Response and non-response to renal denervation: who is the ideal candidate?

Laparoscopic Ablation System for Complete Circumferential Renal Sympathetic Denervation

GOAL

The catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) showed promising results for patients in lowering BP, but there were also many non-responders. One of the possible reasons was the incomplete neural ablation due to the ablation of renal nerves at random sites resulting in asymmetric innervation patterns along the renal artery.

METHODS

We developed a laparoscopic ablation system that is optimized for complete RDN regardless of renal arterial innervation and size. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we evaluated the system using computational simulation and 28-day survival model using pigs.

RESULTS

The ablations were focused around the tunica externa, and the ablation patterns could be predicted numerically during RDN treatment. In the animal study, the mean reduction of systolic BP and diastolic BP in the bilateral main renal arteries was 22.8 mmHg and 14.4 mmHg (P<0.001), respectively. The respond to immunostaining targeting tyrosine hydroxylase was significantly reduced at treatment site (108.2 ± 7.5 (control) vs. 63.4 ± 8.7 (treatment), P<0.001), and an increased degree of sympathetic signals interruption to kidneys was associated with the efficacy of RDN.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic ablation system achieved complete circumferential RDN at the treatment site and could numerically predict the ablation patterns.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings clearly suggest that the proposed system can significantly improve the RDN effectiveness by reducing the variation to the percentage of injured nerves and open up a new opportunity to treat uncontrolled hypertension.

Renal sympathetic denervation restores aortic distensibility in patients with resistant hypertension: data from a multi-center trial

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is under investigation as a treatment option in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). Determinants of arterial compliance may, however, help to predict the BP response to therapy. Aortic distensibility (AD) is a well-established parameter of aortic stiffness and can reliably be obtained by CMR. This analysis sought to investigate the effects of RDN on AD and to assess the predictive value of pre-treatment AD for BP changes. We analyzed data of 65 patients with RH included in a multicenter trial. RDN was performed in all participants. A standardized CMR protocol was utilized at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. AD was determined as the change in cross-sectional aortic area per unit change in BP. Office BP decreased significantly from 173/92 ± 24/16 mmHg at baseline to 151/85 ± 24/17 mmHg (p < 0.001) 6 months after RDN. Maximum aortic areas increased from 604.7 ± 157.7 to 621.1 ± 157.3 mm² (p = 0.011). AD improved significantly by 33% from 1.52 ± 0.82 to 2.02 ± 0.93 × 10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹ (p < 0.001). Increase of AD at follow-up was significantly more pronounced in younger patients (p = 0.005) and responders to RDN (p = 0.002). Patients with high-baseline AD were significantly younger (61.4 ± 10.1 vs. 67.1 ± 8.4 years, p = 0.022). However, there was no significant correlation of baseline AD to response to RDN. AD is improved after RDN across all age groups. Importantly, these improvements appear to be unrelated to observed BP changes, suggesting that RDN may have direct effects on the central vasculature.

Effect of catheter-based renal denervation on left ventricular function, mass and (un)twist with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography

Background

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is an echocardiography modality that is able to measure left ventricular (LV) characteristics, including rotation, strain and strain rate. Strain measures myocardial fibre contraction and relaxation. This study aims to assess the effect of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) on functional myocardial parameters, including STE, and to identify potential differences between responders and non-responders.

Methods

The study population consisted of 31 consecutive patients undergoing RDN in the context of treatment for resistant hypertension. Patients were included between December 2012 and June 2014. Transthoracic echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis was performed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up.

Results

The study population consisted of 31 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension treated with RDN (mean age 64 ± 10 years, 15 men). The total study population could be divided into responders (n = 19) and non-responders (n = 12) following RDN. RDN reduced office blood pressure by 18.9 ± 26.8/8.5 ± 13.5 mmHg (p < 0.001). A significant decrease was seen in LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWd) (0.47 ± 1.0 mm; p = 0.020), without a significant change in the LV mass index (LVMI). In the total cohort, only peak late diastolic filling velocity (A-wave velocity) decreased significantly by 5.3 ± 13.2 cm/s (p = 0.044) and peak untwisting velocity decreased significantly by 14.5 ± 28.9°/s (p = 0.025).

