1
|
van den Brink N, Even R, Delic E, van Hellenberg Hubar-Fisher S, van Rossum HH. Self-sampling of blood using a topper and pediatric tubes; a prospective feasibility study for PSA analysis using 120 prostate cancer patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:2159-2166. [PMID: 37314986 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Self-collection of blood for diagnostic purposes by blood collection assist devices (BCAD) has gained a lot of momentum. Nonetheless, there are a lack of studies demonstrating the feasibility and reliability of self-collecting capillary blood for routine (immuno)chemistry testing. In this study we describe the topper technology together with pediatric tubes to enable self-collection of blood and investigated its feasibility for PSA testing by prostate cancer patients. METHODS A total of 120 prostate cancer patients for which a routine follow-up PSA test was requested, were included in this study. Patients received instruction materials and the blood-collection device consisting of a topper, pediatric tube and base-part, and performed the blood collection procedure themselves. Afterwards a questionnaire was filled-in. Finally, PSA was measured on a Roche Cobas Pro. RESULTS The overall self-sampling success rate was 86.7 %. Furthermore, when specified per age category, a 94.7 % success rate for patients under 70 years and a 25 % success rate for patients of 80 years and older was observed. Venous and self-collected PSA were highly comparable when analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression with a slope of 0.99 and intercept of 0.00011, Spearmans correlation coefficient (0.998) and average self-collected PSA recovery of 99.8 %. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is presented that self-collected capillary blood by topper and pediatric tube from the finger is feasible, particularly for patients under 70 years. Furthermore, capillary blood self-sampling did not compromise any of the PSA test results. Future validation in a real-world setting, without supervision and including sample stability and logistics, is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rixt Even
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Enver Delic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Huub H van Rossum
- Self Safe Sure Blood Collections B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maass KF, Barfield MD, Ito M, James CA, Kavetska O, Kozinn M, Kumar P, Lepak M, Leuthold LA, Li W, Mikhailov D, Patel S, Perez NL, Jackson Rudd D, Vakkalagadda B, Williams TM, Zha J, Zhang X, Anderson MD. Leveraging patient-centric sampling for clinical drug development and decentralized clinical trials: Promise to reality. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:2785-2795. [PMID: 36129129 PMCID: PMC9747123 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in the technologies to enable patient-centric sampling (PCS) have the potential to improve blood sample collection by enabling clinical trial participants to collect samples via self-collection or with the help of a caregiver in their home. Typically, blood samples to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug during clinical development are collected at a clinical site via venous blood draw. In this position paper by the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ), the potential value PCS can bring to patients, to the clinical datasets generated, and to clinical trial sponsors is discussed, along with considerations for program decision making, bioanalytical feasibility, operations, and regulatory implications. With an understanding of the value of PCS and considerations when implementing during clinical drug development, we can bring the promise of PCS closer to reality and enable decentralized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mototsugu Ito
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.NorthbrookIllinoisUSA
| | | | | | - Marc Kozinn
- Bristol Myers SquibbLawrencevilleNew JerseyUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nisha L. Perez
- Blueprint MedicinesCambridgeMassachusettsUSA,ROME TherapeuticsCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Xin Zhang
- Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knitza J, Tascilar K, Vuillerme N, Eimer E, Matusewicz P, Corte G, Schuster L, Aubourg T, Bendzuck G, Korinth M, Elling-Audersch C, Kleyer A, Boeltz S, Hueber AJ, Krönke G, Schett G, Simon D. Accuracy and tolerability of self-sampling of capillary blood for analysis of inflammation and autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients-results from a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:125. [PMID: 35614488 PMCID: PMC9130452 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02809-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires early diagnosis and tight surveillance of disease activity. Remote self-collection of blood for the analysis of inflammation markers and autoantibodies could improve the monitoring of RA and facilitate the identification of individuals at-risk for RA. OBJECTIVE Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the accuracy, feasibility, and acceptability of an upper arm self-sampling device (UA) and finger prick-test (FP) to measure capillary blood from RA patients for C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the presence of IgM rheumatoid factor (RF IgM) and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP IgG). METHODS RA patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to self-collection of capillary blood via UA or FP. Venous blood sampling (VBS) was performed as a gold standard in both groups to assess the concordance of CRP levels as well as RF IgM and CCP IgG. General acceptability and pain during sampling were measured and compared between UA, FP, and VBS. The number of attempts for successful sampling, requests for assistance, volume, and duration of sample collection were also assessed. RESULTS Fifty seropositive RA patients were included. 49/50 (98%) patients were able to successfully collect capillary blood. The overall agreement between capillary and venous analyses for CRP (0.992), CCP IgG (0.984), and RF IgM (0.994) were good. In both groups, 4/25 (16%) needed a second attempt and 8/25 (32%) in the UA and 7/25 (28%) in the FP group requested assistance. Mean pain scores for capillary self-sampling (1.7/10 ± 1.1 (UA) and 1.9/10 ± 1.9 (FP)) were significantly lower on a numeric rating scale compared to venous blood collection (UA: 2.8/10 ± 1.7; FP: 2.1 ± 2.0) (p=0.003). UA patients were more likely to promote the use of capillary blood sampling (net promoter score: +28% vs. -20% for FP) and were more willing to perform blood collection at home (60% vs. 32% for FP). CONCLUSIONS These data show that self-sampling is accurate and feasible within one attempt by the majority of patients without assistance, allowing tight monitoring of RA disease activity as well as identifying individuals at-risk for RA. RA patients seem to prefer upper arm-based self-sampling to traditional finger pricking. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS.de Identifier: DRKS00023526 . Registered on November 6, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Knitza
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
- University Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France.
