Development of a semi-automated MHC-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) method using streptavidin bead-based immunoaffinity capture and nano LC-MS/MS to support immunogenicity risk assessment in drug development

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-Associated Peptide Proteomics (MAPPs) is an ex vivo method used to assess the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics. MAPPs can identify potential T-cell epitopes within the biotherapeutic molecule. Using adalimumab treated human monocyte derived dendritic cells (DCs) and a pan anti-HLA-DR antibody (Ab), we systematically automated and optimized biotin/streptavidin (SA)-capture antibody coupling, lysate incubation with capture antibody, as well as the washing and elution steps of a MAPPs method using functionalized magnetic beads and a KingFisher Magnetic Particle processor. Automation of these steps, combined with capturing using biotinylated-Ab/SA magnetic beads rather than covalently bound antibody, improved reproducibility as measured by minimal inter-and intra-day variability, as well as minimal analyst-to-analyst variability. The semi-automated MAPPs workflow improved sensitivity, allowing for a lower number of cells per analysis. The method was assessed using five different biotherapeutics with varying immunogenicity rates ranging from 0.1 to 48% ADA incidence in the clinic. Biotherapeutics with ≥10%immunogenicity incidence consistently presented more peptides (1.8-28 fold) and clusters (10-21 fold) compared to those with <10% immunogenicity incidence. Our semi-automated MAPPs method provided two main advantages over a manual workflow- the robustness and reproducibility affords confidence in the epitopes identified from as few as 5 to 10 donors and the method workflow can be readily adapted to incorporate different capture Abs in addition to anti-HLA-DR. The incorporation of semi-automated MAPPs with biotinylated-Ab/SA bead-based capture in immunogenicity screening strategies allows the generation of more consistent and reliable data, helping to improve immunogenicity prediction capabilities in drug development. MHC associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs), Immunogenicity risk assessment, in vitro/ex vivo, biotherapeutics, Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II (MHC II), LC-MS, Immunoaffinity Capture, streptavidin magnetic beads.

Immunopurification Reagents and Their Application in Biologics and Biomarker Quantitation Using LC-MS/MS in Drug Discovery

The LC-MS/MS technology is one of the most utilized bio-analytical tools owing to its advantage of selectivity, sensitivity and multitasking. The advent of novel biological therapies and increasing demand for protein biomarker identification and quantitation have put the LC-MS/MS technology at the forefront. The questions which are been posed to the LC-MS/MS scientist are complex. The complexity of the question increases further with the matrices in which these questions need to be answered. To bring down the complexity of the analysis, LC-MS/MS technology is utilizing the immunopurification (IP) technique as the new sample preparation technique. The IP reagents are the most common reagents which are used to decrease the matrices' complexity and allow the LC-MS/MS system to reach greater sensitivity. The utilization of these reagents is increasing every day, but the proper utilization of these reagents is still unknown to the common analyst in drug discovery. The present review throws light on the utilization aspect of these reagents, as we have classified these reagents on basis of their utilization, which will allow the readers to gain an understanding of these reagents. This review will also talk about the merits and the demerits of each approach and the current understanding of utilizing these reagents.

Quantitative bioanalysis of proteins by digestion and LC-MS/MS: the use of multiple signature peptides

The use of multiple signature peptides for the quantification of proteins by digestion and LC-MS/MS is reviewed and evaluated here. A distinction is made based on the purpose of the use of multiple peptides: confirmation of the protein concentration, discrimination between different protein forms or species and in vivo biotransformation. Most reports that describe methods with at least two peptides use these for confirmation, but it is not always mentioned how the peptides are used and how possible differences in concentration between the peptides are handled. Differences in concentration are often reported in the case of monitoring different protein forms or in vivo biotransformation, and this offers insight into the biological fate of the protein.

