Coronary covered stents

Coronary Artery Aneurysms and Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Interventionalist's Dilemma

We report three cases of coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) in adults who presented with acute coronary syndrome. Two of these patients did not have traditional coronary artery disease risk factors. Management of CAA poses a significant challenge to interventionalists. We discuss the etiologic mechanisms, risk factors, pathophysiology, and diagnosis using angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary computed tomography. We also highlight management options, including medical therapy and catheter-based interventions such as stenting, coil embolization, stent-assisted coil embolization, and surgical exclusion.

Coronary Artery Aneurysm: Its Evaluation in a 27-Year-Old Female Patient, Prognosis, and Suggested Treatment Strategies

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is characterized by a localized dilation of one or more of the coronary arteries with multiple etiologies, including congenital, acquired, or connected to auto-inflammatory diseases with multiple shapes and classifications. It is usually diagnosed incidentally during coronary imaging and can have variable clinical outcomes, ranging from asymptomatic to sudden cardiac death with a generally poor prognosis. Management of this condition faces a clinical dilemma due to the lack of clear guidelines or randomized trials. Treatment should be individualized based on symptoms, shape, and comorbidities. Herein, we present the case report of a 27-year-old female patient with no prior medical conditions. However, she presented with palpitations, and a compressive mass located over the right atrium was identified in the patient. After undergoing cardiac catheterization and coronary scanning, a giant aneurysm of the sinoatrial branch was detected with an aneurysmal left main that was retrieved surgically with good recovery and postoperative course.

Case report: Multimodality imaging revealing ruptured giant coronary artery aneurysm presenting with hemoptysis

Giant coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is a relatively uncommon disease that is defined by a focal dilation of at least 20 mm and characterized by various clinical symptoms. However, cases presenting primarily with hemoptysis have not been reported. A man in his late 20 s suffering from persistent chest pain for over 2 months was transferred to our emergency department for intermittent hemoptysis lasting for 12 h. Bronchoscopy detected fresh blood in the left upper lobe bronchus without a definite bleeding source. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a heterogeneous mass and the high-intensity signals suggested active bleeding. coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography demonstrated a giant ruptured CAA wrapped in a large mediastinal mass Coronary angiography confirmed the CAA originating from the left anterior descending artery. The patient underwent an emergency sternotomy and an enormous hematoma arising from a ruptured CAA densely adhering to the left lung was identified. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 7th day later. The ruptured CAA masquerading as hemoptysis highlights the indispensability of multimodality imaging for accurate diagnosis. Urgent surgical intervention is desirable in such life-threatening conditions.

Coronary artery aneurysms: Comprehensive review and a case report of a left main coronary artery aneurysm

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are rare anatomical disorders of the coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis and Kawasaki disease are the principal causes of CCAs, while other causes including genetic factors, inflammatory arterial diseases, connective tissue disorders, endothelial damage after cocaine use, iatrogenic complications after interventions and infections, are also common among patients with CAAs. Although there is a variety of non-invasive methods including echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography remains the gold standard diagnostic method. There is still no consensus about the most appropriate therapeutic strategy. Medical therapy including antiplatelets, anticoagulants, statins and ACEs are preferred either in patients with atherosclerosis, inflammatory status and stable CAAs, while percutaneous or surgery interventions are usually applied in patients with acute coronary syndrome due to a CAA culprit, obstructive coronary artery disease or large saccular aneurysms at a high risk of rupturing.

Covered Stenting for a Large Coronary Artery Aneurysm With Adjacent Stenosis in a Poor Surgical Candidate

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are being increasingly diagnosed with the advent of coronary angiography, and their management depends on the clinical presentation, size, and etiology of the aneurysm. Small aneurysms are usually managed with covered stents, while surgical intervention is considered for large aneurysms. We present a challenging case of a large CAA with adjacent coronary artery stenosis managed with guide extension catheter-assisted covered stent deployment as the patient was not a good surgical candidate.

Managing coronary artery perforation after percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery perforation is a serious complication during percutaneous coronary intervention that results in significant increase in morbidity and mortality. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the contemporary management of coronary perforation and the possible scenarios that operators may run into during percutaneous coronary interventions.

