Multidisciplinary team approach in breast cancer care: Benefits and challenges

Improving outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: importance of clinical presentation and multi-disciplinary review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may cause hypertension, chronic kidney disease and heart failure, but large randomized control trials to date have shown no major additional benefit of renal revascularization over optimal medical management. However, these trials did not consider outcomes specifically in relation to clinical presentations. Given that atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a heterogenous condition, measures of success likely differ according to the clinical presentation. Our retrospective study objectives were to determine the effects of revascularization when applied to specific clinical presentations and after careful multi-disciplinary team review.

METHODS

All patients presenting to our centre and its referring hospitals with radiological findings of at least one renal artery stenosis > 50% between January 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed at the renovascular multi-disciplinary team meeting with revascularization considered in accordance with international guidelines, notably for patients with anatomically significant renal artery stenosis, adequately sized kidney and presentations with any of; deteriorating kidney function, heart failure syndrome, or uncontrollable hypertension. Optimal medical management was recommended for all patients which included lipid lowering agents, anti-platelets and anti-hypertensives targeting blood pressure ≤ 130/80 mmHg. The effect of revascularization was assessed according to the clinical presentation; blood pressure and number of agents in those with renovascular hypertension, delta glomerular filtration rate in those with ischaemic nephropathy and heart failure re-admissions in those with heart failure syndromes.

RESULTS

During this 5-year period, 127 patients with stenosis ≥ 50% were considered by the multidisciplinary team, with 57 undergoing revascularization (17 primarily for severe hypertension, 25 deteriorating kidney function, 6 heart failure syndrome and 9 for very severe anatomical stenosis). Seventy-nine percent of all revascularized patients had a positive outcome specific to their clinical presentation, with 82% of those with severe hypertension improving blood pressure control, 72% with progressive ischaemic nephropathy having attenuated GFR decline, and no further heart failure admissions in those with heart failure. Seventy-eight percent of patients revascularized for high grade stenosis alone had better blood pressure control with 55% also manifesting renal functional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-disciplinary team discussion successfully identified a group of patients more likely to benefit from revascularization based on 3 key factors: clinical presentation, severity of the renal artery lesion and the state of the kidney beyond the stenotic lesion. In this way, a large proportion of patients can clinically improve after revascularization if their outcomes are considered according to the nature of their clinical presentation.

Modelling-based joint embedding of histology and genomics using canonical correlation analysis for breast cancer survival prediction

Traditional approaches to predicting breast cancer patients' survival outcomes were based on clinical subgroups, the PAM50 genes, or the histological tissue's evaluation. With the growth of multi-modality datasets capturing diverse information (such as genomics, histology, radiology and clinical data) about the same cancer, information can be integrated using advanced tools and have improved survival prediction. These methods implicitly exploit the key observation that different modalities originate from the same cancer source and jointly provide a complete picture of the cancer. In this work, we investigate the benefits of explicitly modelling multi-modality data as originating from the same cancer under a probabilistic framework. Specifically, we consider histology and genomics as two modalities originating from the same breast cancer under a probabilistic graphical model (PGM). We construct maximum likelihood estimates of the PGM parameters based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and then infer the underlying properties of the cancer patient, such as survival. Equivalently, we construct CCA-based joint embeddings of the two modalities and input them to a learnable predictor. Real-world properties of sparsity and graph-structures are captured in the penalized variants of CCA (pCCA) and are better suited for cancer applications. For generating richer multi-dimensional embeddings with pCCA, we introduce two novel embedding schemes that encourage orthogonality to generate more informative embeddings. The efficacy of our proposed prediction pipeline is first demonstrated via low prediction errors of the hidden variable and the generation of informative embeddings on simulated data. When applied to breast cancer histology and RNA-sequencing expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), our model can provide survival predictions with average concordance-indices of up to 68.32% along with interpretability. We also illustrate how the pCCA embeddings can be used for survival analysis through Kaplan-Meier curves.

Metastatic Neoplasms to the Breast

OBJECTIVE

When the clinical presentation is related to the metastatic mass and a radiologically solitary tumor focus is detected, especially in cases where clinical information is not taken into account or is insufficient, if a possible metastatic neoplasia is not kept in mind then it is possible to evaluate the tumor as a primary breast neoplasm. In this study, it is aimed to present our cases of non-hematopoietic metastatic neoplasms and to evaluate the clinicopathological features that may aid in distinguishing metastatic from primary neoplasms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study includes cases diagnosed with metastatic non-hematopoietic breast neoplasm in breast resection materials in our center, between the years 2010-2023. All cases were analyzed retrospectively by evaluating clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

Of the 15 subjects included in the study, 11 (73%) were female and 4 (27%) were male. The mean age of the patients were 46.9 ranged from 22 to 63 years. The most frequent metastatic malignancy was carcinoma (60%), followed by melanoma (33%) and sarcoma (7%). Of the 9 patients with metastatic carcinoma, the primary tumor originated from the lungs in 4, from gastrointestinal system in 2, female genital tract in 2, and kidney in 1 patient. Sarcoma diagnosis was given in a single patient and the histology was a leiomyosarcoma originating from kidney.

