Toxicity and Repellency of Magnolia grandiflora Seed Essential Oil and Selected Pure Compounds Against the Workers of Hybrid Imported Fire Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

We tested Magnolia grandiflora L. (Magnoliales: Magnoliaceae) seed essential oil and its pure compounds for their repellency and toxicity against workers of hybrid imported fire ants. Series of dosages were tested starting from 156 µg/g to the dose where the treatment failed. Workers removed significantly less sand from the vials with M. grandiflora seed essential oil and 1-octanol treated sand at serial dosages of 156-4.9 µg/g than the solvent control whereas the amount removed at 2.4-0.6 µg/g was similar to the solvent control. In 1-decanol treatments, workers removed significantly less sand at serial dosages of 156-0.15 µg/g than the solvent control whereas the removal of sand at the dose of 0.08 µg/g was similar to the solvent control. In DEET (N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) treatments, workers removed significantly less sand at serial dosages of 156-78 µg/g than the solvent control whereas the quantity of removed sand at 39 µg/g was similar to the solvent control. Based on the mean amount of sand removed, M. grandiflora essential oil, 1-decanol, and 1-octanol showed significantly higher repellency than DEET. 1-Decanol and 1-octanol, present in seed essential oil showed toxicity against fire ant workers. 1-Decanol with LC50 of 140.6 µg/g was the most toxic natural compound followed by 1-octanol (LC50 = 486.8 µg/g). Bifenthrin with LC50 value of 0.018 µg/g showed much higher toxicity than these natural compounds. High repellency and toxicity of 1-decanol makes it a natural compound of interest for further studies under field conditions.

Using essential oils from Citrus paradisi as a fumigant for Solenopsis invicta workers and evaluating the oils' effect on worker behavior

The red imported fire ant is one of the world's most devastating invasive species, adversely affecting humans, wildlife, crops, and livestock. To control infestations, chemical pesticides are deployed extensively around the world. However, their extensive use has led to negative effects on the environment and human health. Essential oils, which are safe and ecofriendly, can potentially be used as alternatives to chemical pesticides. In this study, grapefruit essential oils were used as fumigant agents to control red imported fire ants. The crude grapefruit oil (GO1) contained 28 compounds, and the concentrated grapefruit oil (GO2), which was refined from GO1 by vacuum distillation, contained 20 compounds. D-Limonene was the dominant constituent in both GO1 (70.1%) and GO2 (73.96%), and other important constituents included β-pinene, α-pinene, β-phellandrene, octanal, d-carvone, α-terpineol, and linalool. Both the essential oils and their individual constituents (α-pinene, α-terpineol, β-phellandrene, octanal, and d-carvone) showed strong lethal fumigant effects against workers. Workers were more susceptible to GO2 than GO1, and octanal was more toxic to workers as compared with the other four constituents. When antennas of workers were treated with the two oils or the five constituents, their walking and gripping abilities were significantly suppressed, and there was an obvious bending or breaking phenomenon on the sensilla of the antennas. Fumigant activity by grapefruit essential oils and their main compounds were associated with their effects on the walking and gripping behavior of workers, and this confirmed that grapefruit essential oil is a promising, ecofriendly, and safe fumigant for the control of red imported fire ants.

Naturally Occurring Compounds/Materials as Alternatives to Synthetic Chemical Insecticides for Use in Fire Ant Management

Simple Summary

Red imported fire ants are a notorious pest, impacting humans, livestock, pets and wildlife due to their venomous stings and causing billions of dollars in damages annually. Synthetic insecticides are a major tool used to control this pest. There is an ever-increasing public concern about the potential adverse effects of synthetic insecticides. Extensive effort has been made in searching for alternatives. In addition to biological control, physical and cultural practices, and semiochemicals, natural products continue to be one of the most attractive sources of alternatives. Naturally occurring compounds/materials have been successfully used as active ingredients in fire ant baits, contact-based control products, repellants and fumigants. In this article, we summarized the synthetic insecticides that are currently used in managing fire ants, available alternative products in the current USA market, and academic efforts in searching for fire ant natural toxins, repellants and fumigants.

