Epidemiology of atlas fractures in the United States: A 20-year analysis

Trends and epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population in the United States from 2011 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the lower trunk are among the most common fractures occurring in the elderly. Super elderly individuals (i.e., those 80 years of age and older) represent a growing segment of the population and are especially prone to these fractures. The contemporary epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population is incompletely described in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive epidemiology study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to examine the incidence and recent trends of lower trunk fractures (i.e., fractures of the hip, pelvis, and lumbar spine) occurring among super elderly individuals in the United States (US) from 2011 to 2020. Annual, overall, and age-/sex-specific incidence rates (IRs) were analyzed. Average annual percent change (AAPC) estimates were calculated to indicate the magnitude/direction of trends in annual injury rates.

RESULTS

An estimated N=1,226,160 super elderly patients sustained lower trunk fractures over the 10-year study period for an overall IR of 100.2 per 10,000 person-years at-risk (PYR). Hip fractures accounted for the largest percentage of cases (IR=71.7 PYR), followed by lumbar spine fractures (IR=14.7), and pelvic fractures (IR=14.3). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among super elderly females (IR=121.5 PYR) was significantly greater than that of males (IR=65.7 PYR). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among nonagenarians and centenarians was significantly higher than that of octogenarians. Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in super elderly patients over the study period from 86.7 PYR in 2011 to 107.2 PYR in 2020 (AAPC=2.7, p<0.001). The annual incidence of both pelvic (AAPC=5.8) and lumbar spine (AAPC=6.9) fractures increased at a significantly higher rate than that of hip fractures (AAPC=1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in the oldest cohort of patients in the US (80+ years of age) increased significantly during the recent decade from 2011 to 2020, with pelvic and lumbar fractures in particular becoming increasingly common. Increased incidence rates highlight the need for future research aimed at optimizing outcomes and quality of life in this frail and ever-growing segment of the population.

Epidemiology of patellar dislocations in the United States from 2001 to 2020: results of a national emergency department database

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have shown an increasing incidence of patellar dislocations among children and adolescents. Updated, population-based studies of all patellar dislocations in the United States (US), however, are lacking. This study investigated recent trends in injury rates and demographics among patients sustaining patellar dislocations in the US from 2001 to 2020.

METHODS

This descriptive epidemiologic study retrospectively analyzed the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database to identify cases of acute patellar dislocations presenting to US Emergency Departments (EDs) from 2001 to 2020. Annual, overall, and age-adjusted incidence rates (IRs, expressed per 100,000 at-risk person-years) and additional patient/injury characteristics were analyzed. Average annual percent change (AAPC) estimates are presented to indicate the magnitude/direction of trends in annual injury rates.

RESULTS

An estimated total of 159,529 patellar dislocations occurred over the study period for an overall IR of 2.58 (95% CI = 2.04-3.12). Accounting for population growth, the overall annual incidence increased significantly from 2.61 in 2001 to 3.0 in 2020 (AAPC = 2.8, p < 0.0001). When considering sex and age, statistically significant increases in annual IRs were observed among males aged 10-19 years (AAPC = 3.8, p < 0.0001), females aged 10-19 years (AAPC = 5.3, p < 0.0001), and females aged 20-29 years (AAPC = 3.5, p = 0.0152), while no significant changes were observed in any other age groups. Two-thirds of patellar dislocations involved sports-related injury mechanisms. The annual incidence of both sports-related and non-sports-related injuries increased significantly over the study period (sports-related: AAPC = 2.6, p = 0.0001; non-sports-related: AAPC = 3.4, p = 0.0001). Athletic patellar dislocations occurred most commonly in basketball and dance.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients sustaining patellar dislocations is increasing in the US. Similar increasing trends were observed in both males and females aged 10-19 years, whereas injury rates increased in the third decade only among females. A large percentage of injuries occur during athletic activity, but both sports- and non-sports-related patellar dislocations are on the rise.

Regional variations in C1-C2 bone density on quantitated computed tomography and clinical implications

Background

Our elderly population is growing and the number of spine fractures in the elderly is also growing. The elderly population in general may be considered as poor surgical candidates experience a high rate of fractures at C1 and C2 compared with the general population. Nonoperative management of upper cervical fractures is not benign as there is a high nonunion rate for both C1 and C2 fractures in the elderly, and orthosis compliance is often suboptimal, or complicated by skin breakdown. The optimal technique for upper cervical stabilization in the elderly may be different than in younger populations as the bone quality is inferior in the elderly. The objective of this basic science study is to determine whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of C1 and C2 vary by region, and if this is a gender difference in this elderly age group.

Methods

Twenty cadaveric spines from 45 to 83 years of age were used to obtain BMD using quantitated computed tomography (QCT). BMD was measured using a QCT. For C1, 8 regions were determined: anterior tubercle, bilateral anterior and medial lateral masses, bilateral posterior arches, and posterior tubercle. For C2, 7 regional BMDs were determined: top of odontoid, base of odontoid-body interface, mid body, bilateral lateral masses, anterior inferior body near the discs space, and the C2 spinous process.

Results

The BMD was greatest at the C1 anterior tubercle (564.4±175.8 mg/cm³) and C1 posterior ring (420.8±110.2 mg/cm³), and least at the anterior and medial lateral masses (262.8±59.5 mg/cm³, 316.9±72.6 mg/cm³). At C2 QCT BMD was greatest at the top of the dens (400.6±107.9 mg/cm³) decreasing down through the odontoid-C2 body junction (267.8±103.5 mg/cm³) and least in the mid C2 body 249.1±68.8 mg/cm³). The posterior arch of C1 and the spinous process of C2 had higher BMD's 420.8±110.2 mg/cm³ and 284.1±93.0 mg/cm³, respectively. A high correlation was observed between the BMD at the interface of the dens-vertebral body with the vertebral body with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. The BMD of the top of dens was significantly higher (p<.05) than all the regions in C2.

