Microsatellite instability in hematological malignancies: Hypermutation vs. immune control-who is challenging who?

If it is a solid tumor target, then it may be a hematologic cancer target: Bridging the great divide

Tumor-agnostic US Food and Drug Administration approvals are transforming oncology. They include larotrectinib/entrectinib/repotrectinib (NTRK fusions), selpercatinib (RET fusions), dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAFV600E mutations), pembrolizumab/dostarlimab (microsatellite instability), pembrolizumab (high tumor mutational burden), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (HER2 3+ expression) (all solid cancers). Pemigatinib is approved for FGFR1-rearranged myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms. The genomically driven tissue-agnostic approach has a strong biological rationale (cancer is a disease of the genome), yields remarkably high response rates, and provides drug access to patients with an unmet need (rare/ultra-rare malignancies). Despite the solid tumor focus, both solid and hematologic cancers can harbor identical driver molecular abnormalities and respond to cognate therapies. For example, BRAFV600E and IDH1/2 mutations; ALK, FGFR, and NTRK fusions; PD-L1 amplification; and CD70 antigens are druggable in both solid and blood malignancies by gene-/immune-targeted therapies/chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Future biomarker-based tissue-agnostic basket studies/approvals should bridge the great divide and include both solid and hematologic cancers.

Genomic and immune landscape Of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

The mechanisms triggering metastasis in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma are unknown, hindering therapeutic options for patients with metastatic tumors (mPPGL). Herein we show by genomic profiling of a large cohort of mPPGLs that high mutational load, microsatellite instability and somatic copy-number alteration burden are associated with ATRX/TERT alterations and are suitable prognostic markers. Transcriptomic analysis defines the signaling networks involved in the acquisition of metastatic competence and establishes a gene signature related to mPPGLs, highlighting CDK1 as an additional mPPGL marker. Immunogenomics accompanied by immunohistochemistry identifies a heterogeneous ecosystem at the tumor microenvironment level, linked to the genomic subtype and tumor behavior. Specifically, we define a general immunosuppressive microenvironment in mPPGLs, the exception being PD-L1 expressing MAML3-related tumors. Our study reveals canonical markers for risk of metastasis, and suggests the usefulness of including immune parameters in clinical management for PPGL prognostication and identification of patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.

Trial watch: Naked and vectored DNA-based anticancer vaccines

One type of anticancer vaccine relies on the administration of DNA constructs encoding one or multiple tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). The ultimate objective of these preparations, which can be naked or vectored by non-pathogenic viruses, bacteria or yeast cells, is to drive the synthesis of TAAs in the context of an immunostimulatory milieu, resulting in the (re-)elicitation of a tumor-targeting immune response. In spite of encouraging preclinical results, the clinical efficacy of DNA-based vaccines employed as standalone immunotherapeutic interventions in cancer patients appears to be limited. Thus, efforts are currently being devoted to the development of combinatorial regimens that allow DNA-based anticancer vaccines to elicit clinically relevant immune responses. Here, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical and clinical development of this therapeutic paradigm.