Parallel processing of olfactory memories in Drosophila

Differentially expressed genes linked to natural variation in long-term memory formation in Cotesia parasitic wasps

Even though learning and memory are universal traits in the Animal Kingdom, closely related species reveal substantial variation in learning rate and memory dynamics. To determine the genetic background of this natural variation, we studied two congeneric parasitic wasp species, Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula, which lay their eggs in caterpillars of the large and small cabbage white butterfly. A successful egg laying event serves as an unconditioned stimulus (US) in a classical conditioning paradigm, where plant odors become associated with the encounter of a suitable host caterpillar. Depending on the host species, the number of conditioning trials and the parasitic wasp species, three different types of transcription-dependent long-term memory (LTM) and one type of transcription-independent, anesthesia-resistant memory (ARM) can be distinguished. To identify transcripts underlying these differences in memory formation, we isolated mRNA from parasitic wasp heads at three different time points between induction and consolidation of each of the four memory types, and for each sample three biological replicates, where after strand-specific paired-end 100 bp deep sequencing. Transcriptomes were assembled de novo and differential expression was determined for each memory type and time point after conditioning, compared to unconditioned wasps. Most differentially expressed (DE) genes and antisense transcripts were only DE in one of the LTM types. Among the DE genes that were DE in two or more LTM types, were many protein kinases and phosphatases, small GTPases, receptors and ion channels. Some genes were DE in opposing directions between any of the LTM memory types and ARM, suggesting that ARM in Cotesia requires the transcription of genes inhibiting LTM or vice versa. We discuss our findings in the context of neuronal functioning, including RNA splicing and transport, epigenetic regulation, neurotransmitter/peptide synthesis and antisense transcription. In conclusion, these brain transcriptomes provide candidate genes that may be involved in the observed natural variation in LTM in closely related Cotesia parasitic wasp species.

Gamma neurons mediate dopaminergic input during aversive olfactory memory formation in Drosophila

Mushroom body (MB)-dependent olfactory learning in Drosophila provides a powerful model to investigate memory mechanisms. MBs integrate olfactory conditioned stimulus (CS) inputs with neuromodulatory reinforcement (unconditioned stimuli, US), which for aversive learning is thought to rely on dopaminergic (DA) signaling to DopR, a D1-like dopamine receptor expressed in MBs. A wealth of evidence suggests the conclusion that parallel and independent signaling occurs downstream of DopR within two MB neuron cell types, with each supporting half of memory performance. For instance, expression of the Rutabaga (Rut) adenylyl cyclase in γ neurons is sufficient to restore normal learning to rut mutants, whereas expression of Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) in α/β neurons is sufficient to rescue NF1 mutants. DopR mutations are the only case where memory performance is fully eliminated, consistent with the hypothesis that DopR receives the US inputs for both γ and α/β lobe traces. We demonstrate, however, that DopR expression in γ neurons is sufficient to fully support short- and long-term memory. We argue that DA-mediated CS-US association is formed in γ neurons followed by communication between γ and α/β neurons to drive consolidation.

Brain organization and the roots of anticipation in Drosophila olfactory conditioning

Defining learning at the molecular and physiological level has been one of the greatest challenges in biology. Recent research suggests that by studying fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) brain organization we can now begin to unravel some of these mysteries. The fruit fly brain is organized into executive centers that regulate anatomically separate behavioral systems. The mushroom body is an example of an executive center which is modified by olfactory conditioning. During this simple form of learning, an odor is paired with either food or shock. Either experience alters distinguishable specific circuitry within the mushroom body. Results suggest that after conditioning an odor to food, the mushroom body will activate a feeding system via a subset of its circuitry. After conditioning an odor to shock, the mushroom body will instead activate an avoidance system with other subsets of mushroom body neurons. The results of these experiments demonstrate a mechanism for flies to display anticipation of their environment after olfactory conditioning has occurred. However, these results fail to provide evidence for reinforcement, a consequence of action, as part of this mechanism. Instead, specific subsets of dopaminergic and octopaminergic neurons provide a simple pairing signal, in contrast to a reinforcement signal, which allows for prediction of the environment after experience. This view has implications for models of conditioning.