Midterm outcomes of rotational atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of severe peripheral arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the midterm results of atherectomy-assisted angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions and the identification of possible subgroups of patients with superior outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, physician-initiated, nonindustry-sponsored retrospective analysis of patients with Rutherford category ranging from II to V and de novo occlusive or stenotic lesions of the superficial femoral (SFA) and/or popliteal arteries treated with atherectomy-assisted angioplasty (Jetstream rotational atherectomy + drug-eluting ballooning). In cases of subintimal recanalization or patients without an SFA stamp, with previous ipsilateral bypass surgery, systemic coagulopathy, end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, life expectancy of <12 months, and intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, and/or heparin were excluded.

RESULTS

In a total of 103 enrolled patients, the median SFA and/or popliteal lesion length was 80 mm (interquartile range, 61.2 mm) with 73 lesions being occlusive (70.9%) and 84 (81.5%) classified as Fanelli calcification score 3 and 4. Technical success was met in 96.1% of cases (n = 99) at a median operative time of 108 minutes. Adjunctive stenting was needed in 10 patients (9.8%). At a median follow-up of 18.0 ± 10.8 months, Rutherford class clinical improvement was present in 77 patients (74.8%), and 7 patients (6.79%) presented target lesion occlusion needing reintervention in 6 cases (5.82%). The primary patency rates were 97% at 12 months and 83% at 24 months with secondary patency rates of 99% at 12 months and 91% at 24 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences when treating differently located lesions, diabetic vs nondiabetic patients, or comparing experienced vs nonexperienced operators.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rotational atherectomy and drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of severe femoropopliteal disease showed relatively low need for bailout stenting and good midterm primary patency rates. The influence of lesion location, diabetes mellitus, or operator experience did not show statistically different results in terms of patency. Longer term outcomes and comparative analysis are needed to consolidate further clinical evidence.

Safety and Effectiveness of Excimer Laser Ablation Combined With Drug-Coated Balloon for Atherosclerotic Obliterans in the Lower Extremity

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for atherosclerotic obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2019 to December 2020, all eligible patients were enrolled. Demographics, characteristics of lesions, complications, and follow-up information were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was major amputation-free survival (MAFS). Secondary endpoints included technical success, primary patency, bailout stent, distal embolization, target lesion reintervention (TLR), and ulcer healing rate. Major amputation-free survival and primary patency were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients were enrolled. Forty-eight (81.7%) patients presented critical limb ischemia (CLI) and 48.6% of them was calcification class 4 according to Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS). Chronic totally occluded (CTO) disease was the most common lesion in 66.0% of them and superficial femoral artery (SFA) was the most common segment in 59.6%. Technical success rate was 93.0%. One-year follow-up was finished in 25 (35.2%) patients. The primary patency and MAFS were 92.0%±27.6% and 96.0%±20.0% at 12 months, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 9.4±4.3 months, clinically-driven TLR occurred in 2 (2.8%) patients, and major and minor amputation occurred in 2 (2.8%) and 1 (1.4%) patient, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The early results demonstrated that ELA was an effective treatment in de novo, in-stent restenosis (ISR) and CTO lesions. Meanwhile, ELA could prepare the lumen for the use of DCB and reduce the implantation of stents, especially in segments unsuitable for stenting. Mid-term and long-term results need to be awaited.

Assessment of Sirolimus- vs. paCLitaxEl-coated balloon angioPlasty In atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesiOnS (ASCLEPIOS Study): preliminary results

BACKGROUND

There appears to be an association between paclitaxel-coated devices and increased 5-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center, noninferiority study. All consecutive patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria are sequentially and consecutively assigned to either paclitaxel (Ranger, Boston Scientific) or sirolimus (MagicTouch, Concept Medical) coated balloon angioplasty treatment. The primary outcome are procedural success and primary vessel patency at index procedure. The secondary outcomes are 30-day and 12-month freedom from MAEs (amputation, death, TLR/TVR, MI, distal embolization that requires a separate intervention or hospitalization), procedural success (≤30% residual diameter stenosis or occlusion after the procedure), Rutherford category improvement (reduction ≤1 category) and ABI improvement (increase ≥0.10 from baseline).

