Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the RoadsaverTM Dual-Layer Carotid Stent System

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using first-generation single-layer stents is widely accepted as a good alternative to standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) but it is associated with worse outcomes in terms of both plaque prolapse and cerebral embolization.

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative and midterm outcomes of CAS using the new-generation RoadsaverTM dual-layer micromesh-covered carotid stent.

METHODS

Herein, we present the results of an observational, retrospective, multicentric study on non-consecutive patients who underwent the CAS procedure between January 2017 and December 2022 at three Italian, high-volume vascular surgery centers. The inclusion criteria were the patients' eligibility for the CAS procedure in accordance with the current Italian guidelines, and the implantation of a Roadsaver stent. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were included in the study. The patients requiring reintervention for carotid restenosis following CEA were also included. Perioperative data regarding procedural success was defined as the successful implantation of the device in the desired position, less than 30% residual stenosis, and the absence of intraoperative neurological complications. The primary outcome was any adverse cerebrovascular event such as stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) during the procedure and/or after discharge. The secondary outcomes were the need for further intervention, and all-cause death following procedure.

RESULTS

Three-hundred-fifty-three (353) patients were included in our study; the mean age was 74.3 years. A total of 5.9% of the patients were symptomatic on their operated side, while 7.3% had contralateral carotid occlusion. A cerebral embolic protection device (CPD) was employed in all patients. A total of 13.3% of the patients were operated on for restenosis after CEA Technical success was achieved in 96.9% of the cases with an intraoperative report of six TIAs (1.7%) and six ipsilateral strokes (1.7%). The mean hospital stay was 1.8 days. The thirty-day follow up showed one TIA and one more stroke. At the mean 35-month follow-up time, the primary outcome was present in six patients (1.7%), where four TIAs (1.1%) and two strokes (0.5%) were reported. Restenosis occurred in five patients (1.4%). Death for any cause was reported in 11 patients (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

As most recent, high-quality studies show, the CAS procedure with second-generation devices such as the Roadsaver stent is safe and effective in preventing carotid-related cerebrovascular events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The intraoperative and postoperative cerebrovascular complication rate in high volume centers is very low, ensuring confidence in its employment for the CAS procedure along with a CPD as a valid alternative to CEA.

Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).

Impact of Carotid Stent Design on Embolic Filter Debris Load During Carotid Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND

The carotid stent design may influence the risk of embolization during carotid artery stenting. The aim of the study was to assess this risk by comparing the quantity of embolized material captured by filters during carotid artery stenting, using different stent designs.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis >70% (2010-2022) in a tertiary academic hospital (Padua University Hospital, Italy). Carotid stents were classified according to their design as open-cell (OCS), closed-cell (CCS), or micromesh stents (MMS). A distal filter protection was used in all patients, and the amount of captured embolized particles was semiautomatically analyzed using a dedicated software (Image-Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics). Primary end point was embolic filter debris (EFD) load, defined as the ratio of the filter area covered by particulate material to the total filter area. Secondary end points were 30 days major stroke and death.

RESULTS

Four-hundred-eighty-one carotid artery stentings were included; 171 (35%) using an OCS, 68 (14%) a CCS, and 242 (50%) a MMS. Thirty-days mortality was 0.2% (n=1) and major stroke rate was 0.2% (P=0.987). Filters of patients receiving MMS were more likely to be free from embolized material (OCS, 30%; CCS, 13%; MMS, 41%; P<0.001) and had a lower EFD load (OCS, 9.1±14.5%; CCS, 7.9±14.0%; MMS, 5.0±9.1%; P<0.001) compared with other stent designs. After stratification by plaque characteristics, MMS had a lower EFD load in cases of hypoechogenic plaque (OCS, 13.4±9.9%; CCS, 10.9±8.7%; MMS, 6.5±13.1%; P<0.001), plaque length>15 mm (OC, 10.2±15.3; CC, 8.6±12.4; MM, 8.2±13.6; P<0.001), and preoperative ipsilateral asymptomatic ischemic cerebral lesion (OCS, 12.9±16.8%; CCS, 8.7±19.5%; MMS, 5.4±9.7%; P<0.001). After multivariate linear regression, use of MMS was associated with lower EFD load (P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MMS seems to be associated with a lower embolization rate and EFD load, especially in hypoechogenic and long plaques and in patients with a preoperative evidence of asymptomatic ischemic cerebral lesion.

