Efficacy of Terbinafine and Itraconazole in Different Doses and in Combination in the Treatment of Tinea Infection: A Randomized Controlled Parallel Group Open Labeled Trial with Clinico-Mycological Correlation

Clinico-mycological and therapeutic updates on cutaneous dermatophytic infections in the era of Trichophyton indotineae

Trichophyton indotineae has emerged as a novel dermatophyte species resulting in treatment recalcitrant skin infections. While the earliest reports came from India, T. indotineae has now spread to many parts of the world and is rapidly becoming a global health concern. Accurate identification of T. indotineae requires elaborate mycological investigations which is beyond the domain of routine microbiology testing. Extensive, non-inflammatory and atypical presentations are commonly seen with this novel species. T. indotineae shows an alarmingly high rate of mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene leading to lowered in vitro susceptibility to terbinafine. This has also translated into a lowered clinical response and requirement of a higher dose and much longer durations of treatment with the drug. Although the species remains largely susceptible to itraconazole, prolonged treatment durations are required to achieve cure with itraconazole. Fluconazole and griseofulvin do not have satisfactory in vitro or clinical activity. Apart from requirement of prolonged treatment durations, relapse postsuccessful treatment is a distressing and yet unexplained consequence of this "species-shift." Use of third generation azoles and combinations of systemic antifungals is unwarranted as both have not demonstrated clear superiority over itraconazole given alone, and the former is an important class of drugs for invasive mycoses.

Trichophyton indotineae, an Emerging Drug-Resistant Dermatophyte: A Review of the Treatment Options

Background: Dermatophytosis is a prevalent superficial infection caused by filamentous fungi, primarily affecting the skin and/or its appendages. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in mycotic strains resistant to standard antifungal therapies, including Trichophyton indotineae, a dermatophyte of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the treatment options for T. indotineae, elucidating their effectiveness in managing this challenging mycotic infection. Methods: For this review, a search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases, encompassing all published data until March 2024. English-language articles detailing therapy outcomes for patients confirmed to be affected by T. indotineae, identified through molecular analysis, were included. Results: Itraconazole was shown to be a good therapeutic choice, particularly when administered at a dosage of 200 mg/day for 1-12 weeks. Voriconazole was also demonstrated to be effective, while terbinafine exhibited a reduced response rate. Griseofulvin and fluconazole, on the other hand, were found to be ineffective. Although topical treatments were mostly ineffective when used alone, they showed promising results when used in combination with systemic therapy. Mutational status was associated with different profiles of treatment response, suggesting the need for a more tailored approach. Conclusions: When managing T. indotineae infections, it is necessary to optimize therapy to mitigate resistances and relapse. Combining in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing with mutational analysis could be a promising strategy in refining treatment selection.

Mapping the Global Spread of T. indotineae: An Update on Antifungal Resistance, Mutations, and Strategies for Effective Management

INTRODUCTION

The global spread of Trichophyton indotineae presents a pressing challenge in dermatophytosis management. This systematic review explores the current landscape of T. indotineae infections, emphasizing resistance patterns, susceptibility testing, mutational analysis, and management strategies.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in November 2023 using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria covered clinical trials, observational studies, case series, or case reports with T. indotineae diagnosis through molecular methods. Reports on resistance mechanisms, antifungal susceptibility testing, and management were used for data extraction.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 1148 articles were identified through the systematic search process, with 45 meeting the inclusion criteria. The global spread of T. indotineae is evident, with cases reported in numerous new countries in 2023. Tentative epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) suggested by several groups provide insights into the likelihood of clinical resistance. The presence of specific mutations, particularly Phe397Leu, correlate with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), indicating potential clinical resistance. Azole resistance has also been reported and investigated in T. indotineae, and is a growing concern. Nevertheless, itraconazole continues to be an alternative therapy. Recommendations for management include oral or combination therapies and individualized approaches based on mutational analysis and susceptibility testing.

CONCLUSION

Trichophyton indotineae poses a complex clinical scenario, necessitating enhanced surveillance, improved diagnostics, and cautious antifungal use. The absence of established clinical breakpoints for dermatophytes underscores the need for further research in this challenging field.

Case Report: Diagnosing Dermatophytoses in Children

Dermatophytoses of the skin and scalp are common disorders in the pediatric population. The resemblance of the clinical presentation to other dermatoses can make fungal infections challenging to diagnose. We present three cases of dermatophytoses in children. The presence of fungi within skin lesions was confirmed in all cases. The diagnoses were "id" reaction in response to Trichophyton tonsurans infection, Kerion celsi because of Microsporum canis infection, and hair loss during microsporosis. Based on our review and clinical experience, we suggest diagnostic paths and treatments for dermatophytoses in children.

