New therapeutic strategies targeting transmembrane signal transduction in the immune system

Design and evaluation of a multiepitope vaccine for pancreatic cancer using immune-dominant epitopes derived from the signature proteome in expression datasets

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and often lethal malignancy with limited treatment options. Its late-stage diagnosis and resistance to conventional therapies make it a significant challenge in oncology. Immunotherapy, particularly cancer vaccines, has emerged as a promising avenue for treating pancreatic cancer. Multi-epitope vaccines, designed to target multiple epitopes derived from various antigens associated with pancreatic cancer, have gained attention as potential candidates for improving therapeutic outcomes. In this study, we have explored transcriptomics and protein expression databases to identify potential upregulated proteins in pancreatic cancer cells. After examining a total of 21,054 proteins from various databases, it was discovered that 143 proteins expressed differently in malignant and healthy cells. The CTL, HTL and BCE epitopes were predicted for the shortlisted proteins. 51,840 vaccine constructs were created by concatenating CTL, HTL, and B-cell epitopes in the respective sequences. The best 86 structures were selected from a set of 51,840 designs after they were analyzed for vaxijenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, and antigenicity scores. In further simulation of the immune response using constructs, it was found that 41417, 37961, and 40841 constructs could produce a strong immune response when injected. Further, it was found that construct 37961 showed stronger interaction and stability with TLR-9 as determined from the large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. Moreover, the 37961 construct has shown interactions with TLR-9 suggests its potential in inducing immune response. In addition, construct 37961 has shown 100% predicted solubility in the E. coli expression system. Overall, the study indicates the designed construct 37961 has the potential to induce an anti-tumor immune response and long-standing protection pending further studies.

Membrane receptor activation mechanisms and transmembrane peptide tools to elucidate them

Single-pass membrane receptors contain extracellular domains that respond to external stimuli and transmit information to intracellular domains through a single transmembrane (TM) α-helix. Because membrane receptors have various roles in homeostasis, signaling malfunctions of these receptors can cause disease. Despite their importance, there is still much to be understood mechanistically about how single-pass receptors are activated. In general, single-pass receptors respond to extracellular stimuli via alterations in their oligomeric state. The details of this process are still the focus of intense study, and several lines of evidence indicate that the TM domain (TMD) of the receptor plays a central role. We discuss three major mechanistic hypotheses for receptor activation: ligand-induced dimerization, ligand-induced rotation, and receptor clustering. Recent observations suggest that receptors can use a combination of these activation mechanisms and that technical limitations can bias interpretation. Short peptides derived from receptor TMDs, which can be identified by screening or rationally developed on the basis of the structure or sequence of their targets, have provided critical insights into receptor function. Here, we explore recent evidence that, depending on the target receptor, TMD peptides cannot only inhibit but also activate target receptors and can accommodate novel, bifunctional designs. Furthermore, we call for more sharing of negative results to inform the TMD peptide field, which is rapidly transforming into a suite of unique tools with the potential for future therapeutics.

Targeting Intramembrane Protein-Protein Interactions: Novel Therapeutic Strategy of Millions Years Old

Intramembrane protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are involved in transmembrane signal transduction mediated by cell surface receptors and play an important role in health and disease. Recently, receptor-specific modulatory peptides rationally designed using a general platform of transmembrane signaling, the signaling chain homooligomerization (SCHOOL) model, have been proposed to therapeutically target these interactions in a variety of serious diseases with unmet needs including cancer, sepsis, arthritis, retinopathy, and thrombosis. These peptide drug candidates use ligand-independent mechanisms of action (SCHOOL mechanisms) and demonstrate potent efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Recent studies surprisingly revealed that in order to modify and/or escape the host immune response, human viruses use similar mechanisms and modulate cell surface receptors by targeting intramembrane PPIs in a ligand-independent manner. Here, I review these intriguing mechanistic similarities and discuss how the viral strategies optimized over a billion years of the coevolution of viruses and their hosts can help to revolutionize drug discovery science and develop new, disruptive therapies. Examples are given.

