1
|
Thant AA, Ruangpornvisuti V, Sangvanich P, Banlunara W, Limcharoen B, Thunyakitpisal P. Characterization of a bioscaffold containing polysaccharide acemannan and native collagen for pulp tissue regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 2023; 225:286-297. [PMID: 36356879 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Dental pulp regeneration exploits tissue engineering concepts using stem cells/scaffolds/growth-factors. Extracted collagen is commonly used as a biomaterial-scaffold due to its biocompatibility/biodegradability and mimics the natural extracellular matrix. Adding biomolecules into a collagen-scaffold enhanced pulp regeneration. Acemannan, β-(1-4)-acetylated-polymannose, is a polysaccharide extracted from aloe vera. Acemannan is a regenerative biomaterial. Therefore, acemannan could be a biomolecule in a collagen-scaffold. Here, acemannan and native collagen were obtained and characterized. The AceCol-scaffold's physical properties were investigated using FTIR, SEM, contact angle, swelling, pore size, porosity, compressive modulus, and degradation assays. The AceCol-scaffold's biocompatibility, growth factor secretion, osteogenic protein expression, and calcification were evaluated in vitro. The AceCol-scaffolds demonstrated higher hydrophilicity, swelling, porosity, and larger pore size than the collagen scaffolds (p < 0.05). Better cell-cell and cell-scaffold adhesion, and dentin extracellular matrix protein (BSP/OPN/DSPP) expression were observed in the AceCol-scaffold, however, DSPP expression was not detected in the collagen group. Significantly increased cellular proliferation, VEGF and BMP2 expression, and mineralization were detected in the AceCol-scaffold compared with the collagen-scaffold (p < 0.05). Computer simulation revealed that acemannan's 3D structure changes to bind with collagen. In conclusion, the AceCol-scaffold synergistically provides better physical and biological properties than collagen. The AceCol-scaffold is a promising material for tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aye Aye Thant
- Dental Biomaterials Science Program, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Polkit Sangvanich
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wijit Banlunara
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Benchaphorn Limcharoen
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pasutha Thunyakitpisal
- Research Unit of Herbal Medicine, Biomaterial and Material for Dental Treatment, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Institute of Dentistry, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paterson K, Zanivan S, Glasspool R, Coffelt SB, Zagnoni M. Microfluidic technologies for immunotherapy studies on solid tumours. LAB ON A CHIP 2021; 21:2306-2329. [PMID: 34085677 PMCID: PMC8204114 DOI: 10.1039/d0lc01305f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy is a powerful and targeted cancer treatment that exploits the body's immune system to attack and eliminate cancerous cells. This form of therapy presents the possibility of long-term control and prevention of recurrence due to the memory capabilities of the immune system. Various immunotherapies are successful in treating haematological malignancies and have dramatically improved outcomes in melanoma. However, tackling other solid tumours is more challenging, mostly because of the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME). Current in vitro models based on traditional 2D cell monolayers and animal models, such as patient-derived xenografts, have limitations in their ability to mimic the complexity of the human TME. As a result, they have inadequate translational value and can be poorly predictive of clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need for robust in vitro preclinical tools that more faithfully recapitulate human solid tumours to test novel immunotherapies. Microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip technologies offer opportunities, especially when performing mechanistic studies, to understand the role of the TME in immunotherapy, and to expand the experimental throughput when using patient-derived tissue through its miniaturization capabilities. This review first introduces the basic concepts of immunotherapy, presents the current preclinical approaches used in immuno-oncology for solid tumours and then discusses the underlying challenges. We provide a rationale for using microfluidic-based approaches, highlighting the most recent microfluidic technologies and methodologies that have been used for studying cancer-immune cell interactions and testing the efficacy of immunotherapies in solid tumours. Ultimately, we discuss achievements and limitations of the technology, commenting on potential directions for incorporating microfluidic technologies in future immunotherapy studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Paterson
- Centre for Microsystems and Photonics, EEE Department, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - S Zanivan
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK and Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Glasspool
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK and Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - S B Coffelt
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK and Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Zagnoni