Conclusion

RDN reduced blood pressure and significantly improved functional myocardial parameters such as A-wave velocity and peak untwisting velocity in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, suggesting a potential beneficial effect of RDN on myocardial mechanics.

Beneficial effects of renal denervation on cardiac angiogenesis in rats with prolonged pressure overload

AIM

Renal denervation (RDN) has beneficial effects on cardiac remodelling and function in resistant hypertension. We aimed to investigate the impact of RDN on cardiac angiogenesis during prolonged pressure overload.

METHODS

Cardiac pressure overload was reproduced by transverse aorta constriction (TAC) procedure in adult Sprague Dawley male rats (n = 35). RDN/sham-RDN procedure was performed in surviving rats at 5 weeks after TAC.

RESULTS

Five weeks post-TAC, transthoracic echocardiography revealed that myocardial hypertrophy occurred in TAC rats, with ejection fraction and fractional shortening not significantly changed. At the end of 10 weeks, cardiac systolic function was preserved in RDN group, but not in sham group. CD31 immunohistochemical staining showed that RDN-treated rats had higher cardiac capillary density than sham rats. However, no significant between-group difference was observed in the kidneys. A decreased protein expression of left ventricle vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was observed in sham group, while RDN attenuated this decrease. Compared with sham, RDN resulted in a higher protein expression of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (p-eNOS) in the heart.

CONCLUSION

Renal denervation benefits cardiac angiogenesis during sustained pressure overload, involving regulation of VEGF and VEGFR2 expression as well as activation of eNOS.

Endpoint design for future renal denervation trials - Novel implications for a new definition of treatment response to renal denervation

BACKGROUND

Defining an adequate endpoint for renal denervation trials represents a major challenge. A high inter-individual and intra-individual variability of blood pressure levels as well as a partial or total non-adherence on antihypertensive drugs hamper treatment evaluations after renal denervation. Blood pressure measurements at a single point in time as used as primary endpoint in most clinical trials on renal denervation, might not be sufficient to discriminate between patients who do or do not respond to renal denervation.

METHODS

We compared the traditional responder classification (defined as systolic 24-hour blood pressure reduction of -5mmHg six months after renal denervation) with a novel definition of an ideal respondership (based on a 24h blood pressure reduction at no point in time, one, or all follow-up timepoints).

RESULTS

We were able to re-classify almost a quarter of patients. Blood pressure variability was substantial in patients traditionally defined as responders. On the other hand, our novel classification of an ideal respondership seems to be clinically superior in discriminating sustained from pseudo-response to renal denervation.

CONCLUSION

Based on our observations, we recommend that the traditional response classification should be reconsidered and possibly strengthened by using a composite endpoint of 24h-BP reductions at different follow-up-visits.

Selective proximal renal denervation guided by autonomic responses evoked via high-frequency stimulation in a preclinical canine model

