Easy method to simplify "freehand" subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion

Research into the anatomy of the subaxial cervical pedicle for ensuring screw insertion safety

The study aimed to determine the optimal entry points and trajectories for posterior subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation. Computed tomography (CT) and Mimics software were used to evaluate the subaxial cervical pedicle in 42 cervical spine CT scans. The width of the cervical pedicle was measured and compared at medial angulations of 30°, 35°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 55°, and 60° relative to the midline sagittal plane. Based on an observational examination of the positions of all cervical 3-dimensional models and screws, the proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was analyzed. Although the variations in C3-6 pedicle width (PW) among 45°, 50°, and 55° were not statistically significant, they were significantly larger than the differences among 30°, 35°, 40°, and 60° angles (P < .05). The differences in C7 PW between the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were not statistically different even though the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were significantly bigger. (P < .05). The proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The entry point for C3-7 levels was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The optimal medial angulation for the posterior C3-6 CPS was 45°-55° and that for the posterior C7 CPS was 30°-45°. The sagittal angle of the posterior C3-7 CPS was parallel to the corresponding upper endplate.

Subaxial Cervical Pedicular Screw Insertion via the Nonanatomic Axis: Identification of Entry Point and Trajectory Based on a Radiographic Study and Workshop

STUDY DESIGN

A radiological study and workshop.

OBJECTIVE

To propose a novel technique for subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion via the nonanatomic axis (nAA) and identify a new entry point (EP) and trajectory based on a radiological study.

METHODS

The new EP was determined to be the center of the upper half of the lateral mass, and the nAA was defined as the line connecting the EP and center of the pedicle. CT images of 493 subaxial cervical pedicles from 51 adults were utilized. The pedicle axis length (PAL/nPAL), pedicle transverse angle (PTA/nPTA), sagittal and transverse pedicle screw depth ratio (S-DO, T-DO), and sagittal and transverse angles (S-angle, T-angle) were measured in the anatomical axis (AA) and nAA. nAA-CPS insertions were conducted on dry specimens, and the positions of the screws were graded.

RESULTS

The nPTA (22.35° ± 1.57°), nPAL (23.75 ± 2.07 mm), T-DO (45.61% ± 3.10%), and S-DO (70.46% ± 4.44%) of the nAA-CPS were significantly different from the PTA (41.86° ± 2.77°), PAL (31.98 ± 2.40 mm), T-DO and S-DO of the AA-CPS (both 100% in ideal conditions), respectively (P < .05). The T-angle and S-angle were 92.78° ± 3.07° and 92.18° ± 3.78°, respectively. A constant EP and consistent trajectory of the nAA-CPS identified by 2 perpendicular angles were summarized and utilized as the manipulation protocols of the workshop, and a perfect position was achieved in 80.00% (24/30) of screws.

CONCLUSION

The nAA-CPS is a novel alternative to the classic CPS technique. A constant entry point and 2 perpendicular angles in the sagittal and transverse planes for identifying the trajectory of the nAA-CPS should be taken into account in the establishment of a manipulation protocol.

Pedicle Screw Fixation for Hemiplegia and Bilateral Hypoesthesia Due to C2-C3 Spinal Fracture Dislocation: A Case Report

CASE

A 48-year-old man fell from a tree and presented to the emergency department with right-sided full hemiplegia and C3 bilateral hypoesthesia. Imaging was remarkable for a C2-C3 fracture-dislocation. The patient was effectively managed surgically with a posterior decompression and 4-level posterior cervical fixation/fusion that included pedicle screws in the axis fixation and lateral mass screws. The reduction/fixation remained stable, and the patient regained full lower extremity function and demonstrated functional upper-extremity recovery at three-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

C2-C3 fracture-dislocation is a rare but potentially fatal injury due to concomitant spinal cord injury, and its surgical management can be challenging because of the proximity of vascular and nerve structures. Posterior cervical fixation that includes axis pedicle screws can be an effective fixation option in select patients with this condition.

Medial Pedicle Pivot Point Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Morphometric Measurements for Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Novel Technique and Case Series

This study describes a new and safe freehand cervical pedicle screw insertion technique using preoperative computed tomography (CT) morphometric measurements as a guide and a medial pedicle pivot point (MPPP) during the procedure. This study included 271 pedicles at 216 cervical spine levels (mean: 4.75 pedicles per patient). A pedicle diameter (PD) ≥ 3.5 mm was the cut-off for pedicle screw fixation. The presence and grade of perforation were detected using postoperative CT scans, where perforations were graded as follows: 0, no perforation; 1, perforation < 0.875 mm; 2, perforation 0.875-1.75 mm; and 3, perforation > 1.75 mm. The surgical technique involved the use of an MPPP, which was the point at which the lines representing the depth of the lateral mass and total length of the pedicle intersected, deep in the lateral mass. The overall success rate was 96.3% (261/271, Grade 0 or 1 perforations). In total, 54 perforations occurred, among which 44 (81.5%) were Grade 1 and 10 (18.5%) were Grade 2. The most common perforation direction was medial (39/54, 72.2%). The freehand technique for cervical pedicle screw fixation using the MPPP may allow for a safe and accurate procedure in patients with a PD ≥3.5 mm.

Subaxial Cervical Pedicular Screw Insertion via the Nonanatomic Axis: Technical Notes and Preliminary Clinical Report

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the technical details of subaxial cervical pedicular screw insertion via the nonanatomic axis (nAA-CPS) and evaluate its clinical safety and accuracy.