RESULTS

A total of six patients have been enrolled in the present study up to now. The mean age was 72.6 years old and five were male. All patients had angiographic evidence of isolated occlusion in the transition segment of the distal femoral superficial artery in the popliteal artery. The mean length was 109 mm. Three patients were treated by sirolimus-coated (group A) and three by paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (group B). The primary patency and procedural success was in two of three and three of three patients, for group A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results show safety and feasibility of the Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty. Further investigation and increase of sample size will allow for more sustained conclusions regarding patency and procedural success of this type of balloons for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Rotational Atherectomy in Japanese Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease Presenting Femoropopliteal Lesions: The J-SUPREME and J-SUPREME II Trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of the J-SUPREME (J-S) and J-SUPREME II (J-SII) trials was to evaluate the performance of the Jetstream Atherectomy System for the treatment of Japanese patients with symptomatic occlusive atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The J-S and J-SII trials were both prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trials. Patients in J-S underwent Jetstream atherectomy followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), whereas those in J-SII had adjunctive drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment following atherectomy. Patients were adults with Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4 and had stenotic, restenotic, or occlusive lesion(s) with a degree of stenosis ≥70 in the superficial femoral artery and/or proximal popliteal artery. In J-S, lesions were required to be calcified, and in J-SII lesions were required to be severely calcified.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in J-S (mean age 72.3±8.7 years, lesion length 82.0±41.5 mm, 36% calcification PACSS Grade 3, 22% Grade 4) and 31 patients in J-SII (mean age 72.5±7.7 years, lesion length 122.6±55.6 mm, 19.4% calcification PACSS Grade 3, 77.4% Grade 4). No bailout stenting or bypass conversions were required. No major adverse events (MAEs) were reported for either trial through 1 month. The 6-month primary patency for J-S, with PTA alone following atherectomy, was 40.4% (19/47). The 6-month primary patency for J-SII, with DCB treatment following atherectomy, was 96.7% (29/30). At 6-month post-procedure, 79.2% (38/48) of patients in J-S, and 100% (30/30) of patients in J-SII had improved by at least 1 Rutherford category.

CONCLUSION

J-SUPREME trial results demonstrate procedural safety and efficacy of the Jetstream Atherectomy System and J-SII showed sustained patency through 6 months following combination treatment with Jetstream atherectomy and DCB.

Comparison of long-term outcomes after directional versus rotational atherectomy in peripheral artery disease

Introduction

The rate of atherectomy utilization in peripheral artery diseases (PAD) is growing. The two atherectomy devices available on the market and used most frequently are the directional and rotational ones. Nonetheless, there is a lack of direct comparison between these two types of atherectomy in PAD.

Aim

To compare the long-term outcomes after PAD endovascular revascularization with two types of atherectomies: rotational (AR) (Phoenix Philips) and directional (AD) (SilverHawk Medtronic).

Material and methods

This was a single-center, retrospective study of obstructive and symptomatic PAD patients who underwent revascularization with atherectomy. The endpoints were considered as target lesion revascularization (TLR), death, amputations and bailout stenting (BS).

Results

The AR group consisted of 97 patients, while the AD group consisted of 85 individuals. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of baseline characteristics except for an increased critical limb ischemia (CLI) prevalence in the AR group. The mean follow-up for AD and AR was 282.6 ±147.4 and 255.7 ±186.1 days, respectively (p = 0.44). There were no significant differences in the death rate (AD: 1 (1.7%) vs. AR: 5 (5.7%); p = 0.54), amputations (AD: 2 (2.3%) vs. AR: 5 (5.7%); p = 0.45) or bailout stenting (AD: 2 (2.3%) vs. AR: 3 (3.2%); p = 0.74), whereas TLR was more frequent in the AD group (AD: 25 (29%) vs. AR: 15 (15.9%; p = 0.03). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences between the groups in time to TLR, amputation or death.

