Ocular surface cytotoxicity and safety evaluation of tafluprost, a recently developed anti-glaucoma prostaglandin analog

Effects of PPAR-γ and RXR-α on mouse meibomian gland epithelial cells during inflammation induced by latanoprost

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of latanoprost on the secretion of cytokines and chemokines from meibomian gland epithelial cells, and to evaluate the modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) and retinoid X receptor α (RXR-α) during latanoprost-induced inflammation. Mouse meibomian gland epithelial cells were cultured in proliferation and differentiation medium, respectively. Cells were exposed to latanoprost, rosiglitazone (PPAR-γ agonist), or LG100268 (RXR-α agonist), respectively. The expression of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, MMP-9, MCP-1, and CCL-5 were detected by real-time PCR and ELISA. The effect of latanoprost, rosiglitazone, LG100268, and inflammatory cytokines on the differentiation of meibocyte were evaluated by related gene expression and lipid staining. The expression of Keratin-1, 6, 17 protein was detected by western immunoblotting. The results showed that the above cytokines could be induced by latanoprost in meibomian gland epithelial cells. LG100268 and rosiglitazone could inhibit the production of IL-6 and TNF-α induced by latanoprost, respectively. Latanoprost suppressed the expression of differentiation-related mRNA through a positive feedback loop by enhancement of COX-2 expression via FP receptor-activated ERK signaling. The expression of Keratin-17 was upregulated by rosiglitazone and suppressed by LG100268. The application of IL-6 and TNF-α showed negative effects on lipid accumulation in meibomian gland epithelial cells. These results demonstrated that latanoprost could induce inflammation and suppress differentiation of mouse meibomian gland epithelial cells. The activation of PPAR-γ and RXR-α showed an anti-inflammatory effect, showing a potential role to antagonize the effect of latanoprost eyedrops on meibomian gland epithelial cells.

The Effects of Antiglaucoma Ophthalmic Solutions on the Cornea Revealed by a Corneal Electrical Resistance Device

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the effect of antiglaucoma ophthalmic solutions on the cornea with a corneal resistance device (CRD), and to compare the results with those by fluorescein staining. Methods: In 6 rabbit groups (n = 7 each), right eyes were administered latanoprost ophthalmic solution containing 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAK); dorzolamide/timolol (1%/0.5%) containing 0.005% BAK; dorzolamide/timolol without BAK; dorzolamide/timolol+latanoprost with 0.02% BAK; 0.005% BAK; or 0.02% BAK to the conjunctival sac 3 × at 15-min intervals. Left (control) eyes were administered saline. Baseline and post-treatment corneal resistance (CR) were measured. The CR ratio = CR before versus after treatment. We evaluated superficial punctate keratitis by fluorescein staining using area and density (AD) grades. Results: In the dorzolamide/timolol-without BAK group, there were no significant difference in the CR ratio between the control and treatment eyes at any time point. In the 0.005%-BAK group at 30 min and the other 4 groups at all time points, the CR ratio differed significantly between the control and treatment eyes (P < 0.05). AD grades were 0 in all control eyes and the dorzolamide/timolol-without BAK and 0.005% BAK treatment eyes. Conclusions: Nonpreservative ophthalmic solutions (and those with low BAK concentrations) do not significantly affect corneal electrical resistance. Eye drop ingredients other than BAK may be involved in altering corneal electrical resistance. CRDs may detect corneal epithelium changes not revealed by fluorescein staining.