BACKGROUND

Electric stimulation has been proved to be available to monitor the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN). This study was to evaluate the effectiveness of high-frequency stimulation (HFS)-guided proximal RDN.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 13 Chinese Kunming dogs were included and allocated to proximal RDN group (n=8) and control group (n=5). HFS (20 Hz, 8 V, pulse width 2 ms) was performed from proximal to distal renal artery in all dogs. Radiofrequency ablations were delivered in proximal RDN group and only at the proximal positive sites where systolic blood pressure (BP) increased ≥10 mm Hg during HFS. Postablation HFS was performed over the previously stimulated sites. BP, heart rate, and plasma norepinephrine were analyzed. In 8 denervated dogs, preablation HFS caused significant BP increases of 6.0±5.0/3.4±5.5, 16.9±11.7/11.1±8.5, and 17.1±8.4/8.5±5.3 mm Hg during the first, second, and third 20 s of HFS at the proximal positive sites. After ablation, these sites showed a negative response to postablation HFS with increases of BP by 1.3±3.0/1.0±2.5, 0.8±3.9/1.5±3.4, and 1.5±4.5/0.7±3.8 mm Hg. Of note, no radiofrequency applications were delivered at the positive sites of middle renal artery, repeated HFS increased BP only by 3.3±5.3/2.8±4.2, 5.3±6.6/3.8±4.7, and 2.9±4.6/1.3±3.2 mm Hg, failed to reproduce the previous BP increases of 6.2±5.6/5.3±4.4, 15.0±9.3/10.2±6.2, and 14.9±7.7/8.4±4.7 mm Hg. At 3 months, BP and plasma norepinephrine substantially decreased in proximal RDN group. Whereas controls showed minimal BP decreases and had similar plasma norepinephrine concentrations as baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal afferent nerves can be mapped safely, and HFS-guided targeted proximal RDN can achieve apparent BP reduction and sympathetic inhibition.

Arterial microanatomy determines the success of energy-based renal denervation in controlling hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a treatment option for patients with hypertension resistant to conventional therapy. Clinical trials have demonstrated variable benefit. To understand the determinants of successful clinical response to this treatment, we integrated porcine and computational models of intravascular radiofrequency RDN. Controlled single-electrode denervation resulted in ablation zone geometries that varied in arc, area, and depth, depending on the composition of the adjacent tissue substructure. Computational simulations predicted that delivered power density was influenced by tissue substructure, and peaked at the conductivity discontinuities between soft fatty adventitia and water-rich tissues (media, lymph nodes, etc.), not at the electrode-tissue interface. Electrode irrigation protected arterial wall tissue adjacent to the electrode by clearing heat that diffuses from within the tissue, without altering periarterial ablation. Seven days after multielectrode treatments, renal norepinephrine and blood pressure were reduced. Blood pressure reductions were correlated with the size-weighted number of degenerative nerves, implying that the effectiveness of the treatment in decreasing hypertension depends on the extent of nerve injury and ablation, which in turn are determined by the tissue microanatomy at the electrode site. These results may explain the variable patient response to RDN and suggest a path to more robust outcomes.

Influence of pseudo-resistance on the effect of renal denervation on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure levels

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) is a promising treatment option in addition to medical antihypertensive treatment in patients suffering from resistant hypertension. Despite the growing interest in RDN, the negative result of the Symplicity HTN-3 trial led to a debate on the efficacy of RDN.

METHODS

We systematically investigated the effects of RDN, evaluated by 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM), in a consecutive series of patients with resistant hypertension, which was defined by a mean office systolic blood pressure (SBP) >160 mm Hg (>150 mm Hg in patients with diabetes). Patients with a mean 24-hr SBP of less than 130 mm Hg at baseline were classified as pseudo-resistant, while all other patients were classified as true-resistant. After six months, we analyzed the response rates in true-resistant and in pseudo-resistant patients, respectively, by the means of 24-hr ABPM. Thereby, patients with a reduction of more than 5 mm Hg in 24-hr SBP were classified as responders.

RESULTS

RDN was performed in 106 patients. By 24-hr ABPM, 20 patients (18.9%) were classified as pseudo-resistant patients. In this cohort, we only found two responders (response rate 10%) six months after RDN. By contrast, in true-resistant patients, the response rate was almost 60% and the mean BP reduction was -18.6/-9 mm Hg in 24-hr ABPM.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant BP reduction in almost 60% of patients with true-resistant hypertension, but only in 10% in patients with pseudo-resistant hypertension. According to our results, patient selection seems to be crucial for acceptable response rates after RDN.

Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on urinary sodium excretion in patients with resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sympathetic overactivity increases sodium retention and contributes to the pathophysiology of hypertension. Renal sympathetic denervation lowers blood pressure and reduces sympathetic activity in certain patients with resistant hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study aimed to assess the effect of renal denervation on urinary sodium excretion. 24-h urinary sodium excretion was estimated at baseline and after 6 months using the Kawasaki formula in 137 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing renal denervation. Sodium excretion was adjusted for cystatin C GFR and fractional sodium excretion was assessed. Mean office systolic blood pressure at baseline was 171 ± 2 mmHg despite an intake of 5.2 ± 0.1 antihypertensive drugs. Six months after renal denervation, systolic and diastolic BP decreased by 18 ± 2 mmHg (p < 0.0001) and 10 ± 1 mmHg (p < 0.001). 90 patients (65.7%) had SBP reductions ≥ 10 mmHg (responders). After 6 months, 24-h UNa increased by 13% compared to baseline (236 ± 9 vs. 268 ± 9 mmol/day, p < 0.003). This increase was most pronounced in patients with less response in BP. These findings were paralleled by a significant increase in fractional sodium excretion (1.19 ± 0.11 vs. 1.64 ± 0.14%, p < 0.0001) and were observed independently of the intake of antihypertensive drugs affecting sodium balance, such as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or diuretics.

CONCLUSION

RDN lowered BP and increased estimated UNa and fractional sodium excretion in patients with resistant hypertension independently of renal function and antihypertensive therapy.

Innervation patterns may limit response to endovascular renal denervation

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation is a new interventional approach to treat hypertension with variable results.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to correlate response to endovascular radiofrequency ablation of renal arteries with nerve and ganglia distributions. We examined how renal neural network anatomy affected treatment efficacy.

METHODS

A multielectrode radiofrequency catheter (15 W/60 s) treated 8 renal arteries (group 1). Arteries and kidneys were harvested 7 days post-treatment. Renal norepinephrine (NEPI) levels were correlated with ablation zone geometries and neural injury. Nerve and ganglion distributions and sizes were quantified at discrete distances from the aorta and were compared with 16 control arteries (group 2).

RESULTS

Nerve and ganglia distributions varied with distance from the aorta (p < 0.001). A total of 75% of nerves fell within a circumferential area of 9.3, 6.3, and 3.4 mm of the lumen and 0.3, 3.0, and 6.0 mm from the aorta. Efficacy (NEPI 37 ng/g) was observed in only 1 of 8 treated arteries where ablation involved all 4 quadrants, reached a depth of 9.1 mm, and affected 50% of nerves. In 7 treated arteries, NEPI levels remained at baseline values (620 to 991 ng/g), ≤20% of the nerves were affected, and the ablation areas were smaller (16.2 ± 10.9 mm(2)) and present in only 1 to 2 quadrants at maximal depths of 3.8 ± 2.7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal denervation procedures that do not account for asymmetries in renal periarterial nerve and ganglia distribution may miss targets and fall below the critical threshold for effect. This phenomenon is most acute in the ostium but holds throughout the renal artery, which requires further definition.

Novel and nonpharmacologic approaches to cardio-protection in hypertension

Hypertension has wide (30-45 %) prevalence in the general population and is related to important increases in overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite lifestyle modifications and optimal medical therapy (three drugs, one being diuretic), about 5-20 % of hypertensives are affected by resistant hypertension. Chronic high blood pressure has adverse effects on the heart and other organs such as the kidneys and vasculature. Renal sympathetic denervation and baroreceptor stimulation are invasive approaches initially investigated to treat resistant hypertension. Their pleiotropic effects appear promising in cardiovascular remodeling, heart failure and arrhythmias and could potentially affect cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Reduced effect of percutaneous renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with isolated systolic hypertension

