Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowels are on the rise: Early aspects and management

Comparison of clinical outcomes between conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors are relatively rare subepithelial tumors that arise from cells of the neuroendocrine system. Small duodenal neuroendocrine tumors can be treated endoscopically because of their low potential for metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. Between March 2009 and March 2023, 15 patients with duodenal neuroendocrine tumors resected using conventional (n = 7) and underwater (n = 8) endoscopic mucosal resections were retrospectively enrolled. The median specimen size and median tumor size were 1.0 cm (interquartile range: 0.8-1.2 cm) and 0.6 cm (interquartile range: 0.4-0.6 cm), respectively. More than half of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors were located in the duodenal bulb (9/15, 60%). The en bloc and complete resection rates of both conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resections were 100%. Only one perforation event occurred in the conventional endoscopic mucosal resection group (14.3%). The patient with the perforation was treated with endoscopic clipping. The median follow-up period was 39.5 months (interquartile range: 19.5-57.3 months). There was no local recurrence or distant metastasis during the follow-up period. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective treatment option for small duodenal neuroendocrine tumors and is the preferred treatment option for flat-type duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.

Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

The incidence rate of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing in recent years. Endoscopic resection [ER; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)] is recommended for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NAD-NETs) ≤10 mm in diameter that are confined to the submucosal layer and without lymph node or distant metastasis. However, the efficacy and safety of and indications for EMR/ESD remain unclear.

Methods

Between November 2011 and April 2021, 12 NAD-NETs in 12 patients who underwent either EMR or ESD were analyzed retrospectively. The rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, pathologic complete resection, margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, complications and prognosis were determined during follow-up (median observation period 53.0 months).

Results

EMR was performed for two tumors, and ESD was performed for ten tumors. En bloc resection was performed for both tumors (100%) in the EMR group, and complete resection was achieved in one case (50%). Pathological complete resection was achieved in one case (50%), while in the ESD group, these three rates were 90% (9/10), 80% (8/10), and 80% (8/10), respectively. Intraoperative perforation occurred in one patient (10%) during ESD treatment, with no intraoperative or delayed bleeding in either group. Recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed during the mean follow-up period of 53.0 months (range, 18-131 months).

Conclusions

For NAD-NETs that measure ≤10 mm in size, are confined to the submucosal layer and have neither suspicious lymph nodes nor distant metastasis, ER (EMR and ESD) may be a safe, effective, and feasible endoscopic technique for removing them.

Mesenteric fibrosis in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors is associated with enrichment of alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive fibrosis and COMP-expressing stromal cells

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (SI-NETs) often develop lymph node metastasis (LNM)-induced mesenteric fibrosis (MF). MF can cause intestinal obstruction as well as ischemia and render surgical resection technically challenging. The underlying pathomechanisms of MF are still not well understood. We examined mesenteric LNM and the surrounding stroma compartment from 24 SI-NET patients, including 11 with in situ presentation of strong MF (MF+) and 13 without MF (MF-). Differential gene expression was assessed with the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel comparing MF+ with MF- within LNM and paired stromal samples, respectively. Most interesting differentially expressed genes were validated by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in combination with validation of associated protein levels utilizing immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of MF+ and MF- formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) patient samples. Overall, 14 genes measured with a 2549-gene expression panel were differentially expressed in MF+ patients compared to MF-. Of those, nine were differentially expressed genes in LNM and five genes in the stromal tissue (>2-fold change, p < .05). The top hits included increased COMP and COL11A1 expression in the stroma of MF+ patients compared to MF-, as well as decreased HMGA2, COL6A6, and SLC22A3 expression in LNM of MF+ patients compared to LNM of MF- patients. RT-qPCR confirmed high levels of COMP and COL11A1 in stroma samples of MF+ compared to MF- patients. IHC staining confirmed the enrichment of α-smooth muscle actin-positive fibrosis in MF+ compared to MF- patients with corresponding increase of COMP-expressing stromal cells in MF+. Since COMP is associated with the known driver for fibrosis development transforming growth factor beta and with a cancer-associated fibroblasts enriched environment, it seems to be a promising new target for MF research.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor-tertiary care centre experience: A case report

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from neuroendocrine cells, which contribute a small fraction of gastrointestinal malignancies. Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) represent 2% of all gastroenteropancreatic NENs. NENs are heterogeneous in terms of clinical symptoms, location, and prognosis. Non-functional NETs are mostly asymptomatic and need a high degree of clinical suspicion. Diagnosis of NETs is by endoscopic, endosonographic biopsy, and histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin A.