Conclusions

Regional and segmental BMD variations at C1 and C2 have clinical implications for surgical constructs in the elderly population. Given the higher BMDs of the C1 and C2 spinous process and posterior arches, consideration should be given to incorporate these areas using various C1-C2 wiring techniques. In the elderly, lateral masses particularly at C1 with lower BMD may result in potential screw loosening and nonunion in this age group. Old-school wiring techniques have a track record of efficacy and safety with less blood loss, reduced operative time, reduced X-ray exposure, and should be considered in the elderly as a primary stabilization technique or a belt-over suspenders approach based on regional variations in BMD in the elderly.

Epidemiology of C2 fractures in the United States: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database study

Introduction

C2 fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries of the cervical spine, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Current literature on the incidence of C2 fractures is limited to populations outside of the United States (US), prior to 2014, or specific age cohorts. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence rate (IR) of C2 fractures and associated patient demographics in the US between 2002 and 2021 using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database.

Methods

This study analyzed the NEISS database to identify cases of C2 fractures presenting to US Emergency Departments (EDs) from 2002 to 2021. Annual and overall numbers of fractures, IR, and patient demographics were analyzed. IR is expressed as the number of fractures per 100,000 person-years at risk (PYR). Patients were split into three different age groups for comparison (children and young adults, 0-64 years; older adults, 65-79 years; elderly individuals, 80 + years).

Results

A national estimate of n = 72,764 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54,371-91,156) presented to US EDs with a C2 fracture (IR was 1.17/PYR; 95% CI = 0.87-1.46), and elderly individuals had the highest IR overall (IR = 15.9; P < 0.05). The IR of C2 fractures between 2002 and 2021, reported as average annual percent change (AAPC), increased significantly, regardless of age or sex (AAPC = 10.9; 95% CI = 6.3-15.6; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

C2 fractures occur at higher rates than previous years, with especially high IR in elderly individuals. Emphasis of public health efforts toward osteoporosis and coordination difficulties in elderly individuals would likely significantly reduce the overall IR of these injuries.

Epidemiology of ballistic fractures in the United States: A 20-year analysis of the Firearm Injury Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

Ballistic (i.e., gunshot-induced) fractures present unique treatment challenges and can be associated with high rates of complications and considerable morbidity. Large-scale epidemiologic data on these types of fractures are scarce. There is concern that gun-related violence may be on the rise, potentially increasing the burden of ballistic orthopaedic trauma, but there are few contemporary studies on the topic. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the incidence and demographics of patients with ballistic fractures in the United States (US) over the last 20 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive epidemiology study retrospectively analyzed the Firearm Injury Surveillance Study to identify cases of ballistic fractures in the US from 2000 to 2019. Overall and annual numbers of fractures and fracture incidence rates (IRs), patient demographics, incident characteristics, and temporal trends were analyzed. Patients of all ages were included. Ballistic fractures were grouped by anatomic location for comparisons (non-spine axial, spine, upper extremity, lower extremity).

RESULTS

An estimated N = 240,555 patients (n = 8,322 unweighted cases) sustained ballistic fractures over the 20-year study period for an overall IR of 39.2 per 1,000,000 person-years at-risk (PYR). Overall, lower extremity fractures accounted for the largest percentage of cases (45.9%; IR=18.8 PYR), followed by upper extremity fractures (32.8%; IR=13.4 PYR), non-spine axial fractures (16.1%; IR=6.6 PYR), and spine fractures (5.2%; IR=2.1 PYR). Diaphyseal femur fractures were the most common ballistic fractures overall. Nearly three-fourths (71.2%) of all cases occurred in males in the second through fourth decades. The most common injury intent was assault (71.8%) and a majority of patients (71.2%) required hospital admission. Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing incidence of all ballistic fractures over the study period from 15.7 PYR in 2000 to 96.8 PYR in 2019 (average annual percent change=10.3, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the nationwide burden of ballistic fractures in the US has increased significantly in the last two decades. Ballistic fractures are associated with significant morbidity and societal cost, and increasing injury rates highlight the need for future research aimed at better understanding the ideal treatment of these types of fractures and their outcomes.

The AO spine upper cervical injury classification system: Do work setting or trauma center affiliation affect classification accuracy or reliability?

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy and reliability of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System based on a surgeons' work setting and trauma center affiliation.

METHODS

A total of 275 AO Spine members participated in a validation of 25 upper cervical spine injuries, which were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans. Each participant was grouped based on their work setting (academic, hospital-employed, or private practice) and their trauma center affiliation (Level I, Level II or III, and Level IV or no trauma center). The classification accuracy was calculated as percent of correct classifications, while interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility were evaluated based on Fleiss' Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The overall classification accuracy for surgeons affiliated with a level I trauma center was significantly greater than participants affiliated with a level II/III center or a level IV/no trauma center on assessment one (p₁<0.0001) and two (p₂ = 0.0003). On both assessments, surgeons affiliated with a level I or a level II/III trauma center were significantly more accurate at identifying IIIB injury types (p₁ = 0.0007; p₂ = 0.0064). Academic surgeons and hospital employed surgeons were significantly more likely to correctly classify type IIIB injuries on assessment one (p₁ = 0.0146) and two (p₂ = 0.0015). When evaluating classification reliability, the largest differences between work settings and trauma center affiliations was identified in type IIIB injuries.

CONCLUSION

Type B injuries are the most difficult injury type to correctly classify. They are classified with greater reliability and classification accuracy when evaluated by academic surgeons, hospital-employed surgeons, and surgeons associated with higher-level trauma centers (I or II/III).