AREA COVERED

Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the most recently published articles covering this topic.

EXPERT OPINION

As part of this review, we also provide an expert commentary discussing the nuances in the recognition and management of coronary artery perforation, in addition to future directions, and improvements in technology that could make the management of coronary perforation safer and more effective.

Accelerated Endothelialization of Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomimetic Cardiovascular Implants

Nanofiber nonwovens are highly promising to serve as biomimetic scaffolds for pioneering cardiac implants such as drug-eluting stent systems or heart valve prosthetics. For successful implant integration, rapid and homogeneous endothelialization is of utmost importance as it forms a hemocompatible surface. This study aims at physicochemical and biological evaluation of various electrospun polymer scaffolds, made of FDA approved medical-grade plastics. Human endothelial cells (EA.hy926) were examined for cell attachment, morphology, viability, as well as actin and PECAM 1 expression. The appraisal of the untreated poly-L-lactide (PLLA L210), poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) and polyamide-6 (PA-6) nonwovens shows that the hydrophilicity (water contact angle > 80°) and surface free energy (<60 mN/m) is mostly insufficient for rapid cell colonization. Therefore, modification of the surface tension of nonpolar polymer scaffolds by plasma energy was initiated, leading to more than 60% increased wettability and improved colonization. Additionally, NH3-plasma surface functionalization resulted in a more physiological localization of cell−cell contact markers, promoting endothelialization on all polymeric surfaces, while fiber diameter remained unaltered. Our data indicates that hydrophobic nonwovens are often insufficient to mimic the native extracellular matrix but also that they can be easily adapted by targeted post-processing steps such as plasma treatment. The results achieved increase the understanding of cell−implant interactions of nanostructured polymer-based biomaterial surfaces in blood contact while also advocating for plasma technology to increase the surface energy of nonpolar biostable, as well as biodegradable polymer scaffolds. Thus, we highlight the potential of plasma-activated electrospun polymer scaffolds for the development of advanced cardiac implants.

Applying Principles of Regenerative Medicine to Vascular Stent Development

Stents are a widely-used device to treat a variety of cardiovascular diseases. The purpose of this review is to explore the application of regenerative medicine principles into current and future stent designs. This review will cover regeneration-relevant approaches emerging in the current research landscape of stent technology. Regenerative stent technologies include surface engineering of stents with cell secretomes, cell-capture coatings, mimics of endothelial products, surface topography, endothelial growth factors or cell-adhesive peptides, as well as design of bioresorable materials for temporary stent support. These technologies are comparatively analyzed in terms of their regenerative effects, therapeutic effects and challenges faced; their benefits and risks are weighed up for suggestions about future stent developments. This review highlights two unique regenerative features of stent technologies: selective regeneration, which is to selectively grow endothelial cells on a stent but inhibit the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells, and stent-assisted regeneration of ischemic tissue injury.

Coronary artery perforation after bioresorbable scaffold implantation treated with a new generation covered stent-OCT insights

Background

Coronary artery perforation is a rare but potentially lethal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with an associated mortality of 7–17%. We report the case of coronary artery perforation complicating Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation and the associated technical challenges with managing this life-threatening complication.

Case report

A 46-year-old male was referred to our institution and underwent PCI with an Absorb bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) to a proximal LAD long segment bifurcation lesion. Following pre-dilation and deployment of the 3.5 × 28 mm Absorb BVS, high pressure post-dilation of the distal scaffold was complicated by a large, Ellis type III coronary perforation with no flow to the distal LAD beyond the rupture, and associated with a large pericardial effusion confirmed on bedside transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). The insult was temporised with prolonged balloon inflation within the Absorb BVS immediately proximal to the site of perforation, permitting urgent insertion of a pericardial drain. After deflation of the balloon, a 3.0 × 21 mm BeGraft covered stent was deployed across the perforation, restoring normal LAD flow and abolishing the perforation. Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation was not required and the patient remained conscious throughout the procedure. TTE demonstrated normal left ventricular function and the patient was discharged 3 days later. Repeat angiography at 3 months showed patent stents with TIMI III flow, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed good expansion and apposition of the proximal Absorb BVS and BeGraft. The patient has remained well 4 years after PCI with no major cardiovascular events.

