Assessment of acceptability and usability of new delivery prototype device for intradermal vaccination in healthy subjects

Developing and validating a scale to measure the perceptions of safety, usability and acceptability of microarray patches for vaccination: a study protocol

Background

Vaccination is a fundamental tenet of public and population health. Several barriers to vaccine uptake exist, exacerbated post-COVID-19, including misconceptions about vaccine efficacy and safety, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine inequity, costs, religious beliefs, and insufficient education and guidance for healthcare professionals. Vaccine uptake may be aided using microarray patches (MAPs) due to reduced pain, no hypodermic needle, enhanced thermostability, and potential for self and lay administration.

Objectives

This protocol outlines the development of a scale that aims to accurately measure the perceived safety, usability, and acceptability of MAPs for vaccination among laypeople, MAP recipients, clinicians, and parents or guardians of children.

Methods and analysis

This study will follow three phases of scale development and validation, including (1) item development, (2) scale development, and (3) scale evaluation. Inductive (interviews) and deductive methods (literature searches) will be used to develop scale items, which experts from target populations will assess through an online survey. Cognitive interviews will be conducted to observe their processes of answering the draft survey. Thematic analysis will be conducted to analyse qualitative data. Lastly, four surveys will be administered online to our target populations over two time points to determine their repeatability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be performed.

Ethics

This study was approved by Metro South Health (HREC/2021/QMS/81653) and Western Sydney Local Health District (2023/ETH00705) Human Research Ethics Committees.

Discussion

The scale will support a standardised approach to assessing the social and behavioural aspects of MAP vaccines, enabling comparison of outcomes across studies. Once validated, this scale will assist vaccination programmes in developing effective strategies for integrating MAPs and overcoming barriers to vaccination. This includes improving vaccine equity and accessibility, especially in lower- and middle-income countries and rural or remote locations.

Preclinical evaluation of performance, safety and usability of VAX-ID®, a novel intradermal injection device

The recent SARS-Cov2 pandemic and mpox health emergency have led to renewed interest in intradermal vaccination due to its dose sparing potential. Indeed, intradermal vaccination is particularly of interest for use in mass vaccination campaigns, pandemic preparedness programs, and/or for vaccines that are expensive or in short supply. Moreover, the rich immune network in the skin makes it an attractive target not only for prophylactic vaccination, but also for therapeutic vaccination, like immunotherapy and (dendritic) cell-based therapies. The aim of the current paper was to provide an overview of preclinical data generated with VAX-ID®, a novel intradermal drug delivery device, to allow assessing it performance, safety and usability. The device can overcome challenges seen with the Mantoux technique whereby the needle needs to be inserted under a shallow angle. Various parameters of VAX-ID® were evaluated, including dead-space volume, dose accuracy, penetration depth & liquid deposit in piglets, as well as usability by healthcare professionals. The device has shown to have a low dead volume and a high dose accuracy. Importantly, the device performed successful injections at a predefined depth into the dermis with a high safety profile as confirmed by visual and histological evaluation in piglets. Moreover, the device was rated as easy to use by healthcare professionals. The combined preclinical performance and usability findings indicate that VAX-ID® can provide reliable, standardized and accurate drug delivery in the dermal layer of the skin with a high ease of use. The device offers a solution for injection of various prophylactic as well as therapeutic vaccines.

Approaches in broadening the neutralizing antibody response of the influenza vaccine

INTRODUCTION

Influenza vaccine is the mainstay for influenza prevention and elicits immune response and antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus. However, antigenic drift and shift can confer influenza virus to escape from the immune response induced by vaccine, and then reduce the vaccine effectiveness.

AREAS COVERED

To improve effect and neutralizing antibody response of vaccine for heterologous influenza virus, a literature review of preclinical and clinical studies published before August 2021 and searched in PubMed, which evaluated vaccine effectiveness improved by adjuvants and administration route.

EXPERT OPINION

The review showed that adjuvant, including imiquimod, GLA, MF59, and AS03, can improve the effectiveness of influenza vaccines by regulating immune system. Subjects receiving influenza vaccine combined with these adjuvants showed enhanced antibody response against homologous and heterologous virus strains compared to those vaccinated without adjuvant. This review also discussed the role of intradermal vaccination. In contrast to intramuscular vaccination, intradermal vaccination elicited a robust and prolonged antibody response against vaccine strains and drifted virus than intramuscular vaccination.

