sexual disorder in adult males and one of the most important factors affecting their quality of life and that of their partners. Although PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5is) are the first choice for improving erectile function, there is a substantial proportion of ED patients, termed PDE5i nonresponders, who do not respond to PDE5is. Because of the lack of effective therapies, these patients always have serious social and psychological problems due to ED, which should be addressed. Here, we review the available literature about ED and PDE5is and propose several strategies for mitigating ED in PDE5i nonresponders.