Renal denervation can reduce blood pressure in certain patients with resistant hypertension. The effect in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH, ≥140/<90 mm Hg) is unknown. This study investigated the effects of renal denervation in 126 patients divided into 63 patients with ISH and 63 patients with combined hypertension (CH, ≥140/≥90 mm Hg) defined as baseline office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Renal denervation significantly reduced office SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 3, 6, and 12 months by 17/18/17 and 5/4/4 mm Hg in ISH and by 28/27/30 and 13/16/18 mm Hg in CH, respectively. The reduction in SBP and DBP in ISH was lower compared with patients with CH at all observed time points (P<0.05 for SBP/DBP intergroup comparison). The nonresponder rate (change in office SBP <10 mm Hg) after 6 months was 37% in ISH and 21% in CH (P<0.001). Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP after 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly reduced by 10/13/15 and 6/6/9 mm Hg in CH, respectively. In patients with ISH the reduction in systolic ambulatory blood pressure was 4/8/7 mm Hg (P=0.032/P<0.001/P=0.009) and 3/4/2 mm Hg (P=0.08/P<0.001/P=0.130) in diastolic ambulatory blood pressure after 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The ambulatory blood pressure reduction was significantly lower after 3 and 12 months in SBP and after 12 months in ambulatory DBP, respectively. In conclusion, renal denervation reduces office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with ISH. However, this reduction is less pronounced compared with patients with CH.

Where and when device therapy may be useful in the management of drug-resistant hypertension

Device therapy for the treatment of uncontrolled and resistant hypertension has evolved significantly over the past several decades. Both renal artery disease and sympathetic hyperactivity have been linked to resistant hypertension. This manuscript will review the current evidence base supporting device therapy (e.g., renal artery revascularization, sympathetic nervous system modulation) for resistant hypertension.

Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine long-term results of renal artery denervation for treatment of treatment-resistant hypertension in the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 study.

METHODS

SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized 106 subjects with treatment-resistant hypertension to renal denervation or medical therapy alone. At 6 months, 37 control subjects crossed over to renal denervation. Office blood pressure measurements, antihypertensive medication use, and safety events were followed every 6 months through 3 years.

RESULTS

Follow-up was available at 36 months in 40 of 52 subjects in the initial renal denervation group and at 30 months in 30 of 37 subjects who crossed over and received renal denervation at 6 months. Baseline blood pressure was 184 ± 19/99 ± 16 mmHg in all treated subjects. At 30-month post-procedure, systolic blood pressure decreased 34 mmHg (95% CI: -40, -27, P < 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure decreased 13 mmHg (95% CI: -16, -10, P < 0.01). The systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction at 36 months for the initial renal denervation group was -33 mmHg (95% CI: -40, -25, P < 0.01) and -14 mmHg (95% CI: -17, -10, P < 0.01), respectively. Procedural complications included one haematoma, and one renal artery dissection before energy delivery that was treated successfully. Later complications included two cases of acute renal failure, which fully resolved, 15 hypertensive events requiring hospitalization, and three deaths.

CONCLUSION

Renal denervation resulted in sustained lowering of blood pressure at 3 years in a selected population of subjects with severe, treatment-resistant hypertension without serious safety concerns.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00888433.

Effects of renal denervation on ambulatory blood pressure measurements in patients with resistant arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

The sympathetic nervous system is an important factor in hypertension. In patients suffering from resistant hypertension, transfemoral renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) values.

HYPOTHESIS

Ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) is a better predictor than office BP of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We thus believe that ABPM should be added to the systematic evaluation and follow-up protocol when treating patients with resistant hypertension with RDN. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of RDN on mean 24-hour BP by the use of ABPM.

METHODS

Patients with resistant hypertension (office systolic BP >160 mm Hg, or >150 mm Hg in patients with diabetes) have been treated with RDN. Ambulatory BP measurement was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after RDN. Patients with a 24-hour systolic BP reduction of ≥5 mm Hg were classified as responders.

RESULTS

Of 86 patients initially enrolled in the study, 5 had to be excluded from the analysis because of <70% valid ABPM recordings. Out of the 81 studied patients, we found 49 responders (60.5%). In all patients, office BP decreased from 169.9/87.8 mm Hg to 153.5/86.3 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P = not significant [NS]) and 24-hour BP decreased from 144.3/86.0 mm Hg to 139.9/84.0 mm Hg (P = 0.025/P = NS) 6 months after RDN. In responders, office BP decreased from 169.6/90.3 mm Hg to 143.7/79.7 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P < 0.001). The ABPM levels started at 144.3/84.7 mm Hg and decreased to 138.3/81.5 mm Hg (P = 0.025/P = 0.045). In nonresponders, office BP was 150.2/84.0 mm Hg and 24-hour BP was 144.5/84.7 mm Hg at baseline; at 6 months, office BP was 168.7/96.4 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P = NS) and 24-hour BP was 142.2/81.5 mm Hg (P = NS/P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Office BP and AMBP levels can be significantly lowered by RDN in patients with resistant hypertension.

