1
|
Waheed MT, Malik I, Blakely AM, Zerhouni Y, Hanna M, Melstrom K, Lai LL, Kaiser AM, Thinzar L, Paz IB, Raoof M. Who should get a right colectomy in low-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas? Association of lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastases. Surgery 2024; 176:560-568. [PMID: 38987096 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is variation in the probability of nodal metastases from low-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas, and the role of right colectomy is unclear. We aimed to define the prevalence and utility of lymphovascular invasion in predicting the risk of nodal metastases to help stratify patients who may benefit from right hemicolectomy. METHODS Patients with nonmetastatic low-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2017). The primary outcome was probability of nodal metastases. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of nodal metastases. A 4-tier risk model-the COH Composite Score-was calculated by assigning 1 point each for a high-risk feature (lymphovascular invasion, T3/T4 T stage, or nonmucinous histology). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS A total of 1,303 patients with nonmetastatic low-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas (64.2% mucinous) were identified. Of the 1,133 patients with known lymphovascular invasion status, 78 (6.9%) were lymphovascular invasion positive. In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion was independently associated with nodal metastases (odds ratio, 8.68; P < .001). Overall accuracy of lymphovascular invasion in predicting nodal metastases was 86%. The COH Composite Score stratified patients in 4 categories with increasing risk of nodal metastases and incrementally worse survival. For patients with the COH Composite Score of 0 (12%), the nodal metastasis rate was 3.1%, and a right hemicolectomy in this group did not improve survival. CONCLUSION The presence of lymphovascular invasion is strongly predictive of nodal metastases. Lymphovascular invasion as part of the COH Composite Score may help guide the extent of surgery in low-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Talha Waheed
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. https://twitter.com/mtalhawaheed
| | - Ibrahim Malik
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. https://twitter.com/AMBlakely
| | - Yasmine Zerhouni
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Mark Hanna
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. https://twitter.com/DrMarkhhanna
| | - Kurt Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. https://twitter.com/laleh_melstrom
| | - Lily L Lai
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Andreas M Kaiser
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. https://twitter.com/AndreasMKaiser
| | - Lwin Thinzar
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. https://twitter.com/thinzarr
| | - Isaac B Paz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McClelland PH, Gregory SN, Nah SK, Hernandez JM, Davis JL, Blakely AM. Predicting Survival in Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix: Demographics, Disease Presentation, and Treatment Methodology. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:6237-6251. [PMID: 38874874 PMCID: PMC11300641 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15526-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix (MACA) follows a complex disease course with variable survival. Large-scale predictive modeling may determine subtle yet important prognostic factors otherwise unseen in smaller cohort analyses. METHODS Patients with MACA were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Research Plus database (2005-2019). Primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and average annual percent change (AAPC) in incidence. RESULTS Among 4,258 included patients, MACA was most frequently diagnosed at 50 to 69 years (52.0%), with female preponderance (55.9%). MACA incidence AAPC was 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-5.9). For patients with exclusive, first-diagnosis MACA included in survival analysis (3,222 patients), median DSS and OS were 118 and 88 months, respectively. In DSS-based multivariable analysis, worse prognosis was associated with non-Hispanic Black background (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.82; p = 0.036), high grade (grade 3 HR 3.10, 95% CI 2.44-3.92; p < 0.001), lymphatic spread (HR 2.73, 95% CI 2.26-3.30; p < 0.001), and distant metastasis (HR 5.84, 95% CI 3.86-8.83; p < 0.001). In subcohort analysis of patients with rationale for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC, 2,387 patients), CRS-HIPEC was associated with survival benefit compared with surgery alone but only for moderate-grade tumors (median DSS/OS 138/138 vs. 116/87 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix incidence is increasing in the United States. Survival rates are affected by both demographics and classical risk factors, and CRS-HIPEC-associated survival benefit predominantly occurs in moderate-grade tumors. Further exploration of biologic and clinicopathologic features may enhance risk stratification for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H McClelland
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie N Gregory
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shirley K Nah
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsagkalidis V, Choe JK, Beninato T, Eskander MF, Grandhi MS, In H, Kennedy TJ, Langan RC, Maggi JC, Pitt HA, Alexander HR, Ecker BL. Extent of Resection and Long-Term Outcomes for Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis of Mucinous and non-Mucinous Histologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4203-4212. [PMID: 38594579 PMCID: PMC11164803 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (MAA) and non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (NMAA) demonstrate differences in rates and patterns of recurrence, which may inform the appropriate extent of surgical resection (i.e., appendectomy versus colectomy). The impact of extent of resection on disease-specific survival (DSS) for each histologic subtype was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with resected, non-metastatic MAA and NMAA were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020). Multivariable models were created to examine predictors of colectomy for each histologic subtype. DSS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and examined using Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Among 4674 patients (MAA: n = 1990, 42.6%; NMAA: n = 2684, 57.4%), the majority (67.8%) underwent colectomy. Among colectomy patients, the rate of nodal positivity increased with