Splenic rupture following colon polypectomy: a case report and review of literature

Splenic artery embolisation for splenic injury during colonoscopy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Splenic injury due to colonoscopy is rare, but has high mortality. While historically treated conservatively for low-grade injuries or with splenectomy for high-grade injuries, splenic artery embolisation is increasingly utilised, reflecting modern treatment guidelines for external blunt trauma. This systematic review evaluates outcomes of published cases of splenic injury due to colonoscopy treated with splenic artery embolisation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of published articles concerning splenic injury during colonoscopy treated primarily with splenic artery embolisation, splenectomy, or splenorrhaphy from 1977 to 2022. Datapoints included demographics, past surgical history, indication for colonoscopy, delay to diagnosis, treatment, grade of injury, splenic artery embolisation location, splenic preservation (salvage), and mortality.

RESULTS

The 30 patients treated with splenic artery embolisation were of mean age 65 (SD 9) years and 67% female, with 83% avoiding splenectomy and 6.7% mortality. Splenic artery embolisation was proximal to the splenic hilum in 81%. The 163 patients treated with splenectomy were of mean age 65 (SD 11) years and 66% female, with 5.5% mortality. Three patients treated with splenorrhaphy of median age 60 (range 59-70) years all avoided splenectomy with no mortality. There was no difference in mortality between splenic artery embolisation and splenectomy cohorts (p = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic artery embolisation is an effective treatment option in splenic injury due to colonoscopy. Given the known benefits of splenic salvage compared to splenectomy, including preserved immune function against encapsulated organisms, low cost, and shorter hospital length of stay, embolisation should be incorporated into treatment pathways for splenic injury due to colonoscopy in suitable patients.

Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury.

AIM

To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients

METHODS

A structured search on four databases was done and 45 articles with 68 patients were selected. The reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients were identified and analyzed using SPSS.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years with 64% females. Twenty two percent had a complete splenic rupture with colonoscopy while 63% had subcapsular hematoma, spleen laceration and spleen avulsion. The most common reason for colonoscopy was screening (46%) followed by diagnostic colonoscopy (28%). Eighty seven percent of patients presented with abdominal pain. Patients with spleen rupture mostly required splenectomy (47%), while minor spleen hematomas and lacerations were managed conservatively (38%). Six percent of the patients were managed with proximal splenic artery splenic embolization and 4% were managed with laparoscopic repair. The overall mortality was 10% while 77% had complete recovery. The reason of colonoscopy against presentation specifically, abdominal pain showed no statistical significance P = 0.69. The indication of colonoscopy had no significant impact on incidence of splenic injury (P = 0.89). Majority of the patients (47%) were managed with splenectomy while the rest were managed conservatively (P = 0.04). This association was moderately strong at a cramer’s V test (0.34). The Fisher exact test showed a higher mortality with spleen rupture (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Spleen rupture due to colonoscopy is a significant concern and is associated with high mortality. The management of the patients can be individualized based on clinical presentation.

A systematic review of splenic injuries during colonoscopies: Evolving trends in presentation and management

INTRODUCTION

Although uncommon, the incidence of splenic injury from colonoscopy has been increasing significantly since first being reported in 1974. Early recognition is critical because mortality may be as high as 5%.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify English-language cases of splenic injury from colonoscopy from inception until January 26, 2015. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the identified cases.

RESULTS

A total of 172 cases from 122 reports were included. The mean age was 64 years and 70.8% were females. Prior abdominal or pelvic surgeries were identified in 63.8%. 57.3% of patients underwent polypectomies or biopsies. There was a statistically significant increase in use of computerized tomography for diagnosis in the past 5 years (81.8% versus 65.2%). 76.1% patients received transfusions. Mean inpatient length of stay was 7.83 ± 5.32 days. A non-significant trend toward conservative management was noted in the past 5 years (37.7% versus 23.1%), and a non-significant drop in mortality was noted (4.9% versus 5.4%).

DISCUSSION

Our data support prior literature suggesting a higher incidence of splenic injuries during colonoscopies in females, advanced age, prior history of abdominal/pelvic surgeries and biopsies/polypectomies during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant mortality associated with splenic injuries during colonoscopies warrants prompt recognition of this potentially life threatening, albeit uncommon, complication.