Reconstruction following Excision of Malignant Scalp Tumors with Split Thickness Skin Graft with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparative Study

Oncological outcomes of partial thickness calvarial resection for locally advanced scalp malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, locally advanced scalp malignancies have been managed through composite, full-thickness calvarial resection. The aim of this study is to explore the oncologic outcomes of partial calvarial resection for locally invasive scalp malignancies without medullary space invasion, employing a burr-down approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

This study analyzed records of 26 adult patients diagnosed with scalp cancer that spread to the calvarial region. Data collected included demographics, medical history, adjuvant therapy details, imaging, surgical outcomes, and postoperative oncological results.

RESULTS

26 patients with cancerous scalp lesions necessitating calvarial resection for deep margin control were identified in 22 men and 4 women. Mean age at diagnosis was 72.7 years. The most common histopathological diagnosis was Squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16). Partial removal of the calvarial lesions was achieved in all patients without any intraoperative complications. Twelve patients received adjuvant therapy consisting of the following modalities: radiation (6), chemotherapy (1), immunotherapy (1), a combination of immunotherapy and radiation (2), and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (2). There was a total of 7 recurrences: local (n = 3,11.5 %), regional (n = 3,11.5 %), distal (n = 1,3.8 %). Long term local control was achieved in (n = 23,88.4 %) of patients. The mean time of follow-up was 19.1 months, and the mean time to recurrence was 15.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Partial calvarial resection represents a viable, safe, and effective surgical technique for cancerous tissue removal, reducing risks associated with full thickness calvarial resection, and enhancing soft tissue healing when compared to the established gold standard.

Deep burn surgery of the whole dorsum of the hand: Composite skin grafting over acellular dermal matrix versus thick split-thickness skin grafting

Preservation and restoration of hand function after burn injuries are challenging yet imperative. This study aimed to assess the curative effect of a composite skin graft over an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and a thick split-thickness skin graft (STSG) for treating deep burns on the hand. Patients who met the inclusion criteria at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between September 2011 and January 2020 were retrospectively identified from the operative register. We investigated patient characteristics, time from operation to the start of active motion exercise, take rates of skin graft 7 days post-surgery, donor site recovery, complications and days to complete healing. Patients were followed up for 12 months to evaluate scar quality using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and hand function through total active motion (TAM) and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). A total of 38 patients (52 hands) who received thin STSG on top of the ADM or thick STSG were included. The location of the donor sites was significantly different between Group A (thick STSG) and Group B (thin STSG + ADM) (p = 0.03). There were no statistical differences in age, gender, underlying disease, cause of burn, burn area, dominant hand, patients with two hands operated on and time from burn to surgery between the two groups (p > 0.05). The time from operation to the start of active motion exercise, take rates of skin graft 7 days post-surgery and days to complete healing were not significantly different between Group A and Group B (p > 0.05). The rate of donor sites requiring skin grafting was lower in Group B than in Group A (22.2% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in complications between the groups (p = 0.12). Moreover, 12 months postoperatively, the pliability subscore in the VSS was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (p = 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vascularity (p = 0.42), pigmentation (p = 0.31) and height subscores (p = 0.13). The TAM and JTHFT results revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.22 and 0.06, respectively). The ADM combined with thin STSG is a valuable approach for treating deep and extensive hand burns with low donor site morbidity. It has a good appearance and function in patients with hand burns, especially in patients with limited donor sites.

Spectrum of malignant scalp tumours and its impact on management-a tertiary care cancer centre experience

BACKGROUND

Tumours on the scalp are diverse and often exhibit site- and histology-specific characteristics. Reconstructing the scalp after oncological resection has always been challenging because of its unique anatomy.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective review of patients with malignant scalp tumour operated on at a single institution over 10 years was performed. Data were collected and analysed regarding the scalp tumour profile, treatment, and the outcome of these procedures.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients in our study, 33 (50%) had SCC. In addition to this, 21% were sarcomas, 17% were appendageal carcinomas, 11% were BCCs, and 1% was neuroendocrine carcinoma. Cortical erosion was observed in 6 patients in the CT imaging, all with SCC histology. Among the eight patients with pathological nodal involvement, three had angiosarcoma, three had SCC, one had appendageal carcinoma, and one had neuroendocrine carcinoma. The mean surgical defect size was 67.4 cm2. The surgical defect was reconstructed with local flaps in 58% of patients and primary closure in 27%. Local and systemic recurrence was noted in 25% of patients. Tumour size more than 6 cm, tumour histology (SCC & sarcoma), unplanned margin-positive excision, and residual disease in re-excision had higher recurrence, even though the p-value was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Scalp tumours are heterogeneous in their clinical profiles. Often, its tumour biology and microscopic extent are underestimated. High suspicion, histological diagnosis, and clear surgical margins are all requirements in successfully treating scalp tumours. In order to minimize morbidity and restore an aesthetic and functional outcome, it is critical to use the simplest scalp reconstruction whenever possible.