CASE SUMMARY

We present case reports of 5 patients obtained over a period of 10 years in our center with dNETs. One patient had moderately differentiated NET and the remaining four had well-differentiated NET. Surveillance endoscopy was recommended in all the patients and is kept under regular follow-up after performing endoscopic therapy using endoscopic mucosal resection in 4 of them and one patient was advised to undergo a Whipple procedure.

CONCLUSION

Recently, the number of reported cases of NETs has increased due to advancements in diagnostic modalities and prevalence because of longer survival duration. The management differs based on the site, size, proliferation grade, and locally invasive pattern. They are slow-growing tumors with a good overall prognosis. The prognosis correlates with local lymph node status and metastasis.

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours - casting the net wide

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our aim is to provide an overview of small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), clinical presentation, diagnosis algorithm and management options. We also highlight the latest evidence on management and suggest areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dodecanetetraacetic acid (DOTATATE) scan can detect NETs with an improved sensitivity than when compared with an Octreotide scan. It is complimentary to small bowel endoscopy that provides mucosal views and allows the delineation of small lesions undetectable on imaging. Surgical resection is the best management modality even in metastatic disease. Prognosis can be improved with the administration of somatostatin analogues and Evarolimus as second-line therapies.

SUMMARY

NETs are heterogenous tumours affecting most commonly the distal small bowel as single or multiple lesions. Their secretary behaviour can lead to symptoms, most commonly diarrhoea and weight loss. Metastases to the liver are associated with carcinoid syndrome.

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Literature Review

This review aimed to highlight the characteristics and surgical treatments of tumours, and answer questions regarding the assessment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and optimal therapy. NENs comprise tumours that can produce hormones and cause a secretory syndrome. The diagnostic method and accuracy differ depending on the site of occurrence; hence, the relevant scientific society has created NEN treatment guidelines for each organ. Gastroenteric pancreatic (GEP) NENs have been unified and classified together according to the 2019 World Health Organization classification. Treatment is based on complete tumour resection, and when metastatic or primary lesions cannot be completely resected, lesions and symptoms are treated. Except for surgery for NENs, chemotherapy, molecularly targeted drugs, transarterial chemoembolization, etc., have also been confirmed as treatments. GEP NEN treatment methods will continue to advance and change because of surgery and other advances in treatment and diagnostic methods.

Impact of margin status on outcomes after endoscopic resection of well-differentiated duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) are known to have low metastatic potential and follow an indolent course. Although DNETs <1 cm in size are amenable to endoscopic resection, little is known about the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates of this approach.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with DNETs from 3 centers were retrospectively studied from 2003 to 2018. We analyzed their resection modality (EMR, snare polypectomy, or forceps polypectomy), margin status, risk factors for recurrence, recurrence rate, and endoscopic surveillance patterns.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients who underwent endoscopic resection, 13 (20.6%) had recurrence. The presence of R1 margins was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for recurrence (P = .048). Mean surveillance time for all DNETs was 2.8 ± 2.6 years. Ninety-two percent of recurrences were detected within 3 years of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the main predictor of recurrence in low-grade DNETs <1.0 cm is the presence of positive tumor margins at the initial endoscopic resection. More frequent, earlier surveillance after resection than that currently recommended by European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines may be warranted to promptly capture DNET recurrences. Additionally, no recurrences occurred in our cohort after 4 years of surveillance.

