Three-year clinical and two-year multimodality imaging outcomes of a thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: MeRes-1 trial

Long-term outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

The higher scaffold thrombosis rates observed with the first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared to conventional drug-eluting stents were likely due in part to bioresorbable polymers having insufficient radial strength, necessitating larger strut profiles. Meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes from the first-generation Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) showed that this period of excess risk ended at 3 years. Therefore, current attention has been focused on improving early outcomes by increasing the scaffold's tensile strength and reducing strut thickness.

AREAS COVERED

This review summaries the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS. It updates the long-term clinical outcomes of trials evaluating the ABSORB BVS and metallic alloy-based BRS. In addition, it reviews the next-generation BRSs manufactured in Asia.

EXPERT OPINION

Critical areas to improve the performance and safety of biodegradable scaffolds include further development in material science, surface modification, delivery systems, and long-term follow-up studies.

Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Frontiers: A Dive Into Cutting-Edge Innovations in Coronary Stent Technology

Plain balloon angioplasty was the initial method used to enlarge the intracoronary lumen size. However, it was linked to acute coronary closure due to early vessel recoil. This led to the invention of coronary stents, which offer mechanical support to open and maintain the vascular lumen. Nevertheless, the metallic scaffold introduced other issues, such as thrombosis and restenosis caused by neointimal proliferation. To address these concerns, polymers were employed to cover the scaffold, acting as drug reservoirs and regulators for controlled drug release. The use of polymers prevents direct contact between blood and metallic scaffolds. Drugs within the stent were incorporated to inhibit proliferation and expedite endothelialization in the healing process. Despite these advancements, adverse effects still arise due to the inflammatory reaction caused by the polymer material. Consequently, resorbable polymers and scaffolds were later discovered, but they have limitations and are not universally applicable. Various scaffold designs, thicknesses, materials, polymer components, and drugs have their own advantages and complications. Each stent generation has been designed to address the shortcomings of the preceding generation, yet new challenges continue to emerge. Conflicting data regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of coronary stents, especially in the extended follow-up, further complicates the assessment.

Safety and efficacy of new-generation coronary bioresorbable scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was born with the aim to reduce the rate of late and very late cardiac events related to drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS failed to prove their short-term safety and efficacy. Based on data derived from early investigations, new-generation BRS have been developed and tested in preliminary studies. The present review's focus was to summarize the mechanical characteristics of these new scaffolds and the clinical evidence of their safety and efficacy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Biomed central databases were analyzed. Only papers published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were selected to summarize current evidence about new generation BRS, with CE mark approval. Overall, 23 studies were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data obtained from selected studies assessing the safety and efficacy of new generation BRS are encouraging. This is thanks to the progressive development of scaffolds with a different backbone structure and struts thickness that guarantee higher radial strength, flexibility, and resistance to fracture. These characteristics led to low rates of major adverse cardiac events and device-oriented composite endpoint at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

New-generation BRS have a good safety profile in stable patients with simple lesions, supported by a meticulous implantation technique. The first studies were performed on a small population with short-term follow-up, therefore new randomized clinical trials and registries are needed to expand the preliminary findings.

Safety and performance of the third-generation drug-eluting resorbable coronary magnesium scaffold system in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: 6-month results of the prospective, multicenter BIOMAG-I first-in-human study

Background

A third-generation coronary drug-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold (DREAMS 3G) was developed to enhance the performance of previous scaffold generations and achieve angiographic outcomes comparable to those of contemporary drug-eluting stents.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, first-in-human study was conducted at 14 centers in Europe. Eligible patients had stable or unstable angina, documented silent ischemia, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and a maximum of two single de novo lesions in two separate coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter between 2.5 mm and 4.2 mm. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at one, six and 12 months and annually thereafter until five years. Invasive imaging assessments were scheduled six and 12 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-scaffold late lumen loss at six months. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04157153).

Findings

Between April 2020 and February 2022, 116 patients with 117 coronary artery lesions were enrolled. At six months, in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.21 mm (SD 0.31). Intravascular ultrasound assessment showed preservation of the scaffold area (mean 7.59 mm² [SD 2.21] post-procedure vs 6.96 mm² [SD 2.48]) at six months) with a low mean neointimal area (0.02 mm² [SD 0.10]). Optical coherence tomography revealed that struts were embedded in the vessel wall and were already hardly discernible at six months. Target lesion failure occurred in one (0.9%) patient; a clinically driven target lesion revascularization was performed on post-procedure day 166. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis or myocardial infarction was observed.

