Factors affecting primary health-care physicians' emergency-related practice; Eastern Province, KSA

Barriers faced by primary healthcare providers in addressing emergencies in the Northern region of Palestine before and during the Gaza war

INTRODUCTION

Physicians working in primary health care (PHC) centers are the first contact for patients and expected to deal with emergencies. Emergency care training in PHC settings has been neglected globally, especially in low to middle income countries. Adequate preparation becomes especially important during periods of conflict. The study objectives are to identify the barriers facing PHC physicians when dealing with emergency cases in the northern region of Palestine during the current conflict.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 179 physicians working in the 10 PHC centers distributed among 5 northern governances in Palestine. The study period was from July through December 2023. Data were collected electronically using a self-administered questionnaire, which was adapted from a comprehensive literature review. The questionnaire's internal validity was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of [0.85], indicating high reliability.

RESULTS

The ages of the physicians ranged from 25 to 60 years, with a mean ± SD of 35.3 ± 8.15 years. A significant majority (91.6%) were not boarded in any specialty. Most physicians (85.5%) had attended Basic Life Support (BLS) courses, whereas 45.2% and 72% had never attended Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) or Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses, respectively. Physicians with emergency department experience (P = 0.002) and those who had attended ACLS courses (P < 0.001) reported significantly higher perceived competence in managing emergency cases.

CONCLUSION

Emergency services at PHC centers in northern Palestine are operational but require significant enhancements. There is a critical need for increased availability of essential equipment, supplies, and medications. Additionally, implementing comprehensive training programs in emergency management, particularly ACLS, is essential to improve the competence and performance of PHC physicians in emergency situations.

Barriers Impact the Primary Healthcare Providers When Dealing With Emergency Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Introduction Being the first in-line care providers, primary healthcare (PHC) physicians may encounter all forms of medical emergencies, ranging from minor complaints to major life-threatening events; therefore, this study aims to assess the PHC physicians' knowledge and attitude related to the diagnosis and management of emergency cases as well as their preferences for emergency medicine training courses and their preferred methods of training. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working at PHC in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, between November and December 2023, excluding those who do not work at PHC. The minimum required sample size was 192. A self-administered online questionnaire was developed using Google Forms and distributed conveniently through social media platforms. It consists of 22 items categorized into four sections: The first section focused on demographic information; the second section assessed knowledge related to the diagnosis and management of emergency cases commonly encountered in PHC, along with actual management experiences; the third section gauged physicians' attitudes, and the fourth section explored participants' preferences for emergency medicine courses and their preferred methods of training in this field. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were employed to identify predictors of knowledge and attitude. Results The study involved 193 participants, with 96 (50%) females and a median age of 30 years. The participants included 43 (22%) consultants, 69 (36%) family residents, 30 (16%) general practitioners, and 50 (26%) specialists. Participants reported a median of 4.0 years of experience in PHC in Saudi Arabia. The majority, 69 (36%), reported working in the hospital emergency department, with a reported median duration of three months. Roughly 84% of PHC physicians had a positive attitude toward emergency cases diagnosis and management, while 92% showed fair diagnostic knowledge of emergency cases, and 73% showed fair management knowledge. Higher knowledge in the diagnosis and management of PHC was linked to increasing age, being consultants, being employed in the emergency department, and having higher years of experience in PHC (p < 0.05). A positive attitude toward PHC was found to be associated with working as a consultant and being employed in the emergency department (p < 0.05). Approximately 133 (68.9%) expressed a preference for a course in wound care trauma, followed by central nervous system emergencies (n = 124, 64.2%), coronary artery disease emergencies (n = 116, 60.1%), and obstetrics/gynecologic emergencies (n = 114, 59.1%) with 160 (82.9%) favored training through practice in PHC under supervision of qualified staff. Conclusion While many PHC centers are well equipped and prepared for early stabilization and management of emergency cases, PHC physicians showed low competency in dealing with emergency cases. This indicates a great need for enhancing physician's knowledge and skills regarding emergency situations. Nevertheless, courses like basic life support (BLS) and advanced trauma life support (ATLS) should be the bare minimum requirements for PHC physicians. Mote advance training and lectures should be organized to enhance PHC physician competencies to deal with different emergencies.

The Emergency Preparedness of Level-Four Primary Health Care Centers in the Gaza Strip, the Occupied Palestinian Territory: An Assessment of Primary Care Providers' Competencies and Facilities Preparedness

INTRODUCTION

The Gaza Strip lives in a protracted emergency crisis and experienced several Israeli escalations. These escalations have overwhelmed the hospitals and highlighted the need to optimize Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) to form part of the emergency response system. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the emergency preparedness of the Ministry of Health (MoH)-run level-four PHCCs in the Gaza Strip (where Emergency Medical Services are provided along with preventive and curative services).