Conclusion

The utility of bioresorbable scaffold technology remains controversial although meticulous implantation techniques are associated with improved clinical outcomes. Adoption of the Pre-dilatation, Sizing and Post-dilatation (‘PSP’) method of BVS implantation with routine aggressive vessel preparation and scaffold optimization however may contribute to a higher risk of vessel perforation. The case emphasises the importance of accurate sizing of the vessel with intracoronary imaging and demonstrates the value of newer generation covered stents with single-layer design and slimmer crossing profile producing improved deliverability and procedural success.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02501-3.

Clinical Outcomes following Large Vessel Coronary Artery Perforation Treated with Covered Stent Implantation: Comparison between Polytetrafluoroethylene- and Polyurethane-Covered Stents (CRACK-II Registry)

Data on the clinical outcomes comparing synthetic fluorocarbon polymer polytetrafluoroethylene- (PTFE, GraftMaster) and polyurethane- (Papyrus) covered stents (CSs) to seal coronary artery perforations (CAPs) are limited. We aimed to evaluate 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI complicated by CAP and treated with CS. We assessed 106 consecutive patients with successful CAP sealing (122 CSs): GraftMaster (51 patients, 57 CSs) or Papyrus CS (55 patients, 65 CSs). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI). The mean age of subjects was 69 ± 9.6 years (53.8% males). No significant differences were identified between the GraftMaster and Papyrus groups at the 30-day follow-up for MACE, cardiac death, MI and stent thrombosis (ST), while significantly lower rate of TLR and TVR (p = 0.02) were confirmed in the Papyrus group. At one year, differences remained similar between stents for MACE, a trend towards a lower rate of TLR (p = 0.07), MI (p = 0.08), and ST (p = 0.08), and higher for cardiac death (p = 0.07) was observed in the Papyrus group. This real-life registry of CAP illustrated that the use of Papyrus CS is associated with lower rates of TLR and TVR at 30-day follow-up in comparison to the GraftMaster CSs and no significant differences between both assessed CS at one year of follow-up.

Coronary artery aneurysm: A review

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is a clinical entity defined by a focal enlargement of the coronary artery exceeding the 1.5-fold diameter of the adjacent normal segment. Atherosclerosis is the main cause in adults and Kawasaki disease in children. CAA is a silent progressive disorder incidentally detected by coronary angiography, but it may end with fatal complications such as rupture, compression of adjacent cardiopulmonary structures, thrombus formation and distal embolization. The pathophysiological mechanisms are not well understood. Atherosclerosis, proteolytic imbalance and inflammatory reaction are involved in aneurysmal formation. Data from previously published studies are scarce and controversial, thereby the management of CAA is individualized depending on clinical presentation, CAA characteristics, patient profile and physician experience. Multiple therapeutic approaches including medical treatment, covered stent angioplasty, coil insertion and surgery were described. Herein, we provide an up-to-date systematic review on the pathophysiology, complications and management of CAA.

Outcomes of patients who undergo elective covered stent treatment for coronary artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are reported in up to 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CAAs with covered stents has been reported in several case reports, however there is limited evidence available on the effectiveness and safety of this interventional practice.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current practice and outcomes of elective treatment of coronary artery aneurysms with covered stents.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published case reports and case series of patients presenting with CAA that have been treated with covered stents in a non-emergency setting.

RESULTS

A total of 63 case reports and 3 case series were included in the final analysis comprising data from 81 patients. The treated CAA was situated in a native coronary artery in 92.6%, and in a saphenous vein graft in 7.4%. Procedural success was achieved in 95.1%. The types of stents used were mainly polytetrafluoroethylene (75.3%) and Papyrus (11.1%). In 11.0% of cases additional abluminal drug eluting stents (DES) and in 6.8% additional adluminal DES were implanted. After a mean follow up of 13.4 months overall major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization were reported in 26.2, 0.0, 7.6, 0.0, 4.6 and 18.5% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of covered stents for elective treatment of CAA appears to be effective and reasonably safe. Nevertheless, it is associated with higher MACE rate, driven mainly by higher target lesion revascularization. Further studies, particularly in form of randomized trials and controlled registries are warranted to identify patients who might profit the most from this procedure.

