1
|
Aksoy C, Reimold P, Borgmann H, Kölker M, Cebulla A, Struck JP, Zehe V, Nestler T, von Landenberg N, Uhlig A, Boehm K, Leitsmann M. [Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency training programs in Germany]. Aktuelle Urol 2022; 53:317-324. [PMID: 35580617 DOI: 10.1055/a-1824-4288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several international medical societies reported a negative impact on urology residency training programs due to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the pandemic on urological residency in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS From the 20th of May 2020 until the 20th of June 2020, a Germany-wide online survey on the continuing residency training was distributed via the members of the working group, social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and the German Society of Residents in Urology (GeSRU e.V.) newsletter. The survey covered 3 topics: 1) basic characteristics of the participants, 2) general and 3) subjective influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinics and further residency training. RESULTS A total of 50 residents took part in the survey; 54% were women. The median age was 31 years. Most of the participants were in their 2nd (22%) and 5th (26%) year of training and worked in a university hospital (44%) or in a clinic of maximum care (30%). 38% of the respondents stated that they only served urological emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. For 28% this meant a very large delay (80-100%) in the specialisation, while 28% stated only a minor impact. 66% documented training impairments caused by fewer operations, low patient numbers in the outpatient department (50%), congress (50%) and workshop (44%) cancellations. 46% of residents reported direct contact with COVID-19 patients while 10% were deployed on interdisciplinary IMC units. Numerous physical distancing and hygiene measures have been implemented by the clinics. CONCLUSION On average, around 50% of the urology residents indicated significant restrictions in training due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. The delay in training cannot currently be measured in units of time, but it can be assumed that training for residents during the pandemic is likely to be of a lower quality compared to previous generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Aksoy
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Philipp Reimold
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Borgmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mara Kölker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Cebulla
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Julian Peter Struck
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Viktor Zehe
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tim Nestler
- Klinik für Urologie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Annemarie Uhlig
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Boehm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xue Y, Lopes J, Ritchie K, D'Alessandro AM, Banfield L, McCabe RE, Heber A, Lanius RA, McKinnon MC. Potential Circumstances Associated With Moral Injury and Moral Distress in Healthcare Workers and Public Safety Personnel Across the Globe During COVID-19: A Scoping Review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:863232. [PMID: 35770054 PMCID: PMC9234401 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.863232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) and public safety personnel (PSP) across the globe have continued to face ethically and morally challenging situations during the COVID-19 pandemic that increase their risk for the development of moral distress (MD) and moral injury (MI). To date, however, the global circumstances that confer risk for MD and MI in these cohorts have not been systematically explored, nor have the unique circumstances that may exist across countries been explored. Here, we sought to identify and compare, across the globe, potentially morally injurious or distressful events (PMIDEs) in HCWs and PSP during the COVID-19 pandemic. A scoping review was conducted to identify and synthesize global knowledge on PMIDEs in HCWs and select PSP. Six databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Global Health. A total of 1,412 articles were retrieved, of which 57 articles were included in this review. These articles collectively described the experiences of samples from 19 different countries, which were comprised almost exclusively of HCWs. Given the lack of PSP data, the following results should not be generalized to PSP populations without further research. Using qualitative content analysis, six themes describing circumstances associated with PMIDEs were identified: (1) Risk of contracting or transmitting COVID-19; (2) Inability to work on the frontlines; (3) Provision of suboptimal care; (4) Care prioritization and resource allocation; (5) Perceived lack of support and unfair treatment by their organization; and (6) Stigma, discrimination, and abuse. HCWs described a range of emotions related to these PMIDEs, including anxiety, fear, guilt, shame, burnout, anger, and helplessness. Most PMIDE themes appeared to be shared globally, particularly the 'Risk of contracting or transmitting COVID-19' and the 'Perceived lack of support and unfair treatment by their organization.' Articles included within the theme of 'Stigma, discrimination, and abuse' represented the smallest global distribution of all PMIDE themes. Overall, the present review provides insight into PMIDEs encountered by HCWs across the globe during COVID-19. Further research is required to differentiate the experience of PSP from HCWs, and to explore the impact of social and cultural factors on the experience of MD and MI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanxin Xue
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jillian Lopes
- Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kimberly Ritchie
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Banfield
- Health Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Randi E McCabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Heber
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Veterans Affairs Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth A Lanius
- Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Western University of Canada, London, ON, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Margaret C McKinnon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, ON, Canada.,St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khusid JA, Kashani M, Fink LE, Weinstein CS, Gupta M. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urology Residents: a Narrative Review. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:45. [PMID: 34427779 PMCID: PMC8382932 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for urology resident education. In this review, we discuss the pandemic's impact on urology trainees and their education. RECENT FINDINGS Urology trainees were often redeployed to frontline services in unfamiliar clinical settings. Residents often experienced increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Many programs instituted virtual "check-ins" and formed liaisons with mental health services to foster cohesiveness. Urology trainees experienced the integration of telehealth into the clinical realm. Virtual surgery lectures and simulations were utilized to augment surgical education. Academic governing bodies upheld resident protections and provided dynamic guidance for training requirement throughout the pandemic. Medical students were unable to participate in traditional in-person away rotations and interviews, complicating the residency application process. The COVID-19 pandemic shook the healthcare system and ushered in seismic changes for urology trainees worldwide. Though the longstanding effects of the pandemic remain to be seen, urology residents have demonstrated tremendous resilience and bravery throughout this challenging period, and those qualities will undeniably withstand the test of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan A. Khusid
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | - Mahyar Kashani
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY USA
| | - Lauren E. Fink
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY USA
| | - Corey S. Weinstein
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY USA
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jibhakate NA, Patwardhan SK, Sawant AS, Pathak HR, Patil BP, Kamal H. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID patient's management in urology: a public hospital experience in Mumbai. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2021; 27:96. [PMID: 34248350 PMCID: PMC8258485 DOI: 10.1186/s12301-021-00196-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on non-COVID urological patient's management in tertiary care urology centres. METHODS This is an observational study in which data of patients visiting the urology department of all the MCGM run tertiary care hospitals were recorded for the duration of 1 April 2020 to 31 July 2020 and were compared to data of pre-COVID-19 period of similar duration. RESULTS There was a decrease of 93.86% in indoor admissions of urology patients during the COVID-19 lockdown. Indoor admissions for stone disease, haematuria, malignancy accounted for 53.65%, 15.85%, 9.75%, respectively. Elective surgeries had the highest percentage decrease followed by emergency and semi-emergency procedures. There was a reduction of more than 80% in patients attending outpatient clinics. Stone disease and its consequences were the main reasons for visiting outdoor clinics (39%). A substantial number of patients presented with flank and abdominal pain (14.8%) and benign enlargement of the prostate (10.23%). Malignancy accounted for a very small number of patients visiting outdoor clinics (1.58%). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 pandemic has a profound impact on patient care and education in Urology. There was more than ninety percent reduction in indoor admissions, operative procedures, and outpatient clinics attendance. Once the pandemic is controlled, there will be a large number of patients seeking consultation and management for urological conditions and we should be prepared for it. Surgical training of urology residents needs to be compensated in near future. Long-term impact on urological patient outcome remains to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhilesh A. Jibhakate
- Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Sujata K. Patwardhan
- Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Ajit S. Sawant
- Department of Urology, Lokmanya Tilak Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India
| | - Hemant R. Pathak
- Department of Urology, TNMC and BYL Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India
| | - Bhushan P. Patil
- Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| | - Hitesh Kamal
- Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India
| |
Collapse
|