Carotid Artery Stenting Using Stent-in-Stent Technique with a Closed-Cell Stent and a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent: A Case Report

Objective

Recent studies evaluating plaque protrusion at carotid artery stenting (CAS) using optical coherence tomography showed not a few cases of plaque protrusion when using double-layer micromesh stents. We report a case of symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with at-risk unstable plaques in which CAS was successfully performed using a stent-in-stent technique by the combined use of a closed-cell stent and a dual-layer micromesh stent.

Case Presentation

An 87-year-old Japanese man with dysarthria and right hemiparesis was diagnosed with atheromatous cerebral embolism caused by severe left ICA stenosis on MRI and DSA. MRI with T1-weighted black blood methods showed high intensities in the plaques of the left ICA, suggesting unstable plaque characteristics with intraplaque hemorrhage components. On day 20, CAS was performed. After the pre-stent dilation under proximal and distal protection, a Carotid WALLSTENT was placed to cover the stenotic lesion. Then, a CASPER Rx was placed from the proximal left ICA to the common carotid artery to cover the Carotid WALLSTENT. Although visible plaque debris was recognized in the aspirated blood, the debris became invisible after aspiration of 1300 mL. Postoperative angiography showed enough dilation of the left ICA, with no plaque protrusion or acute stent thrombosis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged without any neurological sequelae.

Conclusion

The present case suggests that the combined stent-in-stent technique using a closed-cell stent and a micromesh stent can be considered as one of the treatment strategies for preventing plaque protrusion and procedural ischemic complications in patients with high-risk carotid plaques.

Optical Coherence Tomography in Cerebrovascular Disease: Open up New Horizons

Optical coherence tomography (OCT), based on the backscattering or reflection of near-infrared light, enables an ultra-high resolution of up to 10 μm. The successful application of OCT in coronary artery diseases has sparked increasing interest in its implementation in cerebrovascular diseases. OCT has shown promising potential in the atherosclerotic plaque structure characterization, plaque rupture risk stratification, pre-stenting and post-stenting evaluation, and long-term follow-up in extracranial and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). In hemorrhagic cerebrovascular diseases, OCT plays an important role in the structure evaluation, rupture risk stratification, and healing and occlusion evaluation following initial treatment in intracranial aneurysms (IAs). In this study, we summarized the applications of OCT in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cerebrovascular diseases, especially in ICAS and IAs. The current limitations and future directions of OCT in the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases were also discussed.

Procedural embolic protection strategies for carotid artery stenting: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an established procedure to treat carotid artery stenosis for either primary or secondary prevention of stroke. Randomized clinical trials have shown an increased risk of periprocedural cerebrovascular events with CAS compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate this risk, including alternative vascular access site, proximal/distal embolic protection devices, and dual-layer stents, among others.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a general overview of current embolic protection strategies for CAS. The phases of the procedure which can affect the early risk of stroke and how to reduce it with novel techniques and devices have been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovations in device technologies have dramatically improved the safety and efficacy of CAS. To minimize the gap with surgery, a thorough, patient-oriented approach should be pursued. Endovascular technologies and techniques should be selected on an individual basis to address unique lesion characteristics and vascular anatomies. Meticulous pre-procedural planning, both clinical and anatomical, is needed to assess the embolic risk of each procedure. Only by having an in-depth understanding of the wide range of available endovascular devices and techniques, the operator will choose the most appropriate strategy to optimize CAS results.

