The contribution of the donor vascularised hand and face allograft in transplant rejection: An immunological perspective

Overcoming immunological rejection remains a barrier to the safe adoption of Vascularised Composite Allotransplantation (VCA). To mitigate this risk, clinical protocols have been derived from solid organ transplantation, targeting recipient immunomodulation, yet VCA is unique. Face and hand composite allografts are composed of multiple different tissues, each with their own immunological properties. Experimental work suggests that allografts carry variable numbers and populations of donor leukocytes in an organ specific manner. Ordinarily, these passenger leukocytes are transferred from the donor graft into the recipient circulation after transplantation. Whether alloantigen presentation manifests as acute allograft rejection or transplant tolerance is unknown. This review aims to characterise the immunological properties of the constituent parts of the donor face and hand, the potential fate of donor leukocytes and to consider theoretical graft specific interventions to mitigate early rejection.

Pre-transplant management and sensitisation in vascularised composite allotransplantation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Vascularised composite allotransplantation (VCA) permits like-for-like reconstruction following extensive soft tissue injuries. The initial management of extensive soft tissue injury can lead to the development of anti-HLA antibodies through injury-related factors, transfusion and cadaveric grafting. The role of antibody-mediated rejection, donor-specific antibody formation and graft rejection in the context of VCA remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to determine whether pre-transplant management strategies influence immunological outcome following VCA.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL using a PRISMA-compliant methodology up to February 2019 was conducted. Pre-transplant, procedural and long-term outcome data were collected and recorded for all VCA recipients on an individual patient basis.

RESULTS

The search revealed 3,847 records of which 114 met inclusion criteria and reported clinical data related to 100 patients who underwent 129 VCA transplants. Trauma (50%) and burns (15%) were the most frequent indications for VCA. Of all 114 studies, only one reported acute resuscitative management. Fifteen patients were sensitised prior to reconstructive transplantation with an 80%%incidence of acute rejection in the first post-operative year. Seven patients demonstrated graft vasculopathy, only one of whom had demonstrated panel reactive antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently employed acute management strategies may predispose to the development of anti-HLA antibodies, adding to the already complex immunological challenge of VCA. To determine whether association between pre-transplant management and outcomes exists, further refinement of international registries is required.