Optimal surgery and lymph node metastasis of duodenal bulbar neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the extent of nodal dissection for duodenal bulbar NENs (neuroendocrine neoplasms).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We constructed and analyzed a combined dataset consisting of the patients who received surgery in our hospital and the patients from the literature based on a systematic review. The incidence, risk factors and location of nodal metastases were examined.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine cases including 11 cases managed at our hospital and 48 cases identified from the literature search were examined. Nodal metastasis was observed in 24 patients (40.7%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100%, regardless of nodal metastasis. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis were tumor size ≥15 mm and muscularis propria or deeper invasion. Stomach-related lymph node metastasis was found in >20% of patients who were positive for at least one risk factor and 15.4% when patients were negative for both risk factors, while pancreas-related lymph node metastasis was observed in 45.5% of patients who were positive for both risk factors, 7.7% who were only positive for one risk factor, and 0% who were negative for both risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size and depth of invasion would determine whether the optimal surgery for duodenal bulbar NENs is distal gastrectomy or pancreatico-duodenectomy.

Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Ileostomy Stoma on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

A 75-year-old man presented with bleeding ileostomy stoma 20 years after total colectomy and end ileostomy for chronic ulcerative colitis. On physical examination, the stoma was mass-like and firm with friable mucosa. Wedge biopsy of the ileostomy stoma revealed well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (intermediate grade). Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed mass-like focal radiotracer uptake at the ileostomy site without radiotracer-avid lymphadenopathy or distant metastatic disease. No additional sites of neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract were further identified by endoscopy. The diagnosis of isolated primary neuroendocrine tumor of the ileostomy stoma was confirmed, an extremely rare entity.

A Modified Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Staging Schema Better Defines the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis and Disease-free Survival

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors are rare but increasing in incidence and optimal management is hindered by lack of duodenum-specific staging. Duodenal carcinoids were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results tumor registry. Depth of invasion was defined as limited to lamina propria (LP), invading muscularis propria (MP), through muscularis propria (TMP), and through serosa (S). Nine hundred forty-nine patients were identified with majorities being male (57%), white (70%), and node-negative (87%). Tumor size (cm) was less than 1, 47 per cent; 1 to 2, 35 per cent; and greater than 2, 8 per cent with 76 per cent LP. Lymph node (LN) involvement was associated with age, depth of invasion (LP 4%, MP 28%, TMP 54%, and S 57%) and size (less than 1 cm, 3%; 1 to 2 cm, 13%; and greater than 2 cm, 40%). Using the current T staging, LN involvement was: T1 (LP) 2 per cent, T2 (MP or greater than 1 cm) 13 per cent, T3 (TMP) 54 per cent, and T4 (S) 57 per cent. We reclassified current T1 to T1a and current T2 stage to T1b (1 to 2 cm and LP) and T2 (MP or greater than 2 cm). LN metastasis for T1b tumors was 4.7 per cent compared with 20.8 per cent for T2. The resulting TNM classification better defines 5-year disease-specific survival. Our modified staging schema identifies a low-risk group (T1a and T1b) that may be considered for local therapy.

Clinicopathological characteristics and frequency of multiple rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Rectal multiple neuroendocrine tumors (M-NETs) are rare, with only few epidemiologic reports on the topic. Therefore, their clinicopathological features are not completely known, and the appropriate treatment strategy has not been established.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological malignant potential (lymphatic or venous invasion-positive and lymph node metastasis rates) of M-NETs with that of solitary NETs (S-NETs).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 369 patients with NETs of the rectum. Patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 1979 and 2016 and diagnosed with S-NETs were included, and S-NETs were found in 348 patients. Patients with M-NETs were classified into two groups as follows: patients with < 8 tumors (several (S) group, n = 21) and those with ≥ 8 tumors (numerous (N) group, n = 3).

RESULTS

The overall frequency of M-NETs was 5.7% and that of the N group was 0.8%. The mean tumor diameter in the N group was 6.0 mm (range, 4-8 mm). The lymphatic invasion rates of the S-NETs, and S and N groups of the M-NETs were 8.9%, 5.6%, and 66.7%, respectively. Moreover, the lymph node metastasis rates were 9.2%, 11.1%, and 33.3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While M-NETs in the S and N groups had different characteristics, they were rarer in the N group. The N group may have higher rates of lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis regardless of tumor size.

