1
|
Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Imbo B, Joujon-Roche R, Tretiakov P, Krol O, Bennett-Caso C, Owusu-Sarpong S, Dave P, McFarland K, Mir J, Dhillon E, Koller H, Diebo BG, Vira S, Lafage R, Lafage V, Passias PG. A Hierarchical Approach to Realignment Strategies in Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:106-111. [PMID: 36920359 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Construct an individualized cervical realignment strategy based on patient parameters at the presentation that results in superior 2-year health-related quality of life metrics and decreased rates of junctional failure and reoperation following adult cervical deformity surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Research has previously focused on adult cervical deformity realignment thresholds for maximizing clinical outcomes while minimizing complications. However, realignment strategies may differ based on patient presentation and clinical characteristics. METHODS We included adult cervical deformity patients with 2-year data. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting good clinical outcomes without distal junctional failure or reoperation. Radiographic parameters assessed included C2 Slope, C2-C7, McGregor's slope, TS-CL, cSVA, T1 slope, and preoperative lowest-instrumented vertebra (LIV) inclination angle. Conditional inference trees were used to establish thresholds for each parameter based on achieving the optimal outcome. Analysis of Covariance and multivariable logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, comorbidities, baseline deformity and disability, and surgical factors, assessed outcome rates for the hierarchical approach within each deformity group. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients were included. After correction, there was a significant difference in meeting the optimal outcome when correcting the C2 slope below 10 degrees (85% vs. 34%, P <0.001), along with lower rates of distal junctional failure (DJF) (7% vs. 42%, P <0.001). Next, after isolating patients below the C2 slope threshold, the selection of LIV with an inclination between 0 and 40 degrees demonstrated lower rates of distal junctional kyphosis and higher odds of meeting optimal outcome(OR: 4.2, P =0.011). The best third step was the correction of cSVA below 35 mm. This hierarchical approach (11% of the cohort) led to significantly lower rates of DJF (0% vs. 15%, P <0.007), reoperation (8% vs. 28%, P <0.001), and higher rates of meeting optimal outcome (93% vs. 36%, P <0.001) when controlling for age, comorbidities, and baseline deformity and disability. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the correction of C2 slope should be prioritized during cervical deformity surgery, with the selection of a stable LIV and correction of cervical SVA below the idealized threshold. Among the numerous radiographic parameters considered during preoperative planning for cervical deformity correction, our determinations help surgeons prioritize those realignment strategies that maximize the health-related quality of life outcomes and minimize complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level-III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Ekamjeet Dhillon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Heiko Koller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School/Brown University Medical Center, Providence, RI
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Additional Economic Burden of Frailty in Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1418-1425. [PMID: 35797658 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The influence of frailty on economic burden following corrective surgery for the adult cervical deformity (CD) is understudied and may provide valuable insights for preoperative planning. OBJECTIVE To assess the influence of baseline frailty status on the economic burden of CD surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS CD patients with frailty scores and baseline and two-year Neck Disability Index data were included. Frailty score was categorized patients by modified CD frailty index into not frail (NF) and frail (F). Analysis of covariance was used to estimate marginal means adjusting for age, sex, surgical approach, and baseline sacral slope, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis. Costs were derived from PearlDiver registry data. Reimbursement consisted of a standardized estimate using regression analysis of Medicare payscales for services within a 30-day window including length of stay and death. This data is representative of the national average Medicare cost differentiated by complication/comorbidity outcome, surgical approach, and revision status. Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at two years was calculated for NF and F patients. RESULTS There were 126 patients included. There were 68 NF patients and 58 classified as F. Frailty groups did not differ by overall complications, instance of distal junctional kyphosis, or reoperations (all P >0.05). These groups had similar rates of radiographic and clinical improvement by two years. NF and F had similar overall cost ($36,731.03 vs. $37,356.75, P =0.793), resulting in equivocal costs per QALYs for both patients at two years ($90,113.79 vs. $80,866.66, P =0.097). CONCLUSION F and NF patients experienced similar complication rates and upfront costs, with equivocal utility gained, leading to comparative cost-effectiveness with NF patients based on cost per QALYs at two years. Surgical correction for CD is an economical healthcare investment for F patients when accounting for anticipated utility gained and cost-effectiveness following the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|