Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty

Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Printed porous titanium metaphyseal cones have become a mainstay for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). A short or long stem is routinely used when implanting a cone to augment fixation and offload stresses. This retrospective analysis compared the short-term survivorships and functional outcomes for use of a short or long stem with a metaphyseal cone.A total of 179 cases using metaphyseal cones and stems with median follow-up of 1.95 years (interquartile range, 1.00-2.14) were compared based on stem type. There were 55 cases with long stem(s) and 124 cases with short stem(s). Cases with both long and short stems were excluded. Demographics, Kaplan-Meier survivorships, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee score, function, and satisfaction scores; EuroQol five-dimension scale; and Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores) were compared using t-tests with a significance level of α = 0.05. There were no significant differences in body mass index (mean ± standard deviation) or sex (men [%]) between the short and long stem cohorts (32.3 ± 5.3, 36.3% and 31.5 ± 5.5, 38.2%, respectively; p > 0.05). Patients who had short stems were younger (65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4, p = 0.0323).Revision-free survivorship for the femoral or tibial component was 100% for long stems and 98.2% for short stems at 1 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank p = 0.6330). The two revisions in the short group were for infection, thus the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100% at 2 years for both cohorts. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative PROMs.This study demonstrated that highly porous printed metaphyseal cones provided rTKA with excellent early survivorship and similar PROMs whether a short or long stem was used. Additional studies will be needed to discern longer term differences.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster than Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains underexplored regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), particularly in terms of time to reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). This study addresses this gap by comparing the time to achieve MCID between primary TKA (pTKA) and rTKA patients, providing valuable insights into their recovery trajectories.

METHODS

A total of 8,266 TKAs (7,618 pTKA and 648 rTKA) were retrospectively studied in a multi-institutional arthroplasty registry. Patients who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical, PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF-10a), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Survival curves with and without interval-censoring were utilized to evaluate the time to achieve MCID.

RESULTS

Comparing the time to achieve MCID, rTKAs were significantly faster than pTKA for PROMIS Global Physical (3.5 versus 3.7 months, P = 0.004) and KOOS-PS (3.3 versus 4.2 months, P < 0.001), but similar for PROMIS PF-10a (4.4 versus 4.8 months, P = 0.057). Interval-censoring also showed similar trends with earlier times to achieve MCID for rTKAs for PROMIS Global Physical (0.6 to 0.61 versus 0.97 to 0.97 months, P = 0.009) and KOOS-PS (0.97 to 0.97 versus 1.47 to 1.47 months, P < 0.001), but not for PROMIS PF-10a (2.43 to 2.54 versus 1.90 to 1.91 months, P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that the time to achieve MCID was faster in patients undergoing rTKA compared to those undergoing pTKA. These findings allow surgeons to reassure preoperative revision TKA patients that their recovery to a minimal clinically important difference postoperatively may be quicker than expected, especially when compared to their initial recovery after primary TKA.

What Is the Correlation between Coronal Plane Alignment Measured on Pre- and Postoperative Weight-bearing Radiographs and Intraoperative Navigation When Stress Is Applied to the Knee?

This study examines the correlation between the weight-bearing (WB) long leg radiograph (LLR)-derived hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) and intraoperative supine computer-assisted surgery (CAS)-derived HKAA measurements at the beginning and end of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary aim of the study was to determine if WB alignment could be mimicked or inferred based on intraoperative alignment findings. We conducted a prospective analysis from a cohort of 129 TKAs undergoing a CAS TKA at a single center by a single surgeon. The HKAA was recorded using the CAS navigation system immediately postregistration of navigation data and after implantation of the prosthesis. The intraoperative HKAA was recorded in both the supine "resting" position of the knee and also while the knee was manipulated in an effort to replicate the patient's WB alignment. These measurements were compared with the HKAA recorded on pre- and postoperative WB LLRs. There was a strong correlation between the preoperative WB LLR HKAA and the intraoperative preimplant CAS-derived stressed HKAA (R = 0.946). However, there was no correlation between the postoperative WB LLR HKAA and the postimplant insertion HKAA as measured intraoperatively via CAS for either a "resting" or "stressed" position of the operated knee (R = 0.165 and R = 0.041, respectively). Thus, the interpretation of intraoperative alignment data is potentially problematic. Despite technological advances in the development and utilization of computer navigation and robotics in arthroplasty to help obtain the optimal alignment, it would seem apparent from our study that this alignment does not correlate to upright stance postoperatively. Surgeons should apply caution to the strength of assumptions they place on intraoperative coronal plane alignment findings.

Assessment of the Potential Role of Preoperative Dental Clearance in Total Joint Arthroplasty Optimization: A Pilot Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. This pilot study primarily aimed to investigate if preoperative dental screenings would impact the rate of PJI following TJA when compared to historical controls. Secondarily, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of dental pathology in patients undergoing TJA.

METHODS

Charts from 103 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, rTHA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, rTKA) by a single surgeon at a single academic institution over a two-year period were reviewed and selected for inclusion. All patients were referred to a dentist for preoperative clearance using a standardized form. The rate of dental pathology before surgery, details of the dental intervention required, and any dental work performed within six months postoperatively were evaluated. The demographic and comorbidity composition of our patient population was also collected. Finally, rates of PJI following each type of TJA were obtained for demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls from similar study designs to examine the potential impact of preoperative dental intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 103 patients, 31 (30.1%) were found to have preoperative dental pathology. Twenty-eight of these 31 patients (90.3%) required dental intervention prior to surgery. Based on demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical data, we expected two (95% CI (0, 6)) PJI cases for the THA group, 0 (95% CI (0, 2)) PJI cases for the TKA group, two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTHA group, and two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTKA group. However, in our study, there were no PJIs after any TJA up to the latest follow-up, which was unlikely for THA, rTHA, and rTKA groups given the calculated Poisson probabilities (9.39%, 15.11%, and 11.26%, respectively). Finding 0 cases was likely for the TKA group given the calculated Poisson probability of 72.61%.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated that preoperative dental screening, which aims to decrease the chance of PJI due to bacteremia, may have an impact on the rate of PJI following THA, rTKA, and rTHA but not TKA based on Poisson probabilities calculated from demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls that lacked preoperative dental screening. For THA, rTKA, and rTHA, the Poisson probabilities of observing 0 cases of PJI postoperatively, as was the case in our study, were unlikely, suggesting that some variable in our cohort was decreasing the PJI rate for these groups. However, in the case of TKA, the Poisson probability of observing 0 cases was likely and matched the results of our study, suggesting that no variable in our cohort was affecting the PJI rate for this group. We cannot draw direct conclusions from this retrospective observational study, but the preliminary findings prompt further investigation through an appropriately controlled, blinded, multi-centered, and powered prospective randomized controlled trial.

Predicting 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after revision total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model analysis of a national patient cohort

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with a higher risk of readmission than primary TKA. Identifying individual patients predisposed to readmission can facilitate proactive optimization and increase care efficiency. This study developed machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned readmission following revision TKA using a national-scale patient dataset. A total of 17,443 revision TKA cases (2013-2020) were acquired from the ACS NSQIP database. Four ML models (artificial neural networks, random forest, histogram-based gradient boosting, and k-nearest neighbor) were developed on relevant patient variables to predict readmission following revision TKA. The length of stay, operation time, body mass index (BMI), and laboratory test results were the strongest predictors of readmission. Histogram-based gradient boosting was the best performer in distinguishing readmission (AUC: 0.95) and estimating the readmission probability for individual patients (calibration slope: 1.13; calibration intercept: -0.00; Brier score: 0.064). All models produced higher net benefit than the default strategies of treating all or no patients, supporting the clinical utility of the models. ML demonstrated excellent performance for the prediction of readmission following revision TKA. Optimization of important predictors highlighted by our model may decrease preventable hospital readmission following surgery, thereby leading to reduced financial burden and improved patient satisfaction.

Are Femoral Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Cost Effective in High Fracture Risk Patients? A Risk Model and Cost Analysis

Femoral stemmed total knee arthroplasty (FS TKA) may be used in patients deemed higher risk for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) to reduce PPF risk. However, the cost effectiveness of FS TKA has not been defined. Using a risk modeling analysis, we investigate the cost effectiveness of FS in primary TKA compared with the implant cost of revision to distal femoral replacement (DFR) following PPF. A model of risk categories was created representing patients at increasing fracture risk, ranging from 2.5 to 30%. The number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for each risk category, which was multiplied by the increased cost of FS TKA and compared with the cost of DFR. The 50th percentile implant pricing data for primary TKA, FS TKA, and DFR were identified and used for the analysis. FS TKA resulted in an increased cost of $2,717.83, compared with the increased implant cost of DFR of $27,222.29. At 50% relative risk reduction with FS TKA, the NNT for risk categories of 2.5, 10, 20, and 30% were 80, 20, 10, and 6.67, respectively. At 20% risk, FS TKA times NNT equaled $27,178.30. A 10% absolute risk reduction in fracture risk obtained with FS TKA is needed to achieve cost neutrality with DFR. FS TKA is not cost effective for low fracture risk patients but may be cost effective for patients with fracture risk more than 20%. Further study is needed to better define the quantifiable risk reduction achieved in using FS TKA and identify high-risk PPF patients.