Proximal versus distal protection: dissecting clinical trials

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a valid alternative to conventional carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Distal embolization of atherosclerotic debris causing cerebrovascular accidents during CAS has been the most significant concern limiting widespread application of CAS technology. A variety of embolic protection devices (EPDs) with different mechanism of action, have been designed to minimize the risk of major embolization causing stroke and their use is recommended by current guidelines. Two general types of EPDs are available: proximal protection devices (PPDs) and distal protection devices (DPDs). However, there is no convincing clinical evidence of the clinical superiority of one device over another. This review will examine the different types of available devices and also innovative devices and techniques, including strengths and weaknesses of each, and present the available evidence and rationale for their routine use during CAS.

Efficacy of Post-Dilatation during Carotid Artery Stenting for Unstable Plaque Using a Double-Layer Stent Evaluated by OFDI

Objective

This study aimed to use optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) to evaluate the efficacy of post-dilatation (PD) after stent placement for unstable plaques during carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a double-layer stent.

Methods

Twelve unstable carotid plaque lesions diagnosed by MRI were evaluated using OFDI during CAS. The pre-procedural minimum lumen diameter was 1.6 ± 0.7 mm. Each lesion was pre-dilated with balloon catheters (diameter, 5.3 ± 0.5 mm), and a double-layer stent was deployed. PD was performed with balloon catheters of the same size as those used for pre-dilatation. Cross-sectional OFDI images within the stented segment were evaluated at 1-mm intervals for a 20-mm segment, including the most stenotic lesion. Slice rates for the presence of in-stent plaque protrusion (PP) and plaque between the double-layer lumen were calculated.

Results

No procedural complications occurred with the use of an embolic protection device. Compared to after stent placement, slice rates for any PP (44 ± 19% to 62 ± 22%, P <0.05) and plaque between the double-layer lumen (79 ± 16% to 91 ± 34%, P <0.05) were significantly increased after PD; slice rates for >500 μm PP (7.5 ± 14% to 0%, P <0.05) were significantly decreased. Visible debris were captured in 50% of lesions.

Conclusion

PD after double-layer carotid stent placement decreases in-stent large PP. Double-layer construction contributed to the prevention of large PP, as the PP may have been crushed into debris by PD.

“Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)”

Purpose

Endovascular carotid artery stenosis treatment is associated with a higher peri- and early post-procedural stroke risk relative to surgery. Dual-layer micromesh carotid stents were specifically designed for improved plaque coverage to reduce the cerebral embolization risk and related ischemic events. ROADSAVER study aims to further confirm the safety and efficacy of the Roadsaver™ dual-layer micromesh stent for the treatment of elective patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Materials and Methods

ROADSAVER is a prospective, multi-center, observational study. Between January 2018 and February 2021, a total of 1967 patients featuring asymptomatic or symptomatic, non-occlusive and non-thrombotic carotid stenosis eligible for an elective stenting procedure were enrolled across 13 European countries (52 centers). Follow-up visits are scheduled at 30 days and at 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the major adverse event rate, i.e., cumulative incidence of any death or stroke up to 30 days post-procedure. All deaths, strokes and carotid revascularizations are adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Sub-analyses are prespecified and focused on baseline patient characteristics (e.g., age, neurologic status), procedural features (e.g., access route, embolic protection use), advanced imaging, and treatment efficacy up to 12 months.

Conclusion

The present study evaluates the Roadsaver™ dual-layer micromesh carotid stent in the real-world clinical practice aiming to provide valuable insights into the contemporary European treatment trends and outcomes of elective carotid artery stenting. The large study population and predefined sub-analyses should help identify the best practices and patient subsets to benefit most from the treatment.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT03504228.

Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Micromesh Carotid Stent: Contemporary Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Severe carotid stenosis (CS) is a major risk factor for stroke. Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard revascularization technique of CS while carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an alternative treatment option, especially in high-risk patients or those with relative contraindications to CEA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of CEA and CAS with Roadsaver® stent device.

