Various models for diabetic retinopathy screening that can be applied to India

Wide-field imaging with smartphone based fundus camera: grading of severity of diabetic retinopathy and locating peripheral lesions in diabetic retinopathy

AIM

To assess the performance of smartphone based wide-field retinal imaging (WFI) versus ultra-wide-field imaging (UWFI) for assessment of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) as well as locating predominantly peripheral lesions (PPL) of DR.

METHODS

Individuals with type 2 diabetes with varying grades of DR underwent nonmydriatic UWFI with Daytona Plus camera followed by mydriatic WFI with smartphone-based Vistaro camera at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India in 2021-22. Grading of DR as well as identification of PPL (DR lesions beyond the posterior pole) in the retinal images of both cameras was performed by senior retina specialists. STDR was defined by the presence of severe non-proliferative DR, proliferative DR or diabetic macular oedema (DME). The sensitivity and specificity of smartphone based WFI for detection of PPL and STDR was assessed. Agreement between the graders for both cameras was compared.

RESULTS

Retinal imaging was carried out in 318 eyes of 160 individuals (mean age 54.7 ± 9 years; mean duration of diabetes 16.6 ± 7.9 years). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of STDR by Vistaro camera was 92.7% (95% CI 80.1-98.5) and 96.6% (95% CI 91.5-99.1) respectively and 95.1% (95% CI 83.5-99.4) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.3-98.6) by Daytona Plus respectively. PPL were detected in 89 (27.9%) eyes by WFI by Vistaro camera and in 160 (50.3%) eyes by UWFI. However, this did not translate to any significant difference in the grading of STDR between the two imaging systems. In both devices, PPL were most common in supero-temporal quadrant (34%). The prevalence of PPL increased with increasing severity of DR with both cameras (p < 0.001). The kappa comparison between the 2 graders for varying grades of severity of DR was 0.802 (p < 0.001) for Vistaro and 0.753 (p < 0.001) for Daytona Plus camera.

CONCLUSION

Mydriatic smartphone-based widefield imaging has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting STDR and can be used to screen for peripheral retinal lesions beyond the posterior pole in individuals with diabetes.

Tractional Retinal Detachment: Prevalence and Causes in Nigerians

Aim

To determine the causes of tractional retinal detachment (TRD) in Nigerians.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, multicentre study evaluating eyes diagnosed to have TRD. History, clinical examination (including visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, anterior segment examination and dilated fundoscopy) and systemic evaluation (including previous diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, sickle-cell disease and others) were performed in TRD eyes out of a cohort of retinal detachment eyes.

Results

The prevalence of TRD of the 237 patients diagnosed with RD within a one-year study period was 25.7% (61 patients). Eighty eyes were diagnosed with TRD. Thirty-eight eyes of nineteen patients (31%) were bilateral, and 42 (69%) were unilateral. There were 38 male patients (62.3%) and 23 female patients (37.7%). The mean age was 52.3 ± 12.7 years (11-69 years). 88.5% of all TRD patients had an associated systemic disease, diabetes being the most common disease in 88.8% of them. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy was the most common cause of TRD (77.5%) and the most common cause of bilateral TRD. Both trauma and proliferative sickle-cell retinopathy occurred in 3.8% of the eyes. 68.8% of TRD eyes were blind at the presentation. However, the causes of TRD did not show any significant association with blindness (P = 0.819).

Conclusion

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy poses a significant threat to vision, being the most common cause of TRD. Early detection and treatment of proliferative retinopathy in diabetes and sickle-cell disease, and trauma prevention will significantly reduce the burden of blindness due to TRD.

Role of cystatin C in the detection of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To study the association between cystatin C and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study carried out at two tertiary centres in India in 2022, individuals with T2DM underwent clinical and ophthalmic assessments and estimation of serum cystatin C. Grading of DR was done by retina specialists. STDR was defined by the presence of severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR) and/or diabetic macular edema. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify cystatin C cut-off value for detecting STDR.

RESULTS

Among 420 individuals with T2DM (mean age 56 ± 9 years; mean duration of diabetes 14.5 ± 7.9 years), 121 (24.1 %) had No-DR, 119 (28.3 %) had No-STDR and 200 (49.6 %) had STDR. Mean cystatin C level was significantly higher in individuals with STDR compared to those with no-STDR and No-DR (1.34 vs 1.06 vs 0.93 mg/L, p < 0.001). Cystatin C cut-off value ≥1.11 mg/L had a C statistic of 0.944 (95 % CI: 0.909-0.968, p < 0.001), 96.8 % sensitivity and 78.2 % specificity for detection of STDR.

