Older Age, Comorbid Illnesses, and Injury Severity Affect Immediate Outcome in Elderly Trauma Patients

An evaluation of the "Obesity Paradox" in isolated blunt abdominal trauma in the United States

BACKGROUND

The obesity paradox theorizes a survival benefit in trauma patients secondary to the cushioning effect of adiposity. We aim to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on abdominal injury severity, morbidity, and mortality in adults with isolated, blunt abdominal trauma in the United States.

METHODS

We reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank (2013-2021) for adults sustaining isolated, blunt abdominal trauma stratified by BMI. We performed a doubly robust, augmented inverse-propensity weighted multivariable logistic regression to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of BMI on mortality and the presence of abdominal organ injury.

RESULTS

36,350 patients met the inclusion criteria. In our study, 41.4 % of patients were normal-weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), 20.6 % were obese (BMI 30-39.9), and 4.7 % were severely obese (BMI≥40). In these cohorts, the abdominal abbreviated injury scale (AIS) was 2 (2 -3). Obese and severely obese patients had significantly reduced presence of pancreas, spleen, liver, kidney, and small bowel injuries. The predicted probability of abdominal AIS severity decreased significantly with increasing BMI. Crude mortality was significantly higher in obese (1.3 %) and severely obese patients (1.3 %) compared to normal-weight patients (0.7 %). Obese and severely obese patients demonstrated non-statistically significant changes in the mortality of +26.4 % (ATE 0.264, 95 %CI -0.108-0.637, p = 0.164) and +55.5 % (ATE 0.555, 95 %CI -0.284-1.394, p = 0.195) respectively, compared to normal weight patients.

CONCLUSION

BMI may protect against abdominal injury in adults with isolated, blunt abdominal trauma. Mortality did not decrease in association with increasing BMI, as this may be offset by the increase in co-morbidities in this population.

No trauma-related diagnosis in emergency trauma room whole-body computer tomography of patients with inconspicuous primary survey

PURPOSE

Whole-body computer tomographic examinations (WBCT) are essential in diagnosing the severely injured. The structured clinical evaluation in the emergency trauma room, according to ATLS® and guidelines, helps to indicate the correct radiological imaging to avoid overtriage and undertriage. This retrospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the value of WBCT in patients with an inconspicuous primary survey and whether there is any evidence for this investigation in this group of patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was conducted with patients admitted to a maximum-care hospital and supraregional trauma center in Germany and part of the TraumaNetwork DGU® in southwest Germany between January 2012 and November 2017. Hospital files were used for evaluation, and WBCT was carried out using a 32-row MSCT device from Siemens Healthineers, Volume Zoom, Erlangen, Germany. For evaluation, non-parametric procedures such as the chi-square test, U test, Fisher test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to test for significance (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

From 3976 patients treated with WBCT, 120 patients (3.02%) showed an inconspicuous primary survey. This examination did not reveal any trauma sequelae in any of this group. Additionally, 198 patients (4.98%) showed minor clinical symptoms in the primary survey, but no morphological trauma sequence could be diagnosed in WBCT diagnostics. Three hundred forty-two patients were not admitted as inpatients after WBCT and discharged to further outpatient treatment because there were no objectifiable reasons for inpatient treatment. Four hundred fifteen patients did not receive WBCT for, e.g., isolated extremity trauma, child, pregnancy, or death.

CONCLUSION

Not one of the clinically asymptomatic patients had an imageable injury after WBCT diagnostics in this study. WBCT should only be performed in severely injured patients after clinical assessment regardless of "trauma mechanism." According to guidelines and ATLS®, the clinical examination seems to be a safe and reliable method for reasonable and responsible decision-making regarding the realization of WBCT with all well-known risk factors.

Performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients: comparison of the ISS, TRISS, and GTOS based on a systemic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published from January 2008 to October 2023. Studies assessing the performance of the ISS, TRISS, or GTOS in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients (over 60 years old) and reporting data for the analysis of the pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) were included. Studies that were not conducted in a group of geriatric patients, did not consider mortality as the outcome variable, or had incomplete data were excluded. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Clinical Prediction Rule Checklist was utilized to assess the risk of bias in included studies. STATA 16.0. was used for the AUROC analysis and HSROC analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies involving 118,761 geriatric trauma patients were included. The pooled AUROC of the TRISS (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77-0.87) was higher than ISS (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71-0.79) and GTOS (AUC = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.77-0.83). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) calculated from HSROC curves also suggested that the TRISS (DOR = 21.5) had a better performance in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients than the ISS (DOR = 6.27) and GTOS (DOR = 4.76).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that the TRISS showed better accuracy and performance in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients than the ISS and GTOS.

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Traumatic Bone Fracture Patterns and Hospital Outcomes in 1646 Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study in Turkey

BACKGROUND During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related lockdowns, modifications in trauma-related behavior and other factors in the elderly population may have occurred. The present retrospective study aimed to compare outcomes from emergency admissions to a major trauma center in Turkey of 1646 elderly patients with traumatic bone fractures that occurred before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort of 1646 elderly trauma patients admitted between September 15, 2019 and September 15, 2020 were retrospectively scanned from the hospital registry system and were grouped as admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic before (Group 1), during (Group 2), or after (Group 3) the lockdown restrictions. Demographic and clinical data were examined by making comparisons between the 3 groups. RESULTS In all groups, female sex was more prevalent. Fractures were more common in the ulna and femur than in other bones (P=0.026, P=0.035). Among the groups, in Group 2, injuries due to the mechanism of falling from one's own height on the ground were more prominent (79.2%). Hospital costs were lower in Group 1 (P<0.001). The majority of hospitalized patients (n=874; 53.1%) were in Group 2 (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS During pandemic lockdowns, the mechanism of falling from one's own height was more common in the elderly population. The ulna and femur were the predominant bones fractured. Therefore, during lockdown periods, precautions should be taken to prevent the elderly from falling from their own height.

Trauma in the Geriatric and the Super-Geriatric: Should They Be Treated the Same?

INTRODUCTION

There is paucity of studies comparing the characteristics of trauma in geriatrics and super-geriatrics. We aimed to explore the injury characteristics and outcomes of older adult trauma patients on a nationwide scale.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included moderate to severely injured (Injury Severity Score >8) older adult (≥65 y) trauma patients. Patients were stratified into geriatric (65 y ≤ Age <80 y) and super-geriatric (Age ≥80 y). Outcomes included interventions, complications, failure-to-rescue, withdrawal of support treatment, and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 269,208 patients (geriatric = 57%; super-geriatric = 43%). Both groups had similar vital signs and Injury Severity Score (geriatric = 9[9-12] versus super-geriatric = 9[9-11]). The super-geriatric were more likely to have falls (71% versus 89%, P < 0.001), while the geriatric were more likely to have Motor vehicle collision (17% versus. 7%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, geriatric patients were more likely to be treated at a Level I Trauma Center (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.1, P < 0.001), undergo hemorrhage control surgery (aOR = 1.5, P < 0.001), be admitted to the intensive care unit (aOR = 1.15, P < 0.001), or intubated (aOR = 1.4, P < 0.001). However, they were less likely to have withdrawal of support treatment (aOR = 0.37, P < 0.001) compared to the super-geriatric. Furthermore, geriatric patients were more likely to develop major complications (aOR = 1.08, P < 0.01). However, they had lower odds of failure-to-rescue (aOR = 0.69, P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (aOR = 0.56, P < 0.001) compared to the super-geriatric.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist in injury patterns, interventions, and outcomes between the geriatric and super-geriatric. Future studies and guidelines may need to classify older adults into geriatric and super-geriatric categories to facilitate tailored care and overall improvement of management strategies for older populations.