Interpretation

These findings show that the implantation of DREAMS 3G in de novo coronary lesions is associated with favorable safety and performance outcomes, comparable to contemporary drug-eluting stents.

Funding

This study was funded by BIOTRONIK AG.

Research Progress of Shape Memory Polymer and 4D Printing in Biomedical Application

As a kind of smart material, shape memory polymer (SMP) shows great application potential in the biomedical field. Compared with traditional metal-based medical devices, SMP-based devices have the following characteristics: 1) The adaptive ability allows the biomedical device to better match the surrounding tissue after being implanted into the body by minimally invasive implantation; 2) it has better biocompatibility and adjustable biodegradability; 3) mechanical properties can be regulated in a large range to better match with the surrounding tissue. 4D printing technology is a comprehensive technology based on smart materials and 3D printing, which has great application value in the biomedical field. 4D printing technology breaks through the technical bottleneck of personalized customization and provides a new opportunity for the further development of the biomedical field. This paper summarizes the application of SMP and 4D printing technology in the field of bone tissue scaffolds, tracheal scaffolds, and drug release, etc. Moreover, this paper analyzes the existing problems and prospects, hoping to provide a preliminary discussion and useful reference for the application of SMP in biomedical engineering.

Surface engineering and the application of laser-based processes to stents - A review of the latest development

Late in-stent thrombus and restenosis still represent two major challenges in stents’ design. Surface treatment of stent is attracting attention due to the increasing importance of stenting intervention for coronary artery diseases. Several surface engineering techniques have been utilised to improve the biological response in vivo on a wide range of biomedical devices. As a tailorable, precise, and ultra-fast process, laser surface engineering offers the potential to treat stent materials and fabricate various 3D textures, including grooves, pillars, nanowires, porous and freeform structures, while also modifying surface chemistry through nitridation, oxidation and coatings. Laser-based processes can reduce the biodegradable materials' degradation rate, offering many advantages to improve stents’ performance, such as increased endothelialisation rate, prohibition of SMC proliferation, reduced platelet adhesion and controlled corrosion and degradation. Nowadays, adequate research has been conducted on laser surface texturing and surface chemistry modification. Laser texturing on commercial stents has been also investigated and a promotion of performance of laser-textured stents has been proved.

In this critical review, the influence of surface texture and surface chemistry on stents performance is firstly reviewed to understand the surface characteristics of stents required to facilitate cellular response. This is followed by the explicit illustration of laser surface engineering of stents and/or related materials. Laser induced periodic surface structure (LIPSS) on stent materials is then explored, and finally the application of laser surface modification techniques on latest generation of stent devices is highlighted to provide future trends and research direction on laser surface engineering of stents.

•

Compared conventional surface engineering with laser-based methods for biomedical devices.

•

Explained the influence of texture geometry and surface chemistry on stents biological response.

•

Reviewed state of the art in laser surface engineering of stents for improved biological response.

•

Reviewed state of the art in laser surface engineering to control degradation of bioresorbable stents.

•

Highlighted novel laser surface engineering designs for improved stents'performance.

Nanoparticles-reinforced poly-l-lactic acid composite materials as bioresorbable scaffold candidates for coronary stents: Insights from mechanical and finite element analysis

Current generation of bioresorbable coronary scaffolds (BRS) posed thrombogenicity and deployment issues owing to its thick struts and overall profile. To this end, we hypothesize that the use of nanocomposite materials is able to provide improved material properties and sufficient radial strength for the intended application even at reduced strut thickness. The nanocomposite formulations of tantalum dioxide (Ta₂O₅), L-lactide functionalized (LA)-Ta₂O₅, hydroxyapatite (HA) and LA-HA with poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) were evaluated in this study. Results showed that tensile modulus and strength were enhanced with non-functionalized nanofillers up until 15 wt% loading, whereas ductility was compromised. On the other hand, functionalized nanofillers/PLLA exhibited improved nanofiller dispersion which resulted higher tensile modulus, strength, and ductility. Selected nanocomposite formulations were evaluated using finite element analysis (FEA) of a stent with varying strut thickness (80, 100 and 150 μm). FEA data has shown that nanocomposite BRS with thinner struts (80-100 μm) made with 15 wt% LA-Ta₂O₅/PLLA and 10 wt% LA-HA/PLLA have increased radial strength, stiffness and reduced recoil compared to PLLA BRS at 150 μm. The reduced strut thickness can potentially mitigate issues such as scaffold thrombosis and promote re-endothelialisation of the vessel.