Measuring the Conformational Distance of GPCR-related Proteins Using a Joint-based Descriptor

Joint-based descriptor is a new level of macroscopic descriptor for protein structure using joints of secondary structures as a basic element. Here, we propose how the joint-based descriptor can be applied to examine the conformational distances or differences of transmembrane (TM) proteins. Specifically, we performed three independent studies that measured the global and conformational distances between GPCR A family and its related structures. First, the conformational distances of GPCR A family and other 7TM proteins were evaluated. This provided the information on the distant and close families or superfamilies to GPCR A family and permitted the identification of conserved local conformations. Second, computational models of GPCR A family proteins were validated, which enabled us to estimate how much they reproduce the native conformation of GPCR A proteins at global and local conformational level. Finally, the conformational distances between active and inactive states of GPCR proteins were estimated, which identified the difference of local conformation. The proposed macroscopic joint-based approach is expected to allow us to investigate structural features, evolutionary relationships, computational models and conformational changes of TM proteins in a more simplistic manner.

Rationally designed ligand-independent peptide inhibitors of TREM-1 ameliorate collagen-induced arthritis

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM‐1) is critically involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In contrast to cytokine blockers, therapeutic blockade of TREM‐1 can blunt excessive inflammation while preserving the capacity for microbial control. However, the nature of the TREM‐1 ligand(s) and mechanisms of TREM‐1 signalling are still not yet well understood, impeding the development of clinically relevant inhibitors of TREM‐1. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti‐arthritic activity of a novel, ligand‐independent TREM‐1 inhibitory nonapeptide GF9 that was rationally designed using the signalling chain homo oligomerization (SCHOOL) model of cell signalling. Free GF9 and GF9 bound to macrophage‐targeted nanoparticles that mimic human high‐density lipoproteins (GF9‐HDL) were used to treat collagen‐induced arthritis (CIA). We also tested if 31‐mer peptides with sequences from GF9 and helices 4 (GE31) and 6 (GA31) of the major HDL protein, apolipoprotein A‐I, are able to perform three functions: assist in the self‐assembly of GA/E31‐HDL, target these particles to macrophages and block TREM‐1 signalling. We showed that GF9, but not control peptide, ameliorated CIA and protected against bone and cartilage damage. The therapeutic effect of GF9 was accompanied by a reduction in the plasma levels of macrophage colony‐stimulating factor and pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor‐α, interleukin (IL)‐1 and IL‐6. Incorporation of GF9 alone or as a part of GE31 and GA31 peptides into HDL significantly increased its therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, our findings suggest that TREM‐1 inhibitory SCHOOL sequences may be promising alternatives for the treatment of RA.

SARS Coronavirus Fusion Peptide-Derived Sequence Suppresses Collagen-Induced Arthritis in DBA/1J Mice

During the co-evolution of viruses and their hosts, the viruses have evolved numerous strategies to counter and evade host antiviral immune responses in order to establish a successful infection, replicate and persist in the host. Recently, based on our model of immune signaling, the Signaling Chain HOmoOLigomerization (SCHOOL) model, we suggested specific molecular mechanisms used by different viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) to modulate the host immune response mediated by members of the family of multichain immune recognition receptors (MIRRs). This family includes T cell receptor (TCR) that is critically involved in immune diseases such as autoimmune arthritis. In the present study, we provide compelling experimental in vivo evidence in support of our hypothesis. Using the SCHOOL approach and the SARS-CoV fusion peptide sequence, we rationally designed a novel immunomodulatory peptide that targets TCR. We showed that this peptide ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1J mice and protects against bone and cartilage damage. Incorporation of the peptide into self-assembling lipopeptide nanoparticles that mimic native human high density lipoproteins significantly increases peptide dosage efficacy. Together, our data further confirm that viral immune evasion strategies that target MIRRs can be transferred to therapeutic strategies that require similar functionalities.

Structural biology of intrinsically disordered proteins: Revisiting unsolved mysteries

The emergence of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) has challenged the classical protein structure-function paradigm by introducing a new paradigm of "coupled binding and folding". This paradigm suggests that IDPs fold upon binding to their partners. Further studies, however, revealed a novel and previously unrecognized phenomenon of "uncoupled binding and folding" suggesting that IDPs do not necessarily fold upon interaction with their lipid and protein partners. The complex and often unusual biophysics of IDPs makes structural characterization of these proteins and their complexes not only challenging but often resulting in opposite conclusions. For this reason, some crucial questions in this field remain unsolved for well over a decade. Considering an important role of IDPs in cellular regulation, signaling and control in health and disease, more efforts are needed to solve these mysteries. Here, I focus on two long-standing contradictions in the literature concerning dimerization and membrane-binding activities of IDPs. Molecular explanation of these discrepancies is provided. I also demonstrate how resolution of these critical issues in the field of IDPs results in our expanded understanding of cell function and has multiple applications in biology and medicine.