Is Hospital-Based Outpatient Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Safe? An Analysis of 2,171 Outpatient Aseptic Revision Procedures

BACKGROUND

Outpatient primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been well-established as a safe and effective procedure; however, the safety of outpatient revision TKA remains unclear. Therefore, this study utilized a large database to compare outcomes between outpatient and inpatient revision TKA.

METHODS

An all-payor database was queried to identify patients undergoing revision TKA from 2010 to 2022. Patients who had diagnosis codes related to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were excluded. Outpatient surgery was defined as a length of stay < 24 hours. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, tobacco use), components revised (1-versus 2-component), and revision etiology. Medical complications at 90 days and surgical complications at 1 and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated through multivariate logistic regression. A total of 4,342 aseptic revision TKAs were included.

RESULTS

No differences in patient characteristics, procedure type, or revision etiologies were seen between groups. The outpatient cohort had a lower risk of PJI (odds ratio (OR): 0.547, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.337 to 0.869; P = .012), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.393, 95% CI: 0.225 to 0.658; P < .001), transfusion (OR: 0.241, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.750; P = .027), reoperation (OR: 0.508, 95% CI: 0.305 to 0.822; P = .007), and any complication (OR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.584 to 0.829; P < .001) at 90 days postoperatively. At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, outpatient revision TKA patients had a lower incidence of revision for PJI (OR: 0.332, 95% CI: 0.131 to 0.743; P = .011 and OR: 0.446, 95% CI; 0.217 to 0.859; P = .020, respectively) and all-cause revision (OR: 0.518, 95% CI: 0.377 to 0.706; P < .001 and OR: 0.548, 95% CI: 0.422 to 0.712; P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that revision TKA can be safely performed on an outpatient basis in appropriately selected patients who do not have an increased risk of adverse events relative to inpatient revision TKA. However, we could not ascertain case complexity in either cohort, and despite controlling for several potential confounders, other less tangible differences could exist between groups.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Outpatient Setting: A Growing Alternative

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have focused on the safety and efficacy of performing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an outpatient setting. Despite being associated with greater costs, much less is known about the accompanying impact on revision TKA (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to describe the trends in costs and outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient rTKA.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted using commercial claims databases. Patients who underwent 1-component and 2-component rTKA in an inpatient setting, hospital outpatient department (HOPD), or ambulatory surgery center (ASC) from 2018 to 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day episode-of-care costs following rTKA. Secondary outcomes included surgical cost, 90-day readmission rate, and emergency department visit rate. Covariates for analyses included patient demographics, surgery type, and indication for revision.

RESULTS

There were 6,515 patients who were identified, with 17.0% of rTKAs taking place in an outpatient setting. On adjusted analysis, patients in the highest quartile of 30-day postoperative costs were more likely to be those whose rTKA was performed in an inpatient setting. One-component revisions were more common in an outpatient setting (HOPD, 50.7%; ASC, 62.0%) compared to an inpatient setting (39.6%). The 90-day readmission rates were higher (P = .003) for rTKAs performed in inpatient (+9.2%) and HOPD (+8.6%) settings compared to those in an ASC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASC may be a suitable setting for simpler revisions performed for less severe indications and is associated with lower costs and 90-day readmission and emergency department visit rates.

Knotless suture in revision total joint arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The use of barbed sutures for wound closure in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to be effective and safe. However, their effectiveness and safety in revision TJA procedures has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using barbed suture closure in revision TJA setting.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients undergoing revision TJA between September 2020 and November 2022 were included in this randomized controlled trial study. Following informed consent, patients were computer-randomized to the treatment arm (barbed suture wound closure) or to the control arm (conventional wound closure). Closure duration, closure rate, number of sutures used and wound related outcomes including complication rates and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The use of barbed sutures decreased closure time by 6 min (30.1 vs. 36.1 min, P = 0.008) with a higher wound closure rate (6.5 vs. 5.5 mm/minute, P = 0.013). Additionally, the number of sutures used for wound closure in the barbed group was significantly lower than in the control group (6.2 vs. 10.1, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound complications (P = 0.556) or patient and observer POSAS scores (P = 0.211, P = 297, respectively) between the two groups at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Closure of revision TJA surgical wound utilizing barbed sutures reduced closure time and the number of needles handled by operative staff, with no significant increase in intra- or post-operative complications rate when compared to traditional closure technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Adipose-derived regenerative therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition with a significant disease burden and no disease-modifying therapy. Definitive treatment ultimately requires joint replacement. Therapies capable of regenerating cartilage could significantly reduce financial and clinical costs. The regenerative potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been extensively studied in the context of knee osteoarthritis. This has yielded promising results in human studies, and is likely a product of immunomodulatory and chondroprotective biomolecules produced by MSCs in response to inflammation. Adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) are becoming increasingly popular owing to their relative ease of isolation and high proliferative capacity. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) are produced by the enzymatic and mechanical disruption of adipose tissue, respectively. This avoids expansion of isolated ASCs ex vivo and their composition of heterogeneous cell populations, including immune cells, may potentiate the reparative function of ASCs. In this editorial, we comment on a multicenter randomized trial regarding the efficacy of MFAT in treating knee osteoarthritis. We discuss the study's findings in the context of emerging evidence regarding adipose-derived regenerative therapies. An underlying mechanism of action of ASCs is proposed while drawing important distinctions between the properties of isolated ASCs, SVF, and MFAT.

Mental Health Effects on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The effect of mental health on patient-reported outcome measures is not fully understood in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Thus, we investigated the relationship between mental health diagnoses (MHDs) and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in primary TJA and revision TJA (rTJA).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected using relevant Current Procedural Terminology and MHDs International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes with completed Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function Short Form 10a, PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires. Logistic regressions and statistical analyses were used to determine the effect of a MHD on MCID-I/MCID-W rates.

RESULTS

Data included 4,562 patients (4,190 primary TJAs/372 rTJAs). In primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), MHD-affected outcomes for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (MCID-I: 81% versus 86%, P = 0.007; MCID-W: 6.0% versus 3.2%, P = 0.008), Physical Function Short Form 10a (MCID-I: 68% versus 77%, P < 0.001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 38% versus 44%, P = 0.009), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 61% versus 73%, P < 0.001; MCID-W: 14% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001) versus pTHA patients without MHD. A MHD led to lower rates of MCID-I for PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 56% versus 63%, P = 0.003) in primary total knee arthroplasty patients. No effects from a MHD were observed in rTJA patients.

DISCUSSION

The presence of a MHD had a prominent negative influence on pTHA patients. Patients who underwent rTJA had lower MCID-I rates, higher MCID-W rates, and lower patient-reported outcome measure scores despite less influence from a MHD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Use of Biomaterials in 3D Printing as a Solution to Microbial Infections in Arthroplasty and Osseous Reconstruction

The incidence of microbial infections in orthopedic prosthetic surgeries is a perennial problem that increases morbidity and mortality, representing one of the major complications of such medical interventions. The emergence of novel technologies, especially 3D printing, represents a promising avenue of development for reducing the risk of such eventualities. There are already a host of biomaterials, suitable for 3D printing, that are being tested for antimicrobial properties when they are coated with bioactive compounds, such as antibiotics, or combined with hydrogels with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, such as chitosan and metal nanoparticles, among others. The materials discussed in the context of this paper comprise beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), hydroxyapatite, lithium disilicate glass, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF), poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), and zirconia. While the recent research results are promising, further development is required to address the increasing antibiotic resistance exhibited by several common pathogens, the potential for fungal infections, and the potential toxicity of some metal nanoparticles. Other solutions, like the incorporation of phytochemicals, should also be explored. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) in the development of certain orthopedic implants and the potential use of AI against bacterial infections might represent viable solutions to these problems. Finally, there are some legal considerations associated with the use of biomaterials and the widespread use of 3D printing, which must be taken into account.