Clinical Outcomes of Self-Made Polyurethane-Covered Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Perforations

Objectives

The present study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of self-made polyurethane-covered stents (PU-CS) in patients for the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background

Coronary artery perforation is reckoned as a serious complication in PCI and associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Covered stents have been used for treating the life-threatening CAP during PCI. But in some catheterization laboratories, no commercial CS is immediately available when there is an urgent need for CS to rescue the coronary rupture site.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 24 patients who underwent 31 self-made PU-CS implantations due to CAP in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from June 2015 to January 2020.

Results

The total procedural success rate of CS to seal the perforation was 79.2%. Nine patients (37.5%) developed cardiac tamponade, of which 8 patients (33.3%) underwent pericardiocentesis and 4 patients (16.7%) underwent cardiac surgeries. Except for 4 cardiac death cases (16.7%), none of myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST) was reported during hospital stay. Data from 22 patients (91.7%) were available at 610.4 ± 420.9 days of follow-up. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 6 patients (27.3%), including 5 cases of cardiac death and one TLR case.

Conclusions

Self-made PU-CS demonstrates high rates of successful delivery and sealing of severe CAP during PCI. Although the in-hospital mortality remains high after PU-CS implantation, the long-term follow-up shows favorable clinical outcomes, indicating the feasibility of PU-CS in treating CAP.

Procedural and 1-year outcomes following large vessel coronary artery perforation treated by covered stents implantation: Multicentre CRACK registry

Background

Data regarding the clinical outcomes of covered stents (CSs) used to seal coronary artery perforations (CAPs) in the all-comer population are scarce. The aim of the CRACK Registry was to evaluate the procedural, 30-days and 1-year outcomes after CAP treated by CS implantation.

Methods

This multicenter all-comer registry included data of consecutive patients with CAP treated by CS implantation. The primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI).

Results

The registry included 119 patients (mean age: 68.9 ± 9.7 years, 55.5% men). Acute coronary syndrome, including: unstable angina 21 (17.6%), NSTEMI 26 (21.8%), and STEMI 26 (21.8%), was the presenting diagnosis in 61.3%, and chronic coronary syndromes in 38.7% of patients. The most common lesion type, according to ACC/AHA classification, was type C lesion in 47 (39.5%) of cases. A total of 52 patients (43.7%) had type 3 Ellis classification, 28 patients (23.5%) had type 2 followed by 39 patients (32.8%) with type 1 perforation. Complex PCI was performed in 73 (61.3%) of patients. Periprocedural death occurred in eight patients (6.7%), of which two patients had emergency cardiac surgery. Those patients were excluded from the one-year analysis. Successful sealing of the perforation was achieved in 99 (83.2%) patients. During the follow-up, 26 (26.2%) patients experienced MACE [7 (7.1%) cardiac deaths, 13 (13.1%) TLR, 11 (11.0%) MIs]. Stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 6 (6.1%) patients [4(4.0%) acute ST, 1(1.0%) subacute ST and 1(1.0%) late ST].

Conclusions

The use of covered stents is an effective treatment of CAP. The procedural and 1-year outcomes of CAP treated by CS implantation showed that such patients should remain under follow-up due to relatively high risk of MACE.

Complications and failure modes of covered coronary stents: Insights from the MAUDE database

BACKGROUND

Data on the mechanisms of failure of covered coronary stents [Graftmaster, PK Papyrus] are limited.

METHODS

We queried the "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" (MAUDE) database between August 2018 (when the PK Papyrus stent was FDA approved) and December 2020 for reports on covered coronary stents.

RESULTS

We identified 299 reports in the MAUDE database (after excluding duplicates, peripheral vascular reports, and incomplete records) (Graftmaster n = 225, PK Papyrus n = 74). The most common mechanism of failure of covered stents was failure to deliver the stent (46.2%), followed by stent dislodgement (22.4%) and failure to seal the perforation (19.7%). Failure to deliver the stent was more often reported with Graftmaster compared with PK Papyrus (59.1% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Stent dislodgement was more often reported with PK Papyrus compared with Graftmaster (75.7% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001) and was managed by device retrieval or by crushing the stent.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common failure mechanisms of covered stents are failure of delivery, stent dislodgement, and failure to seal the perforation. Failure of delivery was more common with Graftmaster, while stent dislodgement was more common with PK Papyrus. Further improvements in covered stent design are needed to optimize deliverability and minimize the risk of complications.