Unusual biophysics of immune signaling-related intrinsically disordered proteins

Intrinsically disordered (ID) regions, the regions that lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure under physiological conditions, are preferentially located in the cytoplasmic segments of plasma membrane proteins, many of which are known to be involved in cell signaling. This is in line with our studies that demonstrated that cytoplasmic domains of signaling subunits of immune receptors, including those of ζ, CD3ε, CD3δ and CD3γ chains of T cell receptor, Igα and Igβ chains of B cell receptor as well as the Fc receptor γ chain represent a novel class of ID proteins (IDPs). The domains all have one or more copies of an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif, tyrosine residues of which are phosphorylated upon receptor engagement in an early and obligatory event in the signaling cascade. Our studies of these IDPs revealed several unusual biophysical phenomena, including (1) the specific dimerization of disordered protein molecules, (2) the fast and slow dimerization equilibrium, depending on the protein, (3) no disorder-to-order transition and the lack of significant chemical shift and peak intensity changes upon dimerization or interaction with a well-folded partner protein and (4) the dual mode of binding to model membranes (with and without folding), depending on the lipid bilayer stability. Here, I highlight several of these studies that not only facilitate a rethinking process of the fundamental paradigms in protein biophysics but also open new perspectives on the molecular mechanisms involved in receptor signaling.

Evolution of immunity: no development without risk

Signal transduction by cell surface receptors in the context of heterogeneous and variable cellular environments plays a pivotal role in regulating many biological processes, including development, activation, and homeostasis of the immune system. In some receptors, extracellular ligand-binding and intracellular signaling domains are located on the same protein chain (single-chain receptors), while in the so-called multichain immune recognition receptors (MIRRs), recognition and signaling functions are separated between different protein chains. Why did nature separate recognition and signaling functions for MIRRs, thereby increasing the risk of malfunction and potential attack by pathogens? The risk is real: in order to escape the immune response, viruses are able to disrupt functional coupling between recognition and signaling aspects of MIRR machinery. Intrinsic disorder of intracellular signal-generating regions of MIRRs adds further intrigue to the story. Why did nature select protein disorder for MIRRs to translate recognition of distinct antigens into appropriate activation signals that would induce specific functional outcomes? Here, I suggest that nature takes the risks associated with intrareceptor separation of functions as well as with the chaos and indeterminacy of protein disorder in exchange for providing diversity and variability of signal transduction. Not only does this phenomenon serve as the molecular basis for the development and evolution of the immune and other complex biological systems, but it fits closely to Darwinian evolutionary biology.

Cells diversify transmembrane signaling through the controlled chaos of protein disorder

Cell surface receptors function to transduce signals across the cell membrane leading to a variety of biologic responses. Structurally, these integral proteins can be classified into two main families, depending on whether extracellular ligand-binding and intracellular signaling domains are located on the same protein chain (single-chain receptors, SRs) or on separate subunits (multichain receptors, MRs). Since most MRs are immune receptors, they are all commonly referred to as multi-chain immune recognition receptors (MIRRs). Recent studies reveal that, in contrast to well-structured signaling domains of SRs, those of MIRRs represent intrinsically disordered regions, the regions that lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure under physiological conditions. Why did nature separate recognition and signaling functions of MIRRs? Why for MIRRs did nature select to provide highly specific signaling through the chaos of protein disorder? What mechanisms could control this chaos in the process of transmembrane signal transduction to provide the specificity and diversity of the immune response? Here, I summarize recent findings that may not only shed light on these and other questions but also add significantly to our understanding of receptor signaling, a fundamental process that plays a critical role in health and disease.

The SCHOOL of nature: IV. Learning from viruses

During the co-evolution of viruses and their hosts, the latter have equipped themselves with an elaborate immune system to defend themselves from the invading viruses. In order to establish a successful infection, replicate and persist in the host, viruses have evolved numerous strategies to counter and evade host antiviral immune responses as well as exploit them for productive viral replication. These strategies include those that modulate signaling mediated by cell surface receptors. Despite tremendous advancement in recent years, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying these critical points in viral pathogenesis remain unknown. In this work, based on a novel platform of receptor signaling, the Signaling Chain HOmoOLigomerization (SCHOOL) platform, I suggest specific mechanisms used by different viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human herpesvirus 6 and others, to modulate receptor signaling. I also use the example of HIV and CMV to illustrate how two unrelated enveloped viruses use a similar SCHOOL mechanism to modulate the host immune response mediated by two functionally different receptors: T cell antigen receptor and natural killer cell receptor, NKp30. This suggests that it is very likely that similar general mechanisms can be or are used by other viral and possibly non-viral pathogens. Learning from viruses how to target cell surface receptors not only helps us understand viral strategies to escape from the host immune surveillance, but also provides novel avenues in rational drug design and the development of new therapies for immune disorders.

