1
|
Moffat GT, Hu ZI, Meric-Bernstam F, Kong EK, Pavlick D, Ross JS, Murugesan K, Kwong L, De Armas AD, Korkut A, Javle M, Knox JJ. KRAS Allelic Variants in Biliary Tract Cancers. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e249840. [PMID: 38709532 PMCID: PMC11074811 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) contain several actionable molecular alterations, including FGFR2, IDH1, ERBB2 (formerly HER2), and KRAS. KRAS allelic variants are found in 20% to 30% of BTCs, and multiple KRAS inhibitors are currently under clinical investigation. Objectives To describe the genomic landscape, co-sequence variations, immunophenotype, genomic ancestry, and survival outcomes of KRAS-mutated BTCs and to calculate the median overall survival (mOS) for the most common allelic variants. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multicenter, pooled cohort study obtained clinical and next-generation sequencing data from multiple databases between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. These databases included Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Foundation Medicine, American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE, and cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. The cohort comprised patients with BTCs who underwent genomic testing. Main Outcome and Measure The main outcome was mOS, defined as date of diagnosis to date of death, which was measured in months. Results A total of 7457 patients (n = 3773 males [50.6%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [5] years) with BTCs and genomic testing were included. Of these patients, 5813 had clinical outcome data available, in whom 1000 KRAS-mutated BTCs were identified. KRAS allelic variants were highly prevalent in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (28.6%) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (36.1%). Thirty-six KRAS allelic variants were identified, and the prevalence rates in descending order were G12D (41%), G12V (23%), and Q61H (8%). The variant G12D had the highest mOS of 25.1 (95% CI, 22.0-33.0) months compared with 22.8 (95% CI, 19.6-31.4) months for Q61H and 17.8 (95% CI, 16.3-23.1) months for G12V variants. The majority of KRAS-mutated BTCs (98.9%) were not microsatellite instability-high and had low tumor mutational burden (ranging from a median [IQR] of 1.2 (1.2-2.5) to a mean [SD] of 3.3 [1.3]). Immune profiling through RNA sequencing of KRAS and NRAS-mutated samples showed a pattern toward a more immune-inflamed microenvironment with higher M1 macrophage activation (0.16 vs 0.12; P = .047) and interferon-γ expression compared with wild-type tumors. The G12D variant remained the most common KRAS allelic variant in all patient ancestries. Patients with admixed American ancestry had the highest proportion of G12D variant (45.0%). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that KRAS allelic variants were relatively common and may be potentially actionable genomic alterations in patients with BTCs, especially perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The findings add to the growing data on genomic and immune landscapes of KRAS allelic variants in BTCs and are potentially of value to the planning of specific therapies for this heterogeneous patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Taylor Moffat
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zishuo Ian Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Developmental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Elisabeth Kathleen Kong
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Dean Pavlick
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S. Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse
| | | | - Lawrence Kwong
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Anaemy Danner De Armas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Anil Korkut
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jennifer J. Knox
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duangdara J, Boonsri B, Sayinta A, Supradit K, Thintharua P, Kumkate S, Suriyonplengsaeng C, Larbcharoensub N, Mingphruedhi S, Rungsakulkij N, Muangkaew P, Tangtawee P, Vassanasiri W, Suragul W, Janvilisri T, Tohtong R, Bates DO, Wongprasert K. CP-673451, a Selective Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Induces Apoptosis in Opisthorchis viverrini-Associated Cholangiocarcinoma via Nrf2 Suppression and Enhanced ROS. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 17:9. [PMID: 38275995 PMCID: PMC10821224 DOI: 10.3390/ph17010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) and PDGF receptors (PDGFRs) play essential roles in promoting cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cell survival by mediating paracrine crosstalk between tumor and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), indicating the potential of PDGFR as a target for CCA treatment. Clinical trials evaluating PDGFR inhibitors for CCA treatment have shown limited efficacy. Furthermore, little is known about the role of PDGF/PDGFR expression and the mechanism underlying PDGFR inhibitors in CCA related to Opisthorchis viverrini (OV). Therefore, we examined the effect of PDGFR inhibitors in OV-related CCA cells and investigated the molecular mechanism involved. We found that the PDGF and PDGFR mRNAs were overexpressed in CCA tissues compared to resection margins. Notably, PDGFR-α showed high expression in CCA cells, while PDGFR-β was predominantly expressed in CAFs. The selective inhibitor CP-673451 induced CCA cell death by suppressing the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway, leading to a decreased expression of Nrf2-targeted antioxidant genes. Consequently, this led to an increase in ROS levels and the promotion of CCA apoptosis. CP-673451 is a promising PDGFR-targeted drug for CCA and supports the further clinical investigation of CP-673451 for CCA treatment, particularly in the context of OV-related cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinchutha Duangdara
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Boonyakorn Boonsri
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
- Division of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
| | - Apinya Sayinta
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
- Division of Basic and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Pathumthani University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand
| | - Kittiya Supradit
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
- Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
| | - Pakpoom Thintharua
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
- Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute (CNMI), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Samut Prakan 10540, Thailand
| | - Supeecha Kumkate
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Noppadol Larbcharoensub
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Somkit Mingphruedhi
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Narongsak Rungsakulkij
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Paramin Muangkaew
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Pongsatorn Tangtawee
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Watoo Vassanasiri
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Wikran Suragul
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Division, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (S.M.); (W.V.); (W.S.)