Use and outcomes of the PK Papyrus covered stent in France: SOS PK Papyrus Registry

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of procedural success and long-term outcomes of the PK Papyrus (PKP) covered stent (CS).

BACKGROUND

CS are essential in the treatment of coronary artery perforation (CAP). They have also been used to treat coronary artery aneurysms. Limited evidence is available on clinical outcomes with the PKP.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective, and prospective study. Consecutive patients undergoing intentional PKP implantation in 22 centers in France were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of procedural success. Secondary endpoints included rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), in-stent restenosis (ISR), and stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

Data from 130 patients were analyzed (mean age 72.5 ± 10.5 years; 71% men). The main indication for PKP was CAP, in 84 patients (65%). Delivery success was achieved in 95% and procedural success in 91%. During the in-hospital stay, 15 patients died (12%) and 7 (5%) presented with ST. Data from 127 patients were available at 19.2 ± 12.8 month follow-up. Thirty-three patients died (26%), 15 (12%) had an MI and 21 (17%) presented with TLR. TLR was due to ISR in 12 patients (9%), 10 had definite ST (8%) and 1 patient for stent under-expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

The principal indication for PKP was CAP. PKP had high rates of delivery and procedural success. At long-term follow-up, there was a high rate of TLR, mainly due to ISR and ST. These results are consistent with previously reported data in these clinical settings.

Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Polyurethane-Covered Cobalt-Chromium Stents: Insights from the Papyrus-Spain Registry

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The main indication of covered stents (CS) is coronary artery perforation (CAP), but, they have been increasingly used in other scenarios. Data on the long-term follow-up of CS is limited, and no studies have been conducted specifically using new-generation polyurethane-covered cobalt-chromium Papyrus CS.

PURPOSE

to evaluate the clinical outcomes after hospital discharge of Papyrus CS and to compare their outcome after implantation in CAP or coronary artery aneurysms (CAA).

METHODS/MATERIALS

We evaluated the baseline clinical characteristics, lesion subsets, procedural features and the outcomes after initial discharge of Papyrus CS implanted in 17 high-PCI-volume centers.

RESULTS

127 Papyrus CS were implanted in 108 patients (68 ± 1 years; 82.8% male) admitted for stable coronary disease (32.3%), NSTEMI (42.4%) or STEMI (25.3%). The number of CS per patient was 1.2 ± 0.6 (diameter: 3.5 ± 1.7 mm; length: 18.5 ± 3.7 mm). Angiographic success rate was 96%. CS diameter was larger in CAA (CAP:3.04 ± 0.5 mm vs CAA:4.1 ± 2.7 mm; p = .022). Intracoronary imaging techniques were used more frequently in CAA (p < .0001). After a mean follow-up of 22 ± 16 months, the major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) rate was 7.1% [cardiac death: 2%, Myocardial infarction: 5%, Target Lesion Revascularization: 5% and Stent Thrombosis (ST): 3%]. MACE rate was similar in CAP (7.7%) and CAA (7.1%) (p = .9). However, CAA showed a higher ST rate (CAP: 0% vs CA: 7.1%; p = .04).

CONCLUSION

After hospital discharge, clinical outcomes after Papyrus CS implantation are acceptable (considering the clinical scenario and compared with other treatment alternatives) with no significant differences in the MACE rate between those implanted in CAA or in CAP. However, CAA group showed a higher ST rate.