METHODS

We made a retrospective analysis of 119 patients undergoing treatment of CS. All CS were evaluated with imaging exams. The patients were divided into CEA group and CAS group. As primary endpoints of the study overall and cardiovascular cause - related mortality, freedom from stroke, and restenosis were considered. All patients were followed up and revaluated with duplex scan over a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 36 months (follow-up mean time 22.3 ± 3.4 months).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort 86 of 119 patients underwent CEA and 33 of 119 CAS. Risk factors were superposable in both groups. During follow-up, we observed 4 deaths, 2 cardiovascular events and 12 restenosis. CEA was associated with lower death probability than CAS (P = 0.036). Probability of Restenosis and cardiovascular events did not vary between CAS and CEA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Albeit CEA remains the gold standard for the treatment of severe CS, CAS with new double layer micromesh stent can be considered a useful and safe alternative in some clinical conditions.

Near-infrared spectroscopy carotid plaque characteristics and cerebral embolism in carotid artery stenting

BACKGROUND

Perioperative thromboembolism is the main consideration in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Precise evaluation of carotid plaque components is clinically important to reduce ischaemic complications since CAS mechanically pushes plaque outwards, which releases plaque debris into the bloodstream.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine whether high lipid core plaque (LCP) assessed by catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is associated with ipsilateral cerebral embolism by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during CAS using a first-generation stent.

METHODS

Carotid stenosis magnetic resonance (MR) T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio (T1W-SIR) followed by NIRS assessment at the time of CAS (using the carotid artery Wallstent) was performed in 117 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

The maximum lipid core burden index (max-LCBI) at minimal luminal areas (MLA; max-LCBIMLA) and the max-LCBI for any 4 mm segment in a target lesion defined as max-LCBIarea were significantly higher for the post-procedural new ipsilateral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI)-positive than negative patients (p<0.001 for all). There was a significant linear correlation between max-LCBIarea and the number of new emboli (r=0.544, p<0.0001). We also found that the second quantile (Q2) of T1W-SIRMLA had a significantly higher max-LCBIMLA and a higher incidence of DWI positivity than Q1 and Q3 (p<0.001 for all). Furthermore, max-LCBIMLA appeared to distinguish between patients with and without postoperative new ipsilateral DWI positivity (AUC 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High LCP assessed by NIRS is associated with cerebral embolism by diffusion-weighted imaging in CAS using a first-generation stent.

Contemporary Results of Carotid Artery Stenting Using Low-Profile Dual-Metal Layer Nitinol Micromesh Stents in Relation to Single-Layer Carotid Stents

PURPOSE

To evaluate patients characteristics, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and midterm results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed with the Roadsaver/Casper stent (Terumo Corp, Tokyo, Japan) as compared to concurrent patients treated with other commercially available carotid stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective, nonrandomized study including 200 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 205 elective CAS procedures due to severe internal carotid artery stenosis between April 2015 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcomes for patients treated with the Roadsaver/Casper stent implantation (100 procedures, in 97 patients) vs first-generation carotid stents implantations (90 procedures, in 88 patients) were compared. Fifteen patients were treated with CGuard carotid stent (InspireMD, Tel Aviv, Israel), and outcomes were reported separately. Primary endpoints were the occurrence of major adverse cerebrovascular events (MACE), including death, ipsilateral stroke, and transitory ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary endpoints were the rate of intrastent stenosis, the need for reintervention, and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and need for inotropic support.

RESULTS

No difference in demographics and preoperative risk factors were observed between patients treated with and without the Roadsaver/Casper stent. The mean procedure time was shorter in the Roadsaver/Casper group (40.7±16.9 vs 49.4±27.3 minutes; p=0.008), while radial percutaneous access was more frequent (24% vs 5%; p<0.001). The rate of stroke/TIA/death at 30 days was 3% in the Roadsaver group vs 1% in the first-generation stent group (p=0.623). The primary patencyrate was 100% and 93.4% at 1- and 3-year of follow-up in the Roadsaver/Casper groupand 99% and 94.3% in the other stent group, respectively (p=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort of patients undergoing CAS, the Roadsaver/Casper stent was used to treat more symptomatic and vulnerable carotid plaques as compared to other carotid stents. Nevertheless, patients treated with this low-profile dual-layer micromesh stent showed low events rates at both 30 days and follow-up, similar to that observed for other stents.