Effects of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Exercise Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Capacity in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Renal denervation reduces office blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. This study investigated the effects of renal denervation on blood pressure, heart rate, and chronotropic index at rest, during exercise, and at recovery in 60 patients (renal denervation group=50, control group=10) with resistant hypertension using a standardized bicycle exercise test protocol performed 6 and 12 months after renal denervation. After renal denervation, exercise blood pressure at rest was reduced from 158±3/90±2 to 141±3/84±4 mm Hg ( P <0.001 for systolic blood pressure/ P =0.007 for diastolic blood pressure) after 6 months and 139±3/83±4 mm Hg ( P <0.001/ P =0.022) after 12 months. Exercise blood pressure tended to be lower at all stages of exercise at 6- and 12-month follow-up in patients undergoing renal denervation, although reaching statistical significance only at mild-to-moderate exercise levels (75–100 W). At recovery after 1 minute, blood pressure decreased from 201±4/95±2 to 177±4/88±2 ( P <0.001/ P =0.066) and 188±6/86±2 mm Hg ( P =0.059/ P =0.01) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Heart rate was reduced after renal denervation from 71±3 bpm at rest, 128±5 bpm at maximum workload, and 96±5 bpm at recovery after 1 minute to 66±2 ( P <0.001), 115±5 ( P =0.107), and 89±3 bpm ( P =0.008) after 6 months and to 69±3 ( P =0.092), 122±7 ( P =0.01), and 93±4 bpm ( P =0.032) after 12 months. Mean exercise time increased from 6.59±0.33 to 8.4±0.32 ( P <0.001) and 9.0±0.41 minutes ( P =0.008), and mean workload increased from 93±2 to 100±2 ( P <0.001) and 101±3 W ( P =0.007) at 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. No changes were observed in the control group. In conclusion, renal denervation reduced blood pressure and heart rate during exercise, improved mean workload, and increased exercise time without impairing chronotropic competence.

[Interventional hypertension therapy in diabetes mellitus. Effects on blood pressure and glucose metabolism?]

Hypertension is the most common chronic cardiovascular disease with increasing prevalence all over the world. Despite the availability of many effective antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control to target values remains low. In the pathophysiology of therapy resistant hypertension, increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system with an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity has been identified as a main contributor to the development and maintenance of hypertension. Catheter-based denervation of the renal sympathetic nerves has been described as reducing blood pressure and decreasing sympathetic activity in patients with resistant hypertension. Supplementary beneficial effects on common cardiovascular comorbidities, such as diabetes type 2, have been reported. The present review aims to give an overview about percutaneous renal denervation for treatment of hypertension and potential new therapeutic options to improve glycemic control.

Renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension

Despite advances in nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy, blood pressure control rates in hypertension are low. About 10 % of patients with hypertension fulfill the criteria of therapy resistance, which is defined as noncontrolled blood pressure despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive drugs of different classes, including a diuretic, at optimal or maximal tolerated doses. Although the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension is multifactorial, an interaction between renal afferent and efferent sympathetic nerves and the central nervous system plays a key role, leading to increased renal and central sympathetic activity. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel therapeutic technique for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Clinical trials of RDN have shown a significant and sustained reduction of blood pressure as well as renal and central sympathetic activity. In clinical practice, appropriate patient selection is crucial to ensure successful and safe treatment. Beyond hypertension, RDN was associated with reduction of heart rate, regression of left ventricular mass, and improvements in glucose metabolism and severity of sleep apnea. Further studies addressing open questions in the treatment of resistant hypertension and evaluating potential new indications such as metabolic syndrome or heart failure (RE-ADAPT-HF) are necessary to prove effectiveness and safety of RDN in these patients. By modulating sympathetic activity, RDN has the potential to provide benefit in a variety of diseases, but these concepts have to be evaluated in well-designed prospective controlled clinical trials.