higher T-stage (MAA: T1: 4.6%, T2: 4.0%, T3: 17.1%, T4: 21.6%, p < 0.001; NMAA: T1: 6.8%, T2: 11.4%, T3: 25.6%, T4: 43.8%, p < 0.001) and higher tumor grade (MAA: well differentiated: 7.7%, moderately differentiated: 19.2%, and poorly differentiated: 31.3%; NMAA: well differentiated: 9.0%, moderately differentiated: 20.5%, and 44.4%; p < 0.001). Nodal positivity was more frequently observed in NMAA (27.6% versus 16.4%, p < 0.001). Utilization of colectomy was associated with improved DSS for NMAA patients with T2 (log rank p = 0.095) and T3 (log rank p = 0.018) tumors as well as moderately differentiated histology (log rank p = 0.006). Utilization of colectomy was not associated with improved DSS for MAA patients, which was confirmed in a multivariable model for T-stage, grade, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.22]. CONCLUSIONS Colectomy was associated with improved DSS for patients with NMAA but not MAA. Colectomy for MAA may not be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Tsagkalidis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jennie K Choe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Toni Beninato
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Mariam F Eskander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Miral S Grandhi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Haejin In
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Timothy J Kennedy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Russell C Langan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Jason C Maggi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - H Richard Alexander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Brett L Ecker
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Belmont E, Bansal VV, Yousef MMG, Zeineddine MA, Su D, Dhiman A, Liao CY, Polite B, Eng OS, Fournier KF, White MG, Turaga KK, Shen JP, Shergill A. Multi-Institutional Study Evaluating the Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Appendiceal Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300531. [PMID: 38723230 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional surveillance methods are poorly sensitive for monitoring appendiceal cancers (AC). This study investigated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in evaluating systemic therapy response and recurrence after surgery for AC. METHODS Patients from two specialized centers who underwent tumor-informed ctDNA testing (Signatera) were evaluated to determine the association between systemic therapy and ctDNA detection. In addition, the accuracy of ctDNA detection during surveillance for the diagnosis of recurrence after complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for grade 2-3 ACs with peritoneal metastases (PM) was investigated. RESULTS In this cohort of 94 patients with AC, most had grade 2-3 tumors (84.0%) and PM (84.0%). Fifty patients completed the assay in the presence of identifiable disease, among which ctDNA was detected in 4 of 7 (57.1%), 10 of 16 (62.5%), and 19 of 27 (70.4%) patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 diseases, respectively. Patients who had recently received systemic chemotherapy had ctDNA detected less frequently (7 of 16 [43.8%] v 26 of 34 [76.5%]; odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.82]; P = .02). Among 36 patients with complete CRS for grade 2-3 AC-PM, 16 (44.4%) developed recurrence (median follow-up, 19.6 months). ctDNA detection was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (median 11.3 months v not reached; hazard ratio, 14.1 [95% CI, 1.7 to 113.8]; P = .01) and showed high accuracy for the detection of recurrence (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 85.0%). ctDNA was more sensitive than carcinoembryonic antigen (62.5%), CA19-9 (25.0%), and CA125 (18.8%) and was the only elevated biomarker in four (25%) patients with recurrence. CONCLUSION This study revealed a reduced ctDNA detection frequency after systemic therapy and accurate recurrence assessment after CRS. These findings underscore the role of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker for grade 2-3 AC-PM management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Belmont
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Varun V Bansal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Mahmoud M G Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mohammad A Zeineddine
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Su
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ankit Dhiman
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Blasé Polite
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Keith F Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kiran K Turaga
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - John Paul Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yousef A, Yousef M, Zeineddine MA, More A, Fanaeian M, Chowdhury S, Knafl M, Edelkamp P, Ito I, Gu Y, Pattalachinti V, Naini ZA, Zeineddine FA, Peterson J, Alfaro K, Foo WC, Jin J, Bhutiani N, Higbie V, Scally CP, Kee B, Kopetz S, Goldstein D, Strach M, Williamson A, Aziz O, Barriuso J, Uppal A, White MG, Helmink B, Fournier KF, Raghav KP, Taggart MW, Overman MJ, Shen JP. Serum Tumor Markers and Outcomes in Patients With Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240260. [PMID: 38416491 PMCID: PMC10902735 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) have been useful in the management of gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers; however, there is limited information regarding their utility in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Objective To assess the association of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA125) with clinical outcomes and pathologic and molecular features in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care comprehensive cancer center. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 52 (21-101) months. Software was used to query the MD Anderson internal patient database to identify patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma and at least 1 tumor marker measured at MD Anderson between March 2016 and May 2023. Data were analyzed from January to December 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Association of serum tumor markers with survival in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were also performed to assess associations between clinical factors (serum tumor marker levels, demographics, and patient and disease characteristics) and patient outcomes (overall survival). Results A total of 1338 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma were included, with a median (range) age at diagnosis of 56.5 (22.3-89.6) years. The majority of the patients had metastatic disease (1080 patients [80.7%]). CEA was elevated in 742 of the patients tested (56%), while CA19-9 and CA125 were elevated in 381 patients (34%) and 312 patients (27%), respectively. Individually, elevation of CEA, CA19-9, or CA125 were associated with worse 5-year survival; elevated vs normal was 81% vs 95% for CEA (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0; 95% CI, 2.9-5.6), 84% vs 92% for CA19-9 (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4), and 69% vs 93% for CA125 (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.7-7.8) (P < .001 for all). Quantitative evaluation of tumor markers was associated with outcomes. Patients with highly elevated (top 10th percentile) CEA, CA19-9, or CA125 had markedly worse survival, with 5-year survival rates of 59% for CEA (HR, 9.8; 95% CI, 5.3-18.0), 64% for CA19-9 (HR, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.0-11.7), and 57% for CA125 (HR, 7.6; 95% CI, 3.5-16.5) (P < .001 for all). Although metastatic tumors had higher levels of all tumor markers, when restricting survival analysis to 1080 patients with metastatic disease, elevated CEA, CA19-9, or CA125 were all still associated worse survival (HR for CEA, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.5-4.8; P < .001; HR for CA19-9, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; P = .002; and HR for CA125, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.4-6.4; P < .001). Interestingly, tumor grade was not associated with CEA or CA19-9 level, while CA-125 was slightly higher in high-grade tumors relative to low-grade tumors (mean value, 18.3 vs 15.0; difference, 3.3; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7; P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified an incremental increase in the risk of death with an increase in the number of elevated tumor markers, with an 11-fold increased risk of death in patients with all 3 tumor markers elevated relative to those with none elevated. Somatic mutations in KRAS and GNAS were associated with significantly higher levels of CEA and CA19-9. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective study of serum tumor markers in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma, CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 were associated with overall survival in appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Given their value, all 3 biomarkers should be included in the initial workup of patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelrahman Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mahmoud Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mohammad A. Zeineddine
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Aditya More
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mohammad Fanaeian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Saikat Chowdhury
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mark Knafl
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Paul Edelkamp
- Department of Data Engineering and Analytics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ichiaki Ito
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yue Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Vinay Pattalachinti
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Zahra Alavi Naini
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Fadl A. Zeineddine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kristin Alfaro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jeff Jin
- Department of Enterprise Development and Integration, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Victoria Higbie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christopher P. Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bryan Kee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Madeleine Strach
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Williamson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Omer Aziz
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Michael G. White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Beth Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Keith F. Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kanwal P. Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Melissa W. Taggart
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Michael J. Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - John Paul Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yousef A, Yousef M, Zeineddine M, More A, Chowdhury S, Knafl M, Edelkamp P, Ito I, Gu Y, Pattalachinti V, Naini ZA, Zeineddine F, Peterson J, Alfaro K, Foo WC, Jin J, Bhutiani N, Higbie V, Scally C, Kee B, Kopetz S, Goldstein D, Uppal A, White MG, Helmink B, Fournier K, Raghav K, Taggart M, Overman MJ, Shen JP. The Clinical Significance of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 in Management of Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.09.10.23295319. [PMID: 37745596 PMCID: PMC10516068 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.10.23295319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Importance Serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, & CA125 have been useful in the management of gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers, however there is limited information regarding their utility in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Objective Assessing the association of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA125) with clinical outcomes, pathologic, and molecular features in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Design This is a retrospective study with results reported in 2023. The median follow-up time was 43 months. Setting Single tertiary care comprehensive cancer center. Participants Under an approved Institutional Review Board protocol, the Palantir Foundry software system was used to query the MD Anderson internal patient database to identify patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma and at least one tumor marker measured at MD Anderson between 2016 and 2023. Results A total of 1,338 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma were included, with a median age of 56.5 years. The majority of the patients had metastatic disease (80.7%). CEA was elevated in more than half of the patients tested (56%), while CA19-9 and CA125 were elevated in 34% and 27%, respectively. Individually, elevation of CEA, CA19-9, or CA125 were associated with worse 5-year survival; 82% vs 95%, 84% vs 92%, and 69% vs 93% elevated vs normal for CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 respectively (all p<0.0001). Quantitative evaluation of tumor markers increased prognostic ability. Patients with highly elevated (top 10th percentile) CEA, CA19-9 or CA125 had markedly worse survival with 5-year survival rates of 59%, 64%, and 57%, respectively (HR vs. normal : 9.8, 6.0, 7.6, all p<0.0001). Although metastatic tumors had higher levels of all tumor markers, when restricting survival analysis to 1080 patients with metastatic disease elevated CEA, CA19-9 or CA125 were all still associated worse survival (HR vs. normal : 3.4, 1.8, 3.9, p<0.0001 for CEA and CA125, p=0.0019 for CA19-9). Interestingly tumor grade was not associated with CEA or CA19-9 level, while CA-125 was slightly higher in high relative to low-grade tumors (18.3 vs. 15.0, p=0.0009). Multivariable analysis identified an incremental increase in the risk of death with an increase in the number of elevated tumor markers, with a 11-fold increased risk of death in patients with all three tumor markers elevated relative to those with none elevated. Mutation in KRAS and GNAS were associated with significantly higher levels of CEA and CA19-9. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the utility of measuring CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 in the management of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Given their prognostic value, all three biomarkers should be included in the initial workup of patients diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelrahman Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mahmoud Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohammad Zeineddine
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aditya More
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Saikat Chowdhury
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark Knafl
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Edelkamp
- Department of Data Engineering & Analytics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ichiaki Ito
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yue Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vinay Pattalachinti
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zahra Alavi Naini
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fadl Zeineddine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristin Alfaro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeff Jin
- Department of Enterprise Dev & Integration, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Victoria Higbie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan Kee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G. White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa Taggart
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J. Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Paul Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Umetsu SE, Kakar S. Staging of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: challenges and recent updates. Hum Pathol 2023; 132:65-76. [PMID: 35843338 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are unique tumors of the appendix, characterized by low-grade mucinous epithelium with villiform, undulating, or flat architecture. These tumors lack infiltrative growth or destructive invasion, but can extend into the appendiceal wall by a "pushing" pattern of invasion, with a broad front that can mimic a diverticulum. These neoplasms have a propensity for peritoneal dissemination, resulting in the clinical presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei. The pathologic staging of these neoplasms is challenging and fraught with confusing terminology and numerous classification systems. This review focuses on the AJCC pathologic staging of these tumors with a focus on challenging situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Umetsu
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Sanjay Kakar
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
AlMasri SS, Hammad AY, Singhi AD, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH, Celebrezze JP, Choudry HA, Nassour I. Appendectomy Is Oncologically Equivalent to Right Hemicolectomy for Well-Differentiated T1 Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:67-74. [PMID: 34508015 PMCID: PMC11195531 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right hemicolectomy is recommended for appendiceal adenocarcinoma but may not be needed for early stage disease. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether appendectomy offers adequate oncologic outcomes for T1 appendiceal adenocarcinoma from a national cohort of patients. DESIGN Patients with T1 appendiceal adenocarcinoma (mucinous and nonmucinous histology) treated with either a right hemicolectomy or appendectomy between 2004 and 2016 were retrieved. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of overall survival. SETTING The study was conducted using a national cancer database. PATIENTS A total of 320 patients (median age, 62 y; 47% women) were identified: 69 (22%) underwent an appendectomy and 251 (78%) underwent a right hemicolectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Overall survival was measured. RESULTS Nonmucinous adenocarcinoma was identified in 194 (61%), whereas 126 (39%) had mucinous adenocarcinoma. Of the overall cohort, 43% had well-differentiated histology, 39% had moderately differentiated disease, and 4% had poorly differentiated tumors. The rate of lymph node metastasis was lower in well-differentiated tumors (3%) compared with moderately (10%) or poorly differentiated tumors (25%). On univariate survival analysis, right hemicolectomy was associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival in patients with moderately/poorly differentiated disease ( p < 0.001) but not for well-differentiated disease ( p = 1.000). After adjustment, right hemicolectomy was associated with overall survival improvement for moderately/poorly differentiated T1 adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.26 [95% CI, 0.08-0.82]; p = 0.02) but not for well-differentiated disease. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS The current analysis from the National Cancer Database demonstrates that appendectomy is associated with equivalent survival to right hemicolectomy for well-differentiated T1 adenocarcinoma, whereas for moderately and poorly differentiated disease, right hemicolectomy is oncologically superior to appendectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B689 . LA APENDICECTOMA ES ONCOLGICAMENTE EQUIVALENTE A LA HEMICOLECTOMA DERECHA PARA EL ADENOCARCINOMA APENDICULAR T BIEN DIFERENCIADO ANTECEDENTES:La hemicolectomía derecha se recomienda para el adenocarcinoma apendicular, pero puede no ser necesaria para la enfermedad en estadio temprano.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar si la apendicectomía ofrece resultados oncológicos adecuados para el adenocarcinoma apendicular T1 de una cohorte nacional de pacientes.DISEÑO:Se recuperaron pacientes con adenocarcinoma apendicular T1 (histología mucinoso y no mucinoso) tratados con hemicolectomía derecha o apendicectomía entre 2004-2016. Se utilizó un análisis de regresión de Cox multivariante para identificar los predictores de la supervivencia global.