Skin thickness measurements for optimal intradermal injections in children

BACKGROUND

In the context of precision medicine and in response to the highly needed capacity of rapid interventions towards new infectious diseases and pandemic outbreaks, intradermal immunization is gaining increased attention. However, the currently used Mantoux technique for ID injection is difficult to standardize and requires training, especially when used in children. To allow determining the maximum penetration depth and needle characteristics for the development of a platform of medical devices suited for intradermal injection, VAX-ID® and to ensure an accurate ID injection in children, the epidermal and dermal thickness at the proximal ventral and dorsal forearm (PVF & PDF) and at the deltoid region in children aged 8 weeks to 18 years were assessed. The lateral part of the upper leg was assessed as well in children aged 8 weeks to 2 years since it is a commonly used injection site in this population.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Mean thickness of the PVF, PDF, lateral part of the upper leg and deltoid were measured using high-frequency ultrasound. Association with gender, age and BMI was assessed using Mann-Whitney U Test, Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, respectively.

RESULTS

Results showed an overall mean skin thickness of 0.99 mm (SD: 0.14 mm) at the PVF, 1.20 mm (SD: 0.17) at the PDF, 1.28 mm (SD: 0.16) at the lateral part of the upper leg and increasing to 1.32 mm (0.25) at the deltoid region. Age and BMI correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with skin thickness at all investigated body sites. Gender did not affect skin thickness in the investigated population.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in skin thickness at the PVF, PDF and deltoid region were seen according to age and BMI. An optimal needle length of 0.7 mm is advised to guarantee intradermal injection in children at all investigated injection sites. (NCT02727114).

Alternative Methods of Vaccine Delivery: An Overview of Edible and Intradermal Vaccines

Vaccines are recognized worldwide as one of the most important tools for combating infectious diseases. Despite the tremendous value conferred by currently available vaccines toward public health, the implementation of additional vaccine platforms is also of key importance. In fact, currently available vaccines possess shortcomings, such as inefficient triggering of a cell-mediated immune response and the lack of protective mucosal immunity. In this regard, recent work has been focused on vaccine delivery systems, as an alternative to injectable vaccines, to increase antigen stability and improve overall immunogenicity. In particular, novel strategies based on edible or intradermal vaccine formulations have been demonstrated to trigger both a systemic and mucosal immune response. These novel vaccination delivery systems offer several advantages over the injectable preparations including self-administration, reduced cost, stability, and elimination of a cold chain. In this review, the latest findings and accomplishments regarding edible and intradermal vaccines are described in the context of the system used for immunogen expression, their molecular features and capacity to induce a protective systemic and mucosal response.

Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal delivery of hepatitis B booster vaccine using the novel drug delivery device VAX-ID™

BACKGROUND

Although intramuscular (IM) injection is still the most preferred method for vaccination, intradermal (ID) delivery may have several advantages over intramuscular and subcutaneous (SC), including an improved immune response and antigen dose sparing effect. However it is currently limited due to the difficulty in standardizing the injection technique often based on the Mantoux technique. Difficulties encountered using the Mantoux technique could be overcome by the use of alternative ID delivery systems that confer more uniform and standardized procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a newly developed intradermal injection device, VAX-ID™, via a proof-of-concept to assess the immunogenicity of a commercially available hepatitis B booster vaccination in healthy hepatitis B pre-immunised subjects. Additionally, device safety and tolerability was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different routes of administration were compared over 4 groups, each receiving hepatitis B vaccine antigen: (1) standard IM injection in the deltoid region (HBVAXPRO® 10 µg/1 ml), (2) ID injection in the proximal posterior area of the forearm according to the Mantoux technique, (3) with VAX-ID™ in one forearm, or (4) with VAX-ID™ in both forearms. For ID injections 0.11 cc, of which 0.01 cc is overfill, was drawn from a vial containing HBVAXPRO® 40 µg/1 ml. Immunogenicity and safety were followed-up at day 0, 14, 30 and 210.

