1
|
Goldstein MB, Islam S, Nicolich-Henkin S, Bellavia L, Klek S. Glycemic Management in Insulin-Naive Patients in the Inpatient Setting. Diabetes Spectr 2024; 37:130-138. [PMID: 38756429 PMCID: PMC11093763 DOI: 10.2337/ds23-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Objective The ideal inpatient insulin regimen efficiently attains the target blood glucose range, effectively treats hyperglycemia, and minimizes the risk of hypoglycemia. The objective of this study was to compare glycemic targets achieved by using correctional monotherapy (CM) and basal-bolus therapy (BBT) in insulin-naive patients in the inpatient setting to determine optimal blood glucose management for these patients. Design This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 792 patients with diabetes not on home insulin therapy who were admitted to an academic hospital over a 5.5-month period. The percentages of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic values in each group were compared. Results Among the 3,112 measured blood glucose values obtained from 792 patients within the first 24 hours of insulin administration, 28.5% were hyperglycemic in the BBT group compared with 23.5% in the CM group. When adjusted for covariates, there was a 23% decrease in hyperglycemia in the BBT group (incidence rate ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.95, P = 0.006). Increases in A1C and admission blood glucose, as well as decreases in admission creatinine and inpatient steroid use, were independently associated with higher rates of hyperglycemia, adjusted for all other covariates. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of hypoglycemia in the first 24 hours, which was 1.9% in the BBT group and 1.4% in the CM group (P = 0.301). Conclusion Utilizing BBT in insulin-naive patients admitted to the hospital within the first 24 hours of insulin administration results in lower rates of hyperglycemia without higher rates of hypoglycemia when compared with CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shahidul Islam
- Biostatistics Core, Division of Health Services Research, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | | | - Lauren Bellavia
- Division of Endocrinology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | - Stanislaw Klek
- Division of Endocrinology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Korytkowski MT, Muniyappa R, Antinori-Lent K, Donihi AC, Drincic AT, Hirsch IB, Luger A, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Nielsen C, Pegg C, Rushakoff RJ, Santesso N, Umpierrez GE. Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Adult Patients in Non-Critical Care Settings: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:2101-2128. [PMID: 35690958 PMCID: PMC9653018 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult patients with diabetes or newly recognized hyperglycemia account for over 30% of noncritically ill hospitalized patients. These patients are at increased risk for adverse clinical outcomes in the absence of defined approaches to glycemic management. OBJECTIVE To review and update the 2012 Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients in Non-Critical Care Settings: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline and to address emerging areas specific to the target population of noncritically ill hospitalized patients with diabetes or newly recognized or stress-induced hyperglycemia. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of clinician experts, together with a patient representative and experts in systematic reviews and guideline development, identified and prioritized 10 clinical questions related to inpatient management of patients with diabetes and/or hyperglycemia. The systematic reviews queried electronic databases for studies relevant to the selected questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. RESULTS The panel agreed on 10 frequently encountered areas specific to glycemic management in the hospital for which 15 recommendations were made. The guideline includes conditional recommendations for hospital use of emerging diabetes technologies including continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy; insulin regimens for prandial insulin dosing, glucocorticoid, and enteral nutrition-associated hyperglycemia; and use of noninsulin therapies. Recommendations were also made for issues relating to preoperative glycemic measures, appropriate use of correctional insulin, and diabetes self-management education in the hospital. A conditional recommendation was made against preoperative use of caloric beverages in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSION The recommendations are based on the consideration of important outcomes, practicality, feasibility, and patient values and preferences. These recommendations can be used to inform system improvement and clinical practice for this frequently encountered inpatient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary T Korytkowski
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ranganath Muniyappa
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Amy C Donihi
- University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andjela T Drincic
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- University of Washington Diabetes Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anton Luger
- Medical University and General Hospital of Vienna, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marie E McDonnell
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Division of Endocrinology Diabetes and Hypertension, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Claire Pegg
- Diabetes Patient Advocacy Coalition, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Robert J Rushakoff