Abstract

The invasive red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (hereafter, fire ants), is a significant threat to public health and a danger to livestock, pets and wildlife due to their venomous stings. The fire ant has invaded many countries and regions and has become a globally significant pest. The current major tool to manage fire ants are synthetic insecticides that are used largely as stomach poisons in bait products or contact insecticides in spray, broadcast, drench, and dust products for area and nest treatments. In addition to these insecticide products, repellants and fumigants can also be useful in some unique scenarios. The ever-increasing public concern about the potential adverse effects of synthetic insecticides on health and the environment has been a driving force for searching for safer alternatives to control fire ants. Tremendous effort has been made in developing biologically-based control for managing fire ants; however, natural products continue to be one of the most attractive sources of safe alternatives to synthetic insecticides. Here, we summarized the synthetic insecticides that are currently used in managing fire ants, available alternative products in the current market, and academic efforts in searching for fire ant natural toxins, repellants and fumigants.

Control of Filth Flies, Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera: Calliphoridae), Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), and Sarcophaga bullata (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), Using Novel Plant-Derived Methyl Ketones

Filth flies live in close proximity to humans and livestock and transmit pathogens. Current control relies on chemical insecticides, and flies can develop resistance to these insecticides. The public is also interested in natural and safer insecticides. Therefore, alternative pesticides compatible with the synanthropic nature of flies are needed. Four plant aliphatic methyl ketones were evaluated for control of adult house flies, Musca domestica L., blow flies, Cochliomyia macellaria (F.), and gray flesh flies, Sarcophaga bullata (Parker). In sealed petri dish assays, 2-heptanone, 2-octanone, 2-nonanone, and 2-undecanone exhibited fumigant activity against house flies with 24-h LC50s of 6.9, 7.5, 8.0, and 9.2 µg/cm3, respectively. Further research focused on undecanone (a U.S. EPA-registered biopesticide). When tested in larger enclosures at 1.7, 2.3, and 2.8 µg/cm3, undecanone provided 60.4, 82.2, and 94.4% house fly mortality; 56.9, 75.6, and 92.5% flesh fly mortality; and 62.1, 84.5, and 97.9% blow fly mortality, respectively, after a 2-h exposure. In a two-choice behavioral assay with 194.6 µg/cm2 of the test compound on the treatment versus an untreated surface of the same area, the overall mean repellencies for blow flies were 84.7% for undecanone versus 87.6% for N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET). For house flies, mean repellencies were 80.7% for undecanone and 84.9% for DEET. The house fly topical LD50 for undecanone was 58.1 µg per fly. Undecanone was far less expensive for filth fly control than the gold standard for insect fumigation, methyl bromide.

Insecticidal Activity of Methyl Benzoate Analogs Against Red Imported Fire Ants, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Although insecticidal properties of certain benzoates have been investigated for pest insects and mites, toxicity of benzoates to the red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta Buren, has never been reported. In this study, 15 commercially available benzoates were assessed for their contact and fumigation toxicity to S. invicta workers and their chemical structure-activity relationships. Among tested benzoates, benzylbenzoate, n-pentybenzoate, and n-hexylbenzoate were three most potent contact toxins against S. invicta workers (mean LD50 value = 23.31, 35.26, 35.99 µg per ant, respectively) and methyl-3-methoxybenzoate, methyl-3-methylbenzoate, and methylbenzoate were the three most potent fumigants (mean LC50 value = 0.61, 0.62, 0.75 µg/ml, respectively). For nonsubstituted alkyl benzoates (esters of benzoic acid and C1-C6 linear alcohols), the contact toxicity was positively correlated to the alkyl chain length (r = 0.89), while the fumigation toxicity was negatively correlated (r = 0.90). Presence of a methoxyl group at either the ortho or meta position of methylbenzoate significantly increased its contact toxicity, so did a methyl group at meta position. However, presence of a methyl group at ortho position reduced the contact toxicity. Presence of methyl or methoxyl group at the meta position did not have significant effect on the fumigation toxicity; however, methyl, methoxyl, chloro, or nitro groups at the ortho position significantly reduced fumigation toxicity. Hexylbenzoate has neither known Occupational Safety and Health Administration hazards nor aquatic toxicity, and methyl 3-methoxybenzoate is not considered a hazardous substance, indicating a great potential for their application in fire ant management.