Mitral valve repair using multiple MitraClips®: a dobutamine stress echocardiography evaluation

Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study

BACKGROUND

Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA-FR-like patients) during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.

METHODS

MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1-year.

RESULTS

A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1-year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all-cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. However, 1-year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA-FR-like patients.

The role of stress echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair era: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

In the last decade, percutaneous treatment of valve disease has changed the approach toward the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR). The clinical usefulness of stress echocardiography (SE) in the candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of MR remains to be established. Therefore, the key aim of this review is to assess the main applications of SE in patients undergoing TAVI or TEER.

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies to be included in the systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases. The literature search was conducted in February 2022. The inclusion criteria of the studies were: observational and clinical trials or meta-analysis involving patients with AS or MR evaluated with SE (excluding those in which SE was used only for screening of pseudo-severe stenosis) and treated with percutaneous procedures.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies published between 2013 and 2021 were included in the review: five regarding candidates for TEER and eight for TAVI. In TEER candidates, seeing an increase in MR grade, and stroke volume of >40% during SE performed before treatment was, respectively, related to clinical benefits (p = 0.008) and an increased quality of life. Moreover, overall, 25% of patients with moderate secondary MR at rest before TEER had the worsening of MR during SE. At the same time, in SE performed after TEER, an increase in mean transvalvular diastolic gradient and in systolic pulmonary pressure is expected, but without sign and symptoms of heart failure. Regarding TAVI, several studies showed that contractile reserve (CR) is not predictive of post-TAVI ejection fraction recovery and mortality in low-flow low-gradient AS either at 30 days or at long-term.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows in TEER candidates, SE has proved useful in the optimization of patient selection and treatment response, while its role in TAVI candidates is less defined. Therefore, larger trials are needed to test and confirm the utility of SE in candidates for percutaneous procedures of valve diseases.

Catheter-based or surgical repair of the highest risk secondary mitral regurgitation patients

Surgical mitral valve repair (MVR) remains the standard of care for patients with severe valve incompetence with clear, proven benefit for patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR). Secondary MR is a primary disease of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. Up to 50% of patients develop secondary MR after an acute myocardial infarction (ischemic MR), with approximately 10% of these having severe MR. It is controversial as to whether surgical MVR is beneficial for these patients because valve repair or replacement does not correct the underlying disease. The increased perioperative risk due to decreased LV function makes clinical decision-making even more complex. The recently introduced less-invasive, catheter-based therapies are potential promising solutions for this dilemma. While the MitraClip device is already in widespread clinical use as a viable therapeutic option in higher-risk patients with primary MR and currently in investigational trials for secondary MR, several other devices for both repair and replacement are currently undergoing feasibility trials. Due to the complex structure of the mitral valve, the development of transcatheter mitral valve replacement has been much slower than that of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but this approach may be an attractive therapeutic option in the future. Currently, the role of surgical therapy in comparison to transcatheter techniques in secondary MR is not well defined.

Impact of failed mitral clipping on subsequent mitral valve operations

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed the effect of failed percutaneous mitral intervention with the MitraClip device (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) on subsequent mitral valve (MV) operations.

METHODS

Nineteen patients (74 ± 9 years) with treatment failure after implantation of 37 MitraClips (mean, 1.9 ± 0.8; range, 1 to 4) for functional or degenerative MV disease underwent operations a median of 12 days later (range, 0 to 546 days). All patients were studied before and after the operation by clinical investigation and echocardiographic analysis. Intraoperative findings and the effect on the operation were analyzed and are described in detail. Data before clipping and at the time of operation were compared, and the surgical outcome was recorded.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in risk between that at the time of clipping and that at subsequent operations, noted as a rise of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II from a median 12.74% to 26.87%, respectively (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Severe clip implantation-induced tissue damage was found in most patients. Surgical MV repair could be performed in 5 of 6 patients (83%) with a 1-clip implant and in only 3 of 13 patients (23%) when 2 or more clips had been inserted (p = 0.0188, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). All patients required other associated procedures: closure of an artificial atrial septal defect that was caused by the clipping procedure (100%), tricuspid valve repair (37%), atrial fibrillation ablation operations (37%), coronary artery bypass grafting (16%), and aortic valve replacement (11%). Two early cardiac deaths (< 30 days) occurred. Survival at 1 year was 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a remarkable impact of failed clipping procedures on MV operations. We observed a severely aggravated cardiac pathology in parallel with a reduced preoperative clinical state compared with the original condition. Moreover, the likelihood of an optimal surgical solution with valve reconstruction was reduced thereafter. However, operations in the critical situation of an unsuccessful mitral clipping procedure should be discussed immediately, because it still seems to be an option compared with conservative therapy.