The multidisciplinary team for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the radiologist's challenge

Background

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours. An effective diagnosis requires a multimodal approach that combines evaluation of clinical symptoms, hormonelevels, radiological and nuclear imaging, and histological confirmation. Imaging plays a critical role in NETs diagnosis, prognosis and management, so the radiologists are important members of the multidisciplinary team. During diagnostic work-up two critical issues are present: firstly the need to identify tumor presence and secondly to define the primary site and assess regional and distant metastases.

Conclusions

The most appropriate imaging technique depends on the type of neuroendocrine tumour and the availability of specialized imaging techniques and expertise. There is no general consensus on the most efficient imaging pathway, reflecting the challenge in reliably detection of these tumours.

A Systematic Review of Technical Parameters for MR of the Small Bowel in non-IBD Conditions over the Last Ten Years

Technical guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the small bowel (SB) in the setting of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) were detailed in a 2017 consensus issued by European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) and European Society of Pediatric Radiology (ESPR); however, MRI for non-IBD conditions was not addressed. Hence, we performed a systematic review collecting researches on SB MRI for non-IBDs. The literatures were then divided into morphologic group and functional group. Information about the MRI techniques, gastrointestinal preparation, and details of cine-MRI protocols was extracted. We found that a 1.5 T MRI system, prone positioning, and MR enterography were frequently utilized in clinical practice. Gadolinium contrast sequences were routinely implemented, while diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was much less performed. The gastrointestinal preparation varied throughout the studies. No uniform protocols for cine imaging could be established. SB MRI examinations for non-IBDs are far from standardized, especially for functional studies. Recommendations for standard parameters in cine-MRI sequences are difficult to make due to lack of evidentiary support. MRI investigations in non-IBD conditions are needed and the standardization of non-IBD imaging in clinical practice is required.

Rare presentation of small bowel adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation in the jejunum: A case report and summary of diagnostic and management options

Cancer of the small bowel (SB) is rare. The most common SB malignancy is neuroendocrine, followed by adenocarcinoma. SB adenocarcinoma with overlapping neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) is very uncommon. The present case report discusses the case of a young African American female who presented with high-grade SB perforation and underwent urgent surgical repair. Histology of the tumor revealed jejunal adenocarcinoma with NED. To the best of our knowledge, this type of tumor has not yet been reported in the jejunum. Referring patients that present with insidious and nonspecific abdominal discomfort for imaging studies that are more sensitive to the SB could potentially identify tumors earlier, prevent the development of emergent gastrointestinal complications and offer a chance for cure. An overview of diagnostic tools for SB evaluation was provided.

[Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors]

Significant augmentation of the incidence of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors duodenum has been observed in recent decades. There are 5 histological types of these tumors: gastrinoma (50-60%), somatostatin-producing tumor (15%), inactive serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (<3%) and gangliocytic paraganglioma (<2%). The majority of tumors are localized within the bulb and postbulbar part of duodenum, 20% are found in periampular area. Treatment strategy depends on dimensions, localization, histological class, stage and type of tumor. It is believed that endoscopic resection is permissible for small inactive tumors (G1) located above major duodenal papilla. The majority of other neoplasms requires surgical resection. Personal experience of various surgeons is limited by small group of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize results for selection of optimal treatment.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: A retrospective, single-center study

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, and risk factors associated with lymph node (LN) metastasis are still not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors of LN metastasis in duodenal NETs based on the final histopathologic results and clinical follow-up data.This study included a total of 44 duodenal NETs in 38 patients who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection between January 2008 and December 2015. Diagnosis of duodenal NETs was confirmed based on immunohistochemical staining of chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56; the clinicopathologic records were collected at the time of the initial diagnosis of duodenal NETs.Most duodenal NETs were small (≤1 cm in 33 tumors), World Health Organization (WHO) grade G1 (in 32 tumors), limited to the mucosa and/or submucosa (in 40 tumors), and located at the duodenal bulb (in 32 tumors). Of 44 tumors, lymphovascular invasion was present in 4 (9.1%), and among 38 patients, LN metastasis was detected in 4 (10.5%). LN metastases were significantly associated with the non-bulb location, tumor size >10 mm, tumor invasion into the muscularis propria or deeper, WHO grade G2, and lymphovascular invasion. During the mean follow-up period of 54.5 months (range, 24-123 months), recurrence occurred in 1 patient.Non-bulb location, tumor size >10 mm, invasion beyond the submucosa, WHO grade G2, and lymphovascular invasion are risk factors of LN metastasis in duodenal NETs. These findings can help clinicians choose the appropriate therapeutic modality for duodenal NETs.