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seisa MO, Saadi S, Nayfeh T, Muthusamy K, Shah SH, Firwana M, Hasan B, Jawaid T, Abd-Rabu R, Korytkowski MT, Muniyappa R, Antinori-Lent K, Donihi AC, Drincic AT, Luger A, Torres Roldan VD, Urtecho M, Wang Z, Murad MH. A Systematic Review Supporting the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Hyperglycemia in Adults Hospitalized for Noncritical Illness or Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:2139-2147. [PMID: 35690929 PMCID: PMC9653020 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Individuals with diabetes or newly recognized hyperglycemia account for over 30% of noncritically ill hospitalized patients. Management of hyperglycemia in these patients is challenging. OBJECTIVE To support development of the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline for management of hyperglycemia in adults hospitalized for noncritical illness or undergoing elective surgical procedures. METHODS We searched several databases for studies addressing 10 questions provided by a guideline panel from the Endocrine Society. Meta-analysis was conducted when feasible. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS We included 94 studies reporting on 135 553 patients. Compared with capillary blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring increased the number of patients identified with hypoglycemia and decreased mean daily blood glucose (BG) (very low certainty). Data on continuation of insulin pump therapy in hospitalized adults were sparse. In hospitalized patients receiving glucocorticoids, combination neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) and basal-bolus insulin was associated with lower mean BG compared to basal-bolus insulin alone (very low certainty). Data on NPH insulin vs basal-bolus insulin in hospitalized adults receiving enteral nutrition were inconclusive. Inpatient diabetes education was associated with lower HbA1c at 3 and 6 months after discharge (moderate certainty) and reduced hospital readmissions (very low certainty). Preoperative HbA1c level < 7% was associated with shorter length of stay, lower postoperative BG and a lower number of neurological complications and infections, but a higher number of reoperations (very low certainty). Treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and mild hyperglycemia was associated with lower frequency of hypoglycemic events than insulin therapy (low certainty). Caloric oral fluids before surgery in adults with diabetes undergoing surgical procedures did not affect outcomes (very low certainty). Counting carbohydrates for prandial insulin dosing did not affect outcomes (very low certainty). Compared with scheduled insulin (basal-bolus or basal insulin + correctional insulin), correctional insulin was associated with higher mean daily BG and fewer hypoglycemic events (low certainty). CONCLUSION The certainty of evidence supporting many hyperglycemia management decisions is low, emphasizing importance of shared decision-making and consideration of other decisional factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed O Seisa
- Correspondence: Mohamed Seisa, M.D., Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
| | - Samer Saadi
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tarek Nayfeh
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Sahrish H Shah
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Bashar Hasan
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tabinda Jawaid
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rami Abd-Rabu
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Ranganath Muniyappa
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | | | - Amy C Donihi
- University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy,Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| | | | - Anton Luger
- Medical University and General Hospital of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Zhen Wang
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
El Khoury G, Mansour H, Kabbara WK, Chamoun N, Atallah N, Salameh P. Prevalence, Correlates and Management of Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Non-critically Ill Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon. Curr Diabetes Rev 2019; 15:133-140. [PMID: 29357807 DOI: 10.2174/1573399814666180119142254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 01/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease that affects 387 million people around the world. Episodes of hyperglycemia in hospitalized diabetic patients are associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, prevention of hyperglycemia is critical to decrease the length of hospital stay and to reduce complications and readmissions. OBJECTIVE The study aims to examine the prevalence of hyperglycemia and assess the correlates and management of hyperglycemia in diabetic non-critically ill patients. METHODS The study was conducted on the medical wards of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Lebanon. A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2014 until September 2015. Diabetic patients admitted to Internal Medicine floors were identified. Descriptive analysis was first carried out, followed by a multivariable analysis to study the correlates of hyperglycemia occurrence. RESULTS A total of 235 medical charts were reviewed. Seventy percent of participants suffered from hyperglycemia during their hospital stay. The identified significant positive correlates for inpatient hyperglycemia, were the use of insulin sliding scale alone (OR=16.438 ± 6.765-39.941, p=0.001) and the low frequency of glucose monitoring. Measuring glucose every 8 hours (OR= 3.583 ± 1.506-8.524, p=0.004) and/or every 12 hours (OR=7.647 ± 0.704-79.231, p=0.0095) was associated with hyperglycemia. The major factor perceived by nurses as a barrier to successful hyperglycemia management was the lack of knowledge about appropriate insulin use (87.5%). CONCLUSION Considerable mismanagement of hyperglycemia in diabetic non-critically ill patients exists; indicating a compelling need for the development and implementation of protocol-driven insulin order forms a comprehensive education plan on the appropriate use of insulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada El Khoury
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, P.O Box: 36-Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Hanine Mansour
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, P.O Box: 36-Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Wissam K Kabbara
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, P.O Box: 36-Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Nibal Chamoun
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, P.O Box: 36-Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Nadim Atallah
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, P.O Box: 36-Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Pascale Salameh