Aqueous humor tyrosinase activity is indicative of iris melanocyte toxicity

Antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones (FQLs) are commonly used to treat ocular infections but are also known to cause dermal melanocyte toxicity. The release of dispersed pigments from the iris into the aqueous humor has been considered a possible ocular side effect of the systemic administration of FQLs such as Moxifloxacin, and this condition is known as bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT). Bilateral acute depigmentation of iris (BADI) is a similar condition, with iris pigment released into the aqueous, but it has not been reported as a side effect of FQL. Iris pigments are synthesized by the melanogenic enzyme tyrosinase (TYR) and can be detected but not quantified by using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The correlation between dispersed pigments in the aqueous and the extent of melanocyte toxicity due to topical antibiotics in vivo is not well studied. Here, we aimed to study the effect of topical FQLs on iris tissue, the pigment release in the aqueous humor and the development of clinically evident iris atrophic changes. We evaluated this process by measuring the activity of TYR in the aqueous humor of 82 healthy eyes undergoing cataract surgery following topical application of FQLs such as Moxifloxacin (27 eyes, preservative-free) or Ciprofloxacin (29 eyes, with preservative) or the application of non-FQL Tobramycin (26 eyes, with preservative) as a control. In addition, the patients were questioned and examined for ocular side effects in pre- and post-operative periods. Our data showed a significantly higher mean TYR activity in the aqueous humor of Ciprofloxacin-treated eyes compared to Moxifloxacin- (preservative free, p < 0.0001) or Tobramycin-treated eyes (p < 0.0001), which indicated that few quinolones under certain conditions are toxic to the iris melanocytes. However, the reduced TYR activity in the aqueous of Moxifloxacin-treated eyes was possibly due to the presence of a higher drug concentration, which inhibits TYR activity. Consistently, immunoblotting analysis of the aqueous humor from both Ciprofloxacin- and Moxifloxacin-treated eyes showed the presence of soluble TYR enzyme, thus reflecting its toxicity to iris melanocytes and corresponding to its activity in the aqueous humor. Intriguingly, none of these patients developed any clinically appreciable ocular side effects characteristic of BAIT or BADI. Overall, our results suggest that topical antibiotics cause different levels of iris melanocyte toxicity, releasing dispersed pigments into the aqueous humor, which can be measured through TYR enzyme activity. Hence, we conclude that topical FQLs may cause subclinical toxicity to the iris melanocytes but may not be the sole cause of the development of BAIT or BADI.

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies

PURPOSE

Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and timolol were compared after single (Day 1) and repeated (Day 8) instillations of once-daily tafluprost 0.0015%-timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FDC), once-daily PF tafluprost 0.0015%, and twice-daily PF timolol 0.5%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers were randomized to this double-masked, single-center, three-period cross-over study. A wash-out interval of at least 4 weeks separated each three 8-day dosing period. Blood samples were drawn on the first and last day of each dosing period, prior to the morning dose, as well as 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post-dosing. Sample plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and/or timolol were determined and maximum concentration (C max), area under the concentration-over-time curve from time zero to the last time point with a quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last), and time to maximum concentration were calculated. Intraocular pressure (IOP), adverse events, and ocular/systemic safety variables were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid were low, with similar levels measured subsequent to either single or repeated dosing of PF FDC and PF tafluprost. On both sampling days, concentrations peaked at 10 min after the dose, and were cleared from the blood circulation by 30 min; average C max ranged from 17 to 24 pg/mL, and AUC0-last from 3 to 5 pg*h/mL. Plasma concentrations of timolol were comparable after the first dose of PF FDC or PF timolol. Concentrations peaked at 15 min post-dose and diminished in a similar manner after 2 h; average C max was 800 pg/mL and AUC0-last 3900 pg*h/mL. As expected, PF timolol produced a higher Day 8 pre-dose timolol concentration than PF FDC (235 vs. 37 pg/mL; p < 0.001, respectively). The Day 8 post-dose changes in timolol concentrations were relative to this pre-dose difference. All study treatments were well tolerated and safe. PF FDC seemed to provide the best IOP reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

PF FDC demonstrated good IOP-lowering efficacy and displayed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics to the monotherapy agents. Exposure to timolol was reduced via the halved dosing.

