Sample preparation in capillary electrophoresis for the determination of small molecule drugs and metabolites in urine

In-line sample concentration in capillary electrophoresis by cyclodextrin to admicelle microextraction

Cyclodextrins (CDs) as a pseudophase in pseudophase-to-pseudophase microextraction (P²ME) in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) are proposed. In this P²ME mode called CD to admicelle ME, a long plug of dilute analyte solution prepared in cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) at the critical micellar concentration was injected into the capillary. This formed CTAB admicelles at the interface between the solution and the negatively charged capillary surface, where the analytes were trapped. The injection of CD solution released the admicelles and the analytes from the capillary surface due to the formation of stable CD/CTAB inclusion complexes. The analytes are concentrated at the CD front during injection and voltage separation. Various neutral CDs were found to be effective for CD to admicelle ME. To implement this in-line sample concentration technique in CZE, CD concentration, sample injection time, and sample:CD solution injection ratio were optimized. The optimized conditions for five model anionic analytes, namely, 4-bromophenol, sulindac, sulfamethizole, 4-vinylbenzoic acid, and succinylsulfathiazole, were 20 mM α-CD in 20 mM sodium tetraborate (pH 9.2) solution, sample injection time of 370 s, and CD:sample injection ratio of 1:2. The sensitivity enhancement factors (SEFs) were between 112 and 168. The SEFs of sulindac and sulfamethizole in particular were similar to previously published off-line microextraction techniques, which are typically time-consuming. The calculated values of LOQ, intra-/inter-day (n = 6/n = 10, 3 days) repeatability, and linearity (R²) of CD to admicelle ME were 0.0125-0.05 µg/mL, 1.5-4.6%, 1.8-4.8%, and ≥0.999, respectively. Finally, the potential of CD to admicelle ME to the analysis of artificial urine samples was demonstrated.

Pseudophase microextraction for in-line sample concentration in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Pseudophase microextraction (PPME) as a simple in-line sample concentration technique in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) is presented. In contrast to popular electric-field driven stacking techniques in MEKC such as sweeping, PPME is pressure-driven. The technique afforded up to 403-2968x improvements in peak heights for fenoprop, dichlorprop, 1- and 2-naphthol compared to typical injection. Under the same MEKC conditions, the improvements in PPME were up to 23-59x better compared to sweeping. Briefly in PPME, the entire capillary was loaded (up to 20 capillary volumes) with the sample prepared in a dilute solution of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide ([CTAB] > critical surface aggregation concentration). The CTAB formed aggregates at the inner capillary walls and these aggregates acted as a stationary chromatographic pseudophase. After clean-up via flushing the capillary with purified water, the MEKC background solution (BGS) with sodium dodecyl sulfate was then introduced by pressure from the outlet end to elute the retained analytes. The analytes concentrate at front of the BGS and the front was moved to the inlet end of the capillary prior to MEKC. Optimization strategies and current limitations in PPME-MEKC are described. The linear ranges using a 4 capillary volume sample load obtained for fenoprop, dichlorprop, 1- and 2-naphthol were between 1 and 160 ng/mL (r²s ≥ 0.996), LOQs = 1-2.5 ng/mL and repeatability %RSDs (n = 6) were ≤5% (intra-day) and ≤7% (inter-day) (using low analyte concentrations 1-5x LOQ). PPME-MEKC with simple dilution of fortified real samples (no off-line sample concentration) was also able to detect low levels of dichlorprop (10 ng/mL, limit set in Australia) and 1- and 2-naphthol (7.5-15 ng/mL) in a drinking water and natural water sample, respectively (% recovery = 84-108%). The concept of PPME may find use in other modes of capillary electrophoresis and other nano-microscale separations.