Conclusions

In this hypothesis-generating study the AR had a lower rate of TLR when compared to the AD. Nevertheless, this should be confirmed in further controlled randomized trials.

Five-year outcomes after revascularization of superficial femoral artery occlusion using Ocelot catheter

Introduction

The population of patients with lower limb atherosclerosis includes a considerable proportion of individuals with long superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) represent the "last frontier" of percutaneous interventions. While open strategies are considered earlier as standard management for these lesions, the results of a number of trials indicate that endovascular management might become an effective alternative to surgery.

Material and methods

This paper presents 5-year outcomes of a first-in-man (FIM) study (before CE mark) and the registry of OCT Guided Ocelot Catheter (Avinger) for chronic total occlusions of the superficial femoral artery. The study group comprised 10 patients with Rutherford 3 lower limb ischemia including nine men and one woman.

Results

The efficacy of the primary intervention was 90%. Angiography performed at 6 months of the procedure, according to the study protocol, revealed 3 and 1 cases of restenosis and reocclusion, respectively, repaired using PTA and open common and deep femoral artery patch plasty. Doppler ultrasound performed at 1, 2 and 5 years after the primary intervention did not reveal significant target vessel restenosis. The primary and primary-assisted patency was 89%. During a 5-year follow-up, four peripheral percutaneous interventions and one femoropopliteal bypass surgery were performed in non-target limbs. There were no cardiovascular deaths, myocardial infarction or stroke and no amputation was required.

Conclusions

This is a first-in-man study reporting long-term follow-up after SFA CTO revascularization using the Ocelot catheter. The catheter proved to have a satisfactory safety profile and a high proportion of CTO crossings. A 5-year follow-up revealed high primary and primary-assisted patency rates.

Long term outcomes in diabetic patients treated with atherectomy for peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes has increased significantly in well-developed countries during the last decade and it continues to grow. Diabetes increases the risk of restenosis in patients treated percutaneously for peripheral artery disease. The present study sought to compare outcomes of atherectomy treatment in diabetic (DM) vs. non-diabetic (nDM) patients suffering from peripheral artery disease.

METHOD

Between 2008 and 2012, 204 revascularization atherectomy procedures were performed on arteries of the lower extremities. The endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation and death. The type of atherectomy (excisional-soft plaque, orbital-calcified plaque, with active aspiration - with a thrombus) was left to operator discretion.

RESULTS

This study contains 132 DM (66% male, age 68 ± 11.2 years) and 72 nDM (63% male, age 75 ± 11.3 years) subjects. DM were younger but had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (DM: 91% vs. nDM: 62%, p < 0.0001) and end-stage renal disease (DM: 22% vs. nDM: 2.5%, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in critical limb ischemia between the groups (DM: 21% vs. nDM: 12%, p = = 0.13). Mean time of follow-up was 384 and 411 days in DM and nDM, respectively (p = 0.43). There were no significant differences in TLR (DM: 15.2% vs. nDM: 22.2%, p = 0.249), amputations (DM: 3.0% vs. nDM: 1.5%, p = NS) or death rates (DM: 2.2% vs. nDM: 2.7%, p = NS). Kaplan-Mayer analysis showed no significant differences between the groups in the time to TLR, amputation or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque modification with adjusted atherectomy appears to have similar outcomes in diabetic as well as in non-diabetic patients. Nonetheless, a randomized study would be warranted to confirm the findings of the current study.

Treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions with scoring and drug-coated balloon angioplasty: 12-month results of the DCB-Trak registry

PURPOSE

Debulking strategies prior to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty were suggested to improve clinical results in femoro-popliteal lesions. Currently, there are no data regarding plaque modification with a scoring balloon with subsequent DCB-angioplasty. Recently published 6-month results of the DCB-Trak registry in patients treated with scoring-balloon angioplasty and DCB-angioplasty were promising without any safety concerns. Herein, we report the 12-month follow-up data.