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum cystatin C was strongly associated with STDR and could possibly be used as a biomarker for screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Non-Mydriatic Fundus Camera in Primary Health Care Settings - A Multicenter Study from Saudi Arabia

Background

Screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using the current digital imaging facilities in a primary health care setting is still in its early stages in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to reduce the risk of vision impairment and blindness among known diabetic people through early identification by general practitioners (GP) in a primary health care setting in Saudi Arabia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diabetic retinopathy (DR) detection by general practitioners (GPs) by comparing the agreement of DR assessment between GPs and ophthalmologists' assessment as a gold standard.

Methods

A hospital-based, six-month cross-sectional study was conducted, and the participants were type 2 diabetic adults from the diabetic registries of seven rural PHCs, in Saudi Arabia. After medical examination, the participants were then evaluated by fundus photography using a non-mydriatic fundus camera without medication for mydriasis. Presence or absence of DR was graded by the trained GPs in the PHCs and then compared with the grading of an ophthalmologist which was taken as a reference or a gold standard.

Results

A total of 899 diabetic patients were included, and the mean age of the patients was 64.89 ± 11.01 years. The evaluation by the GPs had a sensitivity of 80.69 [95% CI 74.8-85.4]; specificity of 92.23 [88.7-96.3]; positive predictive value, 74.1 [70.4-77.0]; negative predictive value, 73.34 [70.6-77.9]; and an accuracy of 84.57 [81.8-89.88]. For the consensus of agreement the adjusted kappa coefficient was from 0.74 to 0.92 for the DR.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that trained GPs in rural health centers are able to provide reliable detection results of DR from fundus photographs. The study highlights the need for early DR screening programs in the rural areas of Saudi Arabia to facilitate early identification of the condition and to lessen impact of blindness due to diabetes.

MiR-99a-5p Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells by Targeting NOX4

Diabetic retinopathy is one of the common microvascular complications of diabetes, and it is the main cause of vision loss among working-age people. This study interpreted the roles of miR-99a-5p in DR patients and human retinal microvascular endothelial cell (hRMECs) injury induced by high glucose. The expression of miR-99a-5p was detected in patients with NDR, NPDR, and PDR. The indictive impacts of miR-99a-5p were tested by the ROC curve, and the link between miR-99a-5p and clinical information was verified by the Pearson test. HG was used to instruct cell models. The CCK-8 and transwell methods were performed to detect the proliferative and migrated cells. The targeted relationship was explained by luciferase activity. The content of miR-99a-5p was gradually lessened in NPDR and PDR patients. MiR-99a-5p might differentiate DR patients from NDR patients and PDR patients from NPDR patients. The interconnection between miR-99a-5p and clinical factors was endorsed in all DR patients. Overexpression of miR-99a-5p assuaged the abnormality of cell migration and proliferation of hRMECs triggered by HG. NOX4 was a downstream signaling component of miR-99a-5p. In conclusion, MiR-99a-5p protected hRMECs against HG damage, and the miR-99a-5p might be a novel target for diagnosis of DR.

Tele-Ophthalmology Versus Face-to-Face Retinal Consultation for Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetes Care Centers in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of tele-ophthalmology (TO) versus face-to-face screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in diabetes care centers (DCC) across India. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of DR screening in individuals with diabetes performed across 35 branches of a chain of DCC in 20 cities in India over 1 year. In 30 DCC, DR screening was performed by TO, where retinal images obtained using Fundus on Phone camera were uploaded through the telemedicine network for centralized DR grading by eight retina specialists. In five DCC, DR screening was performed by fundus examination (FE) by the same retina specialists. The rate of detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR) (defined as the presence of proliferative DR and/or diabetic macular edema) through the two modes was compared. Results: A total of 58,612 individuals were screened for DR from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018: 25,316 by TO and 33,296 by FE. The mean age and mean duration of diabetes of the individuals with diabetes screened by TO was 55.8 ± 11.2 years and 9.5 ± 7.3 years; and in individuals screened by FE, it was 57.5 ± 11.6 years and 11.5 ± 8.0 years respectively. The mean glycated hemoglobin was 8.8% ± 2.1% and 8.5% ± 1.9% in the two groups, respectively. Any DR was detected in 31.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.0-32.3) by tele-screening and in 38.5% (95% CI: 37.9-39.0) by FE, whereas STDR was detected in 7.3% (95% CI: 7.0-7.7) by TO and in 10.5% (95% CI: 10.2-10.9) by FE. Overall, 11.4% individuals with diabetes in the TO group, including 4.1% with ungradable images, were advised referral to retina specialists for further management. Conclusion: Screening for DR at DCC using TO is feasible and effective for STDR detection in India and may be adopted throughout India.