Micelle to cyclodextrin stacking in open-tubular liquid chromatography using capillaries coated with surfactant admicelles

In-line sample concentration by micelle to cyclodextrin stacking (MCDS) in open-tubular liquid chromatography (OT-LC) with UV detection is described. OT-LC of two sets of analytes (small-molecule drugs and neutral alkenylbenzenes) was by the use of a fused-silica capillary that was coated with admicelles of didodecyldimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB). These admicelles acted as a stationary chromatographic pseudophase. The mobile phase was 25 mM sodium tetraborate in 10% methanol, pH 9.2. MCDS was by long pressure injection of samples prepared in 10 mM hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) in 25 mM sodium tetraborate, pH 9.2 (buffer), followed by injection of 50 mM α-CD in buffer (CD solution). Stacking was by application of voltage at -20 kV prior to pressure-driven OT-LC. The factors that influenced MCDS such as type and concentration of CD, concentration of CTAB in the sample, injection time ratio of the sample and the CD solution and stacking time were studied. Under optimised conditions, sensitivity enhancement factors (SEFs) were between 19 and 23, linear ranges were between 0.5 and 10 µg/mL with r² > 0.99 and inter-day/intra-day repeatability in retention time and peak area were ≤5.6% for the model small-molecule drugs. Application to real samples was by the determination of potentially toxic alkenylbenzenes (SEFs = 10 to 12) in basil-leaf and whole-clove extracts. The assay results were comparable to those obtained from an in-house high-performance liquid chromatography-UV method.

Overview of in-capillary enzymatic reactions using capillary electrophoresis

This review summarizes the research that has recently been performed on in-capillary enzymatic reactions integrated with capillary electrophoresis. The manuscript is subdivided in homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches. The main homogeneous techniques are Electrophoretically Mediated Microanalysis, At-inlet and Transverse Diffusion of Laminar Flow Profiles. The main heterogeneous ones are Immobilized MicroEnzyme Reactors with enzymes grafted on either non-magnetic or magnetic particles. The overview covers the period from 2018 to early 2021. The applications range from drug discovery over natural products to food, beverage and pesticide analysis.

Capillary electromigration methods for food analysis and Foodomics: Advances and applications in the period February 2019-February 2021

This work presents a revision of the main applications of capillary electromigration methods in food analysis and Foodomics. Articles that were published during the period February 2019-February 2021 are included. The work shows the multiple CE methods that have been developed and applied to analyze different types of molecules in foods. Namely, CE methods have been applied to analyze amino acids, biogenic amines, carbohydrates, chiral compounds, contaminants, DNAs, food additives, heterocyclic amines, lipids, secondary metabolites, peptides, pesticides, phenols, pigments, polyphenols, proteins, residues, toxins, vitamins, small organic and inorganic compounds, as well as other minor compounds. The last results on the use of CE for monitoring food interactions and food processing, including recent microchips developments and new applications of CE in Foodomics, are discussed too. The new procedures of CE to investigate food quality and safety, nutritional value, storage and bioactivity are also included in the present review work.

Analytical Separation of Carcinogenic and Genotoxic Alkenylbenzenes in Foods and Related Products (2010-2020)

Alkenylbenzenes are potentially toxic (genotoxic and carcinogenic) compounds present in plants such as basil, tarragon, anise star and lemongrass. These plants are found in various edible consumer products, e.g., popularly used to flavour food. Thus, there are concerns about the possible health consequences upon increased exposure to alkenylbenzenes especially due to food intake. It is therefore important to constantly monitor the amounts of alkenylbenzenes in our food chain. A major challenge in the determination of alkenylbenzenes in foods is the complexity of the sample matrices and the typically low amounts of alkenylbenzenes present. This review will therefore discuss the background and importance of analytical separation methods from papers reported from 2010 to 2020 for the determination of alkenylbenzenes in foods and related products. The separation techniques commonly used were gas and liquid chromatography (LC). The sample preparation techniques used in conjunction with the separation techniques were various variants of extraction (solvent extraction, liquid-liquid extraction, liquid-phase microextraction, solid phase extraction) and distillation (steam and hydro-). Detection was by flame ionisation and mass spectrometry (MS) in gas chromatography (GC) while in liquid chromatography was mainly by spectrophotometry.