Autologous Skin Grafts, versus Tissue-engineered Skin Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

For over 100 years, autologous skin grafts have remained the gold standard for the reconstruction of wounds but are limited in availability. Acellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (acellular TCs) and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (cellular TCs) may address these limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare outcomes between them.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, querying MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane to assess graft incorporation, failure, and wound healing. Case reports/series, reviews, in vitro/in vivo work, non-English articles or articles without full text were excluded.

Results

Sixty-six articles encompassing 4076 patients were included. No significant differences were found between graft failure rates (P = 0.07) and mean difference of percent reepithelialization (p = 0.92) when split-thickness skin grafts were applied alone versus co-grafted with acellular TCs. Similar mean Vancouver Scar Scale was found for these two groups (p = 0.09). Twenty-one studies used at least one cellular TC. Weighted averages from pooled results did not reveal statistically significant differences in mean reepithelialization or failure rates for epidermal cellular TCs compared with split-thickness skin grafts (p = 0.55).

Conclusions

This systematic review is the first to illustrate comparable functional and wound healing outcomes between split-thickness skin grafts alone and those co-grafted with acellular TCs. The use of cellular TCs seems promising from preliminary findings. However, these results are limited in clinical applicability due to the heterogeneity of study data, and further level 1 evidence is required to determine the safety and efficacy of these constructs.

Use of xenografts and allografts in scalp reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scalp reconstruction requires a full array of reconstructive options given the complex anatomy and protection of vital structures. Not all patients qualify for advanced reconstructive options and therefore rely on short, effective procedures with minimal morbidity. This review aims to focus on xenografts and allografts to achieve an adequate reconstruction while minimizing morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although bovine xenografts have been used for many decades, there have been recent advances in porcine xenografts to aid in scalp defects. Similarly, new allogenic materials have emerged as additional tools in the armamentarium to promote wound healing.

SUMMARY

Both xenografts and allografts offer viable options for complex scalp reconstruction.

Complex Multidisciplinary Cranial and Scalp Reconstruction for Patient Salvage

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Patients can develop scalp and cranial defects as a result of neoplasm, trauma, or infection. Reconstruction of these defects can be difficult in some patients and may require a multidisciplinary approach using creative solutions usually used for disease processes in other areas of the body, such as severe burns.

METHODS

A series of 9 patients were treated using multidisciplinary techniques for reconstruction of complex cranial and scalp defects. Data on patient characteristics, initial treatment, and preparatory and definitive reconstructive treatment were retrospectively collected. Outcomes were measured as full solution, partial solution, or failure.

RESULTS

Three patients had a full solution/wound closure, 5 had a partial solution, and 1 failed reconstructive attempt. Full solution patients tended to be younger, received reconstruction treatment modalities for longer periods of time, and had more definitive surgeries. Initial and preparatory surgeries did not tend to promote a full solution, though having fewer preparatory surgeries that were not related to wound vacuum-assisted closure use tended to be associated with a better outcome. Infection of the scalp or cranium did not tend to change the result.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive salvage of complex cranial and scalp defects takes time, so patience and earlier recognition of need for atypical reconstruction is beneficial. Patient characteristics may influence outcomes, but judicious choice of materials and techniques is more critical to patient success. Use of a multidisciplinary approach to complex cranial and scalp reconstruction is a beneficial option for many patients for whom standard reconstruction methods are not viable.

Reconstruction of a secondary scalp defect using the crane principle and a split-thickness skin graft

Background

Scalp reconstruction is a common challenge for surgeons, and there are many different treatment choices. The “crane principle” is a technique that temporarily transfers a scalp flap to the defect to deposit subcutaneous tissue. The flap is then returned to its original location, leaving behind a layer of soft tissue that is used to nourish a skin graft. Decades ago, it was commonly used for forehead scalp defects, but this useful technique has been seldom reported on in recent years due to the improvement of microsurgical techniques. Previous reports mainly used the crane principle for the primary defects, and here we present a case with its coincidental application to deal with a complication of a secondary defect.

Case report

We present a case of a 75-year-old female patient with a temporoparietal scalp squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). After tumor excision, the primary defect was reconstructed using a transposition flap and the donor site was covered by a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Postoperatively, the occipital skin graft was partially lost resulting in skull bone exposure. For this secondary defect, we applied the crane principle to the previously rotated flap as a salvage procedure and skin grafting to the original tumor location covered by a viable galea fascia in 1.5 months. Both the flap and skin graft healed uneventfully.

Conclusions

Currently, the crane principle is a little-used technique because of the familiarity of microsurgery. Nevertheless, the concept is still useful in selected cases, especially for the management of previous flap complications.