| | - Tavan Janvilisri
- Graduate Program in Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Rutaiwan Tohtong
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - David O. Bates
- Centre for Cancer Sciences, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Kanokpan Wongprasert
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (J.D.); (B.B.); (K.S.); (P.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meta-analysis on prognostic value of KRAS mutation in resected mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1455-1463. [PMID: 35317947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
4
|
Canale M, Monti M, Rapposelli IG, Ulivi P, Sullo FG, Bartolini G, Tiberi E, Frassineti GL. Molecular Targets and Emerging Therapies for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5671. [PMID: 34830826 PMCID: PMC8616432 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), for their low incidence, have been often considered together. Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy, characterized by late diagnosis and poor prognosis, and although it is considered a rare tumor in western countries, other areas of the world show considerable incidence rates. In 2010, results from the large phase III ABC-02 clinical trial on GBC identified the gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as the most effective first-line regimen for both GBC and other BTCs. Since then, various systemic therapies have proven active in BTCs in both first- and second-line settings. Molecular profiling has highlighted important genetic differences between GBC and other BTCs, opening new ways for targeted therapy in advanced disease where standard chemotherapies show marginal benefit. Genome-wide data analysis have shown that GBC molecular landscape offer possible strategies for precision medicine approaches, and a better molecular understanding of the GBC is needed to better stratify patients for treatment. In this review, we discuss the molecular targetable agents for GBC, including the results that emerged by clinical trials exploring new treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Canale
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.U.)
| | - Manlio Monti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Paola Ulivi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.U.)
| | - Francesco Giulio Sullo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Giulia Bartolini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Elisa Tiberi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (I.G.R.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (E.T.); (G.L.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Persano M, Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Pusceddu V, Lai E, Pretta A, Donisi C, Pinna G, Spanu D, Cimbro E, Parrino A, Liscia N, Mariani S, Dubois M, Migliari M, Scartozzi M. Molecular-driven treatment for biliary tract cancer: the promising turning point. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:1253-1264. [PMID: 34551663 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1982699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the past, targeted therapies have not shown positive results as they have been used without adequate molecular selection of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). This has led to an expansion of research on characteristics and molecular selection to identify new effective strategies in this setting. Improved knowledge of the molecular biology of these neoplasms has highlighted their extraordinary heterogeneity and has made it possible to identify targetable gene alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene fusions, and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations. The FDA recently approved ivosidenib and pemigatinib for the treatment of BTCs. AREAS COVERED We review data in the literature regarding targeted therapies for the treatment of BTCs, as well as on the prospects deriving from the extraordinary molecular heterogeneity of these neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION At present, it is essential to evaluate the expression of the genetic alterations expressed by these neoplasms to offer patients an increasingly personalized therapeutic approach. Studies are needed to better define the limits and potentials of targeted therapies and their role in the therapeutic algorithm to improve the poor prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Persano
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Puzzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pina Ziranu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Valeria Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Eleonora Lai
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrea Pretta
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Clelia Donisi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giovanna Pinna
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Dario Spanu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Erika Cimbro
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alissa Parrino
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nicole Liscia
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mariani
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Dubois
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Migliari