Economic burden and financial vulnerability of injuries among the elderly in Vietnam

Falls are a leading cause of death among elderly people. However, research on the cost of fall-related injuries is limited in Vietnam. We estimated treatment costs and associated factors among 405 elderly patients in Thai Binh hospitals. Costs were estimated through self-reported data on medical and non-medical expenses. Logistic regression and GLM were used to identify payment and affordability factors. Inpatient and outpatient care costs for fall-related injuries were US$98.06 and US$8.53, respectively. 11.85% of participants couldn't pay for treatment. Payment ability and cost decline were linked to family income, medical history, and hospital stay length. Elderly with fall-related injuries in Vietnam experienced high costs and severe health issues. Primary healthcare services and communication campaigns should be strengthened to reduce disease burden and develop effective fall injury prevention strategies.

Outcomes of care at higher-level trauma centers in octogenarians with a history of anticoagulant use who fall from ground level

BACKGROUND

The appropriate care of octogenarian trauma patients after a fall from ground level (FFGL) is a key factor for better outcomes. The purpose of this study is to use data from a national database to evaluate the outcomes of patients who are 80-89 years old with a history of anticoagulant use, sustained a FFGL, and were treated at a higher-level care institution.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the calendar year 2017-2018 was accessed for the study. All hospitalized trauma patients between the ages of 80-89 years old with a history of anticoagulant use and sustaining an injury after FFGL were included in the study. Other variables included in the study are sex [male], race [white], initial systolic blood pressure (SBP mmHg), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), hypotension with an SBP<110 mmHg and other comorbidities. The outcomes of the patients were compared with the care at higher-level trauma centers (Level I & Level II) and lower-level trauma centers (Level III) using propensity matched analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, 2348 patients were identified in each group. There was no clinically significant difference between the patients' characteristics who were treated at higher-level and lower-level care centers. A paired matched analysis showed greater mortality in patients who were treated at higher-level care centers compared to lower-level care centers (3.7% vs 2.6%, P = 0.03). The absolute difference in mortality was 1.1%[95% CI: 0.001, 0.022] which may not have any clinical relevance. A greater number of patients were discharged to home and a lesser number of patients were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) when they were treated at higher-level trauma centers.

CONCLUSION & RELEVANCE

The care at higher-level trauma centers did not show any benefit in-hospital mortality in the short term. A higher number of patients was discharged to home without assistance.

Negative laparotomy rates and outcomes following blunt traumatic injury in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Exploratory laparotomy remains the mainstay of treatment following blunt abdominal trauma. However, the decision to operate can be difficult in hemodynamically stable patients with unreliable physical exams or equivocal imaging findings. The risk of a negative laparotomy and the subsequent complications must be weighed against the potential morbidity and mortality of a missed abdominal injury. Our study aims to evaluate trends and the effect of negative laparotomies on morbidity and mortality in adults with blunt traumatic injuries in the United States.

METHODS

We reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2019) for adults with blunt traumatic injuries who underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Positive or negative laparotomy of abdominal injury was compared. We performed bivariate analysis and a modified Poisson regression to estimate the effect of negative laparotomy on mortality. A sub-analysis of patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis was performed.

RESULTS

92,800 patients met the inclusion criteria of the primary analysis. Negative laparotomy rates were 12.0% in this population, down-trending throughout the study. Negative laparotomy patients had a significantly higher crude mortality (31.1% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001), despite lower injury severity scores (20 (10-29) vs. 25 (16-35), p < 0.001) than positive laparotomy patients. Patients that underwent negative laparotomy had a 33% higher risk for mortality (RR1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.37, P < 0.001) than positive laparotomy patients after adjusting for pertinent covariates. Patients that underwent CT abdomen/pelvis imaging (n = 45,654) had a lower rate of negative laparotomy (11.1%) and decreased difference in crude mortality (22.6% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001) compared to positive laparotomy patients. However, the relative risk for mortality remained high at 37% (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.29 - 1.46, p < 0.001) for this sub-cohort.

CONCLUSION

Negative laparotomy rates in adults with blunt traumatic injuries are trending down in the United States but remains substantial and may show improvement with increased use of diagnostic imaging. Negative laparotomy has a relative risk for mortality of 33% despite lower injury severity. Thus, surgical exploration in this population should be thoughtfully undertaken with appropriate evaluation via physical exam and diagnostic imaging to prevent unnecessary morbidity and mortality.

Retrospective In-Hospital Mortality Analysis of GeriatricPatients Treated in a Level 1 Trauma Center

The aim of this study is to determine the critical time intervals and influencing covariates for in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma and orthopedic patients. During a period of five years, we retrospectively review patients aged > 60 years who were hospitalized at the Department of Trauma, Orthopedic, and Plastic Surgery. The primary outcome is the mean time to death. Survival analysis is performed using an accelerated failure time model. A total of 5388 patients are included in the analysis. Two-thirds underwent surgery (n = 3497, 65%) and one-third were conservatively treated (n = 1891, 35%). The in-hospital mortality rate is 3.1% (n = 168; surgery, n = 112; conservative, n = 56). The mean time to death is 23.3 days (±18.8) after admission in the surgery group and 11.3 days (±12.5) in the conservative treatment group. The greatest accelerating effect on mortality is found in the intensive care unit (16.52, p < 0.001). We are able to identify a critical time interval for in-hospital mortality between days 11 and 23. The day of death on weekend days/holidays, hospitalization for conservative treatment, and treatment at the intensive care unit significantly increase the risk of in-hospital mortality. Early mobilization and a short hospitalization duration seem to be of major importance in fragile patients.

Musculus psoas major morphology - a novel predictor of mortality in elderly polytraumatized patients

INTRODUCTION

Numerous papers in different fields have already shown that CT imaging of the Musculus Psoas Major (MPM) can be used to predict patient outcome. Unfortunately, most of the methods presented in the literature are very complex and not easy to perform in the clinic. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to introduce a novel and convenient method for measuring the MPM to trauma surgeons and to prove the association between MPM morphology and mortality in elderly polytraumatized patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective outcome study was conducted at our level I trauma center. All patients admitted from 2006 to 2020 were included if they (1) presented with multiple injuries (≥2 body regions) and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, (2) were at least 65 years of age, and (3) were diagnosed using a whole-body computed tomography. Subsequently, the ratios of short-axis to long-axis of both MPM were measured, and their mean value was evaluated as a candidate predictor of 31-day mortality.

RESULTS

Our study group consisted of 158 patients (63.3% male; median age, 76 years; median ISS, 25). In the survivors (55.7%), the mean MPM score was significantly higher compared to the fatalities (0.57 versus 0.48; p < 0.0001). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis identified the MPM score as a protective predictor of 31 day-mortality (OR = 0.92, p < 0.001), whereas age (OR 1.08, p = 0.002 and ISS (OR 1.06, p = 0.006) revealed as significant risk factors for mortality. ROC statistics provided an AUC = 0.724 (p < 0.0001) and a cut-off level of 0,48 (sensitivity, 80.7%; specificity, 54.3%).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that MPM score levels lower than 0.48 might be considered an additional tool to identify elderly patients at high risk of death following major trauma. In our opinion, the assessment of the MPM score is an easy, convenient, and intuitive method to gain additional information quickly after admission to the hospital that could be implemented without great effort into daily clinical practice.

