Comparison between Ozurdex and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Intravitreal OZURDEX vs. Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Comprehensive Review

This comprehensive review examines the efficacy, safety, and implications of intravitreal OZURDEX and intravitreal bevacizumab in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). DME is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of vision loss. OZURDEX, through sustained release of dexamethasone, targets inflammation and vascular permeability, while bevacizumab inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), reducing angiogenesis. However, differences in safety profiles exist, with OZURDEX associated with an increased risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation and bevacizumab potentially carrying systemic risks. The choice between these treatments should be individualized, considering patient preferences, ocular and systemic comorbidities, and cost-effectiveness. Collaboration among healthcare providers is essential for the comprehensive management of DME. Future research should focus on long-term comparative studies, predictors of treatment response, and exploration of novel therapeutic targets to optimize treatment outcomes for patients with DME.

Intravitreal Injection of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Combined with Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and corticosteroid combination therapy for the management of treatment-naïve or recurrent/refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in comparison with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the data from publications in the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI and Scopus from January 1, 2007, through November 20, 2020, were compiled. Heterogeneity was statistically quantified by the I2 statistic, and meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four related studies were identified, including a total of 1280 eyes, which consisted of 685 and 507 patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), respectively. This study demonstrated a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the combination group compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy for both CRVO and BRVO cases at 6 months after initiating therapy. The improvement in vision was more notable in BRVO cases than in CRVO cases. However, the changes in central macular thickness (CMT) did not differ significantly between the different treatment approaches, and the results were inconclusive. Including all cases with RVO, there was no inferiority in terms of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction in the triamcinolone subgroup compared with the slow-release dexamethasone implant subgroup. A greater improvement was noticed in terms of BCVA in the sequentially treated subgroup compared to the simultaneous treatment subgroup, while there was a greater reduction in CMT in the simultaneous subgroup with the highest reduction recorded at 1 month after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combination therapy with intravitreal anti-VEGF and corticosteroid (such as intravitreal or subtenon triamcinolone or dexamethasone implant) has a slightly better effect on improving BCVA in cases with BRVO or CRVO at 6 months compared to monotherapy.

The Impact of Intraocular Treatment on Visual Acuity of Patients Diagnosed with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions

Branch retinal vein occlusions are a significant cause of vision loss and present several ophthalmic and systemic risk factors, including age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and glaucoma. Retinal vein occlusion is the second-most-common retinal vascular disease. This study evaluated the effects of Ozurdex in contrast to a combination therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cortisone in treatment-naive branch retinal vein occlusions-macular edema (BRVO-ME) cases, at 4-month and 6-month follow-ups. Thirty eyes were included in the study, which were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 15 eyes, and each received 1 injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex (DEX). The second group of 15 eyes received 3 intravitreal injections, the first and second with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor aflibercept and the third one with 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (Vitreal S), spaced at one month. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) results suggested that the peak efficacy was at 4 months for both groups, with mean values of 0.5 LogMAR and 0.4 LogMAR. Regarding macular edema, there were no significant changes between the 4- and 6-month follow-up periods, with mean values of 361 μm and 390 μm. Six patients experienced transient raised intraocular pressure at one week after treatment. This study highlights the benefits to visual acuity of the combination of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and cortisone, which represents a viable solution with similar results to Ozurdex therapy.

Etiological Roles of p75NTR in a Mouse Model of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a pathological angiogenesis of the choroidal plexus of the retina and is a key feature in the wet form of age-related macular degeneration. Mononuclear phagocytic cells (MPCs) are known to accumulate in the subretinal space, generating a chronic inflammatory state that promotes the growth of the choroidal neovasculature. However, how the MPCs are recruited and activated to promote CNV pathology is not fully understood. Using genetic and pharmacological tools in a mouse model of laser-induced CNV, we demonstrate a role for the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75^NTR) in the recruitment of MPCs, in glial activation, and in vascular alterations. After laser injury, expression of p75^NTR is increased in activated Muller glial cells near the CNV area in the retina and the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE)-choroid. In p75^NTR knockout mice (p75^NTR KO) with CNV, there is significantly reduced recruitment of MPCs, reduced glial activation, reduced CNV area, and the retinal function is preserved, as compared to wild type mice with CNV. Notably, a single intravitreal injection of a pharmacological p75^NTR antagonist in wild type mice with CNV phenocopied the results of the p75^NTR KO mice. Our results demonstrate that p75^NTR is etiological in the development of CNV.