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen MLT, Toan NL, Bozko M, Bui KC, Bozko P. Cholangiocarcinoma Therapeutics: An Update. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2021; 21:457-475. [PMID: 33563168 DOI: 10.2174/1568009621666210204152028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common hepatobiliary cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. Only one-third of CCA cases are diagnosed at operable stages. However, a high rate of relapse has been observed postoperatively. Besides screening for operable individuals, efficacious therapeutic for recurrent and advanced CCA is urgently needed. The treatment outcome of available therapeutics is important to clarify clinical indication and facilitate the development of treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE This review aims to compare the treatment outcome of different therapeutics based on both overall survival and progression-free survival. METHODS Over one hundred peer-reviewed articles were examined. We compared the treatment outcome between different treatment methods, including tumor resection with or without postoperative systematic therapy, chemotherapies including FOFLOX, and targeted therapies, such as IDH1, K-RAS, and FGFR inhibitors. Notably, the scientific basis and outcome of available treatment methods were compared with the standard first-line therapy. RESULTS CCAs at early stages should firstly undergo tumor resection surgery, followed by postoperative treatment with Capecitabine. Chemotherapy can be considered as a preoperative option for unresectable CCAs. Inoperable CCAs with genetic aberrances like FGFR alterations, IDH1, and KRAS mutations should be considered with targeted therapies. Fluoropyrimidine prodrug (S-1)/Gemcitabine/Cisplatin and nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine/Cisplatin show favorable outcome which hints at the triplet regimen to be superior to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin on CCA. The triplet chemotherapeutic should be tested further compared to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin among CCAs without genetic alterations. Gemcitabine plus S-1 was recently suggested as the convenient and equivalent standard first-line for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer. CONCLUSION This review provides a comparative outcome between novel targeted therapies and currently available therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Ly Thi Nguyen
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nguyen Linh Toan
- Department of Pathophysiology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Maria Bozko
- Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - Khac Cuong Bui
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Przemyslaw Bozko
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boonsri B, Yacqub-Usman K, Thintharua P, Myint KZ, Sae-Lao T, Collier P, Suriyonplengsaeng C, Larbcharoensub N, Balasubramanian B, Venkatraman S, Egbuniwe IU, Gomez D, Mukherjee A, Kumkate S, Janvilisri T, Zaitoun AM, Kuakpaetoon T, Tohtong R, Grabowska AM, Bates DO, Wongprasert K. Effect of Combining EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Agents on Cholangiocarcinoma Cells. Cancer Res Treat 2020; 53:457-470. [PMID: 33070556 PMCID: PMC8053863 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The potential of members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB) family as drug targets in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has not been extensively addressed. Although phase III clinical trials showed no survival benefits of erlotinib in patients with advanced CCA, the outcome of the standard-of-care chemotherapy treatment for CCA, gemcitabine/cisplatin, is discouraging so we determined the effect of other ErbB receptor inhibitors alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy in CCA cells. Materials and Methods ErbB receptor expression was determined in CCA patient tissues by immunohistochemistry and digital-droplet polymerase chain reaction, and in primary cells and cell lines by immunoblot. Effects on cell viability and cell cycle distribution of combination therapy using ErbB inhibitors with chemotherapeutic drugs was carried out in CCA cell lines. 3D culture of primary CCA cells was then adopted to evaluate the drug effect in a setting that more closely resembles in vivo cell environments. Results CCA tumors showed higher expression of all ErbB receptors compared with resection margins. Primary and CCA cell lines had variable expression of erbB receptors. CCA cell lines showed decreased cell viability when treated with chemotherapeutic drugs (gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil) but also with ErbB inhibitors, particularly afatinib, and with a combination. Sequential treatment of gemcitabine with afatinib was particularly effective. Co-culture of CCA primary cells with cancer-associated fibroblasts decreased sensitivity to chemotherapies, but sensitized to afatinib. Conclusion Afatinib is a potential epidermal growth factor receptor targeted drug for CCA treatment and sequential treatment schedule of gemcitabine and afatinib could be explored in CCA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boonyakorn Boonsri
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kiren Yacqub-Usman
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pakpoom Thintharua
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kyaw Zwar Myint
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thannicha Sae-Lao
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pam Collier
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Noppadol Larbcharoensub
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Brinda Balasubramanian
- Molecular Medicine Program, Multidisciplinary Unit, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Simran Venkatraman
- Molecular Medicine Program, Multidisciplinary Unit, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Isioma U Egbuniwe
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dhanwant Gomez
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and NIHR Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Abhik Mukherjee
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Supeecha Kumkate
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tavan Janvilisri
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Abed M Zaitoun
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Rutaiwan Tohtong
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anna M Grabowska
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David O Bates
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kanokpan Wongprasert
