Clinical outcomes of TS-1 chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

Fewer Feedback Opportunities and Health Perception of Gastric Cancer Survivors: Opportunities for Patient Education

This study aimed to estimate the impact of having fewer opportunities for patient education on health perception of gastric cancer survivors by examining quality-of-life (QoL) responses from patients who had been away for chemotherapy for a year. The full-surveillance (FullSV) group was comprised of gastric cancer survivors with stage I cancer who completed preoperative and postoperative 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month surveillances. The returning (RTN) group was comprised of 1-year survivors of stage II cancer who had been away for chemotherapy for a year. Surveillance periods were utilized to provide patient education about expected postoperative weight changes. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaires were used to assess QoL. The study included a total of 278 patients (243 in the FullSV group and 35 in the RTN group). The baseline QoL was not significantly different between the groups. Significant differences in postoperative QoL were revealed by some scales (global health status/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, financial difficulties, anxiety, dry mouth, and body image), all in favor of the FullSV group. Despite no significant difference in their actual weight changes, stronger weight dissatisfaction was revealed among the RTN group. Patients with fewer educational inputs for postoperative adjustment of weight perception were the ones with stronger dissatisfaction about current weight. The health perception of cancer survivors is under the constant influence of clinician feedback during patient education. For the best cancer survivorship care, sufficient opportunities for adjustment of health perception through patient education need to be ensured.

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis caused by tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil resulted in diabetes nephropathy, in a patient with minor risk of diabetes nephropathy: a case report

A 79-year-old Japanese male with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for 16 years was admitted to evaluate possible renal disease. The T2DM was well controlled in this patient using nutrition therapy without the need for any diabetes medication, and both diabetes retinopathy and proteinuria were negative. At the age of 78 advanced colorectal cancer (stage IIIa) was diagnosed and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy was performed. Following this procedure, the patient began treatment with tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1), 80 mg twice daily for 28 days of 42-day cycle. The patient received S-1 for 6 months, during which time, serum albumin decreased from 3.0 g/dL to 1.1 g/dL, urinary protein increased from negative to 3.0 g/day, and serum creatinine increased from 0.9 mg/dL to 2.1 mg/dL. Treatment with S-1 was discontinued, and furosemide 180 mg and prednisolone 30 mg treatment was initiated; however, serum creatinine levels continued to increase to 7.2 mg/dL and proteinuria continued to increase reaching a nephrotic range. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) activity was decreased to 27.0%. Renal biopsy showed Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules, while immunofluorescence intensity of IgG subclass was IgG1 dominant, which was not compatible with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Plasma exchange was not affected. However, hemodialysis was initiated.The results of this investigation suggest that when S-1 monotherapy is performed in the case with DN, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) may develop due to a condition similar to thrombotic microangiopathy, even in patients with a minor risk factor of DN.

Clinical Observation of Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 in the Treatment of Pretreated Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

Objective To investigate the clinical effects and safety of bevacizumab combined with S-1 as the second-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic esophageal cancer after chemoradiation. Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer after chemoradiation were treated with bevacizumab and S-1. Bevacizumab was used by intravenous infusion, 7.5mg/kg body weight on day 1; S-1 was used by oral at 80mg/m²·d on day 1-14, 21 days as a cycle of treatment and repeated until either pro- gressive disease or intolerable toxicity occurred. Chest CT were performed and RECIST 1.1 was used for response evaluation. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Side effects were recorded and analyzed. Results Totally 78 patients were enrolled in the study, including 67 squamous cell carcinoma and 11 adenocarcinoma histologically. The overall response (CR+PR) rate was 22.4% (17/76) and disease control (CR+PR+SD) rate was 61.8% (47/76) respectively. The median follow-up time was 20 months (range from 9 to 44 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI 4.4-5.5) and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months (95% CI 7.6-9.2). The median PFS and OS of patients with metastasis diseases were 6.2 months (95% CI 3.3 to 6.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI 5.8 to 11.2), where PFS was longer than that of patients with local regional recurrence (median 5.0 months, 95% CI 3.0 to 5.5, P=0.017) and OS was longer than that of patients with regional disease and metastasis (median 8.0 months, 95% CI 4.6 to 9.5, P=0.010). The common adverse effects were mild to moderate neutropenia (84.2%), grade I-II hand and foot syndrome (51.3%), grade I-II nausea (48.7%), mild epistaxis (30.1%) and mild vomiting (14.5%). Esophageal bleeding occurred in 7.9% of patients. One patient (1.3%) died from massive bleeding which was caused by esophageal perforation. Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with S-1 was effective and safe for esophageal cancer patients who had recurrent or metastatic diseases after chemoradiation.

Emerging role of S-1 in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains one of the most important malignancies worldwide in terms of incidence and mortality. The treatment is based on the combination of local surgery and radiation therapy as well as systemic chemotherapy and targeted molecules. Fluoropyrimidines and particularly 5-fluorouracil (FU) represent still the backbone for gastric cancer chemotherapy and new molecular versions of this molecule have been brought to clinical practice in order to improve benefits and reduce adverse effects. S-1 is an oral prodrug of 5-FU, which has demonstrated high effectiveness for gastric cancer treatment and a favorable safety profile. Currently, there are geographic differences in the treatment of gastric cancer and in the use of S-1, which is a mainstay of gastric cancer management in Eastern countries, but is not part of the standard care in the rest of the world. In this review, we gathered data from phase I, II, and III trials of S-1 in gastric cancer, in order to define its real benefit-risk ratio and assess whether geographic differences in S-1 use are justified by unchangeable factors.

Role of S-1 in treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignancy worldwide. More than 50% of gastric cancer patients have unresectable disease at diagnosis, and there is a high rate of local or distant recurrence, even in patients with an operable tumor. Chemotherapy is regarded as a significant and basic treatment that can provide a longer symptom-free period and improve quality of life. S-1 is a novel oral derivative of 5-FU. Compared with 5-FU, S-1 is more tolerable and effective, and will be more convenient to use for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Recent phase II randomized trials of S-1 based chemotherapy have achieved encouraging results with regard to objective response rate and overall survival. This paper aims to review the efficacy of S-1 in treating advanced gastric cancer, molecular markers that can predict efficacy, and the prospect for therapy with S-1 in combination with new chemotherapeutic drugs or molecularly targeted drugs.