Outcomes in Patients Fully Covered With Coronary Artery Aneurysm and Stenosis Lesion by Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stents After 1 Year

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) fully covering a coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) and stenosis lesion. Patients (n = 33) with CAA and stenosis lesion (>60%) were enrolled between January 2014 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics and biochemical variables were recorded during hospital admission. Changes in CAA resolution (the reduction on CAA size), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and diameter stenosis (DS) were determined before, just after, and 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After DES implantation, MLD and DS after PCI were improved compared with those before PCI (P < .01). Also, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction blood flow was significantly enhanced after PCI (P < .01). One year after PCI, maximal CAA diameter in patients with CAA and stenosis lesion was significantly reduced compared with those just after PCI (P < .01). Meanwhile, CAA resolution ratio in these patients were more than those just after PCI (P < .01). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction about CAA length in these patients (P < .01). Last, there were no clinical events (including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization) in the study. Second-generation DES implantation fully covering CAA and stenosis lesion was safe and effective.

Novel Technique for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Perforation

Coronary artery perforation is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); its rate is estimated at 0.4- 0.7% of all PCIs. Fast recognition and response are imperative for the treatment of this potentially life-threatening complication. Available techniques for the treatment of perforations have moderate success rates and often necessitate dedicated equipment and expertise. In the case report presented, we describe a novel technique used to treat coronary perforations with readily available equipment.

Coronary Artery Perforation and Tamponade - Incidence, Risk Factors, Predictors and Outcomes From 12 Years' Data of the SCAAR Registry

BACKGROUND

The incidence and short- and long-term outcomes of coronary artery perforation (CAP) are not well described.Methods and Results:We analyzed the characteristics and the short- and long-term outcomes of CAP among 243,149 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from 2005 until 2017 in the national Swedish registry. We identified 1,008 cases of CAP with an incidence of 0.42%. Major adverse event rates were significantly higher in patients with CAP than non-CAP (P<0.001). The 1-year mortality rate was 16% vs. 5.5%, respectively, and the 12-year mortality rate was 52% vs. 34%. The restenosis rate was 5.2% vs. 3.1% and 17% vs. 9%, respectively. The target lesion revascularization rate was 4.2% vs. 2.6% and 10.5% vs. 7%. The stent thrombosis rate was numerically higher, 1.5% vs. 0.8% and 4.5 vs. 2.8%, with no stent thrombosis cases for equine pericardial stent grafts. Among the patients with tamponade a large proportion of cases occurred at the late stage (215/1,008, 21%), and most were not recognized in the cath-lab (167/215, 78%). The mortality rate for late tamponade was similar in patients suffering acute tamponade at 1 year (25.6% vs. 27%) or at 12 years (54% vs. 58%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAP is associated with an early high excess in morbidity and mortality but with low risk of additional adverse events in the long term. Late tamponade is as deadly as acute tamponade.

Outcomes of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with covered stents for coronary perforation: A systematic review and pooled analysis of data

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to evaluate the adverse outcomes for patients after treatment with covered stents.

BACKGROUND

Coronary perforation is a potentially fatal complication of percutaneous coronary revascularization which may be treated using covered stents. Studies have evaluated long-term outcomes among patients who received these devices, but hitherto no literature review has taken place.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of adverse outcomes for patients after treatment with covered stents. Data from studies were pooled and outcomes were compared according to stent type.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were analyzed with data from 725 patients who received covered stents. The proportion of patients with chronic total occlusions, vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intracoronary imaging and rotational atherectomy were 16.9, 11.5, 9.2, and 6.6%, respectively. The stents used were primarily polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (70%) and Papyrus (20.6%). Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, pericardiocentesis/tamponade and emergency surgery were 17.2, 35.3, 27.1, and 5.3%, respectively. Stratified analysis by use of PTFE, Papyrus and pericardial stents, suggested no difference in mortality (p = .323), or target lesion revascularization (p = .484). Stent thrombosis, pericardiocentesis/tamponade and emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) occurred more frequently in patients with PTFE stent use (p = .011, p = .005, p = .012, respectively). In-stent restenosis was more common with pericardial stent use (<.001, pooled analysis for first- and second-generation pericardial stents).

CONCLUSIONS

Cases of coronary perforation which require implantation of a covered stent are associated with a high rate of adverse outcomes. The use of PTFE covered stents appears to be associated with more stent thrombosis, pericardiocentesis/tamponade, and emergency CABG when compared to Papyrus or pericardial stents.