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Athauda A, Fong C, Lau DK, Javle M, Abou-Alfa GK, Morizane C, Steward K, Chau I. Broadening the therapeutic horizon of advanced biliary tract cancer through molecular characterisation. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 86:101998. [PMID: 32203843 PMCID: PMC8222858 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a group of rare and heterogeneous poor-prognosis tumours with the incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma increasing over recent years. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line treatment for advanced BTC with a significant but modest survival advantage over monotherapy. There remains no accepted standard treatment in the second-line setting, although recent results from a randomised study have shown a survival benefit with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Historically, clinical trials investigating targeted therapies in unselected BTC have failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. More recently, advancement in molecular exploration of BTC has shed light on the complex biological heterogeneity within these tumours and has also identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and BRAF mutations, which offer promise with the anticipation of increased responses and durable clinical benefit in selected patients. Several targeted drugs have now entered clinical development with some encouraging results being seen. Here we review the current and rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced BTC, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy. We also discuss how recent efforts and successes in BTC are overcoming the obstacles typically associated with precision medicine in rare cancers. Ultimately, the management of advanced BTC is likely to become molecularly selected in the near future with the hope of finally improving the bleak prognosis of patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avani Athauda
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| | - Caroline Fong
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| | - David K Lau
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| | - Milind Javle
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Keith Steward
- QED Therapeutics Inc, 75 Federal Street, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
| | - Ian Chau
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Models for Understanding Resistance to Chemotherapy in Liver Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11111677. [PMID: 31671735 PMCID: PMC6896032 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The lack of response to pharmacological treatment constitutes a substantial limitation in the handling of patients with primary liver cancers (PLCs). The existence of active mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOCs) in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and hepatoblastoma hampers the usefulness of chemotherapy. A better understanding of MOCs is needed to develop strategies able to overcome drug refractoriness in PLCs. With this aim, several experimental models are commonly used. These include in vitro cell-free assays using subcellular systems; studies with primary cell cultures; cancer cell lines or heterologous expression systems; multicellular models, such as spheroids and organoids; and a variety of in vivo models in rodents, such as subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor xenografts or chemically or genetically induced liver carcinogenesis. Novel methods to perform programmed genomic edition and more efficient techniques to isolate circulating microvesicles offer new opportunities for establishing useful experimental tools for understanding the resistance to chemotherapy in PLCs. In the present review, using three criteria for information organization: (1) level of research; (2) type of MOC; and (3) type of PLC, we have summarized the advantages and limitations of the armamentarium available in the field of pharmacological investigation of PLC chemoresistance.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mishra SK, Kumari N, Krishnani N. Molecular pathogenesis of gallbladder cancer: An update. Mutat Res 2019; 816-818:111674. [PMID: 31330366 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2019.111674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy throughout the world, with wide geographical variance. It is the subtype of biliary tract malignancy that has the poorest prognosis and lower survival among all biliary tract malignancies. Various factors are associated with GBC pathogenesis such as environmental, microbial, metabolic and molecular. Chronic inflammation of gallbladder due to presence of gallstone or microbial infection (eg. Salmonella or H. pylori) results in sustained production of inflammatory mediators in the tissue microenvironment, which can cause genomic changes linked to carcinogenesis. Genetic alterations are one of the major factors, associated with aggressiveness and prognosis. Researches have been done to explore suitable biomarker for early diagnosis and identify altered molecular pathways to develop appropriate biomarkers for early diagnosis, therapy and predicting prognosis. Different agents for targeted therapy against actionable mutations of molecules like EGFR, VEGF, mTOR, HER2, PDL-1, PD-1, MET, PI3K, N-cadherin, VEGFR, MEK1 and MEK2 are being tried. Despite these advancements, there is dismal improvement in the survival of GBC patients. Genetic aberrations other than actionable mutations and epigenetic modification including aberrant expressions of micro-RNAs, are also being studied both as diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic targets. Complex pathogenesis of GBC still needs to be unfolded. In this review we focus on the molecular pathogenesis of GBC elucidated till date along with future directions that can be explored to achieve better management of GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shravan Kumar Mishra
- Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
| | - Niraj Kumari
- Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
| | - Narendra Krishnani
- Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
| |
Collapse
|