Leg length discrepancy before total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased complications and earlier time to revision

INTRODUCTION

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common complaint, leading to decreased patient satisfaction. However, the effect of LLD diagnosis prior to TKA on outcomes and complications is not well defined. Thus, this study aimed to assess the effects that LLD has on rates of falls and implant complications, length of stay and readmissions, and implant survivorship following TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a private insurance claims database was conducted from 2010 to 2021. All cases of TKA and those with a diagnosis of leg length discrepancy were identified. Patients undergoing TKA with a diagnosis of LLD were matched to control patients 1:5 based on demographic and comorbidity profiles. Two-year fall rates and implant complications, lengths of stay, 90-day readmissions, and time to revision were compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1,378 LLD patients were matched to 6,889 control patients. The LLD group had significantly higher rates of falls, dislocation, mechanical loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and fibrosis when compared to the control group (all P < 0.01). Additionally, mean length of stay was significantly greater in the LLD group (4.9 days vs. 3.0 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 90-day readmission rates between groups (P = 0.178). Time to revision was significantly shorter in the LLD group (392 days vs. 928 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Leg length discrepancy in patients undergoing TKA was associated with significantly increased fall risk, rates of implant complications, length of stay, and faster time to revision. The findings of this study may allow orthopedic surgeons to identify those patients at risk and allow for more educated patient counseling and operative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

Patient Adherence Following Knee Surgery: Evidence-Based Practices to Equip Patients for Success

Patient adherence with postoperative wound care, activity restrictions, rehabilitation, medication, and follow-up protocols is paramount to achieving optimal outcomes following knee surgery. However, the ability to adhere to prescribed postoperative protocols is dependent on multiple factors both in and out of the patient's control. The goals of this review article are (1) to outline key factors contributing to patient nonadherence with treatment protocols following knee surgery and (2) to synthesize current management strategies and tools for optimizing patient adherence in order to facilitate efficient and effective implementation by orthopaedic health care teams. Patient adherence is commonly impacted by both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors, including health literacy, social determinants of health, patient fear/stigma associated with nonadherence, surgical indication (elective vs. traumatic), and distrust of physicians or the health care system. In addition, health care team factors, such as poor communication strategies or failure to follow internal protocols, and health system factors, such as prior authorization delays, staffing shortages, or complex record management systems, impact patient's ability to be adherent. Because the majority of factors found to impact patient adherence are nonmodifiable, it is paramount that health care teams adjust to better equip patients for success. For health care teams to successfully optimize patient adherence, focus should be paid to education strategies, individualized protocols that consider patient enablers and barriers to adherence, and consistent communication methodologies for both team and patient-facing communication.

Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography

At an estimated cost of $8 billion annually in the United States, revision surgeries to total joint replacements represent a substantial financial burden to the health care system and a tremendous mental and physical burden on patients and their caretakers. Fixation failures, such as implant loosening, wear, and mechanical instability of the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) cement, which bonds the implant to the bone, are the main causes of long-term implant failure. Early and accurate diagnosis of cement failure is critical for developing novel therapeutic strategies and reducing the high risk of a misjudged revision. Unfortunately, prevailing imaging modalities, notably plain radiographs, struggle to detect the precursors of implant failure and are often interpreted incorrectly. Our prior work has shown that the modification of PMMA bone cement with low concentrations of conductive fillers makes it piezoresistive and therefore self-sensing. When combined with a conductivity imaging modality such as electrical impedance tomography (EIT), it is possible to monitor load transfer across the PMMA using cost-effective, physiologically benign, non-contact, and real-time electrical measurements. Despite the ability of EIT for monitoring load transfer across self-sensing PMMA bone cement, it is unable to accurately characterize failure mechanisms. Overcoming this challenge is critical to the success of this technology in practice. Therefore, we herein expand upon our previous results by integrating machine learning techniques with EIT for cement condition characterization with the goal of establishing the feasibility of even off-the-shelf machine learning algorithms to address this important problem. We survey a wide variety of different machine learning algorithms for application to this problem, including neural networks on voltage readings of an EIT phantom for tracking the spatial position of a sample, specifying defect orientation within a sample, and classifying defect types, including cracks and delaminations. In addition, we explore the utilization of principal component analysis (PCA) for pre-treating impedance signals in each of these problems. Within the tested algorithms, our results show clear advantages of neural networks, support vector machines, and K-nearest neighbor algorithms for interpreting EIT signals. We also show that PCA is an effective addition to machine learning. These preliminary results demonstrate that the combination of smart materials, EIT, and machine learning may be a powerful instrumentation tool for diagnosing the origin and evolution of mechanical failure in joint replacements.

Orthopedic consequences of modern gladiators: a systematic review of lower extremity musculoskeletal issues in retired NFL players

OBJECTIVES

The stressors that National Football League (NFL) athletes face are well-described and documented with regard to multisystem afflictions and injury prevalence. However, the majority of literature discusses the short-term effects rather than long-term outcomes of playing professional football. The purpose of this study was to characterize the long-term musculoskeletal issues in the retired NFL population.

METHODS

Publications from CENTRAL, Scopus, Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to February 2021. A total of 9 cohort studies evaluating lower extremity arthritis in retired NFL athletes were included for review. Two reviewers extracted data from the individual studies, including demographic information (age, body mass index, length of career, position), injury descriptions (location of injury, number of injuries, diagnoses), and procedure (total knee and or hip arthroplasty) frequency.

RESULTS

Arthritis in retired NFL players was more than twice as prevalent than the general United States male population (95% CI: 2.1-2.3). Ankle osteoarthritis was directly correlated with the number of foot and ankle injuries. Players <50 years of age had a 16.1 and 13.8 times higher risk of undergoing TKA and THA, respectively, when compared to the general population. In older age groups, this trend held with retired NFL players being at least 4.3 and 4.6 times more likely than members of the general population to undergo TKA and THA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that the effects of NFL-related lower extremity injuries extend beyond the players' careers and present a higher risk for early-onset osteoarthritis and overall frequency of undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications after non-fusion knee arthrodesis with a modular segmental intramedullary implant used for infected total knee arthroplasty revisions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the patients who had been surgically treated with a modular intramedullary arthrodesis implant for recurrent infection after revision TKA between January 2016 and February 2020 were included. The indications for arthrodesis were failed infected TKA with massive bone loss, deficient extensor mechanism and poor soft tissue coverage that precluded joint reconstruction with revision TKA implants. Clinical outcomes were assesed with visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS), Oxford knee score (OKS) and 12-item short form survey (SF-12). Full-length radiographs were used to verify limb length discrepancies (LLD).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (4 male and 10 female) patients with a mean age of 69.3 (range, 59 to 81) years at time of surgery were available for final follow-up at a mean of 28.8 months (range, 24-35 months). All clinical outcome scores improved at the final follow-up (pVAS, 8.5 to 2.6, p = .01; OKS, 12.6 to 33.8, p = .02; SF-12 physical, 22.9 to 32.1, p = .01 and SF-12 mental, 27.7 to 40.2, p = .01). The mean LLD was 1.0 cm (range, + 15 - 2.3 cm). Re-infection was detected in three patients (21.4%). Two patients were managed with suppressive antibiotic treatment and a third patient required repeat 2-stage revision procedure. In one patient, a periprosthetic femur fracture was observed and treated with plate osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSION

Uncontrolled infection after total knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail and satisfactory functional results can be obtained.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Retrospective cohort study.

Does interaction occur between risk factors for revision total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Several risk factors for revision TKA have previously been identified, but interactions between risk factors may occur and affect risk of revision. To our knowledge, such interactions have not been previously studied. As patients often exhibit multiple risk factors for revision, knowledge of these interactions can help improve risk stratification and patient education prior to TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The State Inpatient Databases (SID), part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), were queried to identify patients who underwent TKA between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. Risk factors for revision TKA were identified, and interactions between indication for TKA and other risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 958,944 patients who underwent TKA, 33,550 (3.5%) underwent revision. Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA were significantly associated with revision (p < 0.05). Age was the strongest predictor (p  < 0.0001), with younger patients exhibiting higher revision risk. Risks associated with age were modified by an interaction with indication for TKA (p < 0.0001). There was no significant interaction between sex and indication for TKA (p = 0.535) or race and indication for TKA (p = 0.187).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA are significantly associated with revision TKA. Interaction occurs between age and indication.

A call to "own the bone": osteoporosis is a predictor for adverse two-year outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

While bone health is instrumental in orthopedic surgery, few studies have described the long-term outcomes of osteoporosis (OP) in patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasties.

METHODS

Using the New York State statewide planning and research cooperative system database, all patients who underwent primary TKA or THA for osteoarthritis from 2009 to 2011 with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. They were divided based on their OP status (OP and non-OP) and 1:1 propensity score matched for age, sex, race, and Charlson/Deyo index. Cohorts were compared for demographics, hospital-related parameters, and 2-year postoperative complications and reoperations. Multivariate binary logistic regression was utilized to identify significant independent associations with 2-year medical and surgical complications and revisions.