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Colunga‐Lozano LE, Gonzalez Torres FJ, Delgado‐Figueroa N, Gonzalez‐Padilla DA, Hernandez AV, Roman Y, Cuello‐García CA. Sliding scale insulin for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11:CD011296. [PMID: 30488948 PMCID: PMC6517001 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011296.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion, function, or both. Hyperglycaemia in non-critically ill hospitalised people is associated with poor clinical outcomes (infections, prolonged hospital stay, poor wound healing, higher morbidity and mortality). In the hospital setting people diagnosed with diabetes receive insulin therapy as part of their treatment in order to achieve metabolic control. However, insulin therapy can be provided by different strategies (sliding scale insulin (SSI), basal-bolus insulin, and other modalities). Sliding scale insulin is currently the most commonly used method, however there is uncertainty about which strategy provides the best patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of SSI for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus. SEARCH METHODS We identified eligible trials by searching MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library. We searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registers. The date of the last search for all databases was December 2017. We also examined reference lists of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, and contacted trial authors. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing SSI with other strategies for glycaemic control in non-critically ill hospitalised adult participants of any sex with diabetes mellitus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed trials for risk of bias, and evaluated the overall certainty of evidence utilising the GRADE instrument. We synthesised data using a random-effects model meta-analysis with 95% prediction intervals, if possible, or descriptive analysis, as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS Of 720 records screened, we included eight trials that randomised 1048 participants with type 2 diabetes (387 SSI participants and 615 participants in comparator groups were available for final analysis). We included non-critically ill medical and surgical adults with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The mean follow-up time was measured by the mean length of hospital stay and ranged between five and 24 days. The mean age of participants was 44.5 years to 71 years.Overall, we judged the risk of bias on the trial level as unclear for selection bias, high for outcome-related performance and detection bias with regard to hypoglycaemic episodes, other adverse events, and mean glucose levels, and low for all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay. Attrition bias was low for all outcome measures.Six trials compared SSI with a basal-bolus insulin scheme, three of which investigating 64% of all participants in this category also applying an SSI approach in the bolus comparator part. One trial had a basal insulin-only comparator arm, and the remaining trial used continuous insulin infusion as the comparator. For our main comparison of SSI versus basal-bolus insulin, the results were as follows. Four trials reported mortality data. One out of 268 participants in the SSI group (0.3%) compared with two out of 334 participants in the basal-bolus group (0.6%) died (low-certainty evidence). Severe hypoglycaemic episodes, defined as blood glucose levels below 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L), showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 1.00; P = 0.05; 5 trials; 667 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.02 and 2.57. All nine severe hypoglycaemic episodes were observed among the 369 participants on basal-bolus insulin (2.4%). The mean length of hospital stay was 0.5 days longer for the SSI group, 95% CI -0.5 to 1.4; P = 0.32; 6 trials; 717 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The 95% prediction interval ranged between -1.7 days and 2.7 days. Adverse events other than hypoglycaemic episodes, such as postoperative infections, showed a RR of 1.16, 95% CI 0.25 to 5.37; P = 0.85; 3 trials; 481 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The mean blood glucose levels ranged across basal-bolus groups from 156 mg/dL (8.7 mmol/L) to 221 mg/dL (12.3 mmol/L). The mean blood glucose level in the SSI groups was 14.8 mg/dL (0.8 mmol/L) higher (95% CI 7.8 (0.4) to 21.8 (1.2); P < 0.001; 6 trials; 717 participants; low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction interval ranged between -3.6 mg/dL (-0.2 mmol/L) and 33.2 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L). No trial reported on diabetes-related mortality or socioeconomic effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain which insulin strategy (SSI or basal-bolus insulin) is best for non-critically hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus. A basal-bolus insulin strategy in these patients might result in better short-term glycaemic control but could increase the risk for severe hypoglycaemic episodes. The certainty of the body of evidence comparing SSI with basal-bolus insulin was low to very low and needs to be improved by adequately performed, well-powered RCTs in different hospital environments with well-educated medical staff using identical short-acting insulins in both intervention and comparator arms to compare the rigid SSI approach with flexible insulin application strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Enrique Colunga‐Lozano
- McMaster UniversityDepartments of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact1280 Main Street WestHamiltonOntarioCanadaL8S 4L8
| | | | - Netzahualpilli Delgado‐Figueroa
- Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. MenchacaDepartment of PediatricsSalvador Quevedo y Zubieta No. 750GuadalajaraJaliscoMexico44340
| | - Daniel A Gonzalez‐Padilla
- Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreDepartment of UrologyAvenida de Córdoba, s/nMadridMadridSpain28041
| | | | - Yuani Roman
- Institute of Biomedical Research Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), BarcelonaIberoamerican Cochrane CentreSant Antoni Ma Claret, 171BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08041
| | - Carlos A Cuello‐García
- McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact1280 Main Street West. HSC‐2CHamiltonOntarioCanadaL8S 4K1
| | | |
Collapse
|