| | - Koray Tascilar
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Vuillerme
- University Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- LabCom Telecom4Health, Orange Labs & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP-UGA, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Giulia Corte
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Louis Schuster
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Timothée Aubourg
- University Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France
- LabCom Telecom4Health, Orange Labs & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP-UGA, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | | - Arnd Kleyer
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Boeltz
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Axel J Hueber
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Division of Rheumatology, Nürnberg Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Krönke
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David Simon
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simmons LA, Phipps JE, Whipps M, Smith P, Carbajal KA, Overstreet C, McLaughlin J, De Lombaert K, Noonan D. From hybrid to fully remote clinical trial amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategies to promote recruitment, retention, and engagement in a randomized mHealth trial. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221129065. [PMID: 36185388 PMCID: PMC9515527 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221129065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials worldwide were disrupted when the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020. Most intervention trials moved to some form of remote implementation due to restrictions on in-person research activities. Although the proportion of remote trials is growing, they remain the vast minority of studies in part due to few successful examples. Our team transitioned Goals for Reaching Optimal Wellness ( GROWell), an NIH-funded (R01NR017659) randomized control trial (RCT; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04449432) originally designed as a hybrid intervention, into a fully remote clinical trial. GROWell is a digital dietary intervention for people who enter pregnancy with overweight or obesity. Primary outcomes include gestational weight gain and six-month postpartum weight retention. Strategies that we have tested, refined, and deployed include: (a) use of a HIPAA-compliant, web-based participant recruitment and engagement platform; (b) use of a HIPAA-compliant digital health platform to disseminate GROWell and conduct study visits (c) interconnectivity of these two platforms for seamless recruitment, consent, enrollment, intervention delivery, follow-up, and study team blinding; (d) detailed SMS messages to address initial challenges with protocol adherence; (e) email notifications alerting the study team about missed participant surveys so they can follow-up; (f) remuneration using email gift cards with recipient choice of vendor; and (g) geotargeting social media campaigns to improve participation of Black Indigenous and People of Color Communities. These strategies have resulted in screen failure rates improving by 7%, study task adherence improving by an average of 20–30% across study visits, and study completion rates of 82%. Researchers may consider some or all of these approaches in future remote mHealth trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Ann Simmons
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer E Phipps
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Mackenzie Whipps
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Paige Smith
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Carbajal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Courtney Overstreet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Devon Noonan
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderson M. How the COVID-19 pandemic is changing clinical trial conduct and driving innovation in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 2021; 13:1195-1203. [PMID: 34275327 PMCID: PMC8288280 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2021-0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Thousands of clinical trials all over the world were stopped, disrupted or delayed while countries grappled to contain the pandemic and research resources were redeployed. The long-term effects of the turbulence caused by the pandemic have yet to be fully understood, but it should already be clear that the increased focus on participant needs and on the logistical challenges of current models are not likely to fade away quickly. This disruption is opening doors for rethinking traditional approaches to clinical trial conduct - including decentralizing site visits, introducing new methods of sample collection, rethinking matrix selection, reducing sample volumes and collaborating on device development. These approaches reduce participant burden while improving critical trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Anderson
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics & Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Uytfanghe K, Heughebaert L, Stove CP. Self-sampling at home using volumetric absorptive microsampling: coupling analytical evaluation to volunteers' perception in the context of a large scale study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 59:e185-e187. [PMID: 33112777 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katleen Van Uytfanghe
- Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liesl Heughebaert
- Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christophe P Stove
- Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wickremsinhe ER, Ji QC, Gleason CR, Anderson M, Booth BP. Land O'Lakes Workshop on Microsampling: Enabling Broader Adoption. AAPS JOURNAL 2020; 22:135. [PMID: 33098040 PMCID: PMC7583552 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-00524-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The microsampling workshop generated recommendations pertaining to blood sampling site (venous blood versus capillary blood), when to conduct a bridging study, statistical approaches to establish correlation/concordance and deciding on sample size, opportunities and challenges with patient-centric sampling, and how microsampling technology can enrich clinical drug development. Overall, the goal was to provide clarity and recommendations and enable the broader adoption of microsampling supporting patients’ needs, convenience, and the transformation from clinic-centric to patient-centric drug development. The need and adoption of away-from-clinic sampling techniques has become critical to maintain patient safety during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qin C Ji
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, New Jersey, 08543, USA
| | - Carol R Gleason
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, New Jersey, 08543, USA
| | | | - Brian P Booth
- US FDA, CDER, Office of Translational Sciences, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|