RESULTS

A total of 11,288 TKA and 8248 THA patients were identified. OP and non-OP TKA patients incurred comparable overall hospital charges for their surgical visit and hospital length of stay (LOS) (both, p ≥ 0.125). Though OP and non-OP THA patients incurred similar mean hospital charges for their surgical visit, they experienced longer hospital LOS (4.3 vs. 4.1 days, p = 0.035). For both TKA and THA, OP patients had higher rates of overall and individual medical and surgical complications (all, p < 0.05). OP was independently associated with the 2-year occurrence of any overall, surgical, and medical complications, and any revision in TKA and THA patients (all, OR ≥ 1.42, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study found OP was associated with a greater risk of 2-year adverse outcomes following TKA or THA, including medical, surgical, and overall complications as well as revision operations compared to non-OP patients.

Artificial Intelligence for Automated Implant Identification in Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter External Validation Study Exceeding 3.5 Million Plain Radiographs

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of complications following knee arthroplasty demands accurate and timely identification of implant manufacturer and model. Automated image processing using deep machine learning has been previously developed and internally validated; however, external validation is essential prior to scaling clinical implementation for generalizability.

METHODS

We trained, validated, and externally tested a deep learning system to classify knee arthroplasty systems as one of the 9 models from 4 manufacturers derived from 4,724 original, retrospectively collected anteroposterior plain knee radiographs across 3 academic referral centers. From these radiographs, 3,568 were used for training, 412 for validation, and 744 for external testing. Augmentation was applied to the training set (n = 3,568,000) to increase model robustness. Performance was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Implant identification processing speed was calculated. The training and testing sets were drawn from statistically different populations of implants (P < .001).

RESULTS

After 1,000 training epochs by the deep learning system, the system discriminated 9 implant models with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.989, accuracy of 97.4%, sensitivity of 89.2%, and specificity of 99.0% in the external testing dataset of 744 anteroposterior radiographs. The software classified implants at a mean speed of 0.02 seconds per image.

CONCLUSION

An artificial intelligence-based software for identifying knee arthroplasty implants demonstrated excellent internal and external validation. Although continued surveillance is necessary with implant library expansion, this software represents a responsible and meaningful clinical application of artificial intelligence with immediate potential to globally scale and assist in preoperative planning prior to revision knee arthroplasty.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisions in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

The obese population is at higher risk for complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but little data is available regarding revision outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the role of body mass index (BMI) in the cause for revision TKA and whether BMI classification is predictive of outcomes.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was generated, including revision TKAs from 2012 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, surgery types (primary revision, repeat revision), reasons for revision, lengths of hospital stay, and surgical times. Patients were compared using 3 BMI categories: nonobese (18.5 to 29.9), obese (30 to 39.9), and morbidly obese (≥40). Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-square and 1-way analysis of variance tests, respectively. Regression analyses were used to compare reasons for revision among weight classes.

RESULTS

Obese and morbidly obese patients showed significant risk for repeat revision surgery in comparison to normal weight patients. Obese patients were at higher risk for primary revision due to stiffness/fibrosis and repeat revision due to malposition. In comparison to the obese population, morbidly obese patients were more likely to require primary revision for dislocation and implant loosening.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in primary and repeat revision etiologies exist among weight classes. Furthermore, obese and morbidly obese patients have a greater risk of requiring repeat revision surgery. These patients should be informed of their risk for multiple operations, and surgeons should be aware of the differences in revision etiologies when anticipating complications following primary TKA.

Induction Heating Triggers Antibiotic Release and Synergistic Bacterial Killing on Polymer-Coated Titanium Surfaces

Infection is a major complication associated with orthopedic implants. It often involves the development of biofilms on metal substrates, which act as barriers to the host's immune system and systemic antibiotic treatment. The current standard of treatment is revision surgery, often involving the delivery of antibiotics through incorporation into bone cements. However, these materials exhibit sub-optimal antibiotic release kinetics and revision surgeries have drawbacks of high cost and recovery time. Herein, a new approach is presented using induction heating of a metal substrate, combined with an antibiotic-loaded poly(ester amide) coating undergoing a glass transition just above physiological temperature to enable thermally triggered antibiotic release. At normal physiological temperature, the coating provides a rifampicin depot for >100 days, while heating of the coating accelerates drug release, with >20% release over a 1-h induction heating cycle. Induction heating or antibiotic-loaded coating alone each reduce Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) viability and biofilm formation on Ti, but the combination causes synergistic killing of S. aureus as measured by crystal violet staining, determination of bacterial viability (>99.9% reduction), and fluorescence microscopy of bacteria on surfaces. Overall, these materials provide a promising platform enabling externally triggered antibiotic release to prevent and/or treat bacterial colonization of implants.

Clinical Outcomes and Infection Rates Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Aseptic Failure versus Septic Failure

Background

It is controversial whether revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to septic failure shows inferior clinical outcomes compared with TKA due to aseptic failure. Moreover, few studies have compared the infection rates after revision TKA between aseptic and septic failure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and infection rates after aseptic and septic revision TKA.

Methods

Between April 2006 and May 2019, 68 and 26 patients underwent revision TKA due to aseptic failure (aseptic group) and septic failure (septic group), respectively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and infection rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

The mean follow-up durations in the aseptic and septic groups were 44.4 and 54.8 months, respectively. The septic group showed inferior postoperative ROM (124.1° and 109.4°, p = 0.004), KSKS (88.9 and 78.8, p = 0.001), and KSFS (72.8 and 59.0, p = 0.001). Three patients of aseptic group had infection. Three patients of septic group had recurred infection (same pathogen with the first infection) and 1 patient had a new infection (different pathogen). The septic group showed slightly higher but not significantly different infection rates (4.4% and 15.4%, p = 0.089).

Conclusions

Revision TKA with septic failure showed inferior postoperative clinical outcomes compared with aseptic revision surgery. A slightly higher infection rate was observed in the septic group but it was not significantly different.

Using acoustic feedback and analyses for removal of bone cement during revision knee replacement surgeries

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the scraping sounds generated during revision knee replacement surgeries to discriminate between the inner cortical bone and the cement, with the goal of minimizing bone removal and increasing the structural integrity of the revision.

METHODS

We prepared seven porcine femurs by partially filling them with bone cement, and recorded scraping sounds produced by a surgical scraping tool. We used a hierarchical machine learning approach to first detect a contact and then classify it as either bone or cement. This approach was based on a Support Vector Machine learning algorithm that was fed with temporal and spectral features of the sounds. A Leave-One-Bone-Out validation method was used to assess the performance of the proposed method.

RESULTS

The average recall for the noncontact, bone, and cement classes was 98%, 75%, and 72%, respectively. The corresponding precision for the respective classes was 99%, 67%, and 61%.

CONCLUSION

The scraping sound that is generated during revision replacement surgeries carries significant information about the material that is being scraped. Such information can be extracted using a supervised machine learning algorithm. The scraping sound produced during revision replacement procedures can potentially be used to enhance cement removal during knee revision surgery. Future work will assess whether such monitoring can increase the structural integrity of the revision.

A Comprehensive Research on the Prevalence and Evolution Trend of Orthopedic Surgeries in Romania

Accurate knowledge of the prevalence and trends of orthopedic surgeries can facilitate the design of medical plans for effective treatments. The National Endoprosthetic Registry (NER) in Romania provides statistics on endoprosthetic activity (hip, knee), cases of fractures and bone tumors as a result of the legal obligations to report interventions performed by all orthopedic traumatology hospitals/wards in the country. The aim of this study is to describe the annual volumes of orthopedic surgeries between 2001 and 2022 in Romania and analyze the current and future evolution trends of the studied surgeries, gender differences and regional differences based on a complete survey carried out at a national level. For the period 2001-2022, we extracted from the NER the annual volumes of orthopedic interventions performed. With these data, we studied the prevalence and estimated, with the support of an original calculation methodology, the variation trends of orthopedic surgeries in two situations: over the entire 21-year period, respectively, and over the period 2001-2020, which does not include the pandemic period. For hip replacement surgery and knee replacement surgery, we showed the prevalence by subcategory of interventions, gender distribution, regional prevalence and regional density calculated by the annual averages of the total number of cases reported per 100,000 people in the 40 counties of the country and the capital, Bucharest. We also determined the variations in hip and knee arthroplasty revision burdens, calculated as a percentage between the number of revisions and the number of primary interventions in the same period. We determined the regional densities of revision burdens. The total number of orthopedic surgeries in the period 2001-2022 was 1,557,247, of which 189,881 were hip replacement surgeries; 51,035 were knee replacement surgeries; 11,085 were revision hip arthroplasty; 1497 were revision knee arthroplasty; 541,440 were operated fractures; and 16,418 were operated bone tumors. The growth rates of surgical interventions are hip replacement surgery, +8.19%; knee replacement surgery, +19.55%; revision hip arthroplasty, +9.43%; and revision knee arthroplasty, +28.57%. With these data, we have estimated a doubling of the volume of primary and revision interventions of the hip until 2034 and the knee until 2027, respectively. Operated bone tumors register an annual decrease of -4.52% thanks to modern treatments. There are clear gender differences; for primary hip interventions, the proportion of women is 58.82%, and for knee interventions, the proportion of women is 76.42%. This is the first research that, with the support of exhaustive data from the NER, analyzes for the period 2001-2022 the annual number of orthopedic surgeries in Romania. It allows knowledge of the large, anticipated increases in orthopedic surgery and provides a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the need for medical personnel and material resources.