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Base de datos nacional sobre cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron un total de 320 pacientes (mediana de edad 62 años, 47% mujeres): 69 (22%) se sometieron a una apendicectomía y 251 (78%) se sometieron a una hemicolectomía derecha.PRINCIPAL MEDIDA DE RESULTADO:Sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:Se identificó adenocarcinoma no mucinoso en 194 (61%) mientras que 126 (39%) tenían adenocarcinoma mucinoso. De la cohorte general, el 43% tenía una histología bien diferenciada, el 39% tenía una enfermedad moderadamente diferenciada y el 4% tenía tumores poco diferenciados. La tasa de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos fue menor en los tumores bien diferenciados (3%) en comparación con los tumores moderadamente (10%) o pobremente diferenciados (25%). En el análisis de sobrevida univariante, la hemicolectomía derecha se asoció con una mejor sobrevida general a 1, 3, y 5 años en pacientes con enfermedad moderada / pobremente diferenciada ( p < 0,001) pero no para la enfermedad bien diferenciada ( p = 1,000). Después del ajuste, la hemicolectomía derecha se asoció con una mejora de la sobrevida general para el adenocarcinoma T1 moderadamente / poco diferenciado (HR = 0,26, IC del 95%: 0,08-0,82, p = 0,02) pero no para la enfermedad bien diferenciada.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva.CONCLUSIONES:El análisis actual de la base de datos nacional de cáncer demuestra que la apendicectomía se asocia con una sobrevida similar a la hemicolectomía derecha para el adenocarcinoma T1 bien diferenciado, mientras que para la enfermedad moderada y pobremente diferenciada, la hemicolectomía derecha es oncológicamente superior a la apendicectomía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B689 . (Traducción-Dr. Yazmin Berrones-Medina ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer S. AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Abdulrahman Y. Hammad
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James P. Celebrezze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Haroon A. Choudry
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao X, Li X, Lin Y, Ma R, Zhang Y, Xu D, Li Y. Survival prediction by Bayesian network modeling for pseudomyxoma peritonei after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer Med 2022; 12:2637-2645. [PMID: 36054637 PMCID: PMC9939117 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish a survival prognostic model for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) based on Bayesian network (BN). METHODS 453 PMP patients were included from the database at our center. The dataset was divided into a training set to establish BN model and a testing set to perform internal validation at a ratio of 8:2. From the training set, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for BN model construction. The confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the BN model. RESULTS The univariate and multivariate analyses identified 7 independent prognostic factors: gender, previous operation history, histological grading, lymphatic metastasis, peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction and splenectomy (all p < 0.05). Based on independent factors, the BN model of training set was established. After internal validation, the accuracy and AUC of the BN model were 70.3% and 73.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION The BN model provides a reasonable level of predictive performance for PMP patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Zhao
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Peking University Ninth School of Clinical MedicineBeijingChina
| | - Xinbao Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Yulin Lin
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Ru Ma
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Dazhao Xu
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Peking University Ninth School of Clinical MedicineBeijingChina,Department of Peritoneal Cancer SurgeryBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martín-Román L, Lozano P, Vásquez W, Palencia N, Gómez Y, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, González-Bayón L. Defining stage in mucinous tumours of the appendix with peritoneal dissemination: the importance of grading terminology: systematic review. BJS Open 2021; 5:6342602. [PMID: 34355239 PMCID: PMC8342933 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination (PD) show a wide spectrum of clinical behaviour. Histological grade has been correlated with prognosis, but no universally accepted histological grading has been established. The aim of this systematic review was to provide historical insight to understand current grading classifications, basic histopathological features of each category, and to define which classification correlates best with prognosis. Methods MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that reported survival across different pathological grades in patients with mucinous neoplasm of the appendix with PD treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results Thirty-eight studies were included. Ronnett’s classification was the most common (9 studies). Classifications proposed by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) (6 studies) and the seventh or eighth edition of the AJCC (7 studies) are gaining in popularity. Nine studies supported a two-tier, 12 a three-tier, and two a four-tier classification system. Three studies demonstrated that acellular mucin had a better prognosis than low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei in the PSOGI classification or M1bG1 in the eighth edition of the AJCC classification. Four studies demonstrated that the presence of signet ring cells was associated with a worse outcome than high-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei in the PSOGI classification and M1bG2 in the eighth edition of the AJCC. Conclusion There is a great need for a common language in describing mucinous neoplasms of the appendix with PD. Evolution in terminology as a result of pathological insight turns the four-tiered PSOGI classification system into a coherent classification option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martín-Román
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Lozano
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - W Vásquez
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - N Palencia
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Y Gómez