Utilization of torso computed tomography for the evaluation of ground level falls: More imaging does not equal better care

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) of the chest (CTC), abdomen, and pelvis (CTAP) is common when assessing trauma patients in the emergency department. However, unnecessary imaging can expose patients to unneeded radiation and increase healthcare costs. Here, we characterize the use of torso CT imaging for the evaluation of ground level falls (GLF) at a single level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients ≥18 years old presenting to a single level 1 trauma center with a GLF (1m or less) in 2015-2019. Data were obtained through chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors leading to patients obtaining torso CT imaging. The utility of CT imaging in identifying injuries that changed management was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 1,195 patients captured during the study period, 492 patients had a positive torso physical exam (PE), and 703 had a negative torso PE. Of patients with a negative torso PE, 127 CTC and 142 CTAP were obtained, with only 5.5% CTC identifying traumatic injuries not previously diagnosed on chest radiograph (CXR), and only 0.7% CTAP identifying new injuries not identified on pelvic radiograph (PXR). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only a positive PE was significantly associated with the identification of abnormal imaging findings on torso CT. A negative PE, CXR, and PXR have a negative predictive value of 98%.

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that patients with a negative PE, even if intoxicated, intubated, or with a decreased GCS, are highly unlikely to have new, clinically relevant findings on torso CT imaging.

CONCLUSION

Using PE, CXR, and PXR as a screening tool in patients sustaining GLF, which if negative close to obviates the need for torso CT, may reduce healthcare costs and radiation exposure without compromising patient care.

The effects of sex and neuter status on trauma survival in dogs: A Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of sex and neuter status on trauma survival in dogs.

DESIGN

Multi-institutional prospective case series, September 2013 to March 2019, retrospectively analyzed.

SETTING

Level I and II Veterinary Trauma Centers.

ANIMALS

Consecutive sample of 2649 dogs in the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Veterinary Committee on Trauma patient registry meeting inclusion criteria. For inclusion, dogs had to have complete data entries, be postpubertal (≥7 months age in females and ≥10 months age in males), and have sustained moderate to severe trauma (animal trauma triage [ATT] score ≥5/18). Dogs that were dead upon arrival, euthanized for financial or unknown reasons alone, or that were presented by a Good Samaritan but subsequently humanely euthanized were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data collected included age, sex, neuter status (intact, neutered), trauma type (blunt, penetrating, both), outcome (survived to hospital discharge, died, euthanized), and reason for euthanasia (grave prognosis, financial reasons, or both). Of 2649 eligible dogs, 56% survived to hospital discharge (n = 1469). Neutered females had a significantly higher survival rate (58.3% vs 51.3%; P = 0.03) compared to intact females, and neutered males had a significantly higher survival rate (56.6% vs 50.7%; P = 0.04) compared to intact males. There was no significant difference in survival between intact females and intact males (P = 0.87) or between neutered females and neutered males (P = 0.46). Mean cumulative ATT score was higher in intact groups and was found to be a significant predictor of survival (P < 0.01). Based on logistic models, overall odds of survival were 20.7% greater in neutered dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Gonadectomy is associated with lower ATT scores and improved survival after moderate to severe trauma in both female and male dogs.

Optimized diagnosis-based comorbidity measures for all-cause mortality prediction in a national population-based ICU population

BACKGROUND

We aimed to optimize prediction of long-term all-cause mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, using quantitative register-based comorbidity information assessed from hospital discharge diagnoses prior to intensive care treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult ICU admissions during 2006 to 2012 in the Swedish intensive care register were followed for at least 4 years. The performance of quantitative comorbidity measures based on the 5-year history of number of hospital admissions, length of stay, and time since latest admission in 36 comorbidity categories was compared in time-to-event analyses with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS3).

RESULTS

During a 7-year period, there were 230,056 ICU admissions and 62,225 deaths among 188,965 unique individuals. The time interval from the most recent hospital stays and total length of stay within each comorbidity category optimized mortality prediction and provided clear separation of risk categories also within strata of age and CCI, with hazard ratios (HRs) comparing lowest to highest quartile ranging from 1.17 (95% CI: 0.52-2.64) to 6.41 (95% CI: 5.19-7.92). Risk separation was also observed within SAPS deciles with HR ranging from 1.07 (95% CI: 0.83-1.38) to 3.58 (95% CI: 2.12-6.03).

CONCLUSION

Baseline comorbidity measures that included the time interval from the most recent hospital stay in 36 different comorbidity categories substantially improved long-term mortality prediction after ICU admission compared to the Charlson index and the SAPS score. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04109001, date of registration 2019-09-26 retrospectively.

Epidemiology and outcomes of older trauma patients in Singapore: A multicentre study

BACKGROUND

An ageing population has caused rising trauma cases amongst older patients. Multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy and limited reserves predispose them to poorer outcomes following a traumatic event. The Comorbidity Polypharmacy Score (CPS) has been found to predict outcomes and mortality in older trauma patients, but has not been studied in Asians.

AIM

We aim to describe the epidemiological characteristics of older trauma patients and explore the association of CPS on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from the trauma registries of 2 tertiary trauma centres. Patients aged 45 years and above attending the emergency departments (EDs) from January 2011 to December 2015 with traumatic injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] of 9 and above) were included. Demographics, clinical data including number of comorbidities and medications used were collected to calculate the CPS. Outcomes of mortality, ED disposition and hospital discharge venue were examined.

RESULTS

There were 4,522 patients (median age 70 years; males 53.8%), with majority sustaining Tier 2 injuries (ISS 9 to 15; 68.9%). Falls were the predominant mechanism for those aged above 60 years and above (76%). Median CPS was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 1 to 11). Amongst patients 75 years and older, 56% comprised the moderate to morbid CPS groups (CPS ≥ 8). Overall mortality was 8.4%; patients above 75 years had longer median length of stay (10 versus 7.1-8.9 days in other ages). Male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.02), increasing age (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03-1.05), injury to abdomen (aOR 3.24; 95% CI 1.93-5.45) and severe CPS category (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.23-2.89) were associated with increased odds of death. Increasing age and moderate CPS category increased odds of discharge to a rehabilitation (aOR for age 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04; aOR for moderate CPS 1.72, 95% CI 1.43-2.07) or long-term care facility (aOR for age 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; aOR for CPS 1.60, 95% CI 1.10-2.32).

CONCLUSION

CPS predicted mortality and discharge to a rehabilitation or care facility in this urban, ageing Asian population. Its use may aid future trauma research and needs assessments in such patients.

Major trauma associated with mobility scooters: An analysis of the trauma audit research network

AIMS

To establish the incidence and nature of injuries seen in patients following mobility scooter incidents.

METHODS

The Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was used to collect data concerning injuries associated with mobility scooters. The data was taken from incidents that occurred between February 2014 and November 2020. The data analysed included: patient demographics, injury mechanism and patterns and associated mortality rates.

RESULTS

1,504 patients were identified of which 61.4% were male. The median age was 76.2 years (IQR 63.5-84.9). The median injury severity score (ISS) was 9 (IQR 9-17), with major trauma (ISS ≥16) being observed in 29.4% of patients. Injuries to the limb were most common, although injuries to the head were most severe. Vehicle collisions accounted for 65.4% of injuries and were most closely associated with the most severe incidents. The median length of stay in hospital was 12 days, excluding the patients who died. Overall, mortality following injury was 10.6%, but the mortality rate was 15.4% in those aged 75 years and over, and 24.2% in those sustaining severe trauma.

CONCLUSION

As the population ages, injury characteristics of those with both major and non-major trauma changes. Mobility scooter use is prevalent amongst older people, and we provided a detailed analysis of injuries sustained with their use across a national database. The length of stay and the inherent resource use, because of admission following mobility scooter trauma, is considerable. These injuries particularly affect the 'most elderly' and carry a considerable mortality burden.

Falls downstairs: The impact on a UK major trauma centre

Introduction

Major trauma centres are increasingly managing a significant injury burden in older patients, with falling downstairs being a prevalent mechanism of injury. Literature evaluating the impact of falls on stairs upon UK trauma networks is limited. Gaining a greater understanding of this may allow for more effective planning of services and improvements in training and education. This study evaluates the impact of falls downstairs on a UK major trauma centre.