- Centre for Microsystems and Photonics, EEE Department, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quarta M, Cromie M, Chacon R, Blonigan J, Garcia V, Akimenko I, Hamer M, Paine P, Stok M, Shrager JB, Rando TA. Bioengineered constructs combined with exercise enhance stem cell-mediated treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Nat Commun 2017. [PMID: 28631758 PMCID: PMC5481841 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is associated with loss of skeletal muscle function, and current treatments show limited efficacy. Here we show that bioconstructs suffused with genetically-labelled muscle stem cells (MuSCs) and other muscle resident cells (MRCs) are effective to treat VML injuries in mice. Imaging of bioconstructs implanted in damaged muscles indicates MuSCs survival and growth, and ex vivo analyses show force restoration of treated muscles. Histological analysis highlights myofibre formation, neovascularisation, but insufficient innervation. Both innervation and in vivo force production are enhanced when implantation of bioconstructs is followed by an exercise regimen. Significant improvements are also observed when bioconstructs are used to treat chronic VML injury models. Finally, we demonstrate that bioconstructs made with human MuSCs and MRCs can generate functional muscle tissue in our VML model. These data suggest that stem cell-based therapies aimed to engineer tissue in vivo may be effective to treat acute and chronic VML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Quarta
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Melinda Cromie
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Robert Chacon
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Justin Blonigan
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Victor Garcia
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Igor Akimenko
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Mark Hamer
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Patrick Paine
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| | - Merel Stok
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Hematology and Department of Pediatrics, Rotterdam 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph B Shrager
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Thomas A Rando
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Center for Tissue Regeneration, Restoration and Repair, Veterans Affairs Hospital Palo Alto, California 94036, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bahrami N, Malekolkottab F, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Alizadeh Tabari Z, Hamisi J, Kamyab A, Mohamadnia A, Ai A, Bayat F, Bahrami N, Ai J. The effect of purmorphamine on differentiation of endometrial stem cells into osteoblast-like cells on collagen/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 2016; 45:1343-1349. [DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2016.1236804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Naghmeh Bahrami
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Craniomaxillo Facial Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Malekolkottab
- Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Somayeh Ebrahimi-Barough
- Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Alizadeh Tabari
- Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Jalaleddin Hamisi
- Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Ahmadreza Kamyab
- Department of Genetics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdolreza Mohamadnia
- Virology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Armin Ai
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshad Bayat
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Naeim Bahrami
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest university ? Virginia Tech, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jafar Ai
- Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Minuth WW, Denk L. Bridging the gap between traditional cell cultures and bioreactors applied in regenerative medicine: practical experiences with the MINUSHEET perfusion culture system. Cytotechnology 2016; 68:179-96. [PMID: 25894791 PMCID: PMC4754254 DOI: 10.1007/s10616-015-9873-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 03/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To meet specific requirements of developing tissues urgently needed in tissue engineering, biomaterial research and drug toxicity testing, a versatile perfusion culture system was developed. First an individual biomaterial is selected and then mounted in a MINUSHEET(®) tissue carrier. After sterilization the assembly is transferred by fine forceps to a 24 well culture plate for seeding cells or mounting tissue on it. To support spatial (3D) development a carrier can be placed in various types of perfusion culture containers. In the basic version a constant flow of culture medium provides contained tissue with always fresh nutrition and respiratory gas. For example, epithelia can be transferred to a gradient container, where they are exposed to different fluids at the luminal and basal side. To observe development of tissue under the microscope, in a different type of container a transparent lid and base are integrated. Finally, stem/progenitor cells are incubated in a container filled by an artificial interstitium to support spatial development. In the past years the described system was applied in numerous own and external investigations. To present an actual overview of resulting experimental data, the present paper was written.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will W Minuth
- Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, University Street 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Lucia Denk
- Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, University Street 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|