Acute Effects of Vagotomy on Baroreflex Equilibrium Diagram in Rats with Chronic Heart Failure

Contribution of afferent pathway to vagal nerve stimulation-induced myocardial interstitial acetylcholine release in rats

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been explored as a potential therapy for chronic heart failure. The contribution of the afferent pathway to myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) release during VNS has yet to be clarified. In seven anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats, we implanted microdialysis probes in the left ventricular free wall and measured the myocardial interstitial ACh release during right VNS with the following combinations of stimulation frequency (F in Hz) and voltage readout (V in volts): F0V0 (no stimulation), F5V3, F20V3, F5V10, and F20V10. F5V3 did not affect the ACh level. F20V3, F5V10, and F20V10 increased the ACh level to 2.83 ± 0.47 (P < 0.01), 4.31 ± 1.09 (P < 0.001), and 4.33 ± 0.82 (P < 0.001) nM, respectively, compared with F0V0 (1.76 ± 0.22 nM). After right vagal afferent transection (rVAX), F20V3 and F20V10 increased the ACh level to 2.90 ± 0.53 (P < 0.001) and 3.48 ± 0.63 (P < 0.001) nM, respectively, compared with F0V0 (1.61 ± 0.19 nM), but F5V10 did not (2.11 ± 0.24 nM). The ratio of the ACh levels after rVAX relative to before was significantly <100% in F5V10 (59.4 ± 8.7%) but not in F20V3 (102.0 ± 8.7%). These results suggest that high-frequency and low-voltage stimulation (F20V3) evoked the ACh release mainly via direct activation of the vagal efferent pathway. By contrast, low-frequency and high-voltage stimulation (F5V10) evoked the ACh release in a manner dependent on the vagal afferent pathway.

Threshold and saturation pressures of baroreflex-mediated myocardial interstitial acetylcholine release in rats

Cardiac microdialysis allows the assessment of cardiac efferent vagal nerve activity from myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) levels with minimal influence on the neural control of the heart; however, a total picture of the baroreflex-mediated myocardial interstitial ACh release including the threshold and saturation pressures has yet to be quantified. In eight anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats, we implanted microdialysis probes in the left ventricular free wall and measured the myocardial interstitial ACh release simultaneously with efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) during a carotid sinus baroreceptor pressure input between 60 and 180 mm Hg. The baroreflex-mediated ACh release approximated a positive sigmoid curve, and its threshold and saturation pressures were not significantly different from those of an inverse sigmoid curve associated with the baroreflex-mediated SNA response (threshold: 94.3 ± 8.6 vs. 99.3 ± 6.0 mm Hg; saturation: 150.0 ± 10.3 vs. 158.8 ± 5.8 mm Hg). The sympathetic and vagal systems have certain levels of activities across most of the normal pressure range.

Even weak vasoconstriction from rilmenidine can be unmasked in vivo by opening the baroreflex feedback loop

AIMS

Rilmenidine and moxonidine are centrally acting antihypertensive agents that are more selective for I₁-imidazoline receptors than for α₂-adrenergic receptors. Moxonidine previously showed a peripheral vasoconstrictive effect stronger than generally recognized, which counteracted an arterial pressure (AP) lowering effect resulting from central sympathoinhibition. We tested whether rilmenidine also showed a significant vasoconstrictive effect that could attenuate its AP lowering effect.

MAIN METHODS

Efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and AP responses to changes in carotid sinus pressure were compared in nine anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats before and after low, medium, and high doses (40, 100, and 250 μg/kg, respectively) of intravenous rilmenidine.

KEY FINDINGS

High-dose rilmenidine narrowed the range of the SNA response (from 89.6 ± 2.9% to 50.4 ± 7.9%, P < 0.001) and reduced the lower asymptote of SNA (from 13.5 ± 3.0% to 2.7 ± 1.5%, P < 0.001). High-dose rilmenidine significantly increased the intercept (from 57.1 ± 3.8 to 78.2 ± 2.7 mm Hg, P < 0.001) but reduced the slope (from 0.82 ± 0.08 to 0.51 ± 0.07 mm Hg/%, P < 0.001) of the SNA-AP relationship. The reduction in the operating-point AP induced by high-dose rilmenidine did not significantly differ based on whether the peripheral effect was considered (-19.8 ± 2.2 vs. -26.4 ± 5.3 mm Hg, not significant).

SIGNIFICANCE

Rilmenidine increased AP in the absence of SNA, which suggests a peripheral vasoconstrictive effect; however, the vasoconstrictive effect was weak and did not significantly counteract the AP-lowering effect through central sympathoinhibition.

Central activation of cardiac vagal nerve by α2-adrenergic stimulation is impaired in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats

To elucidate the abnormality of cardiac vagal control in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats, we measured left ventricular myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) release in response to α₂-adrenergic stimulation as an index of in vivo cardiac vagal nerve activity. A cardiac microdialysis technique was applied to the rat left ventricle, and the effect of α₂-adrenergic stimulation by intravenous medetomidine (100 μg/kg) on myocardial interstitial ACh levels was examined in anesthetized diabetic rats (4-6 weeks after intraperitoneal streptozotocin) and age-matched control rats (protocol 1). The effect of electrical vagal nerve stimulation on ACh levels was also examined in separate rats (protocol 2). In protocol 1, medetomidine increased the ACh levels in control (from 1.76 ± 0.65 to 3.13 ± 1.41 nM, P < 0.05, n = 7) but not in diabetic rats (from 2.01 ± 0.47 to 1.62 ± 0.34 nM, not significant, n = 7). In protocol 2, electrical vagal nerve stimulation at 20 Hz significantly increased the ACh levels in both control (from 1.49 ± 0.26 to 6.39 ± 1.81 nM, P < 0.001, n = 6) and diabetic rats (from 1.77 ± 0.54 to 6.98 ± 1.38 nM, P < 0.001, n = 6). In conclusion, medetomidine-induced central vagal activation was impaired in diabetic rats, whereas peripheral cardiac vagal control of ACh release was preserved. The impairment of central vagal activation may lead to relative sympathetic predominance and promote cardiovascular complications in diabetes.

Desipramine increases cardiac parasympathetic activity via α2-adrenergic mechanism in rats

Desipramine (DMI) is a blocker of neuronal norepinephrine (NE) uptake transporter. Although intravenous DMI has been shown to cause centrally-mediated sympathoinhibition and peripheral NE accumulation, its parasympathetic effect remains to be elucidated. We hypothesized that intravenous DMI activates the cardiac vagal nerve via an α₂-adrenergic mechanism. Using a cardiac microdialysis technique, changes in myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) levels in the left ventricular free wall in response to intravenous DMI (1mg·kg^-1) were examined in anesthetized rats. In rats with intact vagi (n=7), intravenous DMI increased ACh from 1.67±0.43 to 2.48±0.66nM (P<0.01). In rats with vagotomy (n=5), DMI did not significantly change ACh (from 0.92±0.16 to 0.85±0.23nM). In rats with intact vagi pretreated with intravenous yohimbine (2mg·kg^-1), DMI did not significantly change ACh (from 1.25±0.23 to 1.13±0.15nM). In conclusion, while DMI is generally considered to be an agent that predominantly affects sympathetic neurotransmission, it can activate the cardiac vagal nerve via α₂-adrenergic stimulation in experimental settings in vivo.