The SCHOOL of nature: III. From mechanistic understanding to novel therapies

Protein-protein interactions play a central role in biological processes and thus represent an appealing target for innovative drug design and development. They can be targeted by small molecule inhibitors, modulatory peptides and peptidomimetics, which represent a superior alternative to protein therapeutics that carry many disadvantages. Considering that transmembrane signal transduction is an attractive process to therapeutically control multiple diseases, it is fundamentally and clinically important to mechanistically understand how signal transduction occurs. Uncovering specific protein-protein interactions critical for signal transduction, a general platform for receptor-mediated signaling, the signaling chain homooligomerization (SCHOOL) platform, suggests these interactions as universal therapeutic targets. Within the platform, the general principles of signaling are similar for a variety of functionally unrelated receptors. This suggests that global therapeutic strategies targeting key protein-protein interactions involved in receptor triggering and transmembrane signal transduction may be used to treat a diverse set of diseases. This also assumes that clinical knowledge and therapeutic strategies can be transferred between seemingly disparate disorders, such as T cell-mediated skin diseases and platelet disorders or combined to develop novel pharmacological approaches. Intriguingly, human viruses use the SCHOOL-like strategies to modulate and/or escape the host immune response. These viral mechanisms are highly optimized over the millennia, and the lessons learned from viral pathogenesis can be used practically for rational drug design. Proof of the SCHOOL concept in the development of novel therapies for atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, platelet disorders and other multiple indications with unmet needs opens new horizons in therapeutics.

The SCHOOL of nature: II. Protein order, disorder and oligomericity in transmembrane signaling

Recent reports have revealed that many proteins that do not adopt globular structures under native conditions, thus termed intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), are involved in cell signaling. Intriguingly, physiologically relevant oligomerization of IDPs has been recently observed and shown to exhibit unique biophysical characteristics, including the lack of significant changes in chemical shift and peak intensity upon binding. In this work, I summarize several distinct features of protein disorder that are especially important as related to receptor-mediated transmembrane signal transduction. I also hypothesize that interactions of IDPs with their protein or lipid partners represent a general biphasic process with the "no disorder-to-order" fast interaction which, depending on the interacting partner, may or may not be accompanied by the slow formation of a secondary structure. Further, I suggest signaling-related functional connections between protein order, disorder, and oligomericity and hypothesize that receptor oligomerization induced or tuned upon ligand binding outside the cell is translated across the membrane into protein oligomerization inside the cell, thus providing a general platform, the Signaling Chain HOmoOLigomerization (SCHOOL) platform, for receptor-mediated signaling. This structures our current multidisciplinary knowledge and views of the mechanisms governing the coupling of recognition to signal transduction and cell response. Importantly, this approach not only reveals previously unrecognized striking similarities in the basic mechanistic principles of function of numerous functionally diverse and unrelated surface membrane receptors, but also suggests the similarity between therapeutic targets, thus opening new horizons for both fundamental and clinically relevant studies.

The SCHOOL of nature: I. Transmembrane signaling

Receptor-mediated transmembrane signaling plays an important role in health and disease. Recent significant advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms linking ligand binding to receptor activation revealed previously unrecognized striking similarities in the basic structural principles of function of numerous cell surface receptors. In this work, I demonstrate that the Signaling Chain Homooligomerization (SCHOOL)-based mechanism represents a general biological mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction mediated by a variety of functionally unrelated single- and multichain activating receptors. within the SCHOOL platform, ligand binding-induced receptor clustering is translated across the membrane into protein oligomerization in cytoplasmic milieu. This platform resolves a long-standing puzzle in transmembrane signal transduction and reveals the major driving forces coupling recognition and activation functions at the level of protein-protein interactions-biochemical processes that can be influenced and controlled. The basic principles of transmembrane signaling learned from the SCHOOL model can be used in different fields of immunology, virology, molecular and cell biology and others to describe, explain and predict various phenomena and processes mediated by a variety of functionally diverse and unrelated receptors. Beyond providing novel perspectives for fundamental research, the platform opens new avenues for drug discovery and development.