Development and characterization of a cancer cachexia model employing a rare human duodenal neuroendocrine carcinoma-originating cell line

Cancer cachexia interferes with therapy and worsens patients' quality of life. Therefore, for a better understanding of cachexia, we aimed to establish a reliable cell line to develop a cachexia model. We recently established and characterized the TCC-NECT-2 cell line, derived from a Japanese patient with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the duodenum (D-NEC). Subcutaneous xenograft of TCC-NECT-2 cells in mice resulted in tumor formation, angiogenesis, and 20% incidence of body weight (BW)-loss. Subsequently, we isolated a potent cachexia-inducing subline using stepwise selection and designated as AkuNEC. Orthotopic and s.c. implantation of AkuNEC cells into mice led to diminished BW, anorexia, skeletal muscle atrophy, adipose tissue loss, and decreased locomotor activity at 100% incidence. Additionally, orthotopic implantation of AkuNEC cells resulted in metastasis and angiogenesis. Serum IL-8 overproduction was observed, and levels were positively correlated with BW-loss and reduced adipose tissue and muscle volumes in tumor-bearing mice. However, shRNA knockdown of the IL-8 gene did not suppress tumor growth and cachexia in the AkuNEC model, indicating that IL-8 is not directly involved in cachexia induction. In conclusion, AkuNEC cells may serve as a useful model to study cachexia and D-NEC.

The Influence of Tumor Stage on the Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index and Mitotic Count in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Tumor cell proliferation rate determined by either Ki-67 index or mitotic count (MC) has shown to be a prognostic factor for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in general, and after its incorporation in the 2010 World Health Organization tumor grading system, it has become essentially mandatory in pathology reports for all gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, regardless of tumor location. Nevertheless, clinical significance for the Ki-67 index or MC has not been well demonstrated in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor (SINET), especially those without distant metastasis, the majority of which have very low proliferation rates. We assessed the clinical behavior of 130 SINETs in relation to stage, Ki-67 index, MC, and other pathologic features. Most SINETs (86%) were grade 1 and 14% were grade 2. There were no grade 3 tumors or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. On multivariate analysis, age, Ki-67 index >5%, MC >10/50 high-power field, stage IV, and liver metastases were associated with increased risk of death in all patients. When both stage and grade were considered, Ki-67 index >5% was associated with a nearly 4-fold increased risk of death in stage IV cases (n=60). In contrast, Ki-67 index did not show prognostic value for patients with stages I to III disease (n=70), although MC >1/50 high-power field was significantly associated with death on multivariable analysis. Our study confirms that liver metastasis and increased tumor cell proliferation rate are independent prognostic factors for SINETs, but shows that most SINETs have a very low proliferation rate, which limits its value for predicting tumor behavior. By combining staging and grading information, we demonstrate different roles and cutoff values of Ki-67 index and MC in SINET with different stages.

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Duodenum-an Uncommon Tumour at an Unusual Site

Neuroendocrine carcinoma rarely occurs in the duodenum, and most cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma in the duodenum show rapid progression of the disease. Such cases have poor prognosis even with radical surgery with or without chemotherapy with low 5-year survival rate. We present a case of a 52-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain of 1-month duration and one episode of vomiting. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed polypoidal lesions in the first and second part of the duodenum. Whipple's procedure was performed. Diagnosis of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was made with extension to pancreas with peripancreatic lymph node metastases. The patient expired on post operative day 17 following cardiac arrest.