Evaluation of the benefit of the addition of 1% topical luliconazole versus topical bland emollient to the systemic itraconazole therapy for the management of disseminated dermatophytosis: A randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

The present epidemic of dermatophytosis in India is marked by an increase in chronic, recurrent and disseminated cases. A combination of oral itraconazole and topical luliconazole is being increasingly utilised by dermatologists in India. The superiority of this combination is not supported by robust clinical trial data.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this randomised, open-label, two arms, parallel assignment intervention trial between November 2022 and May 2023 to determine the superiority of topical 1% Luliconazole over bland emollient as adjuvant to systemic Itraconazole therapy in the management of dermatophytosis.

METHOD

In this study, 135 patients of either sex were randomised to two study cohorts. Major exclusions being concomitant medical illness, use of concomitant medication and substance abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to receive topical bland emollient, (Cohort I, n = 67) or topical luliconazole, (Cohort II, n = 68). Both cohorts received oral itraconazole 200 mg/day (100 mg BID) and levocetirizine 5 mg twice a day as a systemic regime. Clinical and mycological cure at the end of 6 weeks and clinical relapse among cure patients during 10-week follow-up were observed.

RESULTS

The cure rates for Cohorts I and II at 6 weeks were 50 (74.62%) and 56 (82.35%), (p = .46), respectively. During the 4-week follow-up period, clinical relapses were observed in 16 (32%) of the 50 patients in Cohort I and 12 (21.43%) of the 56 patients in Cohort II (p = .18). Luliconazole cohort shows a significantly higher medical cost (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a similar cure rate and relapse rate for patients receiving topical Luliconazole versus topical bland emollient as an adjuvant to the systemic itraconazole regime.

The rapid emergence of antifungal-resistant human-pathogenic fungi

During recent decades, the emergence of pathogenic fungi has posed an increasing public health threat, particularly given the limited number of antifungal drugs available to treat invasive infections. In this Review, we discuss the global emergence and spread of three emerging antifungal-resistant fungi: Candida auris, driven by global health-care transmission and possibly facilitated by climate change; azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, driven by the selection facilitated by azole fungicide use in agricultural and other settings; and Trichophyton indotineae, driven by the under-regulated use of over-the-counter high-potency corticosteroid-containing antifungal creams. The diversity of the fungi themselves and the drivers of their emergence make it clear that we cannot predict what might emerge next. Therefore, vigilance is critical to monitoring fungal emergence, as well as the rise in overall antifungal resistance.

Comparison between the efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole orally vs. the combination of the two drugs in treating recalcitrant dermatophytosis

Fungal infections are a challenging to treat cutaneous condition. Approximately 20-25% of humans are affected by superficial fungal infections that invade and multiply within keratinized tissues. To compare the efficacy of either terbinafine or itraconazole orally versus the combination of the two drugs in the treatment of recalcitrant dermatophytosis. The current study included 45 patients with recalcitrant dermatophytosis who were distributed into 3 groups (each of 15 patients); Group A received terbinafine 250 mg twice a day for 4 weeks. Group B received itraconazole 200 mg twice a day for 4 weeks. Group C received terbinafine 250 mg once daily and itraconazole 200 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The patients were followed up for 12 weeks after initiation of treatment by clinical and microbiological assessment to determine the cure rate. At the end of twelve weeks, 12 (80%) patients in group A; 13 (86.7%) patients in group B and 15 (100%) patients in group C were completely cured. Despite of cure rates being higher in the combined group C; yet results were not statistically significant (p = 0.207). Clinical cure rates were non significantly higher in itraconazole + terbinafine combined group (p = 0.207). Combination of terbinafine and itraconazole had a higher clinical and mycological cure rate when compared to the use of either drug alone as monotherapy. Further randomized, multicenter, large cohort studies are warranted to validate the use of combination antifungal treatments.

Antifungal Resistance, Susceptibility Testing and Treatment of Recalcitrant Dermatophytosis Caused by Trichophyton indotineae: A North American Perspective on Management