CONCLUSION

A careful histomorphological and immunohistochemical evaluation and a detailed examination of the clinicoradiological data are critical to establish the right course in patient management, treatment plan and to correctly predict the prognosis.

Qualitative study of the fertility information support experiences of young breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

This qualitative study aimed to deeply understand the current experience of fertility information support for young breast cancer patients and to provide further evidence supporting the development of a fertility information support project.

METHODS

Using purposive sampling, 18 young breast cancer patients were selected for in-depth interviews from June to September 2022. Colaizzi's seven step analysis method and NVivo software were used to analyze and organize the interview data.

RESULTS

Three themes and 10 subthemes were summarized from the interview data: Information anxiety (strong information demand, insufficient information support, information explosion, and information security); reproductive concerns (desire for fertility, anxiety about their children's health, denial of one's health, multiple burdens of emotional interweaving); and family support (the importance of good family relations, the need for a positive marital relationship).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical staff should realize the importance of information support for young breast cancer patients and correctly identify the obstacles to insufficient information support. By establishing a fertility information support program, patients' awareness and the quality of fertility information support can be improved to reduce fertility anxiety in breast cancer patients.

The Emerging Boon of Information and Communication Technology in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: A Force Multiplier With a Human Touch

Cancer care (CC) is incredibly complex and requires the coordination of multiple disciplines for optimal outcomes. Historically, this has been accomplished with multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), but the benefits, while perhaps intuitive, have not always been demonstrated with sufficient research robustness and validity. We hypothesize that this difficulty in demonstrating the benefit of MDTBs may be related to a delay in decision-making and operationalizing those decisions. The history and value of MDTBs are presented as well as their weaknesses and limited demonstration of improved outcomes. A major weakness highlighted by the challenges of MDTBs is the concept of total package time (TPT) (rather, the inability to keep it as short as possible); any significant delays in CC for any discipline may have a deleterious impact on any given patient's care outcome. Drawing on our own experience with utilizing information and communication technology (ICT) during an effort to apply accountability theory to improve specifically radiation therapy package time (RTPT), we argue that similar principles will be applicable in the improvement of not only the TPT which relies on multiple disciplines, but other factors of CC as well, such as coordination. Experience with improvement in RTPT is discussed and the underlying theory is demonstrated as a sound methodology to apply beyond RTPT to TPT involving coordination of multiple disciplines and stands to lead to the full realization of the benefits of the multidisciplinary approach. The complexity of cancer means that real solutions to optimal outcomes are also, by nature, complex, but here simple accountability theory is demonstrated that may unlock the next phase of multidisciplinary coordination. In this work, we argue that the benefits of the MDTB format can be fully realized with the addition of ICT, a technological breakthrough in the past two decades, while not forgetting about continued human factors.

Application Analysis of Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment Nursing Mode Based on Doctor-Nurse-Integration for Stroke Patients Undergoing Emergency Intervention Surgery

Purpose

To analyze the application value of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment (MDT) nursing mode based on doctor-nurse-integration for stroke patients undergoing emergency intervention surgery.

Methods

In this study, a historical comparative study method was adopted. 118 stroke patients and medical staff (9 doctors and 11 nurses) who met the diagnosis and inclusion criteria of emergency intervention surgery admitted from July 2021 to February 2022 were treated clinically according to the traditional medical care mode (TMC group), 87 stroke patients and medical staff (9 doctors and 11 nurses) who met the diagnosis and inclusion criteria of emergency intervention surgery admitted from February 2022 to June 2022 were treated and cared according to the MDT nursing mode based on medical integration (MDT group). Comparison of perioperative time indicators, postoperative outcome indicators, treatment compliance, secondary complications and visit satisfaction between the two groups of patients, and comparison of cooperation satisfaction between the two groups of medical staff.

Results

The MDT group had shorter onset-emergency physician's reception time, arrival at CT room-completion time of CT/MR, notify intervention chamber-arrival time at catheter chamber, admission-femoral artery puncture time, admission-first vessel recanalization time, mean postural restraint time than the TMC group (P < 0.05). The postoperative mortality rate in the MDT group (5.75%) was comparable to that in the TMC group (8.47%) (P > 0.05); the postoperative disability rate in the MDT group (28.74%) was less than that in the TMC group (45.76%) (P < 0.05); the NIHSS score in the MDT group was lower than that in the TMC group, and the FMA score and BI score were both higher than those in the TMC group (P < 0.05). The MDT group had higher treatment compliance than the TMC group, fewer secondary complications than the TMC group, and higher patient visit satisfaction and medical staff cooperation satisfaction than the TMC group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The implementation of the MDT nursing mode based on the doctor-nurse-integration for stroke patients undergoing emergency intervention surgery can improve the work efficiency of rescuing patients, improve the clinical treatment outcome of patients, and improve the satisfaction of doctors, nurses, and patients.