Methods

A single centre retrospective service evaluation of local major trauma data over a 3-year period from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2019. Included were patients who activated a trauma call whose mechanism of injury recorded at the time of admission was a fall downstairs. We excluded patients less than 16 years of age.

Results

There were 4480 major trauma patients who presented in the study period and of these, 860 (19.2%) sustained injuries following a fall downstairs. The most common age group presenting was 70–79 years; younger patients (<60 years) made up 43.3% with the majority (56.7%) being older. All but one patient were managed by a consultant-led trauma team, 6.4% of patients were admitted to critical care and 1% received an urgent operation. The overall mortality rate was 8.5%. Older patients made up 85% of those who died and had nearly four times longer average length of stay than younger patients (9.69 v 2.49 days).

Conclusion

Falls downstairs place a significant burden on the major trauma centre. There is a stark contrast in the use of hospital resources and outcomes between older and younger patients.

Impact of Modified Geriatric Trauma Activation Criteria on patient outcomes at a level 1 trauma center

Background

The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program recommends a lower threshold for trauma activation on geriatric patients. We implemented the Modified Geriatric Trauma Activation Criteria (MGTAC) and assessed the clinical impact on geriatric trauma patients.

Methods

Geriatric trauma patients aged 65 years and over presenting between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2020 were identified through the Trauma Registry. MGTAC were implemented on 3/1/2017, where patients aged 65 and above were rendered as Highest Level activations when presenting with no prior work-up. Those presenting from 1/1/2014 to 2/28/2017 were grouped as Standard Activation Criteria (SAC), and those presenting between 3/1/2017 and 12/31/2020 were grouped as MGTAC. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, level of activation, operative intervention, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay, survival, and undertriage rates were reviewed. Chi square, ANOVA, and unpaired t-test were used for analysis to compare SAC and MGTAC patient outcomes.

Results

2582 patients were identified: 1293 (50.1%) in SAC and 1289 (49.9%) in MGTAC. Highest Level trauma activations for SAC vs. MGTAC were 9.3% vs. 30.4%, p < .01. Between SAC and MGTAC, ICU admission was 24.1% vs. 16.5%, p<0.01; operative intervention was 10.3% vs. 12.9%, p = .04; undertriage rates were 6.1% vs. 3.8%, p = .01; and average length of stay was 7 days for SAC vs. 6.4 days for MGTAC, p = .54. Overall mortality was 9% for SAC and 9.5% for MGTAC, p = .66.

Conclusion

Implementation of MGTAC did not improve geriatric trauma patient mortality. However, it decreased ICU admission and undertriage, and increased operative intervention during the first 24 hours.

Prediction of Trauma Mortality Incorporating Pre-injury Comorbidities into Existing Mortality Scoring Indices

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study is to develop a comprehensive risk score of mortality in trauma victims that can predict the in-hospital mortality better than trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) score.

METHODS

All hospitalized trauma patients, between the ages of 16 and 89 years old were included in the study. The National Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the calendar year 2011-2016 was accessed for the development of a traum mortality scoring system (TMS). The prediction of mortality was tested by creating a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and an area under the curve (AUC). ROCs and AUCs of TMS were compared with TRISS and ASCOT score.

RESULTS

The AUC of TMS (0.892, 95% CI: 0.888-0.896) was better than TRISS (0.864, 95% CI: 0.859-0.869, P <0.0001) and ASCOT (0.841, 95% CI: 0.835-0.846, P <0.0001), respectively, in blunt injury. Similarly, TMS prediction (AUC: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.940-0.958) was better in penetrating injury when compared with TRISS (0.942, 95% CI: 0.934-0.951, P = 0.030) and ASCOT (0.924, 95% CI: 0.912-0.936, P <0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TMS can predict the in-hospital mortality better than TRISS and ASCOT.

Are home environment injuries more fatal in children and the elderly?

INTRODUCTION

'In-home injuries' are those that occur within the house or its immediate surroundings. The literature on the prevalence and magnitude of home injuries is sparse. This study was designed to characterize the mechanisms of 'in-home' injuries and compare their outcomes with 'outside home injuries'.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Australia-India Trauma Systems Collaboration (AITSC) Project created a multicentric registry consisting of trauma patients admitted at four urban tertiary care hospitals in India from April 2016 to March 2018. This registry data was analysed for this study. All admitted patients except for dead on arrival were included. Patients were categorised into 'in-home' and 'outside home' cohorts based on the place where the trauma occurred. The outcome measures were 30 day in-hospital mortality and the length of hospital stay. Two subgroup analyses were performed, the first comprised pediatric patients (<15 years) and the second elderly patients >64 years).

RESULTS

Among 9354 patients in the AITSC data registry, 8398 patients were included in the study. Out of these, 29 percent were in-home injuries, whereas the rest occurred outside home. The 30 day in-hospital mortality was 10.6 percent in the 'in-home' cohort, as compared to 13.7 percent in the 'outside home' cohort. This difference although significant on univariable analysis (p <0.01), there was no significant difference on multivariable regression analysis, after adjusting for age and injury severity score (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.73-1.04; p = 0.15). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the home injuries group (median = 5 days; IQR = 3-12 days) compared to the outside-home group (median = 7 days; IQR = 4-14 days) (p < 0.01). In the pediatric and the elderly, on multivariable regression analysis, in-home injuries were associated with higher mortality than outside home injuries.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the 30 day in-hospital mortality amongst admitted trauma patients sustaining injuries at home or outside the home. However, in pediatric and elderly patients the chances of mortality was significantly higher when injured at home.

Factors Associated with In-Patient Mortality in the Rapid Assessment of Adult Earthquake Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVE

To date, there is limited evidence for health care providers regarding the determinants of early assessment of poor outcomes of adult in-patients due to earthquakes. This study aimed to explore factors related to early assessment of adult earthquake trauma patients (AETPs).

METHODS

The data on 29,933 AETPs in the West China Earthquake Patients Database (WCEPD) were analyzed retrospectively. Then, 37 simple variables that could be obtained rapidly upon arrival at the hospital were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were performed. A nomogram was then constructed.

RESULTS

Nine independent mortality-related factors that contributed to AETP in-patient mortality were identified. The variables included age (OR:1.035; 95%CI, 1.027-1.044), respiratory rate ([RR]; OR:1.091; 95%CI, 1.050-1.133), pulse rate ([PR]; OR:1.028; 95%CI, 1.020-1.036), diastolic blood pressure ([DBP]; OR:0.96; 95%CI, 0.950-0.970), Glasgow Coma Scale ([GCS]; OR:0.666; 95%CI, 0.643-0.691), crush injury (OR:3.707; 95%CI, 2.166-6.115), coronary heart disease ([CHD]; OR:4.025; 95%CI, 1.869-7.859), malignant tumor (OR:4.915; 95%CI, 2.850-8.098), and chronic kidney disease ([CKD]; OR:5.735; 95%CI, 3.209-10.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The nine mortality-related factors for ATEPs, including age, RR, PR, DBP, GCS, crush injury, CHD, malignant tumor, and CKD, could be quickly obtained on hospital arrival and should be the focal point of future earthquake response strategies for AETPs. Based on these factors, a nomogram was constructed to screen for AETPs with a higher risk of in-patient mortality.

Factors related to early and rapid assessment of in-hospital mortality among older adult trauma patients in an earthquake

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence for emergency physicians and emergency trauma surgeons regarding the determinants of early and rapid assessment of older adult in-hospital mortality due to earthquakes. This study explored factors related to the early and rapid assessment of the mortality among older adult earthquake trauma patients (OAETPs) and created a screening model.