Risk Factors and Treatment Strategy for Retinal Vascular Occlusive Diseases

Retinal occlusive diseases are common diseases that can lead to visual impairment. Retinal artery occlusion and retinal vein occlusion are included in the clinical entity, but they have quite different pathophysiologies. Retinal artery occlusion is an emergent eye disorder. Retinal artery occlusion is mainly caused by thromboembolism, which frequently occurs in conjunction with life-threatening stroke and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, prompt examinations and interventions for systemic vascular diseases are often necessary for these patients. Retinal vein occlusion is characterized by retinal hemorrhage and ischemia, which may impair visual function via several complications such as macular edema, macular ischemia, vitreous hemorrhage, and neovascular glaucoma. Even though anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is the current established first-line of treatment for retinal vein occlusion, several clinical studies have been performed to identify better treatment protocols and new therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize the current findings and advances in knowledge regarding retinal occlusive diseases, particularly focusing on recent studies, in order to provide an update for a better understanding of its pathogenesis.

Chorioretinal venous anastomosis for non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) refers to the occlusion of the central retinal vein or primary and secondary branches caused by multiple factors. Clinical treatments for it include intravitreal or systemic vasodilator application, local usage of steroids and NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), thrombolysis, hemodilution, retinal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy with vascular sheath incision, chorioretinal venous anastomosis (CRVA), and so on. At present, most treatments are aimed at RVO complications, while chorioretinal vein anastomosis can fundamentally reflux retinal vein blood through the choroid by venous vascular remodeling. Reports on the treatment of retinal vein occlusion by chorioretinal anastomosis are numerous in various countries. As a treatment means, CRVA can drain the venous blood, skipping the thrombosis spot, thus partially relieving anatomical vascular occlusion to achieve a therapeutic purpose. In this study, CRVA is evaluated from the aspects of indications, implementation process, postoperative effect evaluation, complications, and combination with anti-VEGF treatment. Based on the development of laser technology and vitrectomy, we hope to further review this treatment and provide a new reference for the clinical treatment of RVO.

The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on central macular thickness and choroidal thickness in the healthy eyes of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) on central macular thickness (CMT) and choroidal thickness (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 42 healthy eyes of 21 patients with ISSNHL (aged 24-61 years) who started HBOT within the first three days of the onset of hearing loss. Duration and severity of hearing loss were noted before starting HBOT. Central macular thickness (CMT), choroidal thickness (CT) 1500 µm nasal and temporal of the fovea, and subfoveal CT were measured by spectral domain optic coherence tomography before the first session of HBOT and after sessions 10 and 20. measurements obtained before and after HBOT were compared.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (52.4%) were men and 10 (47.6%) were women. The mean age was 44.67 ± 10.1 years. The mean duration of sudden hearing loss before HBOT was 2.05 ± 1 day. Hearing loss was mild in 5 patients, moderate in 5 patients, moderate to severe in 2 patients, severe in 4 patients and profound in 5 patients. Comparison of measurements obtained before HBOT and after 10 and 20 sessions of HBOT revealed no significant differences in CMT (219.17 ± 22.91, 220.33 ± 19.66, and 220.21 ± 19.3 µm), subfoveal CT (347.71 ± 66.82, 348.38 ± 74.55, and 345.45 ± 75.39 µm), nasal CT (328.64 ± 82.31, 316.02 ± 79.32, and 313.52 ± 89.92 µm), or temporal CT (321.76 ± 71.29, 317.05 ± 73.94, and 314.05 ± 74.61 µm, respectively) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HBOT for the treatment of ISSNHL had no significant effect on CMT or CT in healthy eyes.