Cementless Compared to Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With More Revisions Within 1 Year of Index Surgery

Background

Cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have gained renewed interest due to improved implant designs and lower rates of revision than its cemented counterparts. The purpose of this study was to compare revision rates between cemented vs cementless TKAs within 1 year of primary arthroplasty.

Methods

This was a retrospective review from the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who had undergone cemented and cementless TKAs and subsequent surgical revisions. An unadjusted univariate analysis of patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and surgical revisions at 90 days and 1 year after TKA was performed using chi-squared testing. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were subsequently performed for 1-year surgical complications requiring revision.

Results

Of 324,508 patients, 312,988 (96.45%) underwent cemented TKAs, and 11,520 (3.55%) underwent cementless TKAs. Patients undergoing cementless TKA tended to be younger than patients undergoing cemented TKA (63.67 ± 9.15 cementless vs 66.22 ± 8.85 cemented, P < .001). Univariate chi-squared testing showed that cementless patients were more likely to require 1-component femoral or tibial revision at 90 days and 1 year, irrigation and debridement at 90 days and 1 year, and arthroscopy with lysis of adhesions at 1 year only. Similar findings were observed for these 3 revision procedures at 1 year after correcting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score using multivariate logistic regression analysis as cementless TKA patients had higher odds ratios for each of the revisions.

Conclusions

Small but significant differences were found in surgical revisions among cementless TKAs when compared to cemented TKAs within 1 year of the index procedure.

Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes in One versus Two Component Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Revisions of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) may require revision of one or both tibial and femoral components. Our purpose was to examine the clinical and functional outcomes in 1- versus 2-component TKA revisions.

METHODS

We identified 92 1-component (tibial or femoral) revisions at a single center. Our inclusion criteria were isolated revision of the tibial or femoral components with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The included cases were matched 1:2 with a control group of 2-component revisions (tibial and femoral) by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and indication for revision. We collected demographics, complications, operative times, any subsequent rerevisions, and functional outcome scores.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for the 1- and 2-component revision groups were 10 years (range, 3 to 17) and 8 years (range, 2 to 18), respectively. The most common complication after rerevision in both groups was stiffness at 9 of 92 (9.8%) and 9 of 170 (5.3%) in the 1- and 2-component groups, respectively (P = .20). The overall complication prevalence in the 1- and 2- component revision groups was similar 20 of 92 (22%) and 35 of 170 (21%), respectively (P = .87). Subsequent rerevisions for any indication were encountered in 12 of 92 (13.0%) of the 1-component and 18 of 170 (11%) in the 2-component groups (P = .69). There was no statistical difference in survivorship or functional outcomes scores between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that isolated revision of a single TKA component is an acceptable option, with comparable functional outcomes, complications, and survivorships when compared with both-component revision. As such, a 1-component revision should be considered where appropriate.

The Cost of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options.

RESULTS

The prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.

Visualizing the randomized sham-controlled trial in orthopedic research: proposed steps to conducting a total knee arthroplasty randomized controlled trial

Performed more than 600,000 times annually in the USA alone, total knee arthroplasty is the one of the most common and costly elective operations in the world. A primary total knee arthroplasty is generally an elective procedure, for which total index hospitalization costs are estimated around $30,000 USD. Roughly four in five patients declare they are satisfied postoperatively, justifying the procedure's frequency and high costs. It is sobering to realize, however, that the evidence base in favor of this procedure remains circumstantial. We as a profession lack randomized trials showing a subjective improvement over placebo intervention. We argue for the necessity of sham-controlled surgical trials in this setting and provide a surgical atlas showing how a sham operation may be performed.

Validation and Generalizability of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Discharge Disposition Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative discharge to facilities account for over 33% of the $ 2.7 billion revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-associated annual expenditures and are associated with increased complications when compared to home discharges. Prior studies predicting discharge disposition using advanced machine learning (ML) have been limited due to a lack of generalizability and validation. This study aimed to establish ML model generalizability by externally validating its prediction for nonhome discharge following revision TKA using national and institutional databases.

METHODS

The national and institutional cohorts comprised 52,533 and 1,628 patients, respectively, with 20.6 and 19.4% nonhome discharge rates. Five ML models were trained and internally validated (five-fold cross-validation) on a large national dataset. Subsequently, external validation was performed on our institutional dataset. Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Global predictor importance plots and local surrogate models were used for interpretation.

RESULTS

The strongest predictors of nonhome discharge were patient age, body mass index, and surgical indication. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from internal to external validation and ranged between 0.77 and 0.79. Artificial neural network was the best predictive model for identifying patients at risk for nonhome discharge (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78), and also the most accurate (calibration slope = 0.93, intercept = 0.02, and Brier score = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

All five ML models demonstrated good-to-excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility on external validation, with artificial neural network being the best model for predicting discharge disposition following revision TKA. Our findings establish the generalizability of ML models developed using data from a national database. The integration of these predictive models into clinical workflow may assist in optimizing discharge planning, bed management, and cost containment associated with revision TKA.

Impact of revision TKA indications on resource utilization

BACKGROUND

Indications for surgery may impact resource utilization in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), and understanding these relationships would facilitate risk-stratification preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of rTKA indications on readmission, reoperation, length of stay (LOS), and cost.

METHODS

We reviewed all 962 patients who underwent aseptic rTKA at an academic orthopedic specialty hospital between June 2011-April 2020 with at least 90 days of follow-up. Patients were categorized based on their indication for aseptic rTKA as listed in the operative report. Demographics, surgical factors, LOS, readmission, reoperation and cost were compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in operative time among cohorts (p < 0.001), highest among the periprosthetic fracture group (164.2 ± 59.8 min). Reoperation rate was greatest in the extensor mechanism disruption cohort (50.0 %, p = 0.009). Total cost differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), which was highest among the implant failure cohort (134.6 % of mean) and lowest for component malpositioning cohort (90.2 % of mean). Similarly, there were significant differences in direct cost (p < 0.001) which was highest in the periprosthetic fracture cohort (138.5 % of mean), and lowest in the implant failure cohort (90.5 % of mean). There were no differences in discharge disposition, or number of re-revisions among all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative time, components revised, LOS, readmissions, reoperation rate, total cost and direct cost following aseptic rTKA varied significantly between different revision indications. These differences should be noted for preoperative planning, resource allocation, scheduling, and risk-stratification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective observational analysis.

Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There has been a long standing debate regarding superiority of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty over posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty regarding the short-term outcomes as well as long-term survivorship. The proponents of both the techniques have published vast evidence in favor of their respective surgical method and early outcome in meta-analyses does not seem to be significantly different. The decision to select either design should depend on their long-term survivorship but the literature comparing their long-term survival is sparse.This meta-analysis was conducted in order to answer the following questions: (1) Does cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better long-term survival beyond 10 years.compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty? (2) Does cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty has higher complication rates compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty?

METHODS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis study was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. The following databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were used to search potentially interesting articles published from database inception until January 2022. Inclusion criteria for articles were: (1) retrospective comparative studies; (2) patients who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty; (3) publications evaluating the long-term survival of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years' follow-up; (4) publications evaluating complications of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years' follow-up; and (5) publications reporting sufficient data regarding the outcomes. We used a fixed-effects design in the case of I² < 50% and P > 0.05; if not, we adopted a random-effects design [4]. We also performed subgroups and sensitivity analysis in order to assess the possible source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Database searching identified 597 studies to be screened, of which 291 abstracts were revealed as potentially eligible and finally 7 articles were included. The forest plot showed that CR had significantly better survival than PS (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.69-2.80) after 10 years. However, complication rate was not significantly different between CR and PS groups (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.44; P = 0.57). Subgroup analysis showed that only the period of publication constituted a source of heterogeneity in survivorship outcome. Sensitivity analysis revealed that outcomes did not differ markedly, which indicates that the meta-analysis had strong reliability.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed that cruciate retaining prosthesis may be preferred over the posterior stabilized design in view of longer survivorship it offers However, further randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm this finding.

Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implants for the Treatment of Focal Chondral Defects of the Knee in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Osteoarthritis remains an unfortunate long-term consequence of focal cartilage defects of the knee. Associated with functional loss and pain, it has necessitated the exploration of new therapies to regenerate cartilage before significant deterioration and subsequent joint replacement take place. Recent studies have investigated a multitude of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources and polymer scaffold compositions. It is uncertain how different combinations affect the extent of integration of native and implant cartilage and the quality of new cartilage formed. Implants seeded with bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) have demonstrated promising results in restoring these defects, largely through in vitro and animal studies. A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL) to identify studies using BMSC-seeded implants in animal models of focal cartilage defects of the knee. Quantitative results from the histological assessment of integration quality were extracted. Repair cartilage morphology and staining characteristics were also recorded. Meta-analysis demonstrated that high-quality integration was achieved, exceeding that of cell-free comparators and control groups. This was associated with repair tissue morphology and staining properties which resembled those of native cartilage. Subgroup analysis showed better integration outcomes for studies using poly-glycolic acid-based scaffolds. In conclusion, BMSC-seeded implants represent promising strategies for the advancement of focal cartilage defect repair. While a greater number of studies treating human patients is necessary to realize the full clinical potential of BMSC therapy, high-quality integration scores suggest that these implants could generate repair cartilage of substantial longevity.

Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) has been increasing continuously. The results of RTKA still remain unsatisfactory. Failure patterns and risk factors in RTKA were thoroughly analyzed, with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and aseptic loosening remaining at the forefront of re-revision (ReRTKA) causes. While there is evidence that stem profile impacts the revisability of cemented implants, its association with the modes of RTKA failure is unknown.

METHODS

50 consecutive ReRTKA performed in a single orthopedic center during 2016-2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were stratified according to age, sex, number of preexisting revisions, fixation technique, stem design and causes of re-revision. All explanted implants with conical vs. cylindrical stem profiles were compared.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67 ± 11.5, and 54% were females. 72% of the cases had ≥ 3 previous revisions. 88% were full-cemented, 3% hybrid and 9% press-fit stems. 36% of the RTKA had conical, 58% cylindrical and 6% combined stem profiles. 92% of the RTKA components were removed. Removal causes were: PJI (52.2%), aseptic loosening (34.8%), implant malposition (9.8%), painful knee (1.1%) and instability (2.2%). While the overall RTKA failure patterns were equally distributed between conical and cylindrical stems, subgroup analysis of only cemented ReRTKA revealed a higher incidence of aseptic loosening within cylindrical stem profiles (46.7% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Stem profile may have an impact on the process of aseptic loosening in cemented non-metaphyseal engaging RTKA, with cylindrical designs tending to worse outcomes than conical designs. Large cohort studies could provide more clarity on current observation.

Can Technology Assistance be Cost Effective in TKA? A Simulation-Based Analysis of a Risk-prioritized, Practice-specific Framework

BACKGROUND

Robotic, navigated, and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) TKA procedures have been introduced to improve component placement precision and improve implant survivorship and other clinical outcomes. However, the best available evidence has shown that these technologies are ineffective in reducing revision rates in the general TKA patient population. Nonetheless, it seems plausible that these technologies could be an effective and cost-effective means of reducing revision risk in clinical populations that are at an elevated risk of revision because of patient-specific demographics (such as older age at index surgery, elevated BMI, and being a man). Since clinical trials on this topic would need to be very large, a simulation approach could provide insight on which clinical populations would be the most promising for analysis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We conducted a simulation-based analysis and asked: (1) Given key demographic parameters characterizing a patient population, together with estimates of the precision achievable with selected forms of technology assistance in TKA, can we estimate the expected distributions of anticipated reductions in lifetime revision risk for that population and the associated improvements in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that would be expected to result? (2) Are there realistic practice characteristics (such as combinations of local patient demographics and capital and per-procedure costs) for which applying a per-patient risk-prioritized policy for using technology-assisted TKA could be considered cost-effective based on projected cost savings from reductions in revision rates?

METHODS

We designed simulations of hypothetical practice-specific clinical scenarios, each characterized by patient volume, patient demographics, and technology-assisted surgical technique, using demographic information drawn from other studies to characterize two contrasting simulated clinical scenarios in which the distributions of factors describing patients undergoing TKA place one population at a comparatively elevated risk of revision (elevated-risk population) and the second at a comparatively reduced risk of revision (lower-risk population). We used results from previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses to estimate the implant precision in coronal plane alignment for patient-specific instrumentation, navigated, and robotic technology. We generated simulated TKA patient populations based on risk estimates from large clinical studies, structured reviews, and meta-analyses and calculated the patient-specific reduction in the revision risk and the change in QALYs attributable to the technology-assisted intervention in each of the two simulated clinical scenarios. We also incorporated a sensitivity analysis, incorporating variations in the effect size of deviations from overall coronal alignment on revision risk and difference in health state utilities acquired through a structured review process. We then simulated the outcomes of 25,000 operations per patient using the precisions associated with the conventional TKA technique, the three technology-assisted techniques, and a hypothetical technology-assisted intervention that could consistently deliver perfectly neutral overall coronal alignment, which is unachievable in practice. A risk-prioritized treatment policy was emulated by ordering the simulated patients from the highest to lowest predicted increase in QALYs, such that simulated patients who would see the greatest increase in the QALYs (and therefore the greatest reduction in lifetime revision risk) were the patients to receive technology-assisted TKA intervention in a practice. We used cost estimates acquired through a structured review process and calculated the net added costs of each of the three technology-assisted techniques as a function of the percent utilization (proportion of patients treated with technology assistance in a practice), factoring in fixed costs, per-procedure variable costs, and savings occurring from the prevention of future revision surgery. Finally, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and marginal cost-effectiveness ratio (MCER) for each technology-assisted technique for the two clinical scenarios. We then used a Monte Carlo approach to simulate variations in key patient risk, health state, and economic factors as well as to obtain a distribution of estimates for cost-effectiveness. We considered an intervention to be cost effective if either the ICER or MCER values were below USD/QALY 63,000.

RESULTS

For the lower-risk population, the median reduction in the revision risk was 0.9% (0.4% to 2.2%, extrema from the sensitivity analysis) and 1.8% (0.9% to 4.4%) for PSI and robotic TKA, respectively, and 1.9% (1.0% to 4.6%) for ideal TKA. In contrast, the median reduction in the revision risk in the elevated-risk clinical scenario was 2.0% (1.2% to 3.4%) and 4.6% (2.7% to 8.5%) for PSI and robotic TKA and 5.1% (3.0% to 9.4%) for ideal TKA. Estimated differences in the cumulative gain in QALYs attributable to technology-assisted TKA ranged from 0.6 (0.2 to 1.8) to 4.0 (1.8 to 10.0) QALYs per 100 patients, depending on the intervention type and clinical scenario. For PSI, we found treating 15% of patients in the lower-risk population and 77% in the elevated-risk population could meet the threshold for being considered cost effective. For navigated TKA systems offering high alignment precision, we found the intervention could meet this threshold for practice sizes of at least 300 patients per year and a percent utilization of 27% in the lower-risk population. In the elevated-risk population, cost-effectiveness could be achieved in practice volumes as small as 100 patients per year with a percent utilization of at least 6%, and cost savings could be achieved with a percent utilization of at least 45%. We found that robotic TKA could only meet the threshold for being considered cost-effectiveness in the lower-risk population if yearly patient volumes exceeded 600 and for a limited range of percent utilization (27% to 32%). However, in the elevated-risk patient population, robotic TKA with high alignment precision could potentially be cost effective for practice sizes as small as 100 patients per year and a percent utilization of at least 20% if a risk-prioritized treatment protocol were used.

CONCLUSION

Based on these simulations, a selective-use policy for technology-assisted TKA that prioritizes using technology assistance for those patients at a higher risk of revision based on patient-specific factors could potentially meet the cost-effectiveness threshold in selected circumstances (for example, primarily in elevated-risk populations and larger practice sizes). Whether it does meet that threshold would depend significantly on the surgical precision that can be achieved in practice for a given proposed technology as well as on the true local costs of using the proposed technology. We further recommend that any future randomized trials seeking to demonstrate possible effects of technology assistance on revision risk focus on clinical populations that are at higher risk of revision (such as, patient populations that are relatively younger, have higher BMIs, and higher proportions of men).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that technology assistance is only likely to prove cost effective in selected circumstances rather than in all clinical populations and practice settings. In general, we project that surgical navigation is most likely to prove cost effective in the widest range of circumstances, that PSI may be cost effective or cost neutral in a moderate range of circumstances, and that robotic surgery is only likely to be cost effective in moderately large practices containing patients who are on average at an intrinsically elevated risk of revision.