METHODS

In a single center registry, 29 consecutive patients with 32 femoro-popliteal lesions were treated with a scoring-balloon (VascuTrak®) and a DCB subsequently. The primary endpoint was the clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), binary restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio > 2.4), change in Rutherford classification and ankle-brachial-index (ABI). Safety endpoints were major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, death) and need for amputation.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 29 lesions. There were no clinically driven TLRs after 12 months. Two patients required clinically driven TVR and one patient had a binary restenosis. ABI significantly increased after the procedure (0.87±0.24 to 1.04±0.18, P < 0.01) without a relevant change after 6 months (1.01±0.15, P < 0.05) or 12 months (1.01±0.20, P < 0.05). Rutherford classification improved in more than 90% of patients after 6 and 12 months. There was one major cardiovascular event at 6-month follow-up, but no amputations at 6- or 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Vessel preparation with a scoring-balloon and subsequent DCB-angioplasty was safe and effective in patients with femoro-popliteal lesions. Further multicenter trials have to validate these results.

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease

Purpose: To report an experience using directional atherectomy (DA) with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) in the form of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty vs DCB angioplasty alone in common femoral artery (CFA) occlusive lesions. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 47 consecutive patients (mean age 71 years; 26 men) treated between October 2011 and July 2016 using either DCB angioplasty alone (n=26) or DAART (n=21) for CFA lesions. The majority of patients had lifestyle-limiting claudication (14 DCB and 15 DAART). Mean lesion length (39±14 mm DCB and 34±16 mm DAART) and vessel calcification (17/26 DCB and 11/21 DAART) were comparable between the groups. There were 4 chronic total occlusions, all in the DAART group. The main outcome measure was primary patency. Key secondary outcomes were technical success, secondary patency, and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: Technical success rates were 89% following DCB angioplasty and 95% for DAART (p=0.41). The 88% 12-month primary patency and 89% freedom from TLR for DAART were higher than the 68% and 75% estimates following DCB angioplasty alone, but neither difference was statistically significant. However, the secondary patency estimate at 12 months was significantly higher in the DAART group (100% vs 81% for DCB, p=0.03). Bailout stenting (1 DCB vs 1 DAART), vessel perforation (1 DCB vs 0 DAART), access site complications (4 DCB vs 3 DAART), and distal embolization (0 DCB vs 1 DAART) were comparable, whereas DCB angioplasty had more non-flow-limiting dissections (8 vs 1 for DAART, p=0.02). Conclusion: Preparation of the atherosclerotic CFA with directional atherectomy was not associated with statistically significantly higher primary patency or freedom from TLR compared to DCB angioplasty alone at 12 months. Nonetheless, both modalities had promising outcomes in a primarily surgically treated vascular territory.

Calcified plaque modification alters local drug delivery in the treatment of peripheral atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Calcific atherosclerosis is a major challenge to intraluminal drug delivery in peripheral artery disease (PAD).

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of orbital atherectomy on intraluminal paclitaxel delivery to human peripheral arteries with substantial calcified plaque.

METHODS

Diagnostic angiography and 3-D rotational imaging of five fresh human lower limbs revealed calcification in all main arteries. The proximal or distal segment of each artery was treated using an orbital atherectomy system (OAS) under simulated blood flow and fluoroscopy. Explanted arterial segments underwent either histomorphometric assessment of effect or tracking of ¹⁴C-labeled or fluorescent-labeled paclitaxel. Radiolabeled drug quantified bulk delivery and fluorescent label established penetration of drug over finer spatial domain in serial microscopic sections. Results were interpreted using a mathematical model of binding-diffusion mediated arterial drug distribution.