Breast Cancer Treatment in Integrated Care Process in Andalusia: The Challenge of Multidisciplinarity

Despite the increasing trend in the incidence of breast cancer in recent decades, mortality has decreased in developed countries. The general objective of the study is to analyse the functioning and organisation of the care process for breast cancer treatment in Andalusia (Spain) in order to identify possible barriers and facilitators that may be affecting its effectiveness and, therefore, the survival of the disease. A qualitative method was adopted based on 19 semi-structured interviews with health professionals from different specialities in two Andalusian provinces: Huelva (mortality rate higher than the national average) and Granada (mortality rate similar to the national average). Results show the existence of barriers (seasonal delays, low frequency of multidisciplinary meetings, lack of human and technical resources, difficulties in accessing treatment in certain populations, etc.) and facilitators (creation of multidisciplinary units and committees for breast pathology, standardisation of treatments, assignment of professionals with preferential attention to breast pathology, etc.) in the care process of breast cancer treatment. The combination of these barriers can have an impact on the accessibility, quality, and efficacy of the treatment, and in the long term, on survival from the disease.

To Study the Effect of Individualized Nursing Model Based on MDT Concept on Limb Function Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer

Objective

To study the value of the individualized nursing model based on the concept of multidisciplinary team (MDT) on recovery of limb function and quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 110 breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected as the research objects. The 110 breast cancer patients were divided into the research group (n = 55) and the control group (n = 55) according to the random number table method. The control group received routine care. The research group implemented individualized nursing based on the MDT concept on the basis of routine nursing. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores before nursing and 1 month after nursing were studied in the two groups, Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-B (FACT-B) score.

Results

After 1 month of nursing, the DASH score of the research group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and after 1 month of nursing, the HAMA score of the research group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After 1 month of nursing, the HAMD scale score of the research group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 1 month of nursing, the FACT-B score of the research group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The individualized nursing model based on the MDT concept has high application value for breast cancer patients. This nursing model can improve the function of limb movement, relieve the patient's anxiety and depression, and improve the patient's quality of life. This nursing model is worthy of clinical promotion.

Clinical utility of breast pathology data: implications for practising pathologists

In breast cancer, the quality of the pathology services is of paramount importance as inevitably, the pathologist makes the confirmatory diagnosis and provides prognostic and predictive information, informing treatment plans directly. Various national and international organisations provide a pathology reporting minimum dataset (MDS) to ensure consistency in reporting. While the use of MDS promotes clarity, there may be specific areas requiring the pathologist's input for individual patients and hence pathologists need to be aware of the clinical utility of pathology data to help tailor individualised patient treatment. In this article, we provide numerous examples of the role of pathology data in determining next steps in the patient pathway that are applicable to both the diagnostic and treatment pathways, including neoadjuvant treatment pathways. We also briefly discuss the important role and thereby the clinical utility of pathology data during the COVID-19 pandemic providing a template for the similar scenarios in the future if required.

Potential Use of Novel Image and Signal Processing Methods to Develop a Quantitative Assessment of the Severity of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

More than 95% of patients who undergo radiotherapy report symptoms of radiation dermatitis, which is a side effect of this therapy. Erythema, edema, dry and moist desquamation intensify with each fraction of irradiation and can significantly reduce a patient's quality of life. Therefore, an effective skin care procedure is needed for skin that has been exposed to ionizing radiation in order to avoid unplanned treatment interruptions. The methods that are currently used to assess the severity of an acute radiation reaction are based on visual scales (RTOG, EORTC, NCI CTCAE, LENT-SOMA). Because the assessment is made subjectively, the results depend on the researchers, their experience and perceptiveness. Until now, several studies have been carried out to check the possibility of using an objective methods like hyperspectral imaging, thermal imaging, laser Doppler flowmetry, dielectric and electrochemical methods, reflection spectrophotometry and Courage-Khazaka Multi-skin instrument to radiation-induced dermatitis assessment. Unfortunately, due to various limitations that occurred in the research, none of these techniques was successfully implement as alternative for visual assessment. The continuous development of technology enables researchers to access new techniques that might constitute useful diagnostic and cognitive tools. Infrared thermal imaging, hyperspectral imaging and reflectance spectroscopy are examples of the visual techniques that have been used for many years in various fields of medicine, including dermatology and chronic wound or burn care. They provide information on the skin parameters, such as the temperature, concentration and distribution of chromophores (eg, hemoglobin and melanin), saturation or perfusion changes. The aim of this study is to review the available literature on the use of imaging methods in the clinical assessment of skin with lesions of various origins, evaluation of their suitability for the assessment of radiation reaction and consideration the possibility of creating a quantitative scale for assessing severity of acute radiation dermatitis.

Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal

Breast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available.

Quality indicators in breast cancer management were assessed in Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Nepal. Inadequacy of documentation of staging workup, very low compliance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy, low rate of BCS, and absence of MDT discussion before management are our key findings of the study. We have identified significant rooms for improvement. Proper recording of staging investigation and establishment of MDT will be the initial steps for improvement of care. Identification and management of patient-related factors with involvement of stakeholders for policy-making work may further supplement the need of quality care.

Combined Endoscopy-Assisted Muscle-Sparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap Harvesting with Lipofilling Enhancement as a New Volume Replacement Technique in Breast Reconstruction

Introduction

This study evaluated the feasibility and patient satisfaction of combined endoscopy-assisted muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap harvesting, with lipofilling enhancement for skin-preserving mastectomy.

Methods

This is a prospective study that included 21 female patients with small breasts (cup size A-B), subjected to skin-preserving mastectomy as a management of breast cancer. Combined endoscopy-assisted muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap harvesting with lipofilling enhancement was performed for immediate breast reconstruction. Patients were followed up for early and late postoperative complications including recurrence for at least 24 months. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed using the Kyungpook National University Hospital breast reconstruction satisfaction questionnaire.

Results

The study included 21 female patients with a mean age of 42.10 ± 8.46 years. Patients were followed up for 26.67 ± 3.38 months. The procedure was successful in all patients with a mean duration of 172.05 ± 28.22 minutes. Local recurrence was encountered in one patient (4.67%). Eighteen patients declared their satisfaction 6 months after the operation, while two patients were satisfied only after the second session of lipofilling. The overall postoperative patient satisfaction was 95.24%. The majority of the patients (93.3%) who underwent NSM surgery were satisfied, while only two-thirds (66.6%) of the patients who underwent SSM surgery were satisfied.

Conclusions

Combined endoscopy-assisted muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap harvesting with lipofilling enhancement seems to be a feasible and encouraging technique for the volume adjustment of small breasts, especially in nipple-sparing mastectomy. It leaves a minor back scar and has an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. The procedure showed high postoperative patient satisfaction.

The Effects of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on Clinical Practice for Colorectal, Lung, Prostate and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Multidisciplinary team meetings have increasingly been implemented in cancer care worldwide to ensure timely, accurate and evidence-based diagnosis, and treatment plans. Nowadays, multidisciplinary team meetings are generally considered indispensable. However, they are considered time-consuming and expensive, while the effects of multidisciplinary team meetings are not yet fully understood. The aim of this systematic review is to update and summarize the literature and create an overview of the existing knowledge. Cancer types such as colorectal, lung, prostate and breast cancer with rapidly increasing incidence rates will inevitably impact the workload of clinicians. Understanding the effects of the widely implemented multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology care is fundamental in order to optimize care pathways and allocate resources in the rapidly diversifying landscape of cancer therapies.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our systematic review is to identify the effects of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) for lung, breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. Methods: Our systematic review, performed following PRISMA guidelines, included studies examining the impact of MDTMs on treatment decisions, patient and process outcomes. Electronic databases PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2020. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and GRADE scale. Results: 41 of 13,246 articles were selected, evaluating colorectal (21), lung (10), prostate (6) and breast (4) cancer. Results showed that management plans were changed in 1.6–58% of cases after MDTMs. Studies reported a significant impact of MDTMs on surgery type, and a reduction of overall performed surgery after MDTM. Results also suggest that CT and MRI imaging significantly increased after MDTM implementation. Survival rate increased significantly with MDTM discussions according to twelve studies, yet three studies did not show significant differences. Conclusions: Despite heterogeneous data, MDTMs showed a significant impact on management plans, process outcomes and patient outcomes. To further explore the impact of MDTMs on the quality of healthcare, high-quality research is needed.

Multidisciplinary Joint Clinics: Talent Wins Games, but Teamwork Wins Championships

Cancer is among the leading causes of deaths worldwide. The treatments of cancer across most sites involve using surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy. The treatment protocols are complex and require careful planning at the beginning of the therapy and coordination between the treating teams, the patient, and the caregivers to ensure compliance and avoid unnecessary treatment delays. This commentary provides an insight into the role the multidisciplinary joint clinics play in providing personalized cancer care. While such joint clinics are advantageous, they are not devoid of drawbacks and these are also enumerated. In this era, when communication platforms are increasingly digitized, we have highlighted the need for virtual tumor boards. The commentary aims to motivate the development of multidisciplinary joint clinics for ensuring holistic cancer care across the country.