Very long-term outcome of coronary covered stents: a report from the SCAAR registry

AIMS

Covered stents are mostly used for coronary perforations with a high risk of early adverse events; however, their long-term outcome is unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the short- and long-term outcome of patients treated with covered stents compared to all other stented patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Swedish national registries from 2005-2017 disclosed 265 patients who had received 366 covered stents. Their outcomes were compared to all other stented patients (197,948) who had received 320,784 stents. Compared to regular stents, covered stents showed significant differences (p<0.001) in the short and long term in relation to in-stent restenosis (ISR), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), re-infarction (MI), re-PCI and mortality, the rates of which were all higher. The higher mortality was concentrated within the first month, as a landmark analysis at that time point, adjusted for age and procedural indication, demonstrated no future difference in mortality (HR 1.02 [0.78-1.33], p=0.877). Stent thrombosis (ST) within one year was reported to be higher in covered stents than in other stents. However, no ST was reported in equine pericardial covered stents.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study including the entire Swedish population shows that patients receiving covered stents have a significantly higher risk of all adverse events. Reassuringly, in the long term, mortality appears to be similar to that in other stented patients.

PK Papyrus covered stent: Device description and early experience for the treatment of coronary artery perforations

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous revascularization is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The PK Papyrus covered stent provides a physical barrier to seal perforated arteries and prevent associated complications including death.

METHODS

In a survey of patients treated for coronary artery perforation with the PK Papyrus stent in 16 countries, procedural and in-hospital outcomes were ascertained. Procedural variables included device delivery, sealing of the perforation, and complications related to the covered stent.

RESULTS

Among 80 patients with coronary perforation, Ellis classification was characterized as grade III or III-cavity spilling in 50.0% and 17.5% of events, respectively. The mean (±SD) number of stents attempted for use per patient was 1.25 ± 0.61. The PK Papyrus stent was successfully delivered to the site of perforation in 76 patients (95.0%), and successful sealing was reported in 73 patients (91.3%). Pericardiocentesis was performed in seven patients (8.8%), and in-hospital death occurred in eight patients (10.0%). Among patient deaths, Ellis grade III perforations were reported in all instances (data not reported in one patient), and two cases were associated with unsuccessful sealing of the perforation site.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK Papyrus covered stent is designed to overcome limitations of existing therapies and to facilitate device delivery and effectively treat coronary artery perforations. Initial experience demonstrates favorably high rates of successful delivery to and sealing of the perforation site. Despite treatment, in-hospital mortality remains high for patients experiencing Ellis grade III coronary perforations.

Outcome after new generation single-layer polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for the treatment of coronary artery perforation

AIMS

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but severe complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Implantation of covered stents (CS) represents a potentially life-saving treatment. Concerns exist regarding limited efficacy and high stent thrombosis (ST) rates related to early generation CS. The aim of this study was to evaluate angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with CAP treated with a new generation single-layer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-CS.

METHODS

Between May 2013 and November 2017, we identified a total of 61 patients who underwent implantation of 71 single layer PTFE-CS after CAP. We analyzed angiographic results at follow up (including binary angiographic restenosis [BAR] and late-lumen-loss [LLL]) and clinical outcomes in hospital and at follow up, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), cardiovascular-, and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in all but two patients (96.7%). Procedure related MI, occurred in 19 cases (31.1%), in hospital death occurred in five cases (8.2%). At follow-up, TLR occurred in 11 cases (18.0%), two patients (3.3%) died from non-cardiovascular cause, there was no case of MI or ST.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, implantation of a new generation PTFE-CS, for the treatment of CAP showed high technical success rates. Although, periprocedural MI-and in-hospital-death rates remain not inconsiderable, new generation PTFE-CS showed favorable angiographic and clinical efficacy and high safety profile, especially with regard to thrombotic events.