RESULTS

Lesion composition affected paclitaxel absorption and distribution in cadaveric human peripheral arteries. Pretreatment imaging calcium scores in control femoropopliteal arterial segments correlated with a log-linear decline in the bulk absorption rate-constant of ¹⁴C-labeled, declining 5.5-fold per calcified quadrant (p=0.05, n=7). Compared to controls, OAS-treated femoropopliteal segments exhibited 180μm thinner intima (p<0.001), 45% less plaque calcification, and 2 log orders higher paclitaxel bulk absorption rate-constants. Correspondingly, fluorescent paclitaxel penetrated deeper in OAS-treated femoropopliteal segments compared to controls, due to a 70% increase in diffusivity (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data illustrate that calcified plaque limited intravascular drug delivery, and controlled OAS treatment of calcific plaques resulted in greater drug permeability and improved adjunct drug delivery to diseased arteries.

Mechanisms Underlying Drug Delivery to Peripheral Arteries

Delivery of drugs onto arterial targets via endovascular devices commands several principles: dissolution, diffusion, convection, drug binding, barriers to absorption, and interaction between the drug, delivery vehicle, and accepting arterial wall. The understanding of drug delivery in the coronary vasculature is vast; there is ongoing work needed in the peripheral arteries. There are differences that account for some failures of application of coronary technology into the peripheral vascular space. Breakthroughs in peripheral vascular interventional techniques building on current technologies require investigators willing to acknowledge the similarities and differences between these different vascular territories, while developing technologies adapted for peripheral arteries.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcified Lesions With Drug-Coated Balloon After Rotational Atherectomy

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the safety and efficacy of PCI using drug-coated balloon (DCB) after rotational atherectomy (rotablation) in a retrospective single center study in patients with calcified de novo coronary lesions. The majority of patients had an increased risk for bleeding.

BACKGROUND

DCB has been effective in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, small vessels, and bifurcations. DCB enables short one month dual antiplatelet treatment. No published data exist on the use of DCB after rotablation.

METHODS

82 PCIs were performed in 65 patients (mean age 72 ± 10 years) using rotablation followed by DCB treatment. The median follow-up time was 17 months. 82% of the patients had at least one risk factor for bleeding such as oral anticoagulation. 32% had an acute coronary syndrome. Median duration of dual antiplatelet treatment was 1 month.

RESULTS

MACE (the composite of cardiovascular death, ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization [TLR] or non-fatal myocardial infarction) occurred in 14% and 20% of the patients at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The rate of ischemia-driven TLR was 1.5% at 12 months and 3.0% at 24 months. No acute closure of the treated vessel occurred. Bailout stenting was needed in 10% of the PCIs. The incidence of significant bleeding was 9% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that PCI using DCB after preparation of calcified lesions with rotablation is safe and effective. This novel strategy may be considered especially in patients with a bleeding risk such as those using an oral anticoagulant.

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial)

Percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions has historically been associated with major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates as high as 30%. In the ORBIT II (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OAS in Treating Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions) trial, treatment of de novo severely calcified lesions with the Diamondback 360° Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) resulted in low rates of procedural and 30-day adverse ischemic events. The long-term results from this trial have not been reported. We sought to determine the 1-year outcomes after orbital atherectomy of severely calcified coronary lesions. ORBIT II was a single-arm trial enrolling 443 subjects at 49 US sites with severely calcified lesions usually excluded from randomized trials. OAS utilizes a centrifugal differential sanding mechanism of action for plaque modification prior to stent implantation. After OAS drug-eluting stents were implanted in 88.2% of the patients. The primary safety end point was 30-day MACE, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]. The present analysis reports the 1-year follow-up results from ORBIT II. One-year data were available in 433 of 443 patients (97.7%), with median follow-up time of 16.7 months. The 1-year MACE rate was 16.4%, including cardiac death (3.0%), myocardial infarction (9.7%), and target vessel revascularization (5.9%). The 1-year target lesion revascularization rate was 4.7%, and stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient (0.2%). Independent predictors of 1-year MACE and target vessel revascularization were diameter stenosis at baseline and the use of bare-metal stents. In patients with severely calcified lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, the use of OAS was associated with low rates of 1-year adverse ischemic events compared with historical controls. This finding has important clinical implications for the selection of optimum treatment strategies for patients with severely calcified lesions.