METHODS

The nAA-CPS technique was performed in 21 patients. Preoperative and intraoperative management-related details are described, and a manipulation protocol is presented. Clinical outcomes were used to assess the safety and accuracy of screws was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography (CT) according to the pedicle perforation grading system, and the nonanatomic pedicle transverse angle (nPTA) and nonanatomic pedicle axis length (nPAL) were assessed based on pre- and postoperative CT images.

RESULTS

According to "one constant entry point (EP) and two perpendicular trajectory angles" protocol, nAA-CPS was performed without much interference from the muscles. No intraoperative or postoperative neurovascular complications related to the technique were observed. Of the 112 inserted screws, 78 (69.64%) were assessed as grade 0, 24 (21.43%) as grade 1, 4 (3.57%) as grade 2 and 6 (5.36%) as grade 3. The overall rate of correct position (grades 0 and 1) was 91.07% (102/112), and the rate of malposition was 8.93% (10/112), including five screws implanted medially and the other five laterally. The nPTA was highly consistent on pre- and postoperative CT (P < .05), while postoperative nPAL was significantly shorter than preoperative nPAL (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically, the accuracy and safety of nAA-CPS was similar to the traditional CPS technique. The protocol, derived from previous radiological studies and workshops, greatly helped standardize clinical manipulation; thus, nAA-CPS is a promising alternative to the traditional CPS.

Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the "Burcev Technique": A Cadaveric Study

The present study attempted to validate the “Burcev freehand method” based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the “freehand technique,” described by Burcev et al, without the aid of fluoroscopy and the trajectory verified by computed tomography scans. The screws were designated as satisfactory, permissible, or unacceptable. Descriptive variables were represented in number and percentages, continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Of the 32 CPSs placed, 24 (75%) exhibited a satisfactory position, 1 (3%) exhibited a permissible position, and 7 (22%) exhibited an unacceptable position. Of the seven CPSs in the unacceptable group, four exhibited a lateral breach and three exhibited a medial breach, whereas the CPS in the permissible group exhibited a medial breach. The overall angle with contralateral lamina in the horizontal plane in terms of mean ± SD was 175.43 ± 2.82, 169.49, and 169.65 ± 6.46 degrees in the satisfactory, permissible, and unacceptable groups, respectively. In the sagittal plane, the screws exhibited an angle of 88.15 ± 3.56 degrees. No breach was observed superiorly or inferiorly. The “Burcev technique” is replicable with similar results in cadavers. Further studies must be conducted in a clinical setting to ensure its safety.

Significance of Preoperative Prone Position Computed Tomography in Free Hand Subaxial Cervical Pedicular Screwing

OBJECTIVE

The subaxial cervical pedicle screwing technique shows powerful biomechanical properties for posterior cervical fusion. When applying a pedicle screw using the freehand technique, it is essential to analyse cervical computed tomography and plan the surgery accordingly. Normal cervical computed tomography is usually performed in the supine position, whereas during surgery, the patient lies in a prone position. This fact leads us to suppose that radiological evaluations may yield misleading results. Our study aimed to investigate whether there is any superiority between preoperative preparation on computed tomography performed in the prone position and that performed in the supine position.

METHODS

This study included 17 patients (132 pedicle screws) who were recently operated on with cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position and 17 patients (136 pedicle screws) who were operated on by conventional cervical vertebral computed tomography as the control group. The patients in both groups were compared in terms of age, gender, pathological diagnosis, screw malposition and complications. A screw malposition evaluation was made according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding age, gender and pathological diagnosis. The screw malposition rate (from 11.1% to 6.9%, p<0.05), mean malposition distance (from 2.18 mm to 1.86 mm, p <0.05), and complications statistically significantly decreased in the prone position computed tomography group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative surgical planning by performing cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position reduces screw malposition and complications. Our surgical success increased with a simple modification that can be applied by all clinicians without creating additional radiation exposure or additional costs.

The "slide technique"-a novel free-hand method of subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement

Background

Cervical Pedicle Screw (CPS) placement is a challenging work due to the high risk of neurovascular complications. Although there have been several different free-hand or navigation assisted techniques for CPS placement, perforations may occur during screw insertion, especially lateral perforation. The objective of this manuscript is to describe a novel free-hand technique for subaxial CPS placement (C3–C7) and to evaluate if it decreases the chances of perforation.

Methods

Thirty-two patients undergoing surgery with CPS instrumentation (C3–C7) at our institute between June 2017 and December 2018 were included in this study. All the patients had cervical trauma, and pedicle screw insertion was performed according to the free-hand “slide technique”. The lamina, lateral mass and facet joint of the target area were exposed and the optimal entry point was found on the lateral mass posterior surface. A pedicular probe was then inserted and gently advanced. During the pedicle probe insertion, the cortex of the medial margin of the pedicle acted as a slide to permit the safe insertion of the screw. If the pedicle screw pathway was intact, the screw of the appropriate size was carefully placed. Three-dimensional (3D) CT imaging reconstruction was performed in all the patients after surgery, and screw perforations were graded with the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.

Results

Thirty-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. A total of 257 CPSs (C3–7) were inserted, of which 41 CPSs were in C3, 61 CPSs were in C4, 55 CPSs were in C5, 53 CPSs were in C6, and 47 CPSs were in C7. The diameter and length of CPSs were 3.5 mm and 22–26 mm respectively. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, grade 0, 231 screws; grade 1, 19 screws; and grade 2, 7 screws. No neurovascular complications occurred stemming from malpositioning of pedicle screws. Among perforated screws (26 screws), there were 16 lateral perforations, 5 medical perforations, and 4 inferior perforations.

Conclusions

The initial usage result shows the “slide technique” is a safe, effective and cost-effective technique for pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. This is the first report of such a technique, and further studies are needed.