Establishment of a novel cell line from a rare human duodenal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the duodenum (D-NEC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis. However, a D-NEC cell line has not yet been established to study the disease. We established a cell line, TCC-NECT-2, from the ascites tumor of a 59-year-old male Japanese patient with D-NEC. TCC-NECT-2 was positive for neuroendocrine markers, chromogranin A (CGA), cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56/NCAM), synaptophysin (SYN/p38), and neuron specific enolase (NSE). Cells exhibited retinoblastoma (RB) protein loss. Orthotopic implantation of TCC-NECT-2 cells into nu/nu mice resulted in tumor formation (incidence = 83.3%) with neuroendocrine characteristics, metastasis, and weight loss. BRAF^V600E and TP53 mutations and C-MYC gene amplification were also observed in TCC-NECT-2. BRAF^V600E-expressing TCC-NECT-2 cells were sensitive to BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, and especially dabrafenib, in vitro, and were strongly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Dabrafenib treatment (30 mg/kg) in a xenograft model for 14 days significantly suppressed tumor growth (percent tumor growth inhibition, TGI% = 48.04). An enhanced therapeutic effect (TGI% = 95.81) was observed on combined treatment of dabrafenib and irinotecan (40 mg/kg). Therefore, TCC-NECT-2, the first reported cell line derived from D-NEC, might serve as a useful model to study the basic biology of D-NEC and translational applications for treatment.

Chromogranin A: From Laboratory to Clinical Aspects of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by having behavior and prognosis that depend upon tumor histology, primary site, staging, and proliferative index. The symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome and vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors are treated with octreotide acetate. The PROMID trial assesses the effect of octreotide LAR on the tumor growth in patients with well-differentiated metastatic midgut NETs. The CLARINET trial evaluates the effects of lanreotide in patients with nonfunctional, well-, or moderately differentiated metastatic enteropancreatic NETs. Everolimus has been approved for the treatment of advanced pancreatic NETs (pNETs) based on positive PFS effects, obtained in the treated group. Sunitinib is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive gastrointestinal stromal tumor or intolerance to imatinib, because a randomized study demonstrated that it improves PFS and overall survival in patients with advanced well-differentiated pNETs. In a phase II trial, pasireotide shows efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with advanced NETs, whose symptoms of carcinoid syndrome were resistant to octreotide LAR. An open-label, phase II trial assesses the clinical activity of long-acting repeatable pasireotide in treatment-naive patients with metastatic grade 1 or 2 NETs. Even if the growth of the neoplasm was significantly inhibited, it is still unclear whether its antiproliferative action is greater than that of octreotide and lanreotide. Because new therapeutic options are needed to counter the natural behavior of neuroendocrine tumors, it would also be useful to have a biochemical marker that can be addressed better in the management of these patients. Chromogranin A is currently the most useful biomarker to establish diagnosis and has some utility in predicting disease recurrence, outcome, and efficacy of therapy.

The Risk Factors for Metastasis in Non-Ampullary Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors Measuring 20 mm or Less in Diameter

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The treatment strategy for non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NAD-NETs) ≤20 mm in diameter has not been established. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the detailed characteristics of NAD-NETs ≤20 mm in diameter to clarify the risk factors of subsequent metastasis.

METHODS

The patients with NAD-NETs ≤20 mm in diameter who had been treated at 12 institutions between 1992 and 2013 were enrolled. Clinical records were retrieved, and histopathological findings of all cases were centrally reviewed by 2 pathologists.

RESULTS

We studied 49 patients with a mean follow-up period of 66.5 months. Thirty-five patients were initially treated with endoscopic resection (ER), and 14 with surgery. A univariate analysis revealed the ORs and 95% CIs of the risk factors for metastasis were lymphovascular invasion (12.5 [2.01-77.9]), multiple tumors (9.75 [1.46-65.4]), a tumor size of 11-20 mm (6.67 [1.21-36.6]), and World Health Organization grade G2 (7.13 [1.16-43.9]). Five-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 86.1 and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to demonstrate the risk factors of metastasis in NAD-NETs ≤20 mm in diameter. These findings may be helpful for determining the appropriate therapeutic approach and the clinical strategy of treatment following ER.