Perforation of a Saphenous Vein Graft Anastomosed at a Y-Configuration to the Left Internal Mammary Artery

Perforation of a saphenous vein graft (SVG) is a rare, yet dreadful complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Perforation of a SVG arising at a Y-construction from the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) can be catastrophic since manipulations and material delivery through the single LIMA inflow can aggravate ischemia and accelerate hemodynamic collapse. Prior CABG and pericardial obliteration should not offer reassurance against tamponade, since coronary perforation in these patients may cause the development of loculated pericardial effusions, a complication associated with high mortality. Treating physicians must be alert for potential periprocedural pitfalls during PCI in post-CABG patients and these should be taken into consideration during interventional planning, procedure and follow-up.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Management of Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery Aneurysm With Covered Stent - A Case Report

Coronary artery aneurysm is defined as the localized dilatation of a coronary artery segment more than 1.5 times the size of adjacent normal segments. The aneurysms of the coronary arteries are rare. Coronary aneurysms can be congenital or acquired. The majority are atherosclerotic in origin. The primary complication is myocardial ischemia or infarction, sudden cardiac death with rupture being rare. Some aneurysms are diagnosed incidentally in arteries other than the culprit artery. Treatment options include medical management with anticoagulation, percutaneous intervention with covered stents or surgery. We report a case of 67-year-old male who presented with acute coronary syndrome. Coronary angiogram showed a moderate size aneurysm of the proximal left anterior descending artery. This aneurysm was successfully managed percutaneously with a covered stent.

Is a covered stent justifiable in the treatment of coronary artery perforation? An observational analysis of long-term results of two different covered stent types

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective observational study, we investigate outcome of patients treated with or without covered stent (CS) implantation in the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

CSs have shown to be effective devices to achieve acute hemostasis in large CAP. However, doubts have been raised regarding their long-term outcome.

METHODS

Data of 19 061 PCI procedures during a 10-year period were reviewed. Fifty-five cases of large CAP were withheld (Ellis type 2, 3 or cavity spilling). All medical and procedural records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (43.6%) patients were treated with CS implantation (15 polytetrafluoroethylene and 9 pericardium CSs). Twenty-six (47.3%) patients were managed without CS implantation, of whom five had unsuccessful delivery of a CS (stent delivery failure 17.2%). Although significantly more Ellis type-3 perforations were present in the CS group compared to the Non-CS group (75.0% vs 45.2%; P = 0.03), in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (8.3% vs 6.4%; [P = 0.79]). We observed a high rate of CS restenosis (29.2%) but a lower rate of CS thrombosis (4.2%). Despite these observations, 5-year MACE and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between CS and Non-CS group (respectively, 58.8% vs 50.0% (P = 0.26) and 26.7% vs 13.3% (P = 0.36)).

CONCLUSION

Although deliverability of CSs was not flawless and a high rate of CS restenosis appeared, short- and long-term outcome were comparable between patients treated with or without CS. Therefore, CSs are justifiable in the treatment of CAP.

Exclusion of a giant saphenous vein graft pseudo-aneurysm with a "double-layer bridging" technique

We report the case of a 72-year-old man admitted to our hospital for chest pain. He had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery 23 years before. Contrast-enhanced computer tomography revealed a severe double-lobed dilatation of the saphenous vein graft for the obtuse marginal branch. Coronary angiography did not opacify completely the saphenous vein graft for the huge turbulence in the dilatation. Severe saphenous vein graft dilatation have a significant mortality and it has been generally treated by surgical repair, such as resection with or without bypass of the affected territory. We described an interventional technique, named "double-layer bridging" that combines metallic DES and covered stent used in a double layer. This percutaneous technique, relatively simple and virtually usable for any type of severe dilatation independently of length, can be a reasonable and safe option to exclude giant aneurysm and maintaining distal flow.

Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Review of the Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are uncommon and describe a localized dilatation of a coronary artery segment more than 1.5-fold compared with adjacent normal segments. The incidence of CAAs varies from 0.3 to 5.3%. Ever since the dawn of the interventional era, CAAs have been increasingly diagnosed on coronary angiography. Causative factors include atherosclerosis, Takayasu arteritis, congenital disorders, Kawasaki disease (KD), and percutaneous coronary intervention. The natural history of CAAs remains unclear; however, several recent studies have postulated the underlying molecular mechanisms of CAAs, and genome-wide association studies have revealed several genetic predispositions to CAA. Controversies persist regarding the management of CAAs, and emerging findings support the importance of an early diagnosis in patients predisposed to CAAs, such as in children with KD. This review aims to summarize the present knowledge of CAAs and collate the recent advances regarding the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease.