1
|
Wang J, Yin Y, Lu C, Lu Z, Hu J, Wang Y, Ge J, Jiang H, Yao C, Yan X, Ma W, Qi X, Dang Y, Chen S, Zhu J, Wang D, Ding C, Wang W, Liu J, Wang Y, Li H, Pan Z, Cui K, Li C, Liang X, Chen W, Sobotka PA, Zhang J, Esler M, Sun N, Chen M, Huo Y. Efficacy and safety of sympathetic mapping and ablation of renal nerves for the treatment of hypertension (SMART): 6-month follow-up of a randomised, controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 72:102626. [PMID: 38756107 PMCID: PMC11096821 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Previous trials of renal denervation (RDN) have been designed to investigate reduction of blood pressure (BP) as the primary efficacy endpoint using non-selective RDN without intraoperatively verified RDN success. It is an unmet clinical need to map renal nerves, selectively denervate renal sympathetic nerves, provide readouts for the interventionalists and avoid futile RDN. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of renal nerve mapping/selective renal denervation (msRDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) and determine whether antihypertensive drug burden is reduced while office systolic BP (OSBP) is controlled to target level (<140 mmHg). Methods We conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. The study combined two efficacy endpoints at 6 months as primary outcomes: The control rate of patients with OSBP <140 mmHg (non-inferior outcome) and change in the composite index of antihypertensive drugs (Drug Index) in the treatment versus Sham group (superior outcome). This design avoids confounding from excess drug-taking in the Sham group. Antihypertensive drug burden was assessed by a composite index constructed as: Class N (number of classes of antihypertensive drugs) × (sum of doses). 15 hospitals in China participated in the study and 220 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio (msRDN vs Sham). The key inclusion criteria included: age (18-65 years old), history of essential HTN (at least 6 months), heart rate (≥70 bpm), OSBP (≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, 24-h SBP ≥130 mmHg or daytime SBP ≥135 mmHg or nighttime SBP ≥120 mmHg), renal artery stenosis (<50%) and renal function (eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The catheter with both stimulation and ablation functions was inserted in the distal renal main artery. The RDN site (hot spot) was selected if SBP increased (≥5 mmHg) by intra-renal artery (RA) electrical stimulation; an adequate RDN was confirmed by repeated electronic stimulation if no increase in BP otherwise, a 2nd ablation was performed at the same site. At sites where there was decreased SBP (≥5 mmHg, cold spot) or no BP response (neutral spot) to stimulation, no ablation was performed. The mapping, ablation and confirmation procedure was repeated until the entire renal main artery had been tested then either treated or avoided. After msRDN, patients had to follow a predefined, vigorous drug titration regimen in order to achieve target OSBP (<140 mmHg). Drug adherence was monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis using urine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02761811) and 5-year follow-up is ongoing. Findings Between July 8, 2016 and February 23, 2022, 611 patients were consented, 220 patients were enrolled in the study who received standardized antihypertensive drug treatments (at least two drugs) for at least 28 days, presented OSBP ≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In left RA and right RA, mapped sites were 8.2 (3.0) and 8.0 (2.7), hot/ablated sites were 3.7 (1.4) and 4.0 (1.6), cold spots were 2.4 (2.6) and 2.0 (2.2), neutral spots were 2.0 (2.1) and 2.0 (2.1), respectively. Hot, cold and neutral spots was 48.0%, 27.5% and 24.4% of total mapped sites, respectively. At 6 M, the Control Rate of OSBP was comparable between msRDN and Sham group (95.4% vs 92.8%, p = 0.429), achieved non-inferiority margin -10% (2.69%; 95% CI -4.11%, 9.83%, p < 0.001 for non-inferiority); the change in Drug Index was significantly lower in msRDN group compared to Sham group (4.37 (6.65) vs 7.61 (10.31), p = 0.010) and superior to Sham group (-3.25; 95% CI -5.56, -0.94, p = 0.003), indicating msRDN patients need significantly fewer drugs to control OSBP <140 mmHg. 24-hour ambulatory SBP decreased from 146.8 (13.9) mmHg by 10.8 (14.1) mmHg, and from 149.8 (12.8) mmHg by 10.0 (14.0) mmHg in msRDN and Sham groups, respectively (p < 0.001 from Baseline; p > 0.05 between groups). Safety profiles were comparable between msRDN and Sham groups, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of renal mapping/selective RDN to treat uncontrolled HTN. Interpretation The msRDN therapy achieved the goals of reducing the drug burden of HTN patients and controlling OSBP <140 mmHg, with only approximately four targeted ablations per renal main artery, much lower than in previous trials. Funding SyMap Medical (Suzhou), LTD, Suzhou, China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Yuehui Yin
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Chengzhi Lu
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300190, China
| | - Zhibing Lu
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Jialu Hu
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yue Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Junbo Ge
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Hong Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Chen Yao
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xiaoyan Yan
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Wei Ma
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xiaoyong Qi
- Department of Cardiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050057, China
| | - Yi Dang
- Department of Cardiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050057, China
| | - Shaoliang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, 210012, China
| | - Jiancheng Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, 210012, China
| | - Dongmei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Norman Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050082, China
| | - Chao Ding
- Department of Cardiology, Norman Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050082, China
| | - Weimin Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yanbin Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Taiyuan Central Hospital, Taiyuan, 030009, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Cardiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, 163458, China
| | - Zhenhua Pan
- Department of Cardiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, 163458, China
| | - Kaijun Cui
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 332001, China
| | - Chengzong Li
- Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Xinjian Liang
- Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 430060, China
| | - Weijie Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Paul A. Sobotka
- Department of Cardiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | | | - Murray Esler
- Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ningling Sun
- Department of Hypertension, Heart Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Yong Huo
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu F, Yuan X, Sun K, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Bai C, Cheng Y, Lu Y, Jiang Y, Song W. Effect of Accessory Renal Arteries on Essential Hypertension and Related Mechanisms. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e030427. [PMID: 38348775 PMCID: PMC11010091 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.030427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This case-control study aimed to determine whether there were differences between patients with essential hypertension with accessory renal arteries (ARAs) and those without ARAs. METHODS AND RESULTS The enrolled patients with essential hypertension were divided into the ARA group (n=200) and control group without ARAs (n=238). After propensity matching, 394 patients (197 in each of the 2 groups), were included. The 24-hour BP (4.33/2.43 mm Hg) and daytime BP (4.48/2.61 mm Hg) of patients in the ARA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The flow-mediated dilation was lower in the ARA group (5.98±2.70 versus 5.18±2.66; P<0.05). In correlation analysis, the horizontal plasma aldosterone concentration had the highest correlation with 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP (r=0.263, 0.247, and 0.243, respectively; P<0.05) and diastolic BP (r=0.325, 0.298, and 0.317, respectively; P<0.05). As for multivariate regression analysis, plasma aldosterone concentration was a significant risk factor for elevated 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP (β=0.249 [95% CI, 0.150-0.349], 0.228 [95% CI, 0.128-0.329], and 0.282 [95% CI, 0.187-0.377], respectively; P<0.05) and elevated diastolic BP (β=0.289 [95% CI, 0.192-0.385], 0.256 [95% CI, 0.158-0.353], and 0.335 [95% CI, 0.243-0.427], respectively; P<0.05). Direct renin concentration was also a risk factor for 24-hour and daytime BPs, whereas heart rate was a risk factor correlated with 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime diastolic BP (all P<0.05). For the mixed-effects model for repeated measures, the results were similar to results of the multivariate regression analysis (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS ARAs could contribute a higher BP of patients with essential hypertension and might promote the development of essential hypertension. The mechanism might be related to overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengyuan Wu
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Xiaoyang Yuan
- Department of Clinical LaboratoryFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Kaiwen Sun
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Lianxin Zhu
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Cuiping Bai
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Yunpeng Cheng
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Yan Lu
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Yinong Jiang
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Wei Song
- Department of CardiologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mao L, Wang T. Dissecting the restricted mean time in favor of treatment. J Biopharm Stat 2024; 34:111-126. [PMID: 37224223 PMCID: PMC10667568 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2210658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The restricted mean time in favor (RMT-IF) summarizes the treatment effect on a hierarchical composite endpoint with mortality at the top. Its crude decomposition into "stage-wise effects," i.e., the net average time gained by the treatment prior to each component event, does not reveal the patient state in which the extra time is spent. To obtain this information, we break each stage-wise effect into subcomponents according to the specific state to which the reference condition is improved. After re-expressing the subcomponents as functionals of the marginal survival functions of outcome events, we estimate them conveniently by plugging in the Kaplan -- Meier estimators. Their robust variance matrices allow us to construct joint tests on the decomposed units, which are particularly powerful against component-wise differential treatment effects. By reanalyzing a cancer trial and a cardiovascular trial, we acquire new insights into the quality and composition of the extra survival times, as well as the extra time with fewer hospitalizations, gained by the treatment in question. The proposed methods are implemented in the rmt package freely available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Mao
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tuo Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kandzari DE, Townsend RR, Kario K, Mahfoud F, Weber MA, Schmieder RE, Pocock S, Tsioufis K, Konstantinidis D, Choi J, East C, Lauder L, Cohen DL, Kobayashi T, Schmid A, Lee DP, Ma A, Weil J, Agdirlioglu T, Schlaich MP, Shetty S, Devireddy CM, Lea J, Aoki J, Sharp ASP, Anderson R, Fahy M, DeBruin V, Brar S, Böhm M. Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:1809-1823. [PMID: 37914510 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications. OBJECTIVES This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications. METHODS SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis. RESULTS The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]; NCT02439775).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raymond R Townsend
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kazuomi Kario
- Departmnet of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Stuart Pocock
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - James Choi
- Baylor Research Institute, Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Cara East
- Baylor Research Institute, Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lucas Lauder
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Debbie L Cohen
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Taisei Kobayashi
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Axel Schmid
- University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David P Lee
- Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adrian Ma
- Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | - Markus P Schlaich
- Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley and Royal Perth Hospitals, and Dobney Hypertension Centre, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sharad Shetty
- Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley and Royal Perth Hospitals, and Dobney Hypertension Centre, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Janice Lea
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jiro Aoki
- Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Böhm
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verbeeck J, De Backer M, Verwerft J, Salvaggio S, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Buyse M, Brunner E. Generalized Pairwise Comparisons to Assess Treatment Effects: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:1360-1372. [PMID: 37730293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.06.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
A time-to-first-event composite endpoint analysis has well-known shortcomings in evaluating a treatment effect in cardiovascular clinical trials. It does not fully describe the clinical benefit of therapy because the severity of the events, events repeated over time, and clinically relevant nonsurvival outcomes cannot be considered. The generalized pairwise comparisons (GPC) method adds flexibility in defining the primary endpoint by including any number and type of outcomes that best capture the clinical benefit of a therapy as compared with standard of care. Clinically important outcomes, including bleeding severity, number of interventions, and quality of life, can easily be integrated in a single analysis. The treatment effect in GPC can be expressed by the net treatment benefit, the success odds, or the win ratio. This review provides guidance on the use of GPC and the choice of treatment effect measures for the analysis and reporting of cardiovascular trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Verbeeck
- Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-Biostat), University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | | | - Jan Verwerft
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hasselt Heart Center, Jessa Hospital Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Samuel Salvaggio
- International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Marco Valgimigli
- Cardiocentro Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana (University of Lugano), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Vranckx
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hasselt Heart Center, Jessa Hospital Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Marc Buyse
- Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-Biostat), University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Edgar Brunner
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng S, Wang D, Qiu J, Chen T, Gamalo M. A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 2023; 33:488-501. [PMID: 36749067 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2170393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Many clinical trials include time-to-event or survival data as an outcome. To compare two survival distributions, the log-rank test is often used to produce a P-value for a statistical test of the null hypothesis that the two survival curves are identical. However, such a P-value does not provide the magnitude of the difference between the curves regarding the treatment effect. As a result, the P-value is often accompanied by an estimate of the hazard ratio from the proportional hazards model or Cox model as a measurement of treatment difference. However, one of the most important assumptions for Cox model is that the hazard functions for the two treatment groups are proportional. When the hazard curves cross, the Cox model could lead to misleading results and the log-rank test could also perform poorly. To address the problem of crossing curves in survival analysis, we propose the use of the win ratio method put forward by Pocock et al. as an estimand for analysing such data. The subjects in the test and control treatment groups are formed into all possible pairs. For each pair, the test treatment subject is labelled a winner or a loser if it is known who had the event of interest such as death. The win ratio is the total number of winners divided by the total number of losers and its standard error can be estimated using Bebu and Lachin method. Using real trial datasets and Monte Carlo simulations, this study investigates the power and type I error and compares the win ratio method with the log-rank test and Cox model under various scenarios of crossing survival curves with different censoring rates and distribution parameters. The results show that the win ratio method has similar power as the log-rank test and Cox model to detect the treatment difference when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true, and that the win ratio method outperforms log-rank test and Cox model in terms of power to detect the treatment difference when the survival curves cross.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirui Zheng
- Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Duolao Wang
- Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Junshan Qiu
- Division of Biometrics I, OB/OTS/CDER, US FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Tao Chen
- Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Margaret Gamalo
- Global Biometrics & Data Management, Pfizer Innovative Health, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang J, Sun N, Ge J, Jiang H, Yin Y, Chen M, Wang Y, Yao C, Yan X, Sobotka PA, Huo Y. Rationale and Design of Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial (SMART) for the Treatment of Hypertension: a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized and Sham Procedure-Controlled Study. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2023; 16:358-370. [PMID: 36042146 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-022-10307-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Renal denervation (RDN) is proposed as a durable and patient compliance independent treatment for hypertension. However, 20-30% non-responder after RDN treatment weakened the therapeutic effect, which may be due to blind ablation. The renal nerve mapping/selective ablation system developed by SyMap Medical Ltd (Suzhou), China, has the function of mapping renal sympathetic/parasympathetic nerve sites and selectively removing renal sympathetic nerves and is expected to meet the urgent unmet clinical need of targeted RDN. The "Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial" (SMART) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, sham procedure-controlled trial, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of targeted renal sympathetic denervation in patients with essential and uncontrolled hypertension. The study is the first clinical registry trial using a targeted RDN for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension; the dual-endpoint design can answer the question of how many antihypertensive drugs can be reduced in patients after RDN. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02761811.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Physician and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Academy of Clinical and Translational Research Jiangsu Province, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Ningling Sun
- Department of Hypertension, Heart Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Junbo Ge
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Hong Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Yuehui Yin
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Academy of Clinical and Translational Research Jiangsu Province, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Chen Yao
- Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, 100191, China
- Department of Biostatistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xiaoyan Yan
- Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, 100191, China
| | | | - Yong Huo
- Division of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kandzari DE, Weber MA, Poulos C, Coulter J, Cohen SA, DeBruin V, Jones D, Pathak A. Patient Preferences for Pharmaceutical and Device-Based Treatments for Uncontrolled Hypertension: Discrete Choice Experiment. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2023; 16:e008997. [PMID: 36484251 PMCID: PMC9848220 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.122.008997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrete choice experiment is a survey method used to understand how individuals make decisions and to quantify the relative importance of features. Using discrete choice experiment methods, we quantified patient benefit-risk preferences for hypertension treatments, including pharmaceutical and interventional treatments, like renal denervation. METHODS Respondents from the United States with physician-confirmed uncontrolled hypertension selected between treatments involving a procedure or pills, using a structured survey. Treatment features included interventional, noninterventional, or no hypertension treatment; number of daily blood pressure (BP) pills; expected reduction in office systolic BP; duration of effect; and risks of drug side effects, access site pain, or vascular injury. The results of a random-parameters logit model were used to estimate the importance of each treatment attribute. RESULTS Among 400 patients completing the survey between 2020 and 2021, demographics included: 52% women, mean age 59.2±13.0 years, systolic BP 155.1±12.3 mm Hg, and 1.8±0.9 prescribed antihypertensive medications. Reduction in office systolic BP was the most important treatment attribute. The remaining attributes, in decreasing order, were duration of effect, whether treatment was interventional, number of daily pills, risk of vascular injury, and risk of drug side effects. Risk of access site pain did not influence choice. In general, respondents preferred noninterventional over interventional treatments, yet only a 2.3 mm Hg reduction in office systolic BP was required to offset this preference. Small reductions in office systolic BP would offset risks of vascular injury or drug side effects. At least a 20% risk of vascular injury or drug side effects would be tolerated in exchange for improved BP. CONCLUSIONS Reduction in systolic BP was identified as the most important driver of patient treatment preference, while treatment-related risks had less influence. The results indicate that respondents would accept interventional treatments in exchange for modest reductions in systolic BP compared with those observed in renal denervation trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joshua Coulter
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, (J.C.)