Effect of renal denervation on left ventricular mass and function in patients with resistant hypertension: data from a multi-centre cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging trial

AIMS

Sympathetic stimulation induces left ventricular hypertrophy and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to reduce sympathetic outflow and blood pressure (BP). The present multi-centre study aimed to investigate the effect of RDN on anatomic and functional myocardial parameters, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), in patients with resistant hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in 72 patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years) with resistant hypertension (55 patients underwent RDN, 17 served as controls) at baseline and after 6 months. Clinical data and CMR results were analysed blindly. Renal denervation significantly reduced systolic and diastolic BP by 22/8 mm Hg and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by 7.1% (46.3 ± 13.6 g/m(1.7) vs. 43.0 ± 12.6 g/m(1.7), P < 0.001) without changes in the control group (41.9 ± 10.8 g/m(1.7) vs. 42.0 ± 9.7 g/m(1.7), P = 0.653). Ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with impaired LVEF at baseline (<50%) significantly increased after RDN (43% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). Left ventricular circumferential strain as a surrogate of diastolic function in the subgroup of patients with reduced strain at baseline increased by 21% only in the RDN group (-14.8 vs. -17.9; P = 0.001) and not in control patients (-15.5 vs. -16.4, P = 0.508).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-based RDN significantly reduced BP and LVMI and improved EF and circumferential strain in patients with resistant hypertension, occurring partly BP independently.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation - A Review of Applications in Current Practice

Resistant hypertension is associated with high morbidity and mortality despite numerous pharmacological strategies. A wealth of preclinical and clinical data have demonstrated that resistant hypertension is associated with elevated renal and central sympathetic tone. The development of interventional therapies to modulate the sympathetic nervous system potentially represents a paradigm shift in the strategy for blood pressure control in this subset of patients. Initial first-in-man and pivotal, randomised controlled trials of endovascular, radio-frequency renal sympathetic denervation have spawned numerous iterations of similar technology, as well as many novel concepts for achieving effective renal sympatholysis. This review details the current knowledge of these devices and the evidence base behind each technology.

Application in Hypertension of Renal Sympathetic Denervation - A Review

Afferent and efferent sympathetic nerves of the kidney located in the adventitia of the renal artery are involved in the regulation of blood pressure and play a pathophysiological role in the progression and maintenance of hypertension. Renal sympathetic denervation is a potent and safe catheter-based therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension. Clinical trials of renal sympathetic denervation have shown significant reduction in blood pressure, which was associated with a reduction in local renal norepinephrine spillover as well as a reduction of whole body sympathetic activation in resistant hypertensive patients.

Renal sympathetic denervation: applications in hypertension and beyond

Renal afferent and efferent sympathetic nerves are involved in the regulation of blood pressure and have a pathophysiological role in hypertension. Renal sympathetic denervation is a novel therapeutic technique for the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension. Clinical trials of renal sympathetic denervation have shown significant reductions in blood pressure in these patients. Renal sympathetic denervation also reduces heart rate, which is a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk. Conditions that are comorbid with hypertension, such as heart failure and myocardial hypertrophy, obstructive sleep apnoea, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome are closely associated with enhanced sympathetic activity. In experimental models and case-control studies, renal denervation has had beneficial effects on these conditions. Renal denervation could become a commonly used procedure to treat resistant hypertension and chronic diseases associated with enhanced sympathetic activation. Current work is focused on refining the techniques and interventional devices to provide safe and effective renal sympathetic denervation. Controlled studies in patients with mild-to-moderate, nonresistant hypertension and comorbid conditions such as heart failure, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnoea, and arrhythmias are needed to investigate the capability of renal sympathetic denervation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.