There is an ongoing epidemic of chronic, relapsing dermatophytoses caused by Trichophyton indotineae that are unresponsive to one or multiple antifungal agents. Although this new species may have originated from the Indian subcontinent, there has been a notable increase of its reporting in other countries. Based on current literature, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) showed a large variation of terbinafine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (0.04 to ≥ 32 µg/ml). Elevated terbinafine MICs can be attributed to mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene (single mutations: Leu393Phe, Leu393Ser, Phe397Leu, and double mutations: Leu393Phe/Ala448Thr, Phe397Leu/Ala448Thr). Itraconazole MICs had a lower range when compared with that of terbinafine (0.008-16 µg/ml, with most MICs falling between 0.008 µg/ml and < 1 µg/ml). The interpretation of AFST results remains challenging due to protocol variations and a lack of established breakpoints. Adoption of molecular methods for resistance detection, coupled with AFST, may provide a better evaluation of the in vitro resistance status of T. indotineae. There is limited information on treatment options for patients with confirmed T. indotineae infections by molecular diagnosis; preliminary evidence generated from case reports and case series points to itraconazole as an effective treatment modality, while terbinafine and griseofulvin are generally not effective. For physicians working outside of endemic regions, there is currently an unmet need for standardized clinical trials to establish treatment guidelines; in particular, combination therapy of oral and topical agents (e.g., itraconazole and ciclopirox), as well as with other azoles (i.e., fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole), warrants further investigation as multidrug resistance is a possibility for T. indotineae.

Efficacy of Terbinafine and Itraconazole Combination Therapy Versus Terbinafine or Itraconazole Monotherapy in the Management of Fungal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fungal infections constitute a common dermatological illness rampant in underdeveloped countries. Combination drug therapy is becoming increasingly well-established owing to drug resistance because of monotherapy. Different studies have been conducted previously to compare the medical regimens for the treatment of fungal infections. However, there is insufficient research on the difference in cure rates and recurrence rates with each regimen. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first to compare the effect of the most widely used oral antifungal medications and their combination usage. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the efficacy of terbinafine or itraconazole monotherapy versus combination therapy in fungal diseases. We queried PubMed and Cochrane Central from their inception to April 2022 for published studies, RCTs, and observational studies without any language restriction that compared itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy with monotherapy in patients with fungal infections. The results from the studies were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled using a random-effects model, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant for the analysis. Endpoints of interest included cure rates and recurrence rates. Cure rates were increased significantly for combination therapy compared to terbinafine monotherapy (RR=2.01 (1.37, 2.94); p=0.0003; I2=67%). On sensitivity analysis, a significant association was observed between combination therapy and itraconazole monotherapy in terms of cure rates (RR=1.91 (1.41, 2.57); p<0.0001; I2=0%) and recurrence rates (RR=0.08 (0.02, 0.44); p=0.003; I2=0%). The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy has a better cure rate when compared to terbinafine monotherapy.

Efficacy of Super-Bioavailable Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole at Different Dosing Regimens in Glabrous Tinea Infection - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction

Itraconazole follows non-linear pharmacokinetics and hence is recommended once daily, but in real-world practice, is commonly prescribed as twice daily. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of super-bioavailable-itraconazole-130 mg (SB-130) and conventional-itraconazole-200 mg (CITZ-200) once daily compared with conventional-itraconazole-100 mg (CITZ-100) twice daily in glabrous tinea.

Methods

A total of 261 eligible patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, clinical study from December-2021 to August-2022 at seven centers in India. Efficacy and safety assessments were done at week-3 and 6, with follow-up at week-10 for relapse. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients who achieved complete cure at week-6 following treatment in all itraconazole groups. The secondary outcomes were safety and clinical and mycological cure rates.

Results

Of 261 patients, 240 were included in the analysis. At week-6, 140 patients were completely cured; thus, overall cure rate was 58.33%. Fifty-five patients (69%) in SB-130 while 47/77 (61%) and 38/83 (46%) patients were completely cured in CITZ-200 and CITZ-100 groups respectively (p<0.05; SB-130: CITZ-100, p=0.32; SB-130: CITZ-200, p=0.058; CITZ-200: CITZ-100). There was no statistical difference in the mycological cure rate and area clearance rate between any of the groups (p=0.14); however, a statistically significant difference was noted for OD dosing over BD dosing in achieving clinical cure rates (p<0.05). A total of 13/140 patients (9%) relapsed following complete cure, with no statistically significant difference between any of the groups (p=0.50). All treatments were safe and well-tolerated, with no discontinuation.

Conclusion

In this clinical study, moderate efficacy with all doses of ITZ was reported but was better with OD dosing. Although there was no statistical difference between SB-130 and CITZ-200, SB-130 may be preferred over CITZ-200 owing to the advantage of SB over the conventional ITZ.