METHODS

The study was cross-sectional, used quantitative methods, and utilized two tools. The first tool was a self-administered structured questionnaire exploring Primary Care Providers' ([PCPs]; doctors and nurses) experiences, perceived capabilities, and training needs. The second tool was an observational checklist used to assess the preparedness of the emergency rooms (ERs) at level-four PHCCs in the Gaza Strip.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-eight PCPs (34.5% doctors and 65.5% nurses) working in 16 level-four PHCCs were included. Overall, 64.4% of the participants had experience working in PHCCs during Israeli escalations, though 35.3% of them were unaware of the contingency plan (CP) of PHCCs. More nurses were aware of CPs than doctors (66.9% versus 42.7%; P <.001). Moreover, 65.7%, 46.7%, and 42.5% of the participants were trained in Basic Life Support (BLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and Primary Trauma Care (PTC), respectively. However, many had received the training for more than two years, and none of the PHCCs had all its staff trained. Only 36.8% of the participants were trained in Post-Trauma/Post-Operative Care (wound care and dressing), and the percentage of trained nurses was significantly higher than those of doctors (36.8% versus 13.9%; P <.001). The majority of the participants admitted they need ACLS training (89.2%), PTC training (89%), BLS training (81.1%), and Post-Trauma/Post-Operative Care training (76.8%). Only 29.63% of emergency drugs and 37.5% of the equipment and disposables were available in the ERs of all PHCCs, and none of the PHCCs had all the essential emergency drugs, equipment, and disposables available.

CONCLUSION

Level-four PHCCs in the Gaza Strip are not adequately prepared to respond to emergencies. Generally, PCPs lack appropriate competencies for emergency response, and many PHCCs lack the infrastructure to support Primary Emergency Care (PEC). Thus, PCPs need continuous education and training in disaster preparedness and response and PEC.

Emergency medical services in rural and urban Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study of Red Crescent emergency personnel' perceptions of workforce and patient factors impacting effective delivery

Individuals who experience a traumatic injury or an acute illness are often reliant on initial healthcare assessment and support from a pre-hospital emergency medical service (EMS). These community-based support models perform a vital role in the provision of life-saving support, but research indicates that the availability, accessibility and resources of EMS are not equivalent in rural and urban areas, and there has been little recognition of the issues facing rural EMS provision outside of the USA, Europe and Australia. The purpose of the current study was to examine the lived experiences of Saudi Arabian EMS personnel, defined as emergency medical technicians, paramedics and local station managers. A semi-structured interview approach was used to collect data from 20 interviewees (10 each with rural and urban personnel) in the Riyadh region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This methodology was used to identify the key issues that these staff face in their day-to-day work practice and ascertain factors that may lead to service delivery issues in rural and urban areas. Data analyses identified three thematic categories impacting EMS delivery; two of these, Personnel Factors and Patient Factors, are the focus of this paper. The participants noted a number of key issues, including a lack of appropriate local training and limited resources in rural areas, as well as general areas of concern regarding the wider EMS staff demographic makeup and poor public awareness about the exact role of the EMS. Three key recommendations arising from this study include specialised training and ongoing accessible education for rural EMS staff to allow for better support for patients; consideration of supplementing the current EMS with additional external specialist staff; and the development and implementation of national public education programmes focusing on the role of the EMS within the community.

Preparedness of non-hospital health centers to manage patients with life-threatening emergency conditions: findings from a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Management of Life-threatening Emergency (LTE) patients in urban and rural areas is an important challenge, which can affect pre-hospital mortality rate. Therefore, Non-hospital Health Center (NHHC) must be prepared to manage such emergency cases that may occur in the geographic area where these centers act. The aim of this study was to explore domains related to the preparedness of NHHCs to manage LTE patients through resorting to healthcare providers' and experts' perspectives.

METHODS

A qualitative exploratory study was applied using Semi-Structured Interviews (SSIs) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Prior to beginning data collection, the study and its objectives were explained to the participants and their informed consents were obtained. Then, SSIs and FGDs were conducted by two trained researchers using an interview guide, which was developed through literature review and consulting experts. In total, 12 SSIs were done with the providers at different NHHCs in Tabriz. In addition, 2 FGDs were conducted with the specialists in Emergency Medicine (EM) and Primary Health Care (PHC), and the executives of health centers, with over 5 years of work experience, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) experts. Purposive sampling method was used in this study. All SSIs and FGDs were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed. Framework Analysis was employed to manually analyze the interview transcripts from all the SSIs and FGDs.

RESULTS

The interview transcripts analysis resulted in the emergence of 3 themes and 11 sub-themes, categorized according to Donabedian's triple model. 5 sub-themes were related to input, including medical equipment and supplies, environmental infrastructures of the centers, emergency medicines, human resource, and protocols, guidelines and policies. 4 sub-themes were related to process, including providing clinical services, medicine storage capacity, maintenance of equipment, and management process. Finally, 2 sub-themes were related to outcome, which were patients' satisfaction with the quality of care and improved survival of LTE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study can provide a new perspective for health managers and policy makers on how to evaluate the preparedness of NHHCs in managing LTE patients. In addition, it will be used to develop instruments to measure the preparedness of these centers.