Failure Analysis of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tibial Insert in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Knee osteoarthritis is treated based on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) interventions. The most frequent failure cause identified in surgical practice is due to wear and oxidation processes of the prothesis' tibial insert. This component is usually manufactured from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). To estimate the clinical complications related to a specific prosthesis design, we investigated four UHMWPE tibial inserts retrieved from patients from Clinical Hospital Colentina, Bucharest, Romania. For the initial analysis of the polyethylene degradation modes, macrophotography was chosen. A light stereomicroscope was used to estimate the structural performance and the implant surface degradation. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the optical results and fulfilled the computation of the Hood index. The oxidation process in UHMWPE was analyzed based on Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The crystallinity degree and the oxidation index were computed in good agreement with the existing standards. Mechanical characterization was conducted based on the small punch test. The elastic modulus, initial peak load, ultimate load, and ultimate displacement were estimated. Based on the aforementioned experimental tests, a variation between 9 and 32 was found in the case of the Hood score. The oxidation index has a value of 1.33 for the reference sample and a maximum of 9.78 for a retrieved sample.

The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether reimplantation of a patellar component during a two-stage revision for periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty infection (PJI) affects patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) or implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing during reimplantation confers a functional benefit or increases implant survivorship after two-stage treatment for PJI.

METHODS

Two-stage revisions for knee PJI performed by three surgeons at a single tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. All original patellar components and cement were removed during resection and the patella was resurfaced whenever feasible during reimplantation. PROMs, implant survivorship, and radiographic measurements (patellar tilt and displacement) were compared between knees reimplanted with a patellar component versus those without a patellar component.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (41.7%) underwent reimplantation with, and 60 patients (58.3%) without a patellar component. At a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, there were no significant differences in patient demographics or PROMs between groups (P ≥ .156). No significant differences were found in the estimated Kaplan-Meier all-cause, aseptic, or septic survivorship between groups (P ≥ .342) at a maximum of 75 months follow-up. There was no significant difference in the change (pre-resection to post-reimplant) of patellar tilt (P = .504) or displacement (P = .097) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patellar resurfacing during knee reimplantation does not appear to meaningfully impact postoperative PROMs or survivorship. Given the risk of potential extensor mechanism complications with patellar resurfacing, surgeons may choose to leave the patella without an implant during total knee reimplantation and expect similar clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

No Difference in Quality-Of-Life Outcomes in the First 7 Years Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Computer Navigation Versus Conventional Referencing: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation techniques can potentially improve both the accuracy and precision of prosthesis implantation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but its impact on quality-of-life outcomes following surgery remains unestablished.

METHODS

An institutional arthroplasty registry was queried to identify patients with TKA performed between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019. Propensity score matching based on demographical, medical, and surgical variables was used to match computer-navigated to conventionally referenced cases. The primary outcomes were Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS), Short Form 6 Dimension utility values (SF-6D), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the first 7 years following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 629 computer-navigated TKAs were successfully matched to 1,351 conventional TKAs. The VR-12 PCS improved by a mean of 12.75 and 11.94 points in computer-navigated and conventional cases at 12-month follow-up (P = .25) and the VR-12 MCS by 6.91 and 5.93 points (P = .25), respectively. The mean VR-12 PCS improvement at 7-year follow-up (34.4% of the original matched cohort) for navigated and conventional cases was 13.00 and 12.92 points (P = .96) and for the VR-12 MCS was 4.83 and 6.30 points (P = .47), respectively. The mean improvement in the SF-6D utility score was 0.164 and 0.149 points at 12 months (P = .11) and at 7 years was 0.115 and 0.123 points (P = .69), respectively. Computer-navigated cases accumulated 0.809 QALYs in the first 7 years, compared to 0.875 QALYs in conventionally referenced cases (P = .65). There were no differences in these outcomes among a subgroup analysis of obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²).

CONCLUSION

The use of computer navigation did not provide an incremental benefit to quality-of-life outcomes at a mean of 2.9 years following primary TKA performed for osteoarthritis when compared to conventional referencing techniques.

Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Both cones or sleeves have been developed to address metaphyseal bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies have directly compared the outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship and aseptic revision rates between metaphyseal cones and sleeves at intermediate follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 1,172 revision TKA patients between 2009 and 2018 with a minimum two-year follow-up on all patients. We compared demographics, surgical indication, stem fixation, constraint, rates of rerevision, and Short-Form-12 scores between patients with cones and sleeves. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the effect of cones and sleeves on aseptic rerevision. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare aseptic survivorship of cones and sleeves.

RESULTS

There were 194 tibial cones (17%), 107 tibial sleeves (9%), 31 femoral cones (3%), and 135 femoral sleeves (12%) with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range: 2-12 years). There was no difference in demographics, indication, stem fixation, or constraint (P > .05). Although overall aseptic failure rates may be lower for tibial sleeves, there were no significant differences in survivorship over a one-year, two-year, and five-year follow-up when both tibial and femoral sleeves were directly compared to cones.

CONCLUSION

Both tibial and femoral sleeves and cones perform well at an intermediate-term follow-up. Further investigation of these two are required to better understand their survivorship relative to each other.

Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report

Background

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period.

Methods

We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005–2009 and 2010–2014).

Results

The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000.

Conclusion

At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000.

Cost-Effectiveness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy for Surgical Site Management After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The PROMISES (Post-market, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Dressings in Reducing Surgical Site Complications in Subjects With Revision of a Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty) randomized controlled trial compared closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) to standard of care (SOC) after revision total knee arthroplasty in high-risk patients. We assessed the costs associated with 90-day surgical site complications (SSCs) to determine the cost-benefit of ciNPT.

METHODS

A health economic model was used to determine mean per-patient costs to manage the surgical site, including the costs of postoperative dressings, surgical and non-surgical interventions, and readmission. A subanalysis was performed to examine cost-benefit in "lower risk" (Charlson Comorbidity Index < 2) and "higher risk" (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2) patients.

RESULTS

Patients with ciNPT experienced fewer SSCs (3.4% vs 14.3%; P = .0013) and required fewer surgical (0.7% vs 4.8%; P = .0666) and non-surgical (2.7% vs 12.9%; P = .0017) interventions compared to those with SOC. Readmission rates were significantly higher when patients experienced SSC (31% vs 4%; P = .0001). Using the economic model, respective per-patient costs for the ciNPT and SOC groups were $666 and $52 for postoperative dressings, $135 and $994 for surgical interventions, $231 and $970 for readmissions, and $15 and $70 for non-surgical interventions. Total per-patient costs for surgical site management were $1,047 for ciNPT and $2,036 for SOC. Among the lower risk population, mean per-patient cost was $1,066 for ciNPT and $1,474 for SOC. Among the higher risk population, mean per-patient cost was $676 for ciNPT and $3,212 for SOC.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher upfront costs for postoperative dressings, ciNPT was cost-effective in this health economic model, decreasing the costs of surgical site management after revision total knee arthroplasty by 49% in this study population and 79% in higher risk subgroup.

A comparison of survival models for prediction of eight-year revision risk following total knee and hip arthroplasty

Background

There is increasing interest in the development and use of clinical prediction models, but a lack of evidence-supported guidance on the merits of different modelling approaches. This is especially true for time-to-event outcomes, where limited studies have compared the vast number of modelling approaches available. This study compares prediction accuracy and variable importance measures for four modelling approaches in prediction of time-to-revision surgery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

The study included 321,945 TKA and 151,113 THA procedures performed between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2017. Accuracy of the Cox model, Weibull parametric model, flexible parametric model, and random survival forest were compared, with patient age, sex, comorbidities, and prosthesis characteristics considered as predictors. Prediction accuracy was assessed using the Index of Prediction Accuracy (IPA), c-index, and smoothed calibration curves. Variable importance rankings from the Cox model and random survival forest were also compared.

Results

Overall, the Cox and flexible parametric survival models performed best for prediction of both TKA (integrated IPA 0.056 (95% CI [0.054, 0.057]) compared to 0.054 (95% CI [0.053, 0.056]) for the Weibull parametric model), and THA revision. (0.029 95% CI [0.027, 0.030] compared to 0.027 (95% CI [0.025, 0.028]) for the random survival forest). The c-index showed broadly similar discrimination between all modelling approaches. Models were generally well calibrated, but random survival forest underfitted the predicted risk of TKA revision compared to regression approaches. The most important predictors of revision were similar in the Cox model and random survival forest for TKA (age, opioid use, and patella resurfacing) and THA (femoral cement, depression, and opioid use).