A Case of Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Stent-in-Stent Technique for Carotid Artery Stenosis with Unstable Plaque

Objective

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the stent-in-stent technique was reported to prevent intraprocedural plaque protrusion (PP) in patients with carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque. We report a case of intraoperative PP after CAS despite the use of stent-in-stent technique.

Case Presentation

A 63-year-old man presented with rapid progression of right carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque during follow-up and was admitted to undergo CAS. Under local anesthesia with Mo.Ma Ultra and FilterWire EZ protection, CAS was performed using the stent-in-stent technique. The first 8 mm × 29 mm Carotid Wallstent (CWS) was placed. The second CWS (6 mm × 22 mm) was placed in a stent-in-stent manner to match the stenotic lesion, and conservative postdilation was performed. Then the third CWS (6 mm × 22 mm) was added due to the presence of PP on intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS). No postoperative neurological abnormalities were found, and no new high-signal areas were observed on diffusion-weighted MRI the day after surgery. The patient was discharged without postoperative complications. No stroke and restenosis were observed at 3 months after CAS.

Conclusion

PP can occur even with stent-in-stent technique, suggesting the importance of diagnosis by IVUS.

Carotid artery stenting with Roadsaver stent. Early and four-year results from a single-center registry

INTRODUCTION

Prevention of peri- and postprocedural complications is still a challenge in carotid artery stenting (CAS).

AIM

To assess immediate and long-term safety and effectiveness of CAS using the Roadsaver double-nitinol-layer-micromesh stent.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2014, 298 CAS procedures in 287 non-consecutive patients (203 men, mean age 70.5 ±8.6 years, 100% symptomatic/high risk lesions) have been performed using the Roadsaver stent and proximal (40%) or distal (60%) neuroprotection system. Clinical and neurological examinations as well as duplex ultrasound were completed before CAS, before discharge, at 1, 6 and 12 months, then annually.

RESULTS

All CAS procedures were successful. Carotid stenosis was reduced from 84.9 ±9.9% to 11.0 ±9.4% (p < 000.1). In hospital, 1 ipsilateral periprocedural major (0.3%) and 3 minor (1.34%) ischemic strokes occurred, 2 (0.7%) patients died due to a cerebral hemorrhage on day 9 and 21. Three (1.0%) additional ipsilateral minor strokes within 30 consecutive days occurred. Thus, 30-day complications were observed in 9 (3.0%) patients. Two minor strokes were associated with in-stent thrombosis (0.7%). The 4-year follow-up showed 82% overall survival (95% CI: 69-91%) with no significant difference between asymptomatic (77%) and symptomatic patients (97%; p = 0.076). The stroke-free survival was 89% (95% CI: 77-95%), 84% asymptomatic vs. 98% symptomatic (p = 0.187). Seven (2.3%) patients developed > 50% in-stent restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid artery stenting using the Roadsaver stent for symptomatic patients and high risk lesions showed to be safe and effective, with a low complication rate and acceptable in-stent restenosis risk in 4-year follow-up.