METHODS

Data on 7,308 OAETPs from the West China Earthquake Patients Database were analyzed retrospectively. The 35 variables that can be obtained rapidly on arrival at the hospital were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed. Then, the nomogram for assessing the mortality of OAETPs was constructed.

RESULTS

We identified 10 independent mortality-related factors that contributed to the in-hospital mortality of OAETPs. The 10 factors included age (odds ratio [OR]=1.061, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.031-1.090), dementia (OR=5.146, 95%CI: 1.169-17.856), coronary heart disease (CHD; OR=23.441, 95%CI: 4.799-83.927), malignant tumor (OR=8.497, 95%CI: 3.583-17.967), deep vein thrombosis (DVT; OR=7.110, 95%CI: 1.369-27.168), chronic kidney disease(CKD; OR=11.783, 95%CI: 5.419-24.407), pulse rate (PR; OR=1.036, 95%CI: 1.022-1.048), mean artery pressure (MAP; OR=0.960, 95%CI: 0.945-0.975), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS; OR=0.864, 95%CI: 0.760-0.972), and Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS, OR=0.485, 95%CI: 0.351-0.696).

CONCLUSION

The 10 mortality-related factors could be quickly obtained on hospital arrival and should be the focal point of future earthquake response strategies regarding hospitalized older adults with trauma. A nomogram was constructed based on the factors for screening OAETPs with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Association between type 2 diabetes and long-term outcomes in middle-aged and older trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with increased hospital complications and mortality following trauma. However, there is limited research on the longer-term recovery of trauma patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to explore the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in-hospital and 24-month outcomes in major trauma patients.

METHODS

In this cohort study using the Victorian State Trauma Registry, middle-aged and older adults (≥45 years) with major trauma were followed up at 24 months postinjury. Logistic regression (univariable and multivariable) analyses were used to determine the association between diabetes status and 24-month patient-reported outcomes. In-hospital outcomes were compared between groups using χ2 tests.

RESULTS

Of the 11,490 participants who survived to hospital discharge, 8,493 survived to 24 months postinjury and were followed up at that time point: 953 people (11%) with and 7540 (89%) without T2D. People with T2D had a higher in-hospital death rate (19%) compared with people without T2D (16%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, people with T2D had poorer outcomes 24 months postinjury than people without T2D, with respect to functional recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.69) and return to work/study (AOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71]). People with T2D experienced higher odds of problems with mobility (AOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.60-2.30), self-care (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.64, 2.29), usual activities (AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.26-1.79), pain and discomfort (AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.49-2.07), anxiety and depression (AOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.24, 1.70), and self-reported disability (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.28-1.79) than people without T2D.

CONCLUSION

Major trauma patients with T2D have a poorer prognosis than patients without T2D, both during their hospital admission and 24 months postinjury. Patients with T2D may need additional health care and support following trauma to reach their recovery potential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

The impact of BMI on morbidity and mortality after femoral fractures

Purpose

Femur fractures are the result of high energy injury and are associated with life-threatening complications. Therefore, we studied how body mass index (BMI) contributes to complications after femoral fractures.

Methods

Using the 2016 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) database, we stratified 41,362 patients into groups based on their BMI: Normal Weight (NW), Overweight (OW), Obese (OB), Severely Obese (SO), and Morbidly Obese (MO). We compared each BMI group to the NW cohort for differences in demographic factors, comorbidities, complications, and mechanism of injury.

Results

OB, SO, and MO patients sustained higher rates of traumatic injury from high energy mechanisms, such as motor vehicle trauma, in comparison to NW patients, who sustained more injuries from falls (p < 0.05). Correspondingly, obese patients were more likely than NW patients to sustain shaft and distal end fractures (p < 0.05). At hospital admission, obese patients presented with more comorbidities, such as bleeding disorders, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (p < 0.05). Despite these individual findings, patients with OB, SO, and MO BMI, as opposed to NW BMI, were independently associated with a higher probability of developing at least one post-trauma complication. More specifically, MO patients were associated with a 45% higher odds of developing a complication (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Irrespective of presenting with more comorbidities and sustaining high energy injuries, OB, SO, and MO patients were independently associated with having a higher risk of developing complications following a femoral fracture. Overall, better clinical outcomes are observed among patients with no underlying conditions and normal BMI.

Novel Trauma Composite Score is superior to Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality across all ages

BACKGROUND

Injury Severity Score (ISS) is a widely used metric for trauma research and center verification; however, it does not account for age-related physiologic parameters. We hypothesized that a novel age-based injury severity metric would better predict mortality.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years) sustaining blunt trauma (BT) or penetrating trauma (PT) were abstracted from the 2010 to 2016 National Trauma Data Bank. Admission vitals, Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS, mechanism, and outcomes were analyzed. Patients with incomplete/non-physiologic vital signs were excluded. For each age: (1) a cut point analysis was used to determine the ISS with the highest specificity and sensitivity for predicting mortality and (2) a linear discriminant analysis was performed using ISS, ISS greater than 16, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and Revised Trauma Scale to compare each scoring system's mortality prediction. A novel injury severity metric, the trauma component score (TCS), was developed for each age using significant (p < 0.05) variables selected from Abbreviated Injury Scale scores, Glasgow Coma Scale, vital signs, and gender. Receiver operator curves were developed and the areas under the curve were compared between the TCS and other systems.

RESULTS

There 777,794 patients studied (BT, 91.1%; PT, 8.9%). Blunt trauma patients were older (53.6 ± 21.3 years vs. 34.4 ± 13.8 years), had higher ISS scores (11.1 ± 8.5 vs. 8.5 ± 8.9), and lower mortality (2.9% vs. 3.4%) than PT patients (p < 0.05). When assessing the entire PT and BT cohort the optimal ISS cut point was 16. The optimal ISS was between 20 and 25 for BT younger than 70 years. For those older than 70 years, the optimal BT ISS steadily declined as age increased PT's cut point was 16 or less for all ages assessed. When the injury metrics were compared by area under the curve, our novel TCS more accurately predicted mortality across all ages in both BT and PT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Injury Severity Score is a poor mortality predictor in older patients and those sustaining penetrating trauma. The age-based TCS is a superior metric for mortality prediction across all ages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Clinical outcomes, Level IV.

Pattern of trauma in elderly patients seen at the trauma centre of national hospital Abuja, Nigeria

Introduction

The global population is aging, creating challenges for health systems. The mean age of patients with major trauma has increased over time, posing some challenges for trauma system designs. Elderly trauma patients are said to have higher mortality rates and longer hospital and intensive care unit stays. This study is aimed at assessing the pattern of injuries in elderly population in a dedicated trauma centre of a developing economy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients aged 60 years and above seen in the trauma centre of a West African tertiary hospital over a three year period from January 2017 to December 2019. Relevant parameters including Sociodemographic data, injury pattern and injury scores were derived from the trauma registry. Data analysis was done using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 24. Results were presented using tables and a figure.

Results

A total of 183 patients aged 60 years and above were enrolled out of 4549 general trauma patients, representing 4% of the trauma patient population seen. Male to female ratio was 2.3 with the mean age of 65 ± 6.3. The most frequent mechanisms of injury were motor vehicular crash (MVC) (48.4%), followed by falls (16.5%). More proportion of females (21.8%) were significantly found to suffer falls compared to their males (14.2%) counterparts (p < 0.05). Traumatic brain injury was the commonest diagnosis accounting for 24.3% of cases. The predominant revised trauma scores (RTS) and injury severity scores (ISS) were 12 and 1–15 respectively, with overall mortality of 6.1%.