Preservative-free tafluprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in India: a phase III clinical trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free (PF) tafluprost compared with PF timolol in Indian subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

This was a randomised, multicentre, double-masked, phase III trial. Subjects aged 18-80 years, following washout of current medication, with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 24 and ≤ 36 mmHg in at least one eye were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to 0.0015% PF tafluprost or 0.5% PF timolol for 4 weeks. IOP was measured at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 hours at baseline and at weeks 2 and 4. The primary efficacy end-point was the mean diurnal IOP change from baseline at week 4, and PF tafluprost was considered non-inferior to PF timolol if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for between-treatment differences was ≤ 1.5 mmHg. The secondary end-point was the proportion of subjects with ≥ 25% reduction in IOP from baseline at week 4.

RESULTS

In total, 190 subjects were randomised, 95 each, to PF tafluprost and PF timolol treatment. PF tafluprost was non-inferior to PF timolol with respect to diurnal IOP changes from baseline over 4 weeks. The mean PF tafluprost-PF timolol difference in the diurnal IOP change was -1.7 (95% CI -2.6 to -0.7), suggestive of superiority for PF tafluprost. The secondary end-point was achieved in a higher proportion of PF tafluprost group subjects. Both PF tafluprost and PF timolol were well-tolerated with similar incidences of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

PF tafluprost was safe and efficacious in reducing IOP in Indian subjects.

Ocular Tolerability of Preservative-Free Tafluprost and Latanoprost: in vitro and in vivo Comparative Study

Objective:

Detrimental effects of the preserved prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) have been thoroughly documented in the published literature. The current work studied two preservative-free (PF) prostaglandin eye drops: PF tafluprost and PF latanoprost. The aim of the study was to compare these two PF formulations in vitro for viability of the human corneal epithelial (HCE-T) cells and in vivo for ocular tolerability of the rabbit eye.

Method:

Viability of the HCE-T cells was measured by the MTS assay. The SV40-immortalized HCE-T cells were exposed to 100 µL of the drug solutions (at their commercial concentrations) or the culture medium. Ocular irritation was evaluated after repeated instillation of the drug solutions in Japanese white rabbits (Kbl:JW).

Results:

A significant loss of HCE-T cell viability was observed in vitro immediately after the exposure to PF latanoprost formulation but not immediately after the exposure to PF tafluprost formulation. Congruently, PF latanoprost induced in vivo more irritation on the rabbit eye than PF tafluprost.

Conclusion:

Comparing these two PF formulations in vitro and in vivo, it is considered that ocular tolerability of PF tafluprost is better than PF latanoprost. Taking into account the composition of these two PF PGA formulations, the solubilizing agent macrogolglycerol hydroxystearate 40 (MGHS40) contained in PF latanoprost formulation is a plausible cause for the negative effects.

Benefits of switching from latanoprost to preservative-free tafluprost eye drops: a meta-analysis of two Phase IIIb clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma patients frequently exhibit ocular surface side effects during treatment with prostaglandin eye drops. The present work investigated whether glaucoma patients suffering from signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease while using preserved latanoprost eye drops benefited from switching to preservative-free tafluprost eye drops.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis was based on 339 glaucoma patients enrolled in two Phase IIIb trials. The patients were required to have two symptoms, or one sign and one symptom of ocular surface disease at baseline, and at least 6 months preceding treatment with latanoprost eye drops preserved with benzalkonium chloride. All eligible patients were switched from latanoprost to preservative-free tafluprost for a total of 12 weeks. Ocular symptoms and ocular signs were evaluated at baseline and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after commencing treatment with tafluprost. Intraocular pressure (IOP), drop discomfort, and treatment preference were evaluated to investigate the clinical efficacy and patient-related outcomes.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of treatment with preservative-free tafluprost, the incidences of irritation/burning/stinging, foreign body sensation, tearing, itching, and dry eye sensation had diminished to one-third of those reported for preserved latanoprost at baseline. The incidences of blepharitis and corneal/conjunctival fluorescein staining had in turn decreased to one-half of those reported for preserved latanoprost. Severity of conjunctival hyperemia was halved during treatment with preservative-free tafluprost, and there was significant improvement in tear break-up time and tear production. A further reduction in IOP (~1 mmHg) was seen with preservative-free tafluprost compared with preserved latanoprost. Drop discomfort was alleviated during preservative-free tafluprost treatment, and an outstanding majority of patients (72%) preferred preservative-free tafluprost over preserved latanoprost.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed that IOP remained at the same level after replacing benzalkonium chloride-preserved latanoprost eye drops with preservative-free tafluprost eye drops. Preservative-free tafluprost significantly decreased the symptoms and signs of ocular surface disease and outrated latanoprost in drop comfort and treatment preference.