Endovascular optical coherence tomography imaging in cerebrovascular disease

Endovascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the highest resolution imaging modality currently available with spatial resolution of 10 µm. Although originally developed for interventional cardiology, the ability to visualize the luminal environment and anatomy, along with the stent-vessel interaction could be of great utility for various cerebrovascular diseases, and the adoption of endovascular OCT imaging in the evolving field of interventional neuroradiology seems instinctive. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding applications of endovascular OCT in the diagnosis and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. In addition, the authors report their institutional experience with the use of OCT in carotid atherosclerotic disease, cerebral aneurysms, and acute ischemic stroke. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Peer-reviewed articles were collected through MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) searches through March 2020. A total of 34 studies with 598 patients were included in the qualitative synthesis. These include 23 studies of carotid atherosclerotic disease, 7 studies of cerebral aneurysms, and 4 studies of non-aneurysmal posterior circulation pathology. OCT imaging was feasible in 94% of patients with 0.6% complication rate. Endovascular OCT appears to be safe and feasible, allowing clinicians to visualize stent-vessel interactions, aneurysmal healing, and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque features. OCT carries great promise, however additional investigations are needed before any imposing statement can be made about the role of OCT in cerebrovascular imaging.

Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Double-layer Micromesh Stent

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently emerged as a potential alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in Japan. However, one of its disadvantages is the higher incidence of ischemic complications than CEA, such as distal embolism during or after the procedure. Plaque protrusion (PP) through the stent strut after deployment of the stent has been suggested as one of the major causes of distal embolism, especially in patients with unstable plaques. The need for increased plaque coverage to reduce the risk of PP through the stent struts has led to the development of a double-layer micromesh stent (micromesh stent) system. This stent system has already been used clinically in European countries with good short- to medium-term follow-up results. Also clinical trials evaluating micromesh stents have been completed in Japan. Hence, usefulness of the micromesh stent for CAS is expected. According to the results of several clinical studies, CAS with the double-layer micromesh stent has the potential to minimize distal embolism during or after the procedure even in patients with unstable plaques. However, it may not be suitable for emergency CAS at this point. Also, since results of only short- to medium-term follow-up have been reported, longer-term follow-up will be required in the near future.

Clinical considerations and recommendations for OCT-guided carotid artery stenting

Introduction: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging providing high-resolution images of morphological features of arterial wall. Nowadays, OCT is an accepted intravascular modality to study coronary arteries, stent implantation, and vessel injury. In the last decade, an increasing interest have been focused on the application of OCT in carotid arteries.Areas covered: Literature evidence in the application of OCT in carotid arteries still remains debated. So far, OCT has been used as a research tool, aiming to evaluate atherosclerotic plaques' features and stents' behavior after implantation. This paper is intended to summarize clinical evidences and practices in the use of OCT in carotid arteries district and during CAS procedures. Literature review was completed via Pubmed search using Keywords.Expert opinion: CAS is a safe and effective procedure when performed by trained physicians with a tailored approach. In this scenario, ambiguous pictures at ultrasound, angiography, and IVUS might be clarified using OCT.By providing unprecedented microstructural information on atherosclerotic plaques, OCT may identify the features of vulnerable carotid plaque and, by identifying possible defects after stent implantation as malapposition and plaque prolapse, it may help the tailoring approach to CAS.

Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Closed-Cell Stent-in-Stent Technique for Unstable Plaque

Purpose: To examine whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) of stenoses with unstable plaque using a closed-cell stent-in-stent technique prevents plaque protrusion. Materials and Methods: Between December 2014 and August 2018, 35 consecutive patients (mean age 75.8 years; 29 men) with carotid artery stenosis (20 symptomatic) and unstable plaque diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging were prospectively analyzed. Mean diameter stenosis was 83.5%. All CAS procedures were performed with stent-in-stent placement of Carotid Wallstents using an embolic protection device and conservative postdilation. The technical success rate, incidence of plaque protrusion, ischemic stroke rate within 30 days, and new ipsilateral ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) within 48 hours after CAS were prospectively assessed. Follow-up outcomes included the incidences of ipsilateral stroke and restenosis. Results: The technical success rate was 100%. No plaque protrusion or stroke occurred in any patient. New ischemic lesions were observed on DWI in 10 (29%) patients. During the mean 11.6-month follow-up, no ipsilateral strokes occurred. Two (6%) patients developed asymptomatic restenosis recorded as 53% lumen narrowing and occlusion, respectively. Conclusion: CAS using a closed-cell stent-in-stent technique for unstable plaque may be useful for preventing plaque protrusion and ischemic complications.