Conclusion

The proportion of elderly trauma patients studied in this centre is low. MVC is still the leading mechanism of injury in our elderly trauma population. The mortality rate is however low in this study, in line with the low trauma and severity scores. Preventive measures for MVC should be strongly encouraged to reduce the incidence of elderly trauma patients in this part of the world.

Retrospective Analysis of Demographic, Psychiatric, and Physical Characteristics That Impact Length of Stay on an Inpatient Geriatric Psychiatric Unit

Currently, the aging adult population is rising fast and presenting multiple challenges for the US healthcare system. Older adults present unique challenges in their care of medical and psychiatric conditions. This study retrospectively examined characteristics that are associated with length of stay on an inpatient geriatric psychiatric unit in an urban located psychiatric hospital. A sample of 74 individuals was examined. Factors that influenced length of stay included commitment status and discharge to a different level of care. Reducing the length of stay for geriatric patients can help reduce costs and improve health outcomes.

Utilization of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of traumatic C-Spine injuries at a level 1 trauma center: A retrospective Cohort analysis

Background

Computerized tomography (CT) is a common imaging modality for trauma patients, but there is debate regarding the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical (C)-spine clearance. We aim to investigate the utilization of CT and MRI imaging in traumatic C-spine clearance and associated outcomes on patients who undergo both imaging modalities.

Methods

A 4-year retrospective review was performed to evaluate the trauma patient imaging algorithm at our institution. The algorithm required CT as a screening examination for traumatic injury patients who are unexaminable because of distracting injury, altered mental status, an abnormal neurological examination, and/or central neck pain. MRI was performed after CT in patients with C-spine injuries identified on CT, those who remained unexaminable, had an abnormal neurological examination, or experienced persistent central neck tenderness. Univariate analyses and adjusted multivariate logistic regression were performed with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results

805 patients were analyzed. Compared to MRI, CT had a sensitivity of 50.2%, specificity of 76.6%, positive predictive value of 69.7%, and negative predictive value of 59.0% in detecting C-spine injuries. CT and MRI differed significantly in their ability to detect C-spine soft tissue injuries and C1 vertebral fractures (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

MRI is more capable of detecting soft tissue injuries whereas CT is superior in detecting vertebral fractures. Our findings support the need to utilize CT and MRI in conjunction to detect both bony and soft tissue C-spine injuries in traumatically injured patients, who are either unexaminable, have an abnormal neurologic examination, or ongoing central neck tenderness.

Established primary care provider improves odds of survival to discharge for injured patients

INTRODUCTION

The average age and number of comorbidities is increasing among trauma patients. Primary care providers (PCPs) provide pre-injury diagnosis and management of comorbidities that may affect outcomes for injured patients. The role of primary care in trauma systems is currently unknown.

METHODS

Observational retrospective review of an institutional trauma databank from 2013 - 2019. PCP was extracted from the electronic medical record and combined with trauma data. Case-control matching was performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without primary care based on age, injury severity score, sex, and injury mechanism. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and multivariate regression described differences between subgroups. Primary outcome was difference in mortality rate for injured patients with and without PCPs.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 19,096 patients were included. 6,626 (34.7%) had a PCP recorded. Of these, 2,158 were matched in a case-control design. Patients with PCPs had a lower mortality rate (1.6%) compared to patients without PCPs (3.6%, P < 0.01). PCP retention was associated with longer length of stay overall, equivalent rates of complications (5.4% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.63), and similar numbers of ICU and ventilator days. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for case-control factors, insurance, and comorbidities conferred an odds ratio of 2.58 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.59 - 4.19, P < 0.001) for survival to discharge.

CONCLUSION

Pre-injury primary care significantly improves the odds of survival to discharge for injured patients. Prospective study of this relationship may identify strategies to promote primary care within health systems.

Six-year national study of damage control laparotomy and the effect of repeat re-exploration on rate of infectious complications

Background

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is a life-saving procedure in patients with abdominal hemorrhage. After DCL, patients are sometimes left with an open abdomen (OA) so they may undergo multiple exploratory laparotomies (EXLAP), or re-explorations. Patients with OA are at increased risk of infectious complications (ICs). The association between number of re-explorations after DCL and the number of ICs is not clear. We hypothesized that each additional re-exploration increases the risk of developing IC.

Methods

This 6-year retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥16 years from the NTDB who had DCL defined as EXLAP within 2 hours of arrival (ICD-9: 54.11, 54.12, 54.19) with at least one re-exploration. The primary outcome was IC (ie, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), organ space SSI, deep SSI, sepsis, pneumonia, or catheter-related bloodstream infection), examined dichotomously (present/absent) and ordinally as the number of ICs. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to assess the association between number of re-explorations and number of ICs. Significance was assigned at p<0.01.

Results

There were 7431 patients who underwent DCL; 2509 (34%) patients developed at least one IC. The rate of IC was lowest in patients who were closed during the first re-exploration (27%) and significantly increased with each re-exploration to 59% in patients who had five or more re-explorations (Cochran-Armitage trend p<0.001). After adjustment, there was 14% increased risk of an additional IC with each re-exploration (p<0.001).

Discussion

For patients requiring DCL, each re-exploration of the abdomen is associated with increased rate of ICs.

Level of evidence

III, retrospective epidemiological study.

Predictors of elderly mortality after trauma: A novel outcome score

INTRODUCTION

Elderly trauma patients are at high risk for mortality, even when presenting with minor injuries. Previous prognostic models are poorly used because of their reliance on elements unavailable during the index hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive algorithm to accurately estimate in-hospital mortality using easily available metrics.

METHODS

The National Trauma Databank was used to identify patients 65 years and older. Data were split into derivation (2007-2013) and validation (2014-2015) data sets. There was no overlap between data sets. Factors included age, comorbidities, physiologic parameters, and injury types. A two-tiered scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality was developed: a quick elderly mortality after trauma (qEMAT) score for use at initial patient presentation and a full EMAT (fEMAT) score for use after radiologic evaluation. The final model (stepwise forward selection, p < 0.05) was chosen based on calibration and discrimination analysis. Calibration (Brier score) and discrimination (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve [AuROC]) were evaluated. Because National Trauma Databank did not include blood product transfusion, an element of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS), a regional trauma registry was used to compare qEMAT versus GTOS. A mobile-based application is currently available for cost-free utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 840,294 patients were included in the derivation data set and 427,358 patients in the validation data set. The fEMAT score (median, 91; S.D., 82-102) included 26 factors, and the qEMAT score included eight factors. The AuROC was 0.86 for fEMAT (Brier, 0.04) and 0.84 for qEMAT. The fEMAT outperformed other trauma mortality prediction models (e.g., Trauma and Injury Severity Score-Penetrating and Trauma and Injury Severity Score-Blunt, age + Injury Severity Score). The qEMAT outperformed the GTOS (AuROC, 0.87 vs. 0.83).

CONCLUSION

The qEMAT and fEMAT accurately estimate the probability of in-hospital mortality and can be easily calculated on admission. This information could aid in deciding transfer to tertiary referral center, patient/family counseling, and palliative care utilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological Study, level IV.

Training to identify red flags in the acute care of trauma: who are the patients at risk for early death despite a relatively good prognosis? An analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®

Background

In the acute care of trauma, some patients with a low estimated risk of death die suddenly and unexpectedly. In this study, we aim to identify predictors for early death within 24 h following hospital admission in low-risk patients.

Methods

The TraumaRegister DGU® was used to collect records of patients who were primarily treated in a participating hospital between 2004 and 2013 with a RISC II score below 10%.

