Redefining Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis with Echocardiography

Novel role of cardiovascular MRI to contextualise tuberculous pericardial inflammation and oedema as predictors of constrictive pericarditis

Tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome have reached epidemic proportions, particularly affecting vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries of sub-Saharan Africa. TB pericarditis is the commonest cardiac manifestation of TB and is the leading cause of constrictive pericarditis, a reversible (by surgical pericardiectomy) cause of diastolic heart failure in endemic areas. Unpacking the complex mechanisms underpinning constrictive haemodynamics in TB pericarditis has proven challenging, leaving various basic and clinical research questions unanswered. Subsequently, risk stratification strategies for constrictive outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Unique pericardial tissue characteristics, as identified on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, enable us to stage and quantify pericardial inflammation and may assist in identifying patients at higher risk of tissue remodelling and pericardial constriction, as well as predict the degree of disease reversibility, tailor medical therapy, and determine the ideal timing for surgical pericardiectomy.

Subacute effusive-constrictive pericarditis in a patient with COVID-19

We report the case of a previously healthy young woman, who developed a severe form of COVID-19 with massive pneumonia and acute pericarditis in whom constrictive physiology developed rapidly. To our knowledge, this represents the second reported case of SARS-CoV-2 constrictive pericarditis, a rare, but severe cardiac complication.

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis in the spectrum of pericardial compressive syndromes

When pericardial fluid accumulates and exceed the reserve volume of the pericardium or when the pericardium becomes scarred and inelastic, one of three pericardial compressive syndromes may ensue, namely, cardiac tamponade (CT), characterised by the accumulation of pericardial fluid under pressure; constrictive pericarditis (CP), the result of scarring and loss of the normal elasticity of the pericardial sac; and effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP), characterised by the concurrence of a tense pericardial effusion and constriction of the heart by the visceral pericardium. Although relatively uncommon, prevalence estimates vary widely and depend on the nature of the cohorts studied, the methods used to diagnose ECP and the manner in which ECP is defined. Most cases of ECP are idiopathic, reflecting the frequency of idiopathic pericardial disease in general, and other causes include radiation, malignancy, chemotherapy, infection and postsurgical/iatrogenic pericardial disease. The diagnosis of ECP often becomes apparent when pericardiocentesis fails to decrease the right atrial pressure by 50% or to a level below 10 mm Hg. Important non-invasive diagnostic modalities include echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and, to a lesser extent, cardiac CT. In cases with clear evidence of pericardial inflammation, a trial of an anti-inflammatory regimen is warranted. A complete pericardiectomy should be reserved for refractory symptoms or clinical evidence of chronic CP.

Tuberculous pericardial disease: a focused update on diagnosis, therapy and prevention of complications

Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is the most important manifestation of tuberculous heart disease and is still associated with a significant morbidity and mortality in TB endemic areas. The high prevalence of the disorder over the last 3 decades has been fueled by the human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS (HIV/AIDS) pandemic in these areas. The objective of this review is to provide a focused update on developments in the diagnosis and therapy of this condition, prevention of its complications, as well as future novel therapies. The definitive diagnosis of a tuberculous etiology in patients with suspected TBP continues to pose a challenge for clinicians. Clinical prediction scores, although never formally validated have been used with some success. However, they may be prone to both over and underdiagnosis due to lack of pericardial fluid analysis. Recent studies evaluating Xpert MTB/RIF, suggest that this advanced polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based technology does not provide increased accuracy compared to earlier iterations. However a combined two test approach starting with Xpert MTB/RIF followed by either adenosine deaminase (ADA) or interferon gamma (IFN-γ) may provide for significantly enhanced specificity and sensitivity cost permitting. Pericardiocentesis remains the gold standard for managing the compressive pericardial fluid and its adverse hemodynamic sequelae. A four drug anti-TB drug regimen at standard doses and duration is recommended. However recent evidence suggests that these drugs penetrate the pericardium very poorly potentially explaining the high mortality observed particularly in those who are culture positive with a high bacillary load. Constrictive pericarditis is the main long-term complication of TBP and is still a significant cause of heart failure in Sub-Saharan Africa. This is important because access to definitive surgical therapy where TBP is prevalent continues to be low, highlighting the need to develop strategies or interventions to prevent fibrosis and constriction. Recent detailed advanced studies of pericardial fluid in TBP have revealed a strong profibrotic transcriptomic profile, with high amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and low levels of the anti-fibrotic tetrapeptide N-Acetyl-Seryl-Aspartyl-Lysyl-Proline (Ac-SDKP). These new insights may explain in part the high propensity to fibrosis associated with the condition and offer hope for the future use of targeted therapy to interrupt pathways and mediators of tissue damage and subsequent maladaptive healing and fibrosis. The value of effective pericardiocentesis in reducing these pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokines and peptides in an attempt to prevent pericardial constriction has yet to be established but has generated hypotheses for ongoing and future research.

Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis: Doppler Findings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the echo-Doppler findings in effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP). ECP corresponds to the coexistence of a hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion and markedly reduced compliance of the pericardium, manifested by constrictive physiology post-pericardiocentesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

We summarize herein the recent observations regarding the prevalence of ECP based on echocardiography as well as the pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler features of ECP. ECP diagnosed by echocardiography was seen in approximately 15% of patients with ECP pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler findings sharing features with both cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis. ECP post-pericardiocentesis is common but its natural history in the current era might be better than previously reported. Further studies and (particularly simultaneous echocardiography-cardiac catheterization) are still critically needed to better understand the underlying hemodynamics of ECP. Moreover, it remains to be determined whether pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler findings can be used to prognosticate or to guide therapy of those undergoing pericardiocentesis.

Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP) corresponds to the coexistence of a hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion and decreased pericardial compliance. The hallmark of ECP is the persistence of elevated right atrial pressure postpericardiocentesis. The prevalence of ECP seems higher in tuberculous pericarditis and lower in idiopathic cases. The diagnosis of ECP is traditionally based on invasive hemodynamics but the presence of echocardiographic features of constrictive pericarditis post-pericardiocentesisis can also identify ECP. Data on the prognosis and optimal treatment of ECP are still limited. Anti-inflammatory agents should be the first line of treatment. Pericardiectomy should be reserved for refractory cases.