Conclusion

The Cox and flexible parametric models had superior overall performance, although all approaches performed similarly. Notably, this study showed no benefit of a tuned random survival forest over regression models in this setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01644-3.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Synovial Classification Is Associated With Revision Indication and Polyethylene Insert Damage

BACKGROUND

Patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) stiffness are commonly presumed to have arthrofibrosis though no specific test exists. In patients undergoing revision TKA, we asked the following question: (1) Do patients who are revised for stiffness display a synovial reaction on MRI that is different than patients revised for other reasons? (2) Do these patients have a different magnitude of polyethylene insert damage than patients revised for other reasons? and (3) Is the MRI synovial classification associated with polyethylene insert damage?

METHODS

Patients undergoing revision TKA for stiffness had a preoperative MRI performed, and the synovium was classified on MRI in a blinded fashion as arthrofibrosis, focal scarring, polymeric reaction, infection, or abnormal. At surgery, the polyethylene inserts were removed, and graded by 2 reviewers for total surface damage.

RESULTS

Revision indication and MRI synovial classification were associated (P < .0001), with a greater proportion of patients assigned an MRI classification of arthrofibrosis revised for arthrofibrosis and a greater proportion of patients assigned a polymeric classification revised for aseptic loosening. Patients assigned an MRI synovial classification of polymeric had the greatest damage to the tibial insert (P < .0001), and patients revised for the clinical indication of aseptic loosening had the greatest damage to the tibial insert (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Synovial grading on MRI is strongly associated with revision indication and polyethylene insert damage. In patients with stiffness in the absence of another complication, MRI can be a helpful diagnostic adjuvant in confirming the diagnosis of stiffness.

The Effect of Joint Line Elevation on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Joint line elevation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is considered a risk factor for inferior outcomes, engendering a dogmatic protocol of joint line restoration. However, this precedent is based on historical data using rudimentary revision systems and unvalidated outcome measures. This study's purpose was to evaluate the effect of joint line height elevation on validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern revision implants.

METHODS

A total of 327 rTKAs performed at a single institution were reviewed. Surgical technique prioritized flexion-extension gap balancing and accepted joint line elevation if necessary to achieve a balanced flexion space. Radiographic measurements included changes in joint line height (from preoperative and calculated "intended" anatomic/native) and change in posterior condylar offset. Prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

The mean joint line elevation from preoperative and "intended" to postoperative joint line was 4.9 ± 5.7 mm and 7.2 ± 6.6 mm, respectively. The mean increase in posterior condylar offset was 1.0 ± 4.6 mm. Patients within ±5 mm of preoperative joint line height were 3.88× more likely to achieve the substantial clinical benefit for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P = .004). An increase from intended joint line height >5 mm was not associated with differences in any other PROMs (P ≥ .165).

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary rTKA, recreating the joint line within 5 mm of preoperative improves knee-specific health outcomes. These data support approximating native joint line height as a viable technique to optimize flexion gap balance and subsequent patient outcomes in rTKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective cohort study.

Distinguishing Periprosthetic Crystalline Arthropathy from Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Distinguishing periprosthetic crystalline arthropathy from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a diagnostic challenge as both symptom presentation and diagnostic tests overlap. Accurate differentiation is important as treatment plans vary significantly. We sought to systematically review all cases of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) periprosthetic crystalline arthropathy reported in the literature and summarize clinical, diagnostic, and operative findings in the context of guidelines for diagnosing PJI. The goal of this systematic review is to determine the amount of diagnostic overlap and to identify best practices for differentiating between these two diagnoses. MEDLINE and Google Scholar were searched to identify cases of crystalline arthropathy following TKA. Case reports were reviewed for patient characteristics, clinical symptoms, physical exam, laboratory results, and treatment outcomes. These findings were summarized across patients and dichotomized based on current thresholds for diagnosing PJI according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Twenty-six articles were identified which included 42 cases of periprosthetic crystalline arthropathy (17 gout, 16 pseudogout, one both, and eight not specified). Of these cases, 25 presented over 1 year after their index arthroplasty and 15 had no prior history of crystalline arthropathy. Only six cases had a superimposed infection based on aspiration or intraoperative cultures. For cases without a culture-positive infection, several diagnostic tests overlap with PJI thresholds: 95% of patients had C-reactive protein greater than 1 mg/dL, 76% had an erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 30 mm/hour, 91% had a synovial white blood cell greater than 3,000 cells, and 76% had a synovial polymorphonuclear cells percent greater than 80%. Patients without co-infection were managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, allopurinol, steroids, or a combination of these treatments and most had complete resolution of symptoms within 1 week. Commonly used markers of PJI fail to reliably distinguish periprosthetic crystalline arthropathy from infection. Though clinical judgement and consideration of the implications of delayed treatment for acute PJI remain paramount, in the setting of synovial crystals, surgeons may wish to consider this alternate etiology as the source of the patient's clinical symptoms.

Revision Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The number of shoulder replacements performed each year continues to increase, and the need for revision replacements has grown accordingly. The outcome of a revision replacement may influence which primary implant is selected and the timing of primary surgery, particularly in younger patients. The aim of this study was to establish the expected improvement in shoulder function and implant survival following revision of a hemiarthroplasty and revision of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of all studies reporting shoulder scores or implant survival following revision hemiarthroplasty or revision TSA. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and National Joint Registry reports were searched. 15 studies were included, reporting on 593 revision anatomical shoulder replacements. There was large variation in the magnitude of improvement in shoulder scores following revision surgery. Over 80% of revision replacements last 5 years and over 70% last 10 years. There was no significant difference in shoulder scores or implant survival according to the type of primary implant. The belief that revision of a shoulder hemiarthroplasty may lead to improved outcomes compared to revision of a TSA is not supported by the current literature.

The Use of Autologous Chondrocyte and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implants for the Treatment of Focal Chondral Defects in Human Knee Joints-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Focal chondral defects of the knee occur commonly in the young, active population due to trauma. Damage can insidiously spread and lead to osteoarthritis with significant functional and socioeconomic consequences. Implants consisting of autologous chondrocytes or mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) seeded onto scaffolds have been suggested as promising therapies to restore these defects. However, the degree of integration between the implant and native cartilage still requires optimization. A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL) to identify studies that used autologous chondrocyte implants (ACI) or MSC implant therapies to repair chondral defects of the tibiofemoral joint. Data on the integration of the implant-cartilage interface, as well as outcomes of clinical scoring systems, were extracted. Most eligible studies investigated the use of ACI only. Our meta-analysis showed that, across a total of 200 patients, 64% (95% CI (51%, 75%)) achieved complete integration with native cartilage. In addition, a pooled improvement in the mean MOCART integration score was observed during post-operative follow-up (standardized mean difference: 1.16; 95% CI (0.07, 2.24), p = 0.04). All studies showed an improvement in the clinical scores. The use of a collagen-based scaffold was associated with better integration and clinical outcomes. This review demonstrated that cell-seeded scaffolds can achieve good quality integration in most patients, which improves over time and is associated with clinical improvements. A greater number of studies comparing these techniques to traditional cartilage repair methods, with more inclusion of MSC-seeded scaffolds, should allow for a standardized approach to cartilage regeneration to develop.

Time Required for Planned and Unplanned Episodes of Care in Septic Two-Stage Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Septic revision total hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty requires more effort but is reimbursed less than primary procedures per minute of intraoperative time. This study quantified planned and unplanned work performed by the surgical team for septic 2-stage revision surgeries during the entire episode-of-care "reimbursement window" and compared that time to allowable reimbursement amounts.

METHODS

Between October 2010 and December 2020 all unilateral septic 2-stage rTHA and rTKA procedures performed by a single surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Time dedicated to planned work was calculated over each episode of care, from surgery scheduling to 90 days postoperatively. Impromptu patient inquiries and treatments after discharge, but within the episode of care, involving the surgeon/surgeon team constituted unplanned work. Planned and unplanned work minutes were summed and divided by the number of patients reviewed to obtain average minutes of work per patient.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight hips and 64 knees were included. For 2-stage rTHA and rTKA the average time per patient for planned care was 1728 and 1716 minutes and for unplanned care was 339 and 237 minutes. Compared to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' allowable reimbursement times, an additional 799 and 887 minutes of uncompensated time was required to care for 2-stage rTHA and rTKA patients.

CONCLUSION

Two-stage revision procedures are substantially more complex than primary procedures. Financially disincentivizing surgeons to care for these patients reduces access to care when high-quality care is most needed. These findings support increasing the allowable times for 2-stage septic revision cases.