Results

During the study period, 64,379 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean RISC II score was 2.0%, and the mean ISS was 16 ± 9. The overall hospital mortality rate was 2.1%, and 0.5% of patients (n = 301) died within the first 24 h. A SPB of ≤ 90 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.001). An AIS abdomen score of ≥ 3 was associated with increased risk of death within the first 24 h (p < 0.001). A high risk of early death was also seen in patients with an AIS score (thorax) ≥ 3; 51% of those who died died within the first 24 h (p < 0.005). Death in patients over 60 years was more common after 24 h (p < 0.001). Patients with an ASA score of ≥ 3 were more likely to die after the first 24 h (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Indicators predicting a high risk of early death in patients with a low RISC II score include a SPB ≤ 90 mmHg and severe chest and abdominal trauma. Emergency teams involved in the acute care of trauma patients should be aware of these “red flags” and treat their patients accordingly.

Reduced Recovery Capacity After Major Trauma in the Elderly: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Cohort Study

AIMS

Considering the worldwide trend of an increased lifetime, geriatric trauma is moving into focus. Trauma is a leading cause of hospitalization, leading to disability and mortality. The purpose of this study was to compare the global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of geriatric patients with adult patients after major trauma.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective registry-based observational study compares HRQoL of patients aged ≥65 years who sustained major trauma (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16) with patients <65 years of age within the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The global HRQoL was measured at 6, 12, and 24 months post trauma using the EQ-5D-3L score.

RESULTS

We identified 405 patients meeting the inclusion criteria with a mean ISS of 25.6. Even though the geriatric patients group (≥65 years, n = 77) had a lower ISS (m = 24, SD = 8) than patients aged <65 years (n = 328), they reported more difficulties in each EQ dimension compared to patients <65 years. Contrary to patients < 65, the EQ-5D Index of the geriatric patients did not improve at 12 and 24 months after trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a limited HRQoL in both groups after major trauma. The group of patients ≥65 showed no improvement in HRQoL from 6 to 24 months after trauma.

Comparing the Clinical Features and Trauma Scores of Trauma Patients Aged Under 65 Years with Those of Patients Aged over 65 Years in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study for Last Ten Years

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and trauma scores of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) trauma patients 65 years and older with the patients under 65 years old.

Materials and Methods

Trauma patients (n=161) who stayed at least 24 hours in ICU were included. Patients younger than 65 years were included into Group 1 (n=109) and patients aged ≥65 years (n=52) were included into Group 2. Patient characteristics and trauma index scores (GCS; APACHE II score, ISS; TRISS and RTS) at ICU admission were calculated.

Results

The patients in Group 2 had more comorbid disease compared with Group 1 (61.5%, 6.4%) (p=0.001). The Trauma-related Injury Severity Score score were higher in Group 1 (49.76±33.75) compared with Group 2 (35.38±34.93) (p=0.006). The APACHE II score were higher in Group 2 (20.08±7.60) compared with Group 1 (17.00±6.90) (p=0.007). The need for invasive mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy were more frequent in Group 2 trauma patients compared with those of patients in Group 1 (92.3%, 73.4%; p=0.003; 26.9%, 8.3%; p=0.002; respectively). The need for transfusion of packed red blood cell suspension (PRBC) was more frequent in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (92.3%, 55.0%; respectively) (p=0.001). The mortality rate was found to be higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (48.1%, 19.3%; respectively) (p=0.001).

Conclusion

The elderly trauma patients have more comorbid disease, higher scores for APACHE II and lower scores for TRISS, more mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy requirements and higher mortality rate compared with young trauma patients.

Risk factors for death of trauma patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the risk factors for death of trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study with data from medical records of adults hospitalized for trauma in a general intensive care unit. We included patients 18 years of age and older and admitted for injuries. The variables were grouped into levels in a hierarchical manner. The distal level included sociodemographic variables, hospitalization, cause of trauma and comorbidities; the intermediate, the characteristics of trauma and prehospital care; the proximal, the variables of prognostic indices, intensive admission, procedures and complications. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The risk factors associated with death at the distal level were age 60 years or older and comorbidities; at intermediate level, severity of trauma and proximal level, severe circulatory complications, vasoactive drug use, mechanical ventilation, renal dysfunction, failure to perform blood culture on admission and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.

CONCLUSION

The identified factors are useful to compose a clinical profile and to plan intensive care to avoid complications and deaths of traumatized patients.

The road to recovery for vulnerable road users hospitalised for orthopaedic injury following an on-road crash

BACKGROUND

Pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists are vulnerable to serious injury due to limited external protective devices. Understanding the level of recovery, and differences between these road user groups, is an important step towards improved understanding of the burden of road trauma, and prioritisation of prevention efforts. This study aimed to characterise and describe patient-reported outcomes of vulnerable road users at 6 and 12 months following orthopaedic trauma.

METHODS

A registry-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) and included pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists who were hospitalised for an orthopaedic injury following an on-road collision that occurred between January 2009 and December 2016. Outcomes were measured using the 3-level EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOS-E) and return to work questions. Outcomes were collected at 6 and 12 months post-injury. Multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE), adjusted for confounders, were used to compare outcomes between the road user groups over time.

RESULTS

6186 orthopaedic trauma patients met the inclusion criteria during the 8-year period. Most patients were motorcyclists (42.8%) followed by cyclists (32.6%) and pedestrians (24.6%). Problems were most prevalent on the usual activities item of the EQ-5D-3 L at 6-months post-injury, and the pain/discomfort item of the EQ-5D-3 L at 12 months. The adjusted odds of reporting problems on all EQ-5D-3 L items were lower for cyclists when compared to pedestrians. Moreover, an average cyclist had a greater odds of a good recovery on the GOS-E, (AOR 2.75, 95% CI 2.33, 3.25) and a greater odds of returning to work (AOR = 3.13, 95% CI 2.46, 3.99) compared to an average pedestrian.

CONCLUSION

Pedestrians and motorcyclists involved in on-road collisions experienced poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 and 12 months post-injury when compared to cyclists. A focus on both primary injury prevention strategies, and investment in ongoing support and treatment to maximise recovery, is necessary to reduce the burden of road trauma for vulnerable road users.

Evaluating the outcomes of blunt thoracic trauma in elderly patients following a fall from a ground level: higher level care institution vs. lower level care institution

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of higher level care institutions of elderly patients who sustained a thoracic injury after a ground-level fall (GLF).

HYPOTHESIS

Higher level care institutions have a better survival.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data set of 2012-2014 was accessed for the study. All patients, 65 years of age and older, who experienced a GLF and sustained a thoracic injury, were included in the study. Patient demography, injury characteristics including injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) motor score, comorbidities, and patient outcomes were compared between the higher level care institution [American College of Surgeon (ACS) level I and level II trauma centers) and lower level care institution (ACS level III and level IV and unranked-trauma centers). On univariate analysis, some significant patient characteristic differences were found; therefore, propensity score matching and paired analyses were performed. All P values are two sided, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Out of the 15,256 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria, approximately 52% (7994) of patients were treated at a higher level care institution. On univariate analysis, significant differences were found between the lower level care institution and higher level care institution regarding male gender (44.2% vs.46%, P = 0.03), ISS median [interquartile] (9 [5-12] vs. 9 [5-13], P < 0.001), history of alcohol abuse (4.2% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.007), dementia (8.7% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.02), bleeding disorder or history of anticoagulation use (17% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.03), obesity (5% vs. 6.6%, P < 0.001), and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) thorax (2 [1-3] vs. 3 [2-3], P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the majority of the characteristics were balanced with few exceptions, including ISS, AIS ≥ 3 head and abdomen, and P values < 0.05. The overall in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the higher level care institution vs. the lower level care institution (4.4% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.14). The median hospital length of stay and 95% confidence interval between both groups was (5 [5, 5] and 5 [5, 5], P = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Treating elderly patients with blunt chest trauma in higher level care institutions failed to show any benefit in overall survival or hospital length of stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

STUDY TYPE

Observational cohort.