Efficacy and safety of 250 mg versus 500 mg oral terbinafine in the treatment of tinea corporis and cruris: A randomised, assessor-blinded comparative study

Background Though higher doses of terbinafine are often prescribed to treat dermatophyte infections, it is unknown if such doses are more effective than the conventional dose because comparative data are unavailable. Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily dose of oral terbinafine 250 mg with 500 mg along with topical clotrimazole in the treatment of tinea infections. Methods A randomised, assessor-blinded, comparative study was carried out. Each group of subjects were administered either 250 mg or 500 mg oral terbinafine once daily for four weeks, along with topical clotrimazole. Clinical improvement was assessed after two weeks and again after four weeks from treatment initiation. Result A total of 60 patients with tinea corporis and cruris were randomised into two groups receiving either 250 mg (group A) or 500 mg (group B) oral terbinafine, along with clotrimazole cream in both groups. Baseline clinical parameters such as lesional activity (papules, vesicles and pustules), degree of erythema, scaling and severity of itching were comparable between both treatment arms. At the first and second follow-ups, no significant differences were found in the clinical parameters between the two groups. At the end of two weeks 13.8% of group A and 14.3% of group B and after 4 weeks 25.9% of group A and 33.3% of group B participants became KOH negative (P = 1.00 and 0.76, respectively). No significant difference in culture negativity was reported at the end of therapy (four weeks) between the two treatment arms (P = 0.78). Overall cure rates were 20% and 33.3% in the two treatment arms respectively at the end of the study (P = 0.82). Conclusion Oral terbinafine 250 mg daily yielded a poor cure rate in tinea cruris and corporis after 4 weeks of treatment and an increased dose of 500 mg did not have any additional benefit.

Red Flaging Unscientific Prescriptions in Dermatophytosis: An Overview

Dermatophytosis has acquired an epidemic-like proportion, fuelling a wide gamut of irrational, unethical and unscientific prescriptions. The menace can be attributed to poorly regulated legislative laws controlling the approval of molecules, unscientific marketing gimmicks by the pharmaceutical industry, over-the-counter availability of drugs and lack of awareness and knowledge among the prescribing physicians. In this review, we have attempted to enlist the irrational and unethical prescription patterns for dermatophytosis.

Therapeutic Updates on the Management of Tinea Corporis or Cruris in the Era of Trichophyton Indotineae: Separating Evidence from Hype-A Narrative Review

The emergence and spread of Trichophyton indotineae (T. indotineae) has led to a sea change in the prescription practices of clinicians regarding the management of dermatophytic skin infections. An infection easily managed with a few weeks of antifungals, tinea corporis or cruris, is now often chronic and recurrent and requires prolonged treatment. Rising resistance to terbinafine, with documented squalene epoxidase (SQLE) gene mutations, and slow clinical response to itraconazole leave clinicians with limited treatment choices. However, in these testing times, it is essential that the tenets of antifungal stewardship be followed in making therapeutic decisions, and that the existing armamentarium of antifungals be used in rationale ways to counter this extremely common cutaneous infection, while keeping the growing drug resistance among dermatophytes in check. This review provides updated evidence on the use of various systemic antifungals for dermatophytic infection of the glabrous skin, especially with respect to the emerging T. indotineae species, which is gradually becoming a worldwide concern.

Management of Dermatophytosis: Real-World Indian Perspective

Background

In spite of the availability of multiple consensus statements on dermatophytosis management, different treatment approaches have been experienced in India and require more scrutiny to further update guidelines and improve patient care.

Aim

To determine the different approaches in dermatophytosis diagnosis and management among dermatologists in India.

Materials and Methods

A web-based questionnaire was created and validated by five panelists with experience of >15 years in dermatophytosis and then circulated to about 2,000 dermatologists in India in September 2021 for a real-world management scenario.

Results

Out of 2,000 dermatologists, 459 responded. About half of the dermatologists (51%) routinely conduct potassium hydroxide mount (KOH) at the initiation of therapy. Similarly, about 53% of dermatologists initiate the management of dermatophytosis with combination therapy in all types of dermatophytosis for 4-6 weeks depending upon severity. Different types of combinations are being practiced, such as either two systemic and one topical, two topicals and one systemic, but the combination of one systemic and one topical (69%) is the most commonly practiced. Itraconazole (100 mg twice a day) and luliconazole are the most commonly prescribed antifungal medications. In case of non-response to routine dose of systemic anti-fungals, about 72% of dermatologists up dose them. Most of them continue these drugs for additional 1-2 weeks after clearance of the disease. Additionally, keratolytics and moisturizers are commonly prescribed. Additionally, 62% advise liver function tests (LFTs) at the initiation of therapy, whereas 72% advise monitoring adverse effects due to systemic antifungal drugs during treatment.

Conclusion

Combination therapy stood out as the need of the hour in the current menace of dermatophytosis with timely monitoring of laboratory tests for adverse events due to the use of systemic antifungals for a longer duration.