Perspective review on applications of optics in cerebral endovascular neurosurgery

Cerebral endovascular neurosurgery has transformed the way we manage cerebrovascular disease. Several landmark trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of endovascular techniques leading to continued technological development and applications for various diseases. The utilization of optical technologies and devices is already underway in the field of endovascular neurosurgery. We discuss the contemporary paradigms, challenges, and current optical applications for the most common cerebrovascular diseases: carotid atherosclerotic disease, cerebral aneurysms, intracranial atherosclerosis, and dural arteriovenous fistulas. We also describe needs-based opportunities for future optical applications, with the goal of providing researchers a sense of where we feel optical technologies could impact the way we manage cerebral disease.

Periprocedural Stroke and Myocardial Infarction as Risks for Long-Term Mortality in CREST

BACKGROUND

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) previously reported increased mortality in patients who sustained a periprocedural stroke or cardiac event (myocardial infarction [MI] or biomarker only) in follow-up to 4 years. We now extend these observations to 10 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CREST is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the outcomes of carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between mortality and periprocedural stroke, MI, or biomarker-only events. For 10-year follow-up, patients with periprocedural stroke were at 1.74× the risk of death compared with those without stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.74; 95% CI, 1.21-2.50; P<0.003). This increased risk was driven by increased early (between 0 and 90 days) mortality (adjusted HR=14.41; 95% CI, 5.33-38.94; P<0.0001), with no significant increase in late (between 91 days and 10 years) mortality (adjusted HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.93-2.10; P=0.11). Patients with a protocol MI were at 3.61× increased risk of death compared with those without MI (adjusted HR=3.61; 95% CI, 2.28-5.73; P<0.0001), with an increased hazard both early (adjusted HR=8.20; 95% CI, 1.86-36.2; P=0.006) and late (adjusted HR=3.40; 95% CI, 2.09-5.53; P<0.0001). Patients with a biomarker-only event were at 2.04× increased risk overall (adjusted HR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.09-3.84; P=0.03) than those without MI, with an increased early hazard (adjusted HR=8.44; 95% CI, 1.09-65.5; P=0.04) and a suggestive but nonsignificant association toward higher 91-day to 10-year risk (1.88; 95% CI, 0.97-3.64; P=0.062) contributing to the increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CREST trial, patients with periprocedural events demonstrate a substantial increase in future mortality to 10 years. For stroke, this risk is largely confined to an early time frame while periprocedural MI or biomarker-only events confer a continuous increased mortality for 10 years. Strategies to reduce periprocedural events and to optimize the evaluation and management of patients with cardiac events should be considered in efforts to reduce not only early but also long-term mortality.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00004732.

Reduction of cerebral DWI lesion burden after carotid artery stenting using the CASPER stent system

INTRODUCTION

Despite various measures to protect against distal embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS), periprocedural ischemic lesions are still encountered.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the periprocedural cerebral diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion burden after CASPER stent placement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CAS using the CASPER stent system were reviewed. Degrees of carotid stenosis and plaque configuration were determined. All patients were pretreated with dual antiplatelet agents and cerebral pre- and postprocedural MRI was obtained. All CAS procedures were performed by a single operator.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (median degree of stenosis 80%, median length of stenosis 10 mm) were treated with CAS. Hypoechogenic or heterogeneous, mostly hypoechogenic, plaques were documented in 48.6% (52/107) of patients. Carotid ulceration was present in 15.9% (17/107). Postprocedurally, 7.3% (8/110) of patients were found to have ischemic DWI lesions. They were asymptomatic in all patients. Follow-up at 90 days was available in 88.2% (97/110) of patients with excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) in 95.9% (93/97).

CONCLUSION

Carotid artery stenting using the new CASPER stent in combination with a distal embolic protection device is safe and results in a lower rate of periprocedural DWI lesion burden compared with reported results for historic controls.