Current perspectives on bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary intervention and other fields

Introduction: The first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) had a large strut profile to compensate for the insufficient radial strength of bioresorbable polymer materials, resulting in higher scaffold thrombosis rates than conventional drug-eluting stents. To improve the clinical safety and efficacy, the new generation BRSs have been improved by optimal structure design, post-processing of bioresorbable polymer materials, or altering bioresorbable metallic alloys.Areas covered: This review summarizes the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS, updates the clinical outcomes of trials evaluating ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold at long-term and bioresorbable metallic alloy-based devices, and examines recent outcomes of BRS treated in STEMI patients. This review also provides an overview of the current clinical data of seven BRSs manufactured in Asia, and of the BRSs extended application in other clinical arenas.Expert opinion: Drawbacks of the first-generation BRSs need to be addressed by the next generation of these stents with novel materials and technologies. Clinical research, including randomized controlled trials, are required to further evaluate BRSs application in coronary artery disease. The encouraging results of BRSs innovation applied in the peripheral arteries and gastrointestinal tracts support other potential clinical applications of BRS technology.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Facing Old Problems, Raising New Hopes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss about the reasons behind the failure of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) device and about the challenges the future holds for the next generation of the bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Absorb BVS was burdened by intrinsic structural limitations which resulted in augmented rates of device thrombosis and clinical adverse events compared to current-generation metallic stent. Nevertheless, new generation devices with novel design and materials are in development. Second generation BRS have enhanced mechanical strength, smaller footprints, less thrombogenicity and modified bioresorption. These features, paired with proper patient and lesion selection and optimal "user-friendly" implant techniques, could possibly overcome the previous BRS generation limitations, rekindling physicians, and industry interest on this promising technology.

Designing Better Cardiovascular Stent Materials - A Learning Curve

Cardiovascular stents are life-saving devices and one of the top 10 medical breakthroughs of the 21st century. Decades of research and clinical trials have taught us about the effects of material (metal or polymer), design (geometry, strut thickness, and the number of connectors), and drug-elution on vasculature mechanics, hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, and patient health. Recently developed novel bioresorbable stents are intended to overcome common issues of chronic inflammation, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis associated with permanent stents, but there is still much to learn. Increased knowledge and advanced methods in material processing have led to new stent formulations aimed at improving the performance of their predecessors but often comes with potential tradeoffs. This review aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of stent material interactions with the host within five areas of contrasting characteristics, such as 1) metal or polymer, 2) bioresorbable or permanent, 3) drug elution or no drug elution, 4) bare or surface-modified, and 5) self-expanding or balloon-expanding perspectives, as they relate to pre-clinical and clinical outcomes and concludes with directions for future studies.

The Future of Paediatric Heart Interventions: Where Will We Be in 2030?

Purpose of Review

Cardiac catheterization therapies to treat or palliate infants, children and adults with congenital heart disease have developed rapidly worldwide in both technical innovation and device development in the previous three decades. By reviewing of current status of novel or development of devices and techniques, we will discuss what is likely to happen in paediatric heart intervention in the next decade.

Recent Findings

Recently, biodegradable stents and devices, transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation for the native right ventricle outflow tract and MRI-guided interventions have been progressing rapidly with good immediate to early results. These are expected to be introduced and spread in the next decade although there are still challenges to overcome.

Summary

The future of paediatric heart intervention is very promising with rapid development of technological progress.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds and metallic stents in diabetic patients: a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux Study, TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS

Background

Several studies compared everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (EE-BRS) with everolimus-eluting stents (EES), but only few assessed these devices in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Aim

To evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of all-comer patients with diabetes mellitus up to 2 years after treatment with EE-BRS or EES.

