Proposal of Treatment Strategies for Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma Based on Laterality of Treated Hematoma

Endovascular Embolization and Atorvastatin Therapy for Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Recurrent chronic subdural hematoma poses a significant clinical challenge. While craniotomy effectively removes the hematoma membrane, it is an invasive procedure associated with significant trauma. Recently, endovascular embolization of the middle meningeal artery has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative, demonstrating efficacy and a low recurrence rate in treating chronic subdural hematoma. Furthermore, postoperative administration of oral atorvastatin calcium may enhance hematoma absorption, thereby improving patient outcomes during the early recovery phase.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Background: Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma (bCSDH) is a frequent condition commonly linked to the need for retreatment; however, the reason for this high retreatment rate remains unclear. The middle meningeal artery (MMA) was found to have a relationship with the occurrence and development of chronic subdural hematomas. This study examines a possible method to reduce bCSDH recurrence using bilateral MMA embolization combined with bilateral burr-hole drainage.

Materials and Methods: Ten patients with bCSDH who underwent bilateral MMA embolization combined with bilateral burr-hole drainage at our hospital between June 2018 and May 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' clinical information, prognoses, imaging results, as well as surgical results were documented and analyzed.

Results: Ten patients were diagnosed with bCSDH with no comorbid brain diseases. They underwent bilateral MMA embolization combined with bilateral burr-hole drainage. We embolized the MMA immediately before burr hole drainage successfully and employed angiography to validate these results. All the patients attained relief of symptoms without adverse events, and no re-expansion or relapse was reported in the follow-up computed tomography.

Conclusion: Bilateral MMA embolization combined with bilateral burr-hole drainage is an available treatment for patients with bCSDH and may have the potential for preventing recurrence.

Risk factors for need of reoperation in bilateral chronic subdural haematomas

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. A subtype of CSDH is bilateral chronic subdural haematoma (bCSDH) which represents 20-25% of patients with CSDH and has a higher recurrence rate. There is no clear consensus on how bCSDH should be treated regarding upfront unilateral- or bilateral evacuation of both haematomas. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with reoperation of bCSDH.

METHODS

A total of 326 patients with radiological evidence of bCSDH were included in this retrospective cohort study where 133 (40.8%) patients underwent primary bilateral evacuation and 193 (59.2%) primary unilateral evacuation. The two centres operated using different surgical approaches. Analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with reoperation of bCSDH. Reoperation rate was defined as reoperation of CSDH on either side of the hemisphere within 3 months after primary evacuation.

RESULTS

The cohort had a total reoperation rate of 26.4%. Patients which underwent unilateral evacuation had a reoperation rate of 32.1%, and the bilateral group had a reoperation rate of 18.0% (p=0.005). Multivariable logistic regression identified unilateral evacuation (OR 1.91, p=0.022) and complications according to Ibanez (OR 2.20, p=0.032) to be associated with the need of reoperation of bCSDH. One-burr hole craniostomy with active subgaleal drain was primarily performed in bilateral approach (69.4%) whereas patients operated with minicraniotomy with passive subdural drain were primarily operated by unilateral evacuation of the larger symptomatic side (92.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral evacuation of bCSDH was associated with a higher risk for reoperation than upfront bilateral evacuations in this study. There is a need to further discuss the criteria for uni- or bilateral evacuation since patients are treated differently at different centres.

Intraoperative hematoma volume can predict chronic subdural hematoma recurrence

Background:

We routinely measured the exact chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) volume during single burr hole surgery. To date, several risk factors have been reported for CSDH recurrence, including sex, hematoma volume and degree of midline shift calculated from computed tomography, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet medications, and alcohol consumption habits. The aim of this study was to clarify whether hematoma volume, in conjunction with other factors, can predict recurrence.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 194 consecutive patients with CSDH who underwent single burr hole surgery. The risk factors for recurrence were analyzed based on patients’ sex, age, bilaterality, existence of apparent trauma history, exact intraoperative hematoma volume, and various clinical factors, including preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet intake.