| | | | | | - Denise Jones
- Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (S.A.C., V.D.B., D.J.)
| | - Atul Pathak
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Princese Grace, Monaco (A.P.).,UMR UT CNRS 88 Hypertension and Heart Failure: molecular and clinical investigations. Toulouse, France, INI-CRCT F-CRIN, GREAT Networks (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
2022 Malaysian Working Group Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation for management of arterial hypertension. Hypertens Res 2022; 45:1111-1122. [PMID: 35650248 PMCID: PMC9192347 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00937-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hypertension is highly prevalent and a major contributor to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In spite of the availability of efficacious, safe and affordable anti-hypertensive drugs, hypertension remains poorly controlled in the majority of hypertensive patients. Various reasons including non-adherence to the anti-hypertensive drugs, account for the poor control. Resistant hypertension is also one of the reasons for poor control of blood pressure (BP). The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) has long been recognized as one of the determinants in the pathophysiology of a raised BP. Overactivity of the SNS is a contributor to sustained arterial hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) is increasingly recognized as a safe and effective adjunctive therapy to control BP with or without pharmacotherapy. Hence for patients who remain uncontrolled despite all efforts, renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment that can potentially improve BP control, hence reducing the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). More recent randomized, sham control trials of RDN have shown that RDN produces a sustained lowering of BP. To date, this lowering of BP through RDN is maintained for at least 3 years. Furthermore, this procedure has been found to be safe. Hence this consensus summarises the science behind RDN and the available clinical data to support the use of this therapy. It is hoped that this consensus will offer guidance on the importance of identifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy. A multidisciplinary team approach in the management of the patient undergoing RDN is recommended. ![]()
Collapse
|
10
|
Kandzari DE, Mahfoud F, Weber MA, Townsend R, Parati G, Fisher NDL, Lobo MD, Bloch M, Böhm M, Sharp ASP, Schmieder RE, Azizi M, Schlaich MP, Papademetriou V, Kirtane AJ, Daemen J, Pathak A, Ukena C, Lurz P, Grassi G, Myers M, Finn AV, Morice MC, Mehran R, Jüni P, Stone GW, Krucoff MW, Whelton PK, Tsioufis K, Cutlip DE, Spitzer E. Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus Document From the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2022; 145:847-863. [PMID: 35286164 PMCID: PMC8912966 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.057687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The clinical implications of hypertension in addition to a high prevalence of both uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence promote interest in developing device-based approaches to hypertension treatment. The expansion of device-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials underscores the need for consistency in trial design, conduct, and definitions of clinical study elements to permit trial comparability and data poolability. Standardizing methods of blood pressure assessment, effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone, and safety outcomes are paramount. The Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC) document represents an integration of evolving evidence and consensus opinion among leading experts in cardiovascular medicine and hypertension research with regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology. The HARC document integrates the collective information among device-based therapies for hypertension to better address existing challenges and identify unmet needs for technologies proposed to treat the world’s leading cause of death and disability. Consistent with the Academic Research Consortium charter, this document proposes pragmatic consensus clinical design principles and outcomes definitions for studies aimed at evaluating device-based hypertension therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA (D.E.K.).,Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (F.M.)
| | - Michael A Weber
- State University of New York, Downstate Medical College, New York (M.A.W.)
| | - Raymond Townsend
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia (R.T.)
| | - Gianfranco Parati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.P.).,Istituto Auxologico Italiano Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Ospedale San Luca, Milan, Italy (G.P.)
| | | | - Melvin D Lobo
- Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (M.D.L.)
| | - Michael Bloch
- University of Nevada/Reno School of Medicine (M. Bloch).,Renown Institute for Heart and Vascular Health, Reno, NV (M. Bloch)
| | - Michael Böhm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany (F.M., M. Böhm, C.U.)
| | - Andrew S P Sharp
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and University of Exeter, United Kingdom (A.S.P.S.)
| | - Roland E Schmieder
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen/Nürnberg, Germany (R.E.S.)
| | - Michel Azizi
- University of Paris, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Centre d'investigation clinique 418, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hypertension Department and Département médico-universitaire Cardiologie Rein Transplantation Neurovasculaire, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, France (M.A.)
| | - Markus P Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, School of Medicine-Royal Perth Hospital Unit and Research Foundation, University of Western Australia (M.P.S.)
| | - Vasilios Papademetriou
- Department of Veterans Affairs and Georgetown University Medical Centers, Washington, DC (V.P.)