Methods

We performed a post hoc pooled analysis of patient-level data in diabetic patients who were treated with EE-BRS or EES in 3 prospective clinical trials: The ABSORB DM Benelux Study (NTR5447), TWENTE (NTR1256/NCT01066650) and DUTCH PEERS (NTR2413/NCT01331707). Primary endpoint of the analysis was target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction or clinically driven target vessel revascularization, as well as definite or probable device thrombosis (ST).

Results

A total of 499 diabetic patients were assessed, of whom 150 received EE-BRS and 249 received EES. Total available follow-up was 222.6 patient years (PY) in the EE-BRS and 464.9 PY in the EES group. The adverse events rates were similar in both treatment groups for TLF (7.2 vs. 5.2 events per 100 PY, p = 0.39; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77–2.87), p = 0.24), MACE (9.1 vs. 8.3 per 100 PY, p = 0.83; adjusted HR = 1.23 (95% CI: 0.70–2.17), p = 0.47), and ST (0.9 vs. 0.6 per 100 PY, p > 0.99).

Conclusion

In this patient-level pooled analysis of patients with diabetes mellitus from 3 clinical trials, EE-BRS showed clinical outcomes that were quite similar to EES.

Final report of the 5-year clinical outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions in a first-in-human study

Background

We aimed to report the 5-year outcomes of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffolds in the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions in a first-in-human (FIM) study. This is the final report of the long-term clinical outcomes of the study. Recent studies have shown that bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) increase the risks of late target lesion failure (TLF) and thrombosis.

Methods

In this prospective, single-arm study, eligible patients with single de novo coronary lesions were enrolled and treated with XINSORB scaffolds. The scaffolds measured 3.0 mm in diameter and 12, 15, and 18 mm in length. The clinical endpoints included TLF [cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR)], its components, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and scaffold thrombosis.

Results

From September 2013 to January 2014, 30 patients were enrolled and treated with XINSORB scaffolds. The procedure had a 100% success rate. None of the patients died during the 5 years of follow-up. The primary endpoint of TLF occurred in 4 patients (13.3%). Six patients were recanalized by intervention, including 4 by ID-TLR. The rate of MACE was 16.7% (5/30). One very late case of scaffold thrombosis was recorded, which led to TV-MI. No more cases of thrombosis were recorded beyond 2 years of follow-up. The rates of clinical endpoints remained steady with no changes after 3 years of follow-up.

Conclusions

Considering that this FIM study was launched at an early stage of the BRS era and without optimal implantation techniques, the clinical outcomes of TLF during the 5-year follow-up were acceptable. The rate of thrombosis was relatively low.

Time-Varying Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During 5-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Meta-analysis and Individual Patient Data Pooled Study

Importance

Bioresorbable scaffolds were designed to provide clinical benefits after their complete bioresorption. Prior studies demonstrated early risks with the Absorb polymeric bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). Whether this risk profile changes over time during the course of its bioresorption is unknown.

Objective

To examine outcomes of the first-generation BVS before and after 3 years, the point of its complete bioresorption in animals.

Data Sources

We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane database, conference proceedings, and public websites for relevant studies.

Study Selection

Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials of BVS vs metallic drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease with at least 5-year follow-up. Four trials of BVS vs everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with 3384 patients met criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Individual patient data from the 4 trials were pooled, and summary-level meta-analysis was performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The major effectiveness and safety measures were target lesion failure (TLF; cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and device thrombosis. Outcomes were examined through 5-year follow-up and between 0 to 3 and 3 to 5 years.

Results

Mean age for the 3384 patients was 62.8 years; 2452 patients were men (72.5%), and diabetes was present in 1020 patients (30.2%). Through 5-year follow-up, treatment with BVS compared with EES was associated with higher rates of TLF (14.9% vs 11.6%; HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54; P = .03) and device thrombosis (2.5% vs 0.8%; HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.46-5.65; P = .002). Target lesion failure occurred in 11.6% of BVS-treated patients vs 7.9% of EES-treated patients between 0 to 3 years (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.80), and 4.3% of BVS-treated patients vs 4.5% of EES-treated patients between 3 to 5 years (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.31) (P for interaction = .046). Device thrombosis occurred in 2.4% of BVS-treated patients vs 0.6% of EES-treated patients between 0 to 3 years (HR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.75-8.50) and 0.1% of BVS-treated patients vs 0.3% of EES-treated patients between 3 to 5 years (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.07-2.70) (P for interaction = .03). These results were consistent by spline analysis and after multiple imputation and multivariable analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

The period of excess risk for the first-generation Absorb BVS ends at 3 years. These data provide mechanistic insights into the timing of adverse events after BVS and identify the hurdles to be overcome for bioresorbable technology to be accepted as a valid alternative for patients with coronary artery disease.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01751906, NCT01844284, NCT01923740, and NCT01425281.

Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffold in Cardiovascular Applications

Advances in material science and innovative medical technologies have allowed the development of less invasive interventional procedures for deploying implant devices, including scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Biodegradable materials (e.g., resorbable polymers) are employed in devices that are only needed for a transient period. In the case of coronary stents, the device is only required for 6-8 months before positive remodelling takes place. Hence, biodegradable polymeric stents have been considered to promote this positive remodelling and eliminate the issue of permanent caging of the vessel. In tissue engineering, the role of the scaffold is to support favourable cell-scaffold interaction to stimulate formation of functional tissue. The ideal outcome is for the cells to produce their own extracellular matrix over time and eventually replace the implanted scaffold or tissue engineered construct. Synthetic biodegradable polymers are the favoured candidates as scaffolds, because their degradation rates can be manipulated over a broad time scale, and they may be functionalised easily. This review presents an overview of coronary heart disease, the limitations of current interventions and how biomaterials can be used to potentially circumvent these shortcomings in bioresorbable stents, vascular grafts and cardiac patches. The material specifications, type of polymers used, current progress and future challenges for each application will be discussed in this manuscript.

Long-term performance and biocompatibility of a novel bioresorbable scaffold for peripheral arteries: A three-year pilot study in Yucatan miniswine

AIMS

Peripheral arteries are constantly exposed to deformation (elongation, twisting, shortening, compression) making bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) a potentially attractive therapeutic alternative to metallic stents. We conducted a long-term pilot preclinical study of a novel sirolimus-eluting BRS in peripheral arteries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fourteen BRS were deployed in iliofemoral arteries of seven healthy Yucatan miniswine and examined with imaging, pharmacokinetic, histopathologic, and polymer degradation techniques at 0, 30, 90, 180 days, 1, 2, and 3.3 years. Angiographic late luminal loss remained unchanged at 30 and 180 days but significantly decreased from 1 to 3.3 years. optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed late increase in lumen area (1 year: 14.70 ± 3.58 mm² , 2 years 22.04 ± 3.81 mm² , and 3.3 years 23.45 ± 7.07 mm² ; p < .05) primarily due to scaffold area enlargement between 1 and 3.3 years, while there was no difference in the percent area stenosis at all time points. Histologic evidence of scaffold degradation was observed starting at 2 years, with minimal inflammatory reaction. At 3.3 years, BRS struts were rarely discernible by OCT, confirmed by a nearly complete polymer degradation by molecular weight analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, novel sirolimus-eluting BRS showed promising acute and chronic performance in the iliofemoral arteries of Yucatan miniswine.

First-in-man study of a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (FUTURE-I): Three-year clinical and imaging outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The FUTURE-I study aimed to assess preliminary safety and effectiveness with the long-term clinical and imaging follow-up for the Firesorb (MicroPort, Shanghai, China), a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS).

BACKGROUND

First-generation BRS has been associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, first-in-man study, patients with single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 into two cohorts after successful Firesorb implantation: cohort 1 (n = 30) underwent multimodality imaging assessment at 6 and 24 months; and cohort 2 (n = 15) at 12 and 36 months. All patients underwent clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually up to 5 years.

RESULTS

Between January and March 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. At 3-year follow-up, one patient had experienced target lesion failure and none scaffold thrombosis. In-scaffold minimal lumen diameter decreased significantly from 6-month to 2-year (2.53 ± 0.24 mm vs. 2.27 ± 0.37 mm, p = .0003), and only numerically from 1-year to 3-year follow-up (2.48 ± 0.28 mm vs. 2.22 ± 0.13 mm, p = .08). By optical coherence tomography, neointimal strut coverage at 3-year follow-up was 99.8%, and very low rate of late scaffold discontinuity was observed, only in one patient on two cross sections with three malapposed struts.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3-year follow-up of the FUTURE-I study, implantation of the thinner-strut Firesorb BRS appeared preliminary feasible and effective in the treatment of patients with noncomplex coronary lesions.