RESULTS

A total of 48 subjects were included. All subjects showed an anamnestic response at 14 days post booster vaccination. Elevated titres persisted until end of follow-up at day 210. For the ID groups a 3 fold higher immune response at day 14 and day 30 was recorded compared to IM group. Local adverse events were more reported for ID compared to IM.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated ID injection device VAX-ID™ proves to be a good alternative to offer ID vaccination.

Assessment of Forces in Intradermal Injection Devices: Hydrodynamic Versus Human Factors

PURPOSE

The force that has to be exerted on the plunger for administering a given amount of fluid in a given time, has an important influence on comfort for the subject and usability for the administrator in intradermal drug delivery. The purpose of this study is to model those forces that are subject-independent, by linking needle and syringe geometry to the force required for ejecting a given fluid at a given ejection rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We extend the well-known Hagen-Poiseuille formula to predict pressure drop induced by a fluid passing through a cylindrical body. The model investigates the relation between the pressure drop in needles and the theoretic Hagen-Poiseuille prediction and is validated in fifteen needles from 26G up to 33G suited for intradermal drug delivery. We also provide a method to assess forces exerted by operators in real world conditions.

RESULTS

The model is highly linear in each individual needle with R-square values ranging from 75% up to 99.9%. Ten out of fifteen needles exhibit R-square values above 99%. A proof-of-concept for force assessment is provided by logging forces in operators in real life conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The force assessment method and the model can be used to pinpoint needle geometry for intradermal injection devices, tuning comfort for subjects and usability for operators.

Human studies with microneedles for evaluation of their efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

During the past two decades, many studies have documented the development of microneedles (MNs) as a feasible technique for the effective administration of drugs. More and more human studies have been done with MNs to bridge the gap between research and market applications that provide efficacious techniques for clinical implementation.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is provide a brief description of the status of human study with MNs and to demonstrate progress for the right use of microneedle arrays in clinical settings. It also describes the considerations for clinical application with each type of MNs.

EXPERT OPINION

Microneedle systems were introduced to overcome the limitations of conventional methods of drug administration. Lots of microneedle systems have undergone clinical evaluation to determine their efficacy and safety, and many studies have demonstrated positive results. The successful clinical use of the microneedle in vaccine therapy is remarkable and supports the importance of conducting further tests in a wide range of medical applications. Self-administered MNs appeared to be an attractive alternative method that needs further research to become a reality in the near future.

Vial usage, device dead space, vaccine wastage, and dose accuracy of intradermal delivery devices for inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)

INTRODUCTION

Intradermal delivery of a fractional dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) offers potential benefits compared to intramuscular (IM) delivery, including possible cost reductions and easing of IPV supply shortages. Objectives of this study were to assess intradermal delivery devices for dead space, wastage generated by the filling process, dose accuracy, and total number of doses that can be delivered per vial.

METHODS

Devices tested included syringes with staked (fixed) needles (autodisable syringes and syringes used with intradermal adapters), a luer-slip needle and syringe, a mini-needle syringe, a hollow microneedle device, and disposable-syringe jet injectors with their associated filling adapters. Each device was used to withdraw 0.1-mL fractional doses from single-dose IM glass vials which were then ejected into a beaker. Both vial and device were weighed before and after filling and again after expulsion of liquid to record change in volume at each stage of the process. Data were used to calculate the number of doses that could potentially be obtained from multidose vials.

RESULTS

Results show wide variability in dead space, dose accuracy, overall wastage, and total number of doses that can be obtained per vial among intradermal delivery devices. Syringes with staked needles had relatively low dead space and low overall wastage, and could achieve a greater number of doses per vial compared to syringes with a detachable luer-slip needle. Of the disposable-syringe jet injectors tested, one was comparable to syringes with staked needles.

DISCUSSION

If intradermal delivery of IPV is introduced, selection of an intradermal delivery device can have a substantial impact on vaccine wasted during administration, and thus on the required quantity of vaccine that needs to be purchased. An ideal intradermal delivery device should be not only safe, reliable, accurate, and acceptable to users and vaccine recipients, but should also have low dead space, high dose accuracy, and low overall wastage to maximize the potential number of doses that can be withdrawn and delivered.