Results:

Recurrence occurred in 22 patients (11.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that intraoperative hematoma volume was an independent risk factor for CSDH recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.02, P < 0.001), in addition to sex (male) (OR 9.25; 95% CI, 1.00–84.8; P = 0.049) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR: 3.97, 95% CI, 1.34–11.7, P = 0.013). Based on receiver operating characteristics analysis, the cutoff value of the hematoma volume predicting CSDH recurrence was 150 ml (sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 72.1%, respectively; area under the curve: 0.7664, 95% CI: 0.654–0.879, P < 0.001). Of these, a hematoma volume ≥150 mL was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrence according to multiple regression (OR: 8.98, 95% CI: 2.73–29.6, P < 0.001) and Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.18–7.87, log-rank P = 0.0046, P = 0.021). Follow-up periods after surgery were significantly longer for cases with recurrence than for non-recurrence cases (24.8 ± 11.5 vs. 15.9 ± 9.7 days), and the recurrence prediction cutoff value was 17 days, with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.1% and 68.2%, respectively (AUC: 0.7707, 95% CI: 0.6695–0.8720, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Intraoperative hematoma volume could be a predictive value for CSDH recurrence.

Recurrent Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma After Interventional Embolization Combined With Drilling and Drainage Treatment

The main treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is surgical drilling and drainage. Meanwhile, the most accepted treatment strategy for bilateral CSDHs (bCSDHs) is unilateral evacuation only on the larger or symptomatic side because the contralateral hematoma is generally either small or asymptomatic. However, the probability of recurrence is high. To effectively reduce this recurrence rate, embolization has been proposed. Because middle meningeal artery embolization may effectively block the blood supply of the CSDH, its combination with drilling and drainage could be an effective treatment strategy for addressing unilateral CSDH (uCSDH). In addition, the recurrence mechanism of bCSDH may be not completely same as that of the uCSDH. Hence, the authors need find a more effective treatment for it.

A Grading System For The Prediction Of Unilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence After Initial Single Burr Hole Evacuation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous studies have identified many risk factors related to the recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). Among these factors, there may be deviations in measuring the midline shift, preoperative hematoma volume (PreHV), postoperative hematoma residual volume, and postoperative pneumocephalus in bilateral CSDHs. The aims of this study were to eliminate the impact of complicated situations on parameter measurement and to identify actual predictors for CSDH recurrence, and finally, to develop a grading system to predict unilateral CSDH (uCSDH) recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 342 patients with uCSDH were identified. Predictors of uCSDH recurrence were obtained from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A prognostic grading system was developed based on the results of multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. All patients were scored according to the grading system, and differences in the recurrence rate were reanalyzed according to the scores.

RESULTS

Age, antiplatelet or anticoagulant use, midline shift, severe brain atrophy, drainage volume, and the ratio of the postoperative pneumocephalus volume (PostPV) to the postoperative hematoma cavity volume (PostHCV) were identified as independent risk factors for predicting the recurrence of uCSDH. The cut-off values of age, drainage volume, midline shift, and the ratio of the PostPV to the PostHCV were 67 years, 101 mL, 11.2 mm, and 31.61%, respectively. The recurrence rates were 1.7%, 12.4%, 19.4%, 53.3%, and 58.3% for scores of 0-1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-6, respectively, which significantly increased as the score increased (P<0. 001).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic grading system for uCSDH on the basis of multivariable logistic regression and ROC analyses is applicable and reliable.

Risk Factors for Contralateral Hematoma Progression after Unilateral Evacuation of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematomas

OBJECTIVE

To find risk factors for contralateral hematoma progression (CHP) in bilateral chronic subdural hematomas after initial unilateral evacuation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with bilateral chronic subdural hematomas who underwent unilateral surgical evacuation in our department. Risk factors for CHP were identified by univariate analysis, a P value <0.05 were entered into multivariate logistic regression model and a predictive receiver operating characteristic curve model.

RESULTS

The progression rate was 32.08%, the average progression interval was 2.32 months. The progression rate of the homogeneous hypodense group was significantly higher than that of the other density group (P = 0.017). The limited type of contralateral hematoma had a significantly lower progression rate than that of the widespread type (P = 0.001). Both pre- and postoperative volume of contralateral hematoma were significantly more in the CHP group compared with the contralateral hematoma without progression group (P = 0.031 and P = 0.001, respectively). Of the 4 risk factors, only postoperative volume of contralateral hematoma was an independent risk factor in multivariate logistic regression model (P = 0.033; 95% confidence interval, 1.005-1.124). The cut-off values of contralateral hematoma volume before and after operation were 29.27 cm³ and 37.84 cm³, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral hematoma volume after operation is an independent risk predictor for CHP after unilateral evacuation. An additional surgery on contralateral hematoma or medical treatment should be taken into consideration if the volume is >37.84 cm³ in the first cranial computed tomography scan after surgery.