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York' NY (A.J.K.).,Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (A.J.K., R.M., G.W.S.)
| | - Joost Daemen
- Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (J.D., E.S.)
| | - Atul Pathak
- Department of Cardiovasculaire Medicine, European Society of Hypertension Excellence Center, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco (A.P.).,Centre for Anthropobiology and Genomics of Toulouse, Toulouse, France (A.P.)
| | - Christian Ukena
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany (F.M., M. Böhm, C.U.)
| | - Philipp Lurz
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (P.L.)
| | - Guido Grassi
- Clinica Medica University Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.G.)
| | - Martin Myers
- Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (M.M.), University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Roxana Mehran
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (A.J.K., R.M., G.W.S.).,Mount Sinai Hospital, New York (R.M., G.W.S.)
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (P.J.), University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregg W Stone
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (A.J.K., R.M., G.W.S.)
| | | | - Paul K Whelton
- Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (P.K.W.)
| | - Konstantinos Tsioufis
- 1st Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocratio Hospital, Greece (K.T.)
| | - Donald E Cutlip
- Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA (D.E.C.).,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (D.E.C.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kandzari DE. Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Therapy: Evolution of Evidence and Future Directions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:e011130. [PMID: 34903035 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.121.011130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Motivated by the persistence of uncontrolled blood pressure and its public health impact, the development and evaluation of device-based therapies for hypertension has advanced at an accelerated pace to complement pharmaceutical and lifestyle intervention strategies. Countering widespread interest from early studies, the lack of demonstrable efficacy for renal denervation (RDN) in a large, sham-controlled randomized trial motivated revision of trial design and conduct to account for confounding variables of procedural technique, medication variability, and selection of both patients and end points. Now amidst varied trial design and methods, several sham-controlled, randomized trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in blood pressure with RDN. With this momentum, additional studies are underway to position RDN as a potential part of standard therapy for the world's leading cause of death and disability. In parallel, further studies will address unresolved issues including durability of blood pressure lowering and reduction in antihypertensive medications, late-term safety, and impact on clinical outcomes. Identifying predictors of treatment effect and surveys of patient-reported outcomes and treatment preferences are also evolving areas of investigation. Aside from confirmatory studies of safety and effectiveness, these additional studies will further inform patient selection, expand experience with RDN in broader populations with hypertension, and provide guidance to how RDN may be incorporated into treatment pathways.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kandzari DE, Townsend RR, Bakris G, Basile J, Bloch MJ, Cohen DL, East C, Ferdinand KC, Fisher N, Kirtane A, Lee DP, Puckrein G, Rader F, Vassalotti JA, Weber MA, Willis K, Secemsky E. Renal denervation in hypertension patients: Proceedings from an expert consensus roundtable cosponsored by SCAI and NKF. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 98:416-426. [PMID: 34343406 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David E Kandzari
- Interventional Cardiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Raymond R Townsend
- Hypertension, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - George Bakris
- Hypertension, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jan Basile
- Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina and Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center to Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Michael J Bloch
- Vascular Care, Renown Institute for Heart and Vascular Health, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Debbie L Cohen
- Hypertension, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cara East
- Cardiology, Baylor Heart & Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Vascular Intervention, Soltero CV Research Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine
| | - Keith C Ferdinand
- Preventive Cardiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Naomi Fisher
- Hypertension, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ajay Kirtane
- Interventional Vascular Therapy, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David P Lee
- Interventional Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Gary Puckrein
- The National Minority Quality Forum, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Florian Rader
- Hypertension Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Vassalotti
- Clinical Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, National Kidney Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Weber
- Cardiovascular Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kerry Willis
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Secemsky
- Vascular Intervention, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|