Comparative Efficacy of Super Bioavailable Itraconazole Capsules 50 mg vs 65 mg Twice Daily in the Management of Glabrous Tinea

Introduction

Owing to pharmacokinetic challenges of itraconazole, super-bioavailable itraconazole (SB) was developed and recently approved in strengths of 50mg and 65mg. But comparative study was lacking between these two strengths in glabrous tinea (dermatophytosis) management. Hence, this study was planned to compare the efficacy of both these strengths in dermatophytosis.

Methods

One hundred eligible patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, clinical study during May-2022 to September-2022 at tertiary hospital in Ahmedabad in adults. Efficacy and safety assessments were done at week-3 and 6 with follow up at week-10 for relapse. Primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients achieving complete cure at week-6 following treatment in both the groups. Secondary outcomes compared safety, clinical and mycological cure rates.

Results

Of the 100 patients enrolled, 98 patients (50 in SB-50mg and 48 in SB-65mg group) included in the final analysis. At week 6, 20 patients (40%) and 30 patients (62.5%) achieved complete cure (p < 0.05) in SB-50mg and SB-65mg groups, respectively. In completely cured patients, relapse was reported in 3 (15%) and 5 (17%) patients of SB-50mg and SB-65mg groups, respectively (p = 1). A significant difference was noted in clearance of symptoms and lesions in SB-65mg group (p < 0.05). Moreover, similar results were also obtained in sub-group analysis of recalcitrant dermatophytosis. Both the treatments were found to be safe and well tolerated with no discontinuation.

Conclusion

Study result concluded the superiority of SB-65mg over SB-50mg in terms of cure rate and resolution of symptoms in dermatophytosis management.

Antifungal activity of alexidine dihydrochloride in a novel diabetic mouse model of dermatophytosis

Dermatophytosis is one of the most prevalent fungal infections and a major public health problem worldwide. Recent years have seen a change in the epidemiological patterns of infecting fungi, corresponding to an alarming rise in the prevalence of drug-recalcitrant dermatophyte infections. In patients with diabetes mellitus, dermatophytosis is more severe and recurrent. The potency of promising new antifungal drugs in the pipeline must be expanded to include dermatophytosis. To facilitate this effort, we established a clinically pertinent mouse model of dermatophyte infections, in which diabetic mice were infected with Trichophyton mentagrophytes on abraded skin. The diabetic mouse model was optimized as a simple and robust system for simulating dermatophytoses in diabetic patients. The outcome of infection was measured using clinical and mycological parameters. Infected mice with fungal lesions were treated with oral and topical formulations of terbinafine or topical administration of the FDA-approved and repurposed pan-antifungal drug alexidine dihydrochloride (AXD). In this model, AXD was found to be highly effective, with outcomes comparable to those of the standard of care drug terbinafine.

Oral Isotretinoin Combined with Oral Terbinafine Versus Oral Terbinafine Alone to Treat Recurrent Dermatophytosis: An Open-Label Randomised Clinical Trial

Background

Recurrent dermatophytosis is becoming arduous to treat. Recently, oral itraconazole with oral isotretinoin was successful in a patient suffering from recurrent dermatophytosis.

Objectives

To evaluate if oral isotretinoin confers any added benefit over oral terbinafine in the treatment of recurrent dermatophytosis.

Materials and Methods

This was an open-label randomized clinical trial including 100 adult patients with recurrent tinea cruris and/or tinea corporis randomized into two groups; Group A (oral isotretinoin 0.5 mg/kg/day and oral terbinafine 250 mg twice daily) and Group B (oral terbinafine 250 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks, and followed up for 3 months. Fungal culture and antifungal susceptibility testing against terbinafine, fluconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole, and griseofulvin were performed.

Results

Out of the 100 patients, 91 patients (44 in Group A and 47 in Group B) completed the trial. Complete cure was seen in 19/44 (43.18%) patients in Group A and 20/47 (42.55%) patients in Group B (P = 0.951). Recurrence occurred in 12/19 (63.1%) patients in Group A and 13/20 (65%) patients in Group B (P = 0.904). Cheilitis and dryness of lips were the most common adverse effects seen in 32/44 (72.73%) patients in Group A. A total of 50 cultures were grown. The commonest species isolated was Trichophyton interdigitale in 36 (72%) patients, having a mean minimum inhibitory concentration of 3.13 μg/mL for terbinafine. However, for itraconazole, it was 0.13 μg/mL, and varied minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were seen for fluconazole, griseofulvin, and amphotericin B.

Conclusion

The addition of isotretinoin to terbinafine has no added benefit in treating patients with recurrent dermatophytosis.