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Fernández-Aceñero
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - L González-Bayón
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin YL, Xu DZ, Li XB, Yan FC, Xu HB, Peng Z, Li Y. Consensuses and controversies on pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of the published consensus statements and guidelines. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16:85. [PMID: 33581733 PMCID: PMC7881689 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01723-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a clinical malignant syndrome mainly originating from the appendix, with an incidence of 2–4 per million people. As a rare disease, an early and accurate diagnosis of PMP is difficult. It was not until the 1980s that the systematic study of this disease was started. Main body As a result of clinical and basic research progress over the last 4 decades, a comprehensive strategy based on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been established and proved to be an effective treatment for PMP. Currently, CRS + HIPEC was recommended as the standard treatment for PMP worldwide. There are several consensuses on PMP management, playing an important role in the standardization of CRS + HIPEC. However, controversies exist among consensuses published worldwide. A systematic evaluation of PMP consensuses helps not only to standardize PMP treatment but also to identify existing controversies and point to possible solutions in the future. The controversy underlying the consensus and vice versa promotes the continuous refinement and updating of consensuses and continue to improve PMP management through a gradual and continuous process. In this traditional narrative review, we systemically evaluated the consensuses published by major national and international academic organizations, aiming to get a timely update on the treatment strategies of CRS + HIPEC on PMP. Conclusion Currently, consensuses have been reached on the following aspects: pathological classification, terminology, preoperative evaluation, eligibility for surgical treatment, maximal tumor debulking, CRS technical details, and severe adverse event classification system. However, controversies still exist regarding the HIPEC regimen, systemic chemotherapy, and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Lin Lin
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China
| | - Da-Zhao Xu
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China
| | - Xin-Bao Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China
| | - Feng-Cai Yan
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China
| | - Hong-Bin Xu
- Department of Myxoma, Aero Space Central Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Zheng Peng
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China. .,Department of Pathology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Soucisse ML, Lansom J, Alshahrani MS, Morris DL. Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with or without pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:1888-1894. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.16185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mikael L. Soucisse
- Department of Surgery University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Sydney Australia
- Department of Surgery Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Joshua Lansom
- Department of Surgery University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Sydney Australia
| | - Mohammad S. Alshahrani
- Department of Surgery University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Sydney Australia
- Surgical Oncology Department King Fahad Medical City Riyadh Saudi Arabia
| | - David L. Morris
- Department of Surgery University of New South Wales, St George Hospital Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fields AC, Lu PW, Li GZ, Welten V, Jolissaint JS, Vierra BM, Saadat LV, Larson AC, Atkinson RB, Melnitchouk N. Current practices and future steps for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 57:100727. [PMID: 32151327 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2019.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Pamela W Lu
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - George Z Li
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vanessa Welten
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua S Jolissaint
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lily V Saadat
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Abby C Larson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel B Atkinson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Levinsky NC, Morris MC, Wima K, Sussman JJ, Ahmad SA, Cloyd JM, Kimbrough C, Fournier K, Lee A, Dineen S, Dessureault S, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Zaidi MY, Staley CA, Maithel SK, Leiting J, Grotz T, Lambert L, Hendrix RJ, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Eng OS, Johnston FM, Greer J, Patel SH. Should We Be Doing Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC for Signet Ring Cell Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma? A Study from the US HIPEC Collaborative. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:155-164. [PMID: 31428960 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04336-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendiceal adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells (SCA) is associated with worse overall survival (OS), and it is unclear whether cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) should be pursued in this patient population. We assessed the prognostic implications of signet ring cells in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma and peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS The US HIPEC Collaborative, a 12-center, multi-institutional database of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, was reviewed for patients with SCA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 514 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for appendiceal adenocarcinoma, 125 (24%) had SCA. The SCA and non-SCA groups had similar baseline characteristics. SCA had worse OS compared with non-SCA (32.0 vs 91.4 months, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis for only SCA cases, there was worse OS in patients with poorly differentiated tumors, positive lymph nodes, LVI, PCI > 20, or incomplete cytoreduction (CC-2/3). However, multivariate analysis showed only positive lymph nodes (HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.00-1.31], p = 0.04), poor differentiation (5.60 [1.29-24.39], p = 0.02), and incomplete cytoreduction (4.90 [1.11-12.70], p = 0.03) were independently associated with decreased OS for SCA. CONCLUSION While signet cells are a negative prognostic feature, they should not be a contraindication to CRS-HIPEC in patients with well-moderately differentiated tumors with negative lymph nodes, where complete cytoreduction can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick C Levinsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA
| | - Mackenzie C Morris
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA
| | - Koffi Wima
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Sussman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Charles Kimbrough
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML-0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou J, Yi Y, Wang C, Su C, Luo Y. Identification of a 3-mRNA signature as a novel potential prognostic biomarker in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma in G2 and G3. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:3545-3552. [PMID: 31579405 PMCID: PMC6757305 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of mRNAs as biomarkers serves to diagnose, treat, as well as aid the prognosis of cancer. The present study involved an analysis of mRNAs in the cell cycle at the G2 and G3 tumor grades for the prognosis of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OSC) using 364 clinical samples (G2:G3=42:322). Statistics aided the identification of NPFFR2, XPNPEP2 and CELA3B; the 3-mRNA model that allows for classification of patients into high- and low-risk groups using a median value of 0.9580745. The rates of survival varied (P=0.00149) and the independent detection of stratification of the risk of this disease was validated with success using the 3-mRNA signature, which was demonstrated to be more successful than the weight model. This approach was revealed to provide the prognosis of grade G2 and G3 in patients with OSC compared with factors used traditionally. Compared with traditional factors, this 3-mRNA model was demonstrated to be the only and independent prognostic factor for patients with G2 and G3 stage OSC. A literature survey was also performed in the present study in order to assess the role of the 3 genes and indirectly prove their effectiveness. The establishment of this new genetic model will enhance prospective prognosis and treatment for patients with OSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahua Zhou
- Pediatric Surgery II Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Yeye Yi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Congjun Wang
- Pediatric Surgery II Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Cheng Su
- Pediatric Surgery II Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Yige Luo
- Pediatric Surgery II Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nasseri YY, Zhu R, Sutanto C, Wai C, Cohen JS, Ellenhorn J, Artinyan A. Role of right hemicolectomy in patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2019; 218:1239-1243. [PMID: 31399196 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little consensus with regards to the most appropriate surgical management for low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas (LAMA), though right hemicolectomy is usually recommended. METHODS The SEER database was queried for all patients with non-metastatic LAMA. Disease specific and overall survival was compared by surgery type: 1) appendectomy, 2) formal right hemicolectomy 3) non-formal colectomy (including ileocecectomy). RESULTS A total of 579 patients with non-metastatic LAMA were identified. 133 (23%), 404 (70%), and 42 (7%) of patients had stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. 99 (17.1%) had appendectomy, 87 (15%) had non-formal colectomy, and 302 (52.2%) had formal right hemicolectomy. We observed no significant differences in disease specific or overall survival by surgery type. Controlling for age and stage, surgery type was not a significant predictor of disease specific or overall survival. CONCLUSION In patients with localized LAMA, right hemicolectomy did not increase disease specific or overall survival. Right hemicolectomy should be reserved for LAMA patients with positive margins post appendectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosef Y Nasseri
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
| | - Ruoyan Zhu
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Christine Sutanto
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Christina Wai
- Verity Medical Group, Surgical Oncology & Colorectal Surgery, 400 Race Street, San Jose, CA, 95126, USA; Saint Vincent Medical Center, 2131 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90057, USA
| | - Jason S Cohen
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Joshua Ellenhorn
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Avo Artinyan
- Verity Medical Group, Surgical Oncology & Colorectal Surgery, 400 Race Street, San Jose, CA, 95126, USA; Saint Vincent Medical Center, 2131 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90057, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lu P, Fields AC, Meyerhardt JA, Davids JS, Shabat G, Bleday R, Goldberg JE, Nash GM, Melnitchouk N. Systemic chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:446-451. [PMID: 31236958 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendiceal cancer is a rare malignancy that exhibits a wide range of histology and treatment response. Given the rarity and heterogeneous nature of the disease, it has been difficult to define optimal treatment strategies. Our goal is to examine the association between use of systemic chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic low-grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. METHODS The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was queried, and patients with mucinous, grade 1, stage IV appendiceal adenocarcinoma were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival, and a Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS Six hundred and thirty-nine patients were identified. Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing no chemotherapy vs chemotherapy was 52.9% and 61.3%, respectively. After adjusting with Cox proportional hazards model, chemotherapy was not associated with OS (HR:1.1, 95% CI:0.82-1.40, P = 0.61). Patients who underwent surgical resection (HR:0.40, 95% CI:0.28-0.57, P < .001) or were female (HR:0.61, 95% CI:0.5-0.8, P < .001) had improved survival in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS There is no association between undergoing chemotherapy and OS in this cohort of patients with stage IV low-grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Development of national treatment guidelines is urgently needed for more consistency in the management of patients with appendiceal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Lu
