The contribution of the donor vascularised hand and face allograft in transplant rejection: An immunological perspective

Overcoming immunological rejection remains a barrier to the safe adoption of Vascularised Composite Allotransplantation (VCA). To mitigate this risk, clinical protocols have been derived from solid organ transplantation, targeting recipient immunomodulation, yet VCA is unique. Face and hand composite allografts are composed of multiple different tissues, each with their own immunological properties. Experimental work suggests that allografts carry variable numbers and populations of donor leukocytes in an organ specific manner. Ordinarily, these passenger leukocytes are transferred from the donor graft into the recipient circulation after transplantation. Whether alloantigen presentation manifests as acute allograft rejection or transplant tolerance is unknown. This review aims to characterise the immunological properties of the constituent parts of the donor face and hand, the potential fate of donor leukocytes and to consider theoretical graft specific interventions to mitigate early rejection.

Normothermic ex vivo perfusion of the limb allograft depletes donor leukocytes prior to transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The donor immune compartment plays a central role in graft rejection of the vascularised composite allograft (VCA) by contributing to 'direct presentation'. Using our limb ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (EVNP) protocol designed for prolonged allograft preservation, this study aimed to assess whether donor leukocytes responsible for allograft rejection are mobilised from the donor compartment.

METHODS

Five genetically different pig forelimbs underwent perfusion via the brachial and radial collateral artery for 6 h after 2 h of cold storage. Oxygenated haemodilute leucocyte-deplete blood was recirculated at normothermia using an extracorporeal perfusion system. Tissue perfusion was evaluated clinically and biochemically via blood perfusate. The temporal kinetics of donor leucocyte extravasation, cytokine secretion and cell-free DNA was characterised in the circulating perfusate.

RESULTS

Flow cytometry revealed increasing populations of viable leukocytes over time, reaching 49 billion leukocytes by 6 h. T (3.0 × 10⁹ cells) and B cells (3.1 × 10⁸ cells) lymphocytes, monocytes (2.7 × 10⁹ cells), granulocytes (8.1 × 10⁹ cells), NK (6.3 × 10⁸) and γδ (8.1 × 10⁸) cells were all identified. Regulatory T cells comprised a minor population (1.6 × 10⁷ cells). There was a cumulative increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines suggesting that the donor limb has the capacity to elicit significant inflammatory responses that could contribute to leucocyte activation and diapedesis.

CONCLUSION

EVNP not only acts as a preservation tool, but could also be utilized to immunodeplete the VCA allograft prior to transplantation. This has clinical implications to mitigate acute rejection and prevent graft dysfunction and supports the future application of machine perfusion in graft preservation and immune modulation.

Development of transplant immunosuppressive agents - considerations in the use of animal models

INTRODUCTION

The development of all immunosuppressant agents to date has involved the experimental use of large and small animal models. Over the last half-century, immunosuppressive drugs have extended the lives of transplant patients worldwide. However, the use of animal models in the development of these drugs is not perfect, and this has brought to light a number of issues including idiosyncratic reactions that are found in animal models but not in humans. The 2006 highly publicized case of the 'elephant man' TGN 1412 drug trial highlights the importance of being cogent of the limitations of animal models. Areas covered: This review covers the utility and limitations of the use of animal models for the development of immunosuppressant agents. This includes both large and small animal models, particularly rodent models in the transplant setting. Expert opinion: The use of animal models represents a critical stage in the development of immunosuppressive drugs. Limitations include physiological differences to humans; this is especially true of immunologically naïve lab rodents with small memory cell populations. Toxic drug levels may differ widely between species. Animal models are also costly and raise ethical concerns. However, there is currently no way to recreate the complex environment of the human immune system purely in vitro.