Effects of Chronic Comorbidities on the Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Patients after Falls in Vietnamese Hospitals

Although comorbidities are prevalent in older people experiencing falls, there is a lack of studies examining their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in this population. This study examines the prevalence of comorbidities and associations between comorbidities and HRQOL in older patients after falls in Vietnamese hospitals. A cross-sectional design was employed among 405 older patients admitted to seven hospitals due to fall injuries in Thai Binh province, Vietnam. The EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) was used to measure HRQOL. Socio-demographic characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire, while comorbidities and other clinical characteristics were examined by physicians and extracted from medical records. Multivariate Tobit regression was used to determine the associations between comorbidities and HRQOL. Among 405 patients, 75.6% had comorbidities, of which hypertension and osteoarthritis were the most common. Lumbar spine/cervical spine diseases (Coefficient (Coef.) = −0.10; 95%CI = −0.18; 0.03) and stroke (Coef. = −0.36; 95%CI = −0.61; −0.10) were found to be associated with a significantly decreased EQ-5D index. Participants with three comorbidities had EQ-5D indexes 0.20 points lower (Coef. = −0.20; 95%CI = −0.31; −0.09) in comparison with those without comorbidities. This study underlined a significantly high proportion of comorbidities in older patients hospitalized due to fall injuries in Vietnam. In addition, the existence of comorbidities was associated with deteriorating HRQOL. Frequent monitoring and screening comorbidities are critical to determining which individuals are most in need of HRQOL enhancement.

Trauma in elderly patients: a study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences

AIM

Trauma, in geriatric patients, increases with age, and is a leading cause of disability and institutionalization, resulting in morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to analyse the prevalence of trauma, the related risk factors, mortality and sex differences in the prevalence in a geriatric population.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We observed 4,554 patients (≥65 years) with home injuries or car accidents. Patients were evaluated with ISS (Injury Severity Score) and major trauma with ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support). The instrumental investigation was in the first instance, targeted X-Ray or whole-body CT.

RESULTS

In over four years of study we treated 4,554 geriatric: 2,809 females and 1,745 Males. When the type of trauma was analysed the most common was head injury, followed by fractures of lower and upper limbs. In our experience hospitalization mainly involved patients over 80. In all patients mortality during assessment was 0.06%.

DISCUSSION

The geriatric patient is often defined as a "frail elderly", for the presence of a greater "injury sensitivity". This is due to the simultaneous presence of comorbidity, progressive loss of full autonomy and exposure to a high risk of traumatic events. Optimal management of the trauma patient can considerable reduce mortality and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Falls and injuries in geriatric age are more frequent in women than in men. Among typical elder comorbidities, osteoporosis certainly causes a female preponderance in the prevalence of fractures. Our discharge data demonstrate that disability, which requires transfer to health care institutions, has a greater effect on women than men.

Comparison of epidemiology and injury profile between vulnerable road users and motor vehicle occupants in road traffic fatalities

Objective: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a major global health issue causing a global burden of mortality and morbidity. Half of all fatalities on the world's roads are vulnerable road users (VRUs). The targeted intervention strategies based on fatality analysis focusing on VRUs can effectively contribute to reducing RTIs. This study aimed to compare VRUs and motor vehicle occupants (MVOs) in terms of epidemiology and injury profile. Methods: We utilized a nationwide, prospective database of RTI-related mortality cases for patients who visited 23 emergency departments between January 2011 and December 2015. All fatalities due to RTIs in the prehospital phase or in-hospital were eligible, excluding patients with unknown mode of transport and those admitted to general wards. The primary and secondary outcomes were fracture injuries and visceral injuries diagnosed using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). We compared fracture injuries between VRUs and MVOs using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2- and 2+ classification. Results: Among a total 3,694 road traffic fatalities (RTFs), 43.3% were pedestrians, followed by MVOs (27.0%), motorcyclists (18.9), bicyclists (6.6%), and agricultural vehicle users (4.2%). The elderly (>60 years old) accounted for 54.9% of VRU fatalities. RTFs occurred most frequently in the autumn and the VRU group and the MVO group showed significant differences in weekly and diurnal variation in RTFs. The injury severities (AIS 2+) of the head, neck, and thorax were significantly different between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). Head (32.1%) and intracranial (58.6%) injuries were the most common fracture and visceral injury sites for RTFs, followed by the thorax and intrathoracic organs (25.3 and 28.8%, respectively). Conclusions: Elderly pedestrians should be targeted for decreases in RTFs, and road traffic safety interventions for VRUs should be made based on the analysis of temporal epidemiology and injury profiles of RTFs.

Nurse Practitioners' Role in Improving Service for Elderly Trauma Patients

Preexisting conditions and decreased physiological reserve in the elderly frequently complicate the provision of health care in this population. A Level 1 trauma center expanded its nurse practitioner (NP) model to facilitate admission of low-acuity patients, including the elderly, to trauma services. This model enabled NPs to initiate admissions and coordinate day-to-day care for low-acuity patients under the supervision of a trauma attending. The complexity of elderly trauma care and the need to evaluate the efficacy of management provided by NPs led to the development of the current study. Accordingly, this study endeavored to compare outcomes in elderly patients whose care was coordinated by trauma NP (TNP) versus nontrauma NP (NTNP) services. Patients under the care of TNPs had a 1.22-day shorter duration of hospitalization compared with that of the NTNP cohort (4.38 ± 3.54 vs. 5.60 ± 3.98, p = .048). Decreased length of stay in the TNP cohort resulted in an average decrease in hospital charges of $13,000 per admission ($38,053 ± $29,640.76 vs. $51,317.79 ± $34,756.83, p = .016). A significantly higher percentage of patients admitted to the TNP service were discharged home (67.1% vs. 36.0%, p = .002), and a significantly lower percentage of patients were discharged to skilled nursing facilities (25.7% vs. 51.9%, p = .040). These clinical and economic outcomes have proven beneficial in substantiating the care provided by TNPs at the study institution. Future research will focus on examining the association of positive outcomes with specific care elements routinely performed by the TNPs in the current practice model.

Comorbidities in Trauma Injury Severity Scoring System: Refining Current Trauma Scoring System

The revised trauma score combined with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) remains the mostly commonly used system for predicting trauma mortality, but these scoring systems do not account for the patient's comorbidities. This study aims to evaluate the effect of comorbidities on ISS-related mortality and length of stay. A review of our trauma center's data registry from 2014 to 2016 was carried out. Patients were divided according to ISS into two groups: ISS ≤ 15 and ISS > 15. Each ISS group was then subdivided by number of comorbidities into two groups: 1 to 2 or ≥3 comorbidities. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared. ANOVA, chi-squared, and t tests were used with significance defined as P < 0.05. A total 9845 adult trauma patients were admitted to our trauma center during the three-year study period. In the ISS ≤ 15 group, patients with <3 comorbidities had significantly higher mortality rate compared with patients with 1 to 2 comorbidities (1.50% vs 0.12%, P << 0.000007). Comparing the ISS ≤ 15 group with ≥3 comorbidities with the ISS > 15 group with 1 to 2 comorbidities, the mortality rate was significantly higher (23.40% vs 4.50%, P << 0.000002). The ICU length of stay was significantly higher in the ISS ≤ 15 groups (17 vs 10 days, P < 0.05) but similar in the ISS > 15 groups (31 vs 29 days) (P > 0.05). It was concluded that when controlling for injury severity, increased comorbidities are associated with a significantly higher mortality, indicating that they may serve as a marker of lower physiologic reserve and be an independent variable. Adding comorbidity parameters to the current trauma scoring systems can assist in predicting more accurate/reliable outcomes.