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jennifer S Davids
- Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Galyna Shabat
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald Bleday
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cata JP, Nguyen LT, Ifeanyi-Pillette IC, Van Meter A, Dangler LA, Feng L, Owusu-Agyemang P. An assessment of the survival impact of multimodal anesthesia/analgesia technique in adults undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a propensity score matched analysis. Int J Hyperthermia 2019; 36:369-375. [PMID: 30829082 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1574985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies suggest volatile anesthetics and opioids may enhance the malignant potential of cancer cells. The objective of this single institution retrospective study was to evaluate the survival impact of a multimodal opioid-sparing nonvolatile anesthetic technique (MA) in a group of patients who had undergone cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for appendiceal carcinomatosis. METHODS Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the survivals of patients who received MA (MA group), to those who received volatile-opioid anesthesia (volatile-opioid group). RESULTS Of the 373 patients, 110 (29%) were in the MA group and 263 (71%) in the volatile-opioid group. The MA group was older (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 55 ± 11 versus 53 ± 10 years, p = .035) and had more patients with ASA scores 3 or 4 (90% versus 81%, p = .032), and those with high grade tumors (18% versus 12%, p = .009). Intraoperative opioid consumption was lower in the MA group (mean morphine equivalents ± SD: 13 ± 10 versus 194 ± 789, p < .0001). After PSM, 107 patients remained in each group. In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model after PSM, MA was not associated with improved progression free survival (PFS) (HR 1.45, 95% CI [0.94-2.22], p = .093) or overall survival (OS) (HR 1.66, 95% CI [0.86-3.20], p = .128), when compared to volatile-opioid anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, a multimodal opioid-sparing nonvolatile anesthetic approach was not associated with improved survival. Precis' statement: In this study of patients undergoing major cancer surgery, the use of multimodal anesthetic and analgesic agents, while avoiding volatile anesthetics and minimizing opioid use was not associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Cata
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.,b Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Linh T Nguyen
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Ifeyinwa C Ifeanyi-Pillette
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Antoinette Van Meter
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Lori A Dangler
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Lei Feng
- c Department of Biostatistics , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Pascal Owusu-Agyemang
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.,b Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Review: Pathology and Its Clinical Relevance of Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
20
|
Ang CSP, Shen JP, Hardy-Abeloos CJ, Huang JK, Ross JS, Miller VA, Jacobs MT, Chen IL, Xu D, Ali SM, Baumgartner J, Lowy A, Fanta P, Ideker T, Millis SZ, Harismendy O. Genomic Landscape of Appendiceal Neoplasms. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:1700302. [PMID: 32913983 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Appendiceal neoplasms are heterogeneous and are often treated with chemotherapy similarly to colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic profiling was performed on 703 appendiceal cancer specimens to compare the mutation profiles of appendiceal subtypes to CRC and other cancers, with the ultimate aim to identify potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets. Methods Tumor specimens were submitted to a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) for hybrid-capture-based sequencing of 3,769 exons from 315 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 28 genes commonly rearranged in cancer. Interactions between genotype, histologic subtype, treatment, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in a clinically annotated subset of 76 cases. Results There were five major histopathologic subtypes: mucinous adenocarcinomas (46%), adenocarcinomas (30%), goblet cell carcinoids (12%), pseudomyxoma peritonei (7.7%), and signet ring cell carcinomas (5.2%). KRAS (35% to 81%) and GNAS (8% to 72%) were the most frequent alterations in epithelial cancers; APC and TP53 mutations were significantly less frequent in appendiceal cancers relative to CRC. Low-grade and high-grade tumors were enriched for GNAS and TP53 mutations, respectively (both χ2 P < .001). GNAS and TP53 were mutually exclusive (Bonferroni corrected P < .001). Tumor grade and TP53 mutation status independently predicted OS. The mutation status of GNAS and TP53 strongly predicted OS (median, 37.1 months for TP53 mutant v 75.8 GNAS-TP53 wild type v 115.5 GNAS mutant; log-rank P = .0031) and performed as well as grade in risk stratifying patients. Conclusion Epithelial appendiceal cancers and goblet cell carcinoids show differences in KRAS and GNAS mutation frequencies and have mutation profiles distinct from CRC. This study highlights the benefit of performing molecular profiling on rare tumors to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celina S-P Ang
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - John Paul Shen
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Camille J Hardy-Abeloos
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Justin K Huang
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Vincent A Miller
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Miriam T Jacobs
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ingrid L Chen
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - David Xu
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Siraj M Ali
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Joel Baumgartner
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Andrew Lowy
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Paul Fanta
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Trey Ideker
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sherri Z Millis
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - Olivier Harismendy
- , , , , and , Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY; , , , , , , , , , and , University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; , Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; , , and , Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|