The Efficacy of Simultaneous Injection of Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab Into Vitreous Cavity on Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous vitreous injection of dexamethasone implant and ranibizumab on macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). We conducted a 6-month retrospective self-control study. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with macular edema secondary to CRVO were enrolled in this study. The patients received intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant and ranibizumab. The changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and interocular pressure (IOP) before and at 2w, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 m after injection were recorded and compared. The adverse reactions in eyes and whole body were observed. The BCVA of all patients at 2 w (61.8 ± 5.42), 1 m (68.68 ± 5.23), 2 m (70.8 ± 5.8), 3 m (68.44 ± 5.61), 4 m (65.76 ± 5.76), 5 m (67.08 ± 5.57), and 6 m (70.12 ± 5.46) after surgery were significantly higher than that before surgery (52.2 ± 5.06,p < 0.01), and CRT of all patients at 2w (393.36 ± 52.66 um), 1 m (334.52 ± 32.95 um), 2 m (298.800 ± 29.97 um), 3 m (309.080 ± 28.78 um), 4 m (345.48 ± 39.81 um), 5 m (349.080 ± 29.88 um), and 6 m (309.76 ± 30.41 um) after surgery were significantly reduced than that before surgery (583.76 ± 121.09 um, p < 0.01). Macular edema recurred in an average of 4.44 ± 0.51 months after treatment, and those patients received combined treatment again. During follow-up, the most common adverse reactions were subconjunctival hemorrhage and increased intraocular pressure, with the incidence of 22% (11/50) and 18% (9/50) respectively. In all cases, the increased intraocular pressure could be controlled by a single intraocular pressure reducing drug. No patient needed to receive anti-glaucoma surgery. The overall incidence of lens opacity was 4% (2/50). After the first injection, no case showed lens opacity. After re-injection, 2 patients (2 eyes) (8%) developed lens opacity. None of the patients showed serious ocular adverse reactions or systemic complications such as vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, uveitis or ocular toxicity. The simultaneous vitreous injection of dexamethasone implant and ranibizumab can significantly improve the visual acuity and anatomical prognosis in macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO-ME) patients, exhibiting good safety and effectiveness.

Real-life medium term follow-up data for intravitreal dexamethasone implant in retinal vein occlusion

Macular edema (ME) is the most frequent vision threatening consequence after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In this study, we evaluate the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DII, Ozurdex) in a real-life cohort of 99 patients with ME due to RVO. All patients who received DII for ME following RVO between 2011 and 2016 at the University Eye Hospital Freiburg, Germany and who had fully accessible electronic medical records were eligible for this study. Most of the patients included in this study were not treatment-naïve: 61 eyes had received prior anti-VEGF drugs, 6 eyes had received intravitreal corticosteroids (triamcinolone) and 15 had been treated with both; 17 eyes were treatment-naïve. Mean follow-up was 312 ± 310 days. Mean visual acuity (VA) was maintained throughout the observation period (mean VA at baseline: 66.7 ± 23.5 letters; at last observation 64.9 ± 28.3). Central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 526 ± 179 µm at baseline to 431 ± 199 µm. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased from 14.4 ± 3.1 mmHg at baseline to 17.1 ± 6.3 mmHg. Cataract surgery was performed in 22% of phakic eyes. DII was used as second-line treatment in the majority of cases in this cohort. The fact that mean VA remained unchanged while mean CRT decreased illustrates that morphologic improvement does not always translate into functional gain. Mean IOP was maintained within normal limits and cataract formation was as expected in this age group.

The efficacy of dexamethasone implants following anti-VEGF failure for macular oedema in retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX) after anti-VEGF failure in retinal vein occlusion macular oedema.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of DEX implant (0.7 mg) given after anti-VEGF 'failure'. Switch to DEX occurred if a ⩽ +5 ETDRS letter gain and ⩽20% reduction in central subfield thickness was present following ⩾6 consecutive anti-VEGF injections. The primary endpoint was VA change 30 days after DEX. Secondary outcomes were peak VA change, VA change at monthly timepoints, percentage achieving 15-letter gain, central subfield thickness (CST) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

Sixty-two injections in 62 patients associated with 26% central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 74% branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) were eligible. There was a modest, significant improvement in mean VA change at 30 days compared to baseline (+6 letters, 95% CI +2.2 to +9.1 letters, p < 0.01). DEX implant significantly improved mean peak VA change compared to preceding anti-VEGF by +18.1 letters in CRVO (p = 0.002) and +13.2 letters in BRVO (p < 0.0001). IOP peaked between 30 and 60 days following injection, with 31% of CRVO and 11% of BRVO patients experiencing an IOP ⩾ 25 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

DEX implant provides useful rescue therapy in cases of anti-VEGF 'failure' for macular oedema following retinal vein occlusion, resulting in improved functional outcomes at 30 days.