Coronary vasomotion after treatment with drug-coated balloons or drug-eluting stents: a prospective, open-label, single-centre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Although recent studies have reported that drug-coated balloons (DCB) are non-inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of native coronary arteries in a specific population, there is no available information concerning vasomotion after treatment with DCB.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare coronary vasomotion in patients with small coronary artery disease treated with DCB versus DES.

METHODS

Forty-two native lesions (2.0-3.0 mm) treated in our institution were randomly assigned to the DCB arm (n=19) or the bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents arm (n=23) after successful predilation. At eight months after treatment, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotion was evaluated with intracoronary infusions in incremental doses of acetylcholine (right coronary artery: low dose 5 μg, high dose 50 μg; left coronary artery: low dose 10 μg, high dose 100 μg) and nitroglycerine (200 μg). The mean lumen diameter of the distal segment, beginning 5 mm and ending 15 mm distal to the edge of the treated segment, was quantitatively measured by angiography.

RESULTS

The luminal dimension in the treated segment did not differ between groups at the follow-up angiography. The vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion was less pronounced in the DCB arm than in the DES arm (low-dose: 6±13% vs -3±18%, p=0.060; high-dose: -4±17% vs -21±29%, p=0.035). The response to nitroglycerine did not differ between groups (17±13% vs 17±22%, p=0.929).

CONCLUSIONS

Vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion in the peri-treated region was less pronounced in the DCB arm than in the DES arm, suggesting that endothelial function in treated coronary vessels could be better preserved by DCB than by new-generation DES.

Optical coherence tomography tissue coverage and characterization at six months after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus conventional everolimus eluting stents in the ISAR-Absorb MI trial

Purpose

Data regarding vessel healing by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) or everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) implantation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is scarce. We compared OCT findings after BRS or EES implantation in patients with AMI enrolled in a randomized trial.

Methods

In ISAR-Absorb MI, AMI patients were randomized to BRS or EES implantation, with 6–8 month angiographic follow-up. This analysis includes patients who underwent OCT during surveillance angiography. Tissue characterization was done using grey-scale signal intensity analysis. The association between OCT findings and target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years was investigated.

Results

OCT was analyzed in 103 patients (2237 frames, 19,827 struts) at a median of 216 days post-implantation. Of these, 70 were treated with BRS versus 32 with EES. Pre-(92.8 vs. 68.7%, p = 0.002) and post-dilation (51.4 vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001) were more common in BRS as compared to EES. Strut coverage was higher in BRS vs. EES (97.5% vs. 90.9%, p < 0.001). Mean neointimal thickness was comparable in both groups [85.5 (61.9, 124.1) vs. 69.5 (32.7, 127.5) µm, respectively, p = 0.20]. Mature neointimal regions were numerically more common in BRS (43.0% vs. 24.6%; p = 0.35); this difference was statistically significant in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients (40.9% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.03).

At two-years, 8 (7.8%) patients experienced TLF. Mean neointimal area [0.61 (0.21, 1.33) vs. 0.41 (0.11, 0.75) mm², p = 0.03] and mean neointimal coverage [106.1 (65.2, 214.8) vs. 80.5 (53.5, 122.1) µm, p < 0.01] were higher, with comparable tissue maturity, in lesions with versus without TLF.

Conclusions

In selected patients who underwent OCT surveillance 6–8 months after coronary intervention for AMI with differing implantation characteristics depending on the device type used, vessel healing was more advanced in BRS compared with EES, particularly in the STEMI subgroup.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02251-x.

Comparable neointimal healing in patients with stable coronary lesions and acute coronary syndrome: 3-month optical coherence tomography analysis

We aimed to assess a possible difference of the neointimal coverage status and its quality after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. stable coronary lesions (non-ACS). We comprehensively analyzed three prospective single-center observational studies RESTORE (UMIN000033009), HEAL-BioFreedom (UMIN000029692), and HEAL-BioFreedom ACS (UMIN000034769). All patients who received successful optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination at planned 3-month follow-up after stent implantation were analyzed. Study population was divided into two groups, ACS vs. non-ACS groups. We evaluated standard OCT variables, coverage percent, and the quantitative light property values including light intensity, attenuation, and backscatter of neointima. A total of 177 lesions from 154 patients (ACS 44 lesions vs. non-ACS 133 lesions) were analyzed. At 3-month follow-up, coverage percent (ACS 91.5  ±  9.5% vs. non-ACS 91.8  ±  9.0%, P = 0.722) and neointimal thickness (ACS 59.5  ±  32.3 µm vs. non-ACS 58.2  ±  32.3 µm, P = 0.760) did not significantly differ. Light property values were similar between both groups (light intensity 159.29  ±  72.20 vs. 159.45   ± 63.78, P = 0.654; light attenuation 0.88  ±  0.26 vs. 0.87   ±  0.24 m^-1, P = 0.988; backscatter 4.86   ±  0.58 vs. 4.83   ±  0.57, P = 0.812). The similarity of the neointimal quality in ACS and non-ACS patients was consistent across the 6 different types of current-generation metallic stents (P for interaction  > 0.05). Our findings suggested the comparable neointimal characteristics 3 months after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with ACS and stable coronary lesions by quantitative OCT methodology.

Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease-AIDA trial substudy

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) might represent a specific subgroup, in which bioresorbable scaffold implantation in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), might lead to better outcomes when compared to conventional treatment with metallic drug eluting stents. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the Amsterdam Investigator-Initiated Absorb Strategy All-Comers (AIDA) trial, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) versus Xience everolimus eluting stent (EES) treated patients presenting either with or without ACS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We classified AIDA patients on the basis of clinical presentation of ACS or of no-ACS. The rate of the 2-year primary endpoint of target vessel failure (TVF) was similar after treatment with Absorb BVS or Xience EES in ACS patients (10.2% versus 9.0% respectively; P = 0.49) and in no-ACS patients (11.7% versus 10.7%, respectively; P = 0.67) Definite or probable device thrombosis occurred more frequently with Absorb BVS compared to Xience EES in ACS patients (4.3% versus 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.03) as well as in no-ACS patients (2.4% versus 0.2%, respectively; P = 0.002). There were no statistically significant interactions between clinical presentation and randomized device modality for TVF (P = 0.80) and for the endpoint of definite or probable device thrombosis (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

In the AIDA trial, the 2-year outcomes of PCI with Absorb BVS versus Xience EES were consistent in ACS and no-ACS patients: similar rates for TVF and consistently higher rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis under Absorb BVS versus Xience EES. There were no statistically significant interactions between clinical presentation and randomized device modality.

Serial optical coherence tomography and angioscopic assessments of 10-year in-stent restenosis of Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent treated with drug-coated balloon angioplasty

The drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is considered a standard therapeutic option for in-stent restenosis. In the present case, we observed high-intensity spots on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and bright spots on coronary angioplasty (CAS) immediately after DCB angioplasty. The superficial high-intensity area on OCT presumably corresponded with the bright spots on CAS. The high-intensity superficial regions were thought to represent an iopromide/paclitaxel mixture. The present serial observation demonstrated that the eluted drugs remained for at least 2 months but disappeared within 6 months. At the site where we observed the drugs, neointimal growth was successfully inhibited and stabilized at the 6-month follow-up. The association of eluted drugs after DCB angioplasty with consequent neointimal growth is of scientific interest. Further prospective imaging studies with a large sample size are warranted to clarify this association.

Early vessel healing after implantation of biodegradable-polymer and durable-polymer drug-eluting stent: 3-month angioscopic evaluation of the RESTORE registry

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the vessel healing status 3 months after stent implantation of bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DESs) in comparison with durable-polymer DESs (DP-DESs) by angioscopy. Study design was a single-center all-comer prospective cohort study: the RESTORE registry (UMIN000033009). All patients who received successful angioscopic examination at planned 3-month follow-up after the DES implantation in the native coronary artery were enrolled. We evaluated main, maximum, minimum strut coverage grades and coverage heterogeneity score defined as a difference between maximum and minimum coverage grades. All lesions were divided into three segments: proximal, mid, and distal segments. A total of 108 patients (66.6 ± 10 years) with 124 lesions were analyzed (BP-DES 57 patients 61 lesions 226 segments vs. DP-DES 57 patients 63 lesions 203 segments; six patients had both BP-DES and DP-DES). Patient and lesion demographics, procedural characteristics were well balanced. Main coverage grade (mean ± standard error; 1.08 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 0.03, p = 0.354) and minimum coverage grade (1.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.00 ± 0.00, p > 0.999) were not significantly different between BP-DES and DP-DES groups. Maximum coverage grade was significantly higher in the BP-DES than in the DP-DES (1.45 ± 0.04 vs. 1.35 ± 0.04, p = 0.049). Coverage heterogeneity score did not differ between BP-DES and DP-DES groups (1.05 ± 0.07 vs. 0.90 ± 0.07, p = 0.162). At 3-month follow-up, the current BP-DES had higher maximum stent coverage than the contemporary DP-DES, while main and minimum coverage grades and heterogeneity of the neointimal coverage were comparable. Further prospective randomized trials should be conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of the present imaging results.

Device specificity of vascular healing following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and bioabsorbable polymer metallic drug-eluting stents in human coronary arteries: the ESTROFA OCT BVS vs. BP-DES study

AIMS

We sought to compare vascular healing with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BVS) and drug-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymers (BP-DES) at six and 12 months both implanted in the same patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a multicentre and prospective study including patients with at least two comparable lesions to treat. In every patient both BVS and BP-DES (SYNERGY, Orsiro or BioMatrix Flex) were implanted by lesion randomisation. Patients included were evaluated with optical coherence tomography at six or 12 months (2:1). Finally, 68 patients had an examination at six months and 27 patients at 12 months. The rates of uncovered struts at six months were 1.7±3.2% for BVS and 5.3±5.6% for BP-DES (p=0.0001), and at 12 months 0.48±0.72% and 4.8±5%, respectively (p=0.001). Rates of strut malapposition were significantly lower with BVS. There was no significant intra-patient correlation with BP-DES/BVS for endpoints. Evaginations were more frequent and larger with BVS. Discontinuities in BVS were observed in 19.4% at six months and 14.3% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular healing with BVS and BP-DES could be more device-specific than patient-specific. At follow-up, BVS presented fewer uncovered or non-apposed struts than BP-DES but more frequent and larger evaginations. Discontinuities in BVS were relatively frequent at both time points.