In Vivo Effects of Preservative-free and Preserved Prostaglandin Analogs: Mouse Ocular Surface Study

Purpose

Chronic use of topical hypotensive agents induces several side effects caused by preservatives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of prostaglandin analogs with varying concentrations of benzalkonium chloride (BAC), preservative-free (PF), and alternative preservatives on mouse corneal tissue.

Methods

Thirty-five, 8- to 10-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (five mice for each group) were used for this study. To the control group, we applied normal saline, and to each drug-treated group we applied 0.02% BAC, bimatoprost 0.01% (with BAC 0.02%), latanoprost 0.005% (with BAC 0.02%), travoprost 0.004% (with 0.001% polyquad) or tafluprost 0.0015% with/without 0.001% BAC, once a day (9 p.m.) for 4 weeks. Corneal fluorescein staining was evaluated in all groups. After harvest, the corneal tissues were embedded in paraffin and then Hematoxylin-Eosin stain was performed for histopathological examination. Immunofluorescence staining was done against TNF-α, IL-6, HLA DR, pJNK, and pAkt.

Results

In corneal fluorescein staining, severe punctate epithelial keratitis was seen in the groups of 0.02% BAC, 0.02% BAC containing bimatoprost 0.01% and latanoprost 0.005%. The surface desquamation, irregular surface, loss of cell borders, anisocytosis and stromal shrinkage were observed in the groups of BAC-containing eye drops. Moreover, the groups treated with BAC-containing eye drops have high inflammatory markers, significantly decreased cell viability-related signal, pAkt, and higher apoptosis-inducing signal, pJNK, than the control group. On the other hand, travoprost 0.004% and PF tafluprost 0.0015% have less cellular morphologic changes, lower inflammation, and higher cellular viability than BAC-containing formulations.

Conclusions

Corneal damage, increased inflammation and apoptosis and low cell viability were observed in BAC-containing groups. PF or alternatively preserved glaucoma medications seem to be a reasonable and viable alternative to those preserved with BAC.

Efficacy and tolerability of mono-compound topical treatments for reduction of intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: an overview of reviews

AIM

To evaluate the existing evidence on relative efficacy and tolerability of topical mono-compound intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering drugs in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

METHODS

In this systematic review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials a thorough and sensitive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Databases was performed. Individual study methodological quality and quality of evidence were assessed using the AMSTAR checklist and the GRADE system, respectively. The relationships between individual drugs were evaluated based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

Of the 133 initial non-duplicate records, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five achieved an overall "moderate" (none achieved "high") quality of evidence and evaluated prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) - latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost; timolol; "other beta-blockers;" carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI) as a group or dorzolamide separately; and brimonidine. "Moderate quality" refers to efficacy and incidence of conjunctival hyperemia. Quality of evidence regarding other tolerability aspects was low. PGAs should be considered equivalent regarding efficacy, but latanoprost was relevantly better tolerated than the other two. Non-PGA compounds did not relevantly differ between each other in either efficacy or safety. Timolol and brimonidine were relevantly less effective than all PGAs. The same was true for CAI vs bimatoprost. Regarding tolerability, timolol was superior to all PGAs and brimonidine and CAI were superior to bimatoprost.

CONCLUSION

No high quality evidence on relative efficacy and tolerability of the most commonly used mono-compound IOP-lowering drugs for POAG/OHT exists. Moderate quality evidence indicates latanoprost as a treatment with the most favorable trade-off between benefits and harms.