Therapeutic peptides for chemotherapy: Trends and challenges for advanced delivery systems

The past decades witnessed an increasing interest in peptides as clinical therapeutics. Rightfully considered as a potential alternative for small molecule therapy, these remarkable pharmaceuticals can be structurally fine-tuned to impact properties such as high target affinity, selectivity, low immunogenicity along with satisfactory tissue penetration. Although physicochemical and pharmacokinetic challenges have mitigated, to some extent, the clinical applications of therapeutic peptides, their potential impact on modern healthcare remains encouraging. According to recent reports, there are more than 400 peptides under clinical trials and 60 were already approved for clinical use. As the demand for efficient and safer therapy became high, especially for cancers, peptides have shown some exciting developments not only due to their potent antiproliferative action but also when used as adjuvant therapies, either to decrease side effects with tumor-targeted therapy or to enhance the activity of anticancer drugs via transbarrier delivery. The first part of the present review gives an insight into challenges related to peptide product development. Both molecular and formulation approaches intended to optimize peptide's pharmaceutical properties are covered, and some of their current issues are highlighted. The second part offers a comprehensive overview of the emerging applications of therapeutic peptides in chemotherapy from bioconjugates to nanovectorized therapeutics.

The role of ligand-binding assay and LC-MS in the bioanalysis of complex protein and oligonucleotide therapeutics

Ligand-binding assay (LBA) and LC-MS have been the preferred bioanalytical techniques for the quantitation and biotransformation assessment of various therapeutic modalities. This review provides an overview of the applications of LBA, LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS for the bioanalysis of complex protein therapeutics including antibody-drug conjugates, fusion proteins and PEGylated proteins as well as oligonucleotide therapeutics. The strengths and limitations of LBA and LC-MS, along with some guidelines on the choice of appropriate bioanalytical technique(s) for the bioanalysis of these therapeutic modalities are presented. With the discovery of novel and more complex therapeutic modalities, there is an increased need for the biopharmaceutical industry to develop a comprehensive bioanalytical strategy integrating both LBA and LC-MS.

An Automated Multicycle Immunoaffinity Enrichment Approach Developed for Sensitive Mouse IgG1 Antibody Drug Analysis in Mouse Plasma Using LC/MS/MS

In the immuno-oncology field, surrogate mouse monoclonal antibodies are often preferred in establishing proper PK/PD/efficacy correlations as well as supporting anticipated mouse to human translation. Thus, a highly sensitive and specific bioanalytical method is needed in quantifying those surrogate mouse antibodies after dosing in mice. Unfortunately, when specific reagents, such as recombinant target antigen and anti-idiotypic antibody, are not available, measuring mouse surrogate antibody drugs in mice is very challenging for ligand binding assay (LBA) due to the severe cross reactivity potential. Different from LBA, if at least one unique surrogate peptide can be identified from the surrogate antibody sequence, the immunoaffinity enrichment based LC/MS/MS assay may be able to differentiate the analyte response from the high endogenous immunoglobulin background and provide adequate sensitivity. Herein, a new automated multicycle immunoaffinity enrichment method was recently developed to extract a surrogate mouse IgG1 (mIgG1) antibody drug from mouse plasma using a commercially available antimouse IgG1 secondary antibody. In the assay, reuse of the capture antibody up to six times mostly resolved the binding capacity issue caused by the abundant endogenous mIgG1 and made the immunoaffinity enrichment step more cost-effective. Combined with a unique surrogate peptide identified from the antibody, the LC/MS/MS assay achieved a limit of quantitation of 5 ng/mL with satisfactory assay precision, accuracy, and dynamic range. The successful implementation of this novel approach in discovery pharmacokinetic (PK) studies eliminates the dependence on specially generated immunoaffinity capturing reagents.

Immunoaffinity LC–MS/MS is more suitable than ELISA to quantify a PEGylated molecule in cynomolgus monkey serum

Background: Polyethylene glycolylation (PEGylation) technology is a long-acting delivery platform used to increase the half-life of protein therapeutics. Quantitation of PEGylated anti-Factor D Fab (PEG-aFD) poses bioanalytical challenges. Results: An ELISA was developed to determine total Fab concentration in cynomolgus monkey serum following intravitreal administration of PEG-aFD. However, assay characterization showed a low recovery of about 25% for free unconjugated Fab whereas recovery for PEG-conjugated Fab was within 80–120%. To overcome this challenge, an immunoaffinity liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (IA LC–MS/MS) assay was developed, achieving recovery within 80–120% for both free and conjugated Fab. Conclusion: Immunoaffinity LC–MS/MS is more suitable than ELISA to accurately quantify the total protein concentration of PEG-aFD in cynomolgus monkey serum.