Early Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Endoscopic Therapy and Surveillance

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN) of the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, appendix, or rectum that are ≤1 cm in size as well as well-differentiated with World Health Organization grade 1 (G1) can be considered 'early' neuroendocrine tumors; they have a very good prognosis. Regarding prognosis, neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G1 must be distinguished from well-differentiated NET G2 and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) G3. NET are increasing, with a rise in the age-adjusted incidence in the USA by about 700% in the last 40 years. Earlier diagnosis of NET is one of the main epidemiological changes of clinically detected NEN. The general availability of high-resolution endoscopy and advanced radiological imaging techniques has contributed to a shift in the discovery to smaller-sized (≤10 mm) gastrointestinal and pancreatic NET and earlier tumor stages at diagnosis. Thus, screening colonoscopy is effective in the early diagnosis not only of colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas but also of rectal NET. Endoscopic resection is the treatment of choice in NET G1 of the stomach, duodenum (despite gastrinoma), and rectum that are ≤10 mm in size, do not infiltrate the muscularis propria (T1), and do not show angioinvasion (V0, L0). Similarly, histologically proven, early pancreatic NET G1 (≤10 mm) may be managed conservatively by regular surveillance. In contrast, small (≤1 cm) NET G1 of the jejunum or ileum are not 'early' tumors and have to be resected surgically with lymph node dissection.

The role of pre-operative imaging and double balloon enteroscopy in the surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Is it necessary?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pre-operative localization of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) is important for operative planning. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of pre-operative imaging and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in identifying extent of disease.

METHODS

Database review identified 85 patients with primary SBNET between 2006 and 2013. Analysis included patients who underwent imaging, endoscopy, and surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

Average age was 60.7 years. Sixty-six (77.1%) patients had a primary NET in the ileum. Seventy-two patients (67.3%) underwent CT, 47 (46.7%) had MRI, 44 (46.7%) had somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI), and 41 (39.3%) underwent DBE. The sensitivity of each in identifying the NET was 59.7% for CT, 54% for MRI, 56% for SRI, and 88.1% for DBE. Eighteen (21.2%) patients had primary tumors not identified on imaging. Of these 18, 13 underwent DBE, and 12 of 13 (92.3%) DBEs identified the primary lesion. DBE was significantly better at identifying the primary NET than CT, MRI or SRI (P = 0.004, 0.007, and 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Most SBNETs are identified with a combination of imaging modalities. In those with unidentified primary tumors after imaging, DBE should be considered as it may provide valuable information as to the location of the primary tumor.

Smoking, alcohol and family history of cancer as risk factors for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Risk factors for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are not well understood. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify risk factors for SI-NET and to further assess these by meta-analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed and abstracts from the ENETS and NANETS were searched for studies published until May 2015. Eligible studies were selected according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Seven studies evaluating six individual populations were included (study accrual period 1980-2012) in the meta-analysis, involving 765 (range 17-325) cases and 502,282 (range 52-498,376) controls. All studies were case-control by design. The following risk factors were reported in ≥2 studies: family history of any cancer, family history of colorectal cancer, ever alcohol use and ever smoking. The pooled OR was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.60; p < .01; I² = 0.0%) for family history of any cancer, 1.43 (95% CI: 1.15-1.79; p < .01; I² = 0.0%) for family history of colorectal cancer, 1.04 (95% CI: 0.63-1.72; p = .87; I² = 65.0%) for ever alcohol use and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.06-1.86; p < .05; I² = 49.3%) for ever smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Family history of any cancer, family history of colorectal cancer and history of ever smoking were associated with an increased risk of SI-NET by meta-analysis. Alcohol consumption was not a significant risk factor for SI-NET. However, the studies reporting smoking and alcohol had a high degree of heterogeneity. Therefore, further studies are needed for clarification of smoking and alcohol as risk factors for the occurrence of SI-NET.

The slow progressive nature of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor: a case report of long-term observation over 14 years

The number of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors has recently increased, but their natural history has not been well characterized. Here we report the case of a 59-year-old female undergoing complete resection by endoscopic mucosal resection after monitoring endoscopic morphologic changes and the size increment of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor over the longest follow-up duration. An elevated lesion was initially detected on the duodenal bulb. Endoscopic biopsy from this lesion was performed three times during the follow-up, but all of the specimens simply demonstrated the presence of gastric metaplasia. Thereafter, in the esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed 14 years after the initial examination, a slight depression was detected in the center of the lesion together with an incremental change of its size. The histopathologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor was made by deeper tissue sampling, and the patient subsequently underwent endoscopic mucosal resection for this tumor and was finally diagnosed with a G1 duodenal neuroendocrine tumor with pT2 cN0, cM0, stage IIa in the TNM classification. This is the first case demonstrating the slowly progressive nature of such a tumor with the longest follow-up of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor ever reported, which could provide important information regarding the natural history and management of such tumors.

Gastrointestinal Involvement of Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma: CT Findings and Clinicopathologic Features

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the CT findings and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) involvement of recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records were reviewed for 15 patients with 19 pathologically proven GI tract metastases of RCC. The CT findings were analyzed to determine the involved sites and type of involvement; lesion size, morphology, and contrast enhancement pattern; and occurrence of lymphadenopathy, ascites and other complications.

RESULTS

The most common presentation was GI bleeding (66.7%). The average interval between nephrectomy and the detection of GI involvement was 30.4 ± 37.4 months. GI lesions were most commonly found in the ileum (36.8%) and duodenum (31.6%). A distant metastasis (80%) was more common than a direct invasion from metastatic lesions. The mean lesion size was 34.1 ± 15.0 mm. Intraluminal polypoid masses (63.2%) with hyperenhancement (78.9%) and heterogeneous enhancement (63.2%) were the most common findings. No patients had regional lymphadenopathy. Complications occurred in four patients, with one each of bowel obstruction, intussusception, bile duct dilatation, and pancreatic duct dilatation.

CONCLUSION

GI involvement of recurrent RCC could be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with heterogeneous, hyperenhanced intraluminal polypoid masses in the small bowel on CT scans along with a relative paucity of lymphadenopathy.

Surgical Treatment of NEN of Small Bowel: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the small intestine have been noticed more frequently over the past 35 years. They constitute about 25% of all NENs and 29% of all tumors of the small intestine. Due to the predominantly indolent nature and overall good prognosis, the benefit of surgical treatment is still debated.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, data of 83 surgically treated patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine, 48 males and 35 females with a median age of 62 years (range 25-86 years) were analyzed. Patient data were documented in the MaDoc database for neuroendocrine tumors of the University Medical Center of Mainz. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests, censoring patients at the time of last follow-up, were used to compare the overall survival depending on potential prognostic factors (stage, grade, surgical treatment).

RESULTS

At the time of diagnoses, the most common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (n = 31, 37.3%), bowel obstruction (n = 11, 13.3%), bowel perforation and peritonitis (n = 3, 3.6%), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 9, 10.8%), weight loss (n = 11, 13.3%), and carcinoid syndrome (n = 27, 32.5%). 65 patients (78.3%) had lymph node metastasis and in 58 patients (69.9%) distant metastasis were present. Segmental bowel resection (44) was the most common surgical procedure, followed by right hemi-colectomy (32) and explorative laparotomy (7). In most patients (78.9%), lymphadenectomy (systematic/selective) was performed. The 5-year survival of patients who underwent a systematic or a selective lymphadenectomy differed significantly (82.2 vs. 40.0%). The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88.2, 80.3, and 71.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Mesenteric lymph node metastases are almost invariably present and have significant impact on patients' prognosis. Systematic lymphadenectomy prevents complications and improves the survival. Early surgical treatment should be the goal in order to prevent complications.

Trends in incidence, treatment and survival of small bowel adenocarcinomas between 1999 and 2013: a population-based study in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

We conducted a population-based study to establish the incidence, treatment and overall survival over time of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with small bowel adenocarcinoma in the Netherlands between 1999 and 2013 were included (n = 1775). Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated per 100 000 person-years using the European standardized population rate. The influence of patient and tumor characteristics on the administration of chemotherapy was analyzed by means of a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was conducted to evaluate trends in treatment and survival and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival.

RESULTS

The incidence of small bowel adenocarcinomas increased, mainly due to an almost twofold increase of duodenal adenocarcinomas. Patients with locoregional duodenal tumors were less likely to undergo surgery (58%), towards 95% of the locoregional jejunal and ileal tumors (p < 0.0001). The use of chemotherapy doubled for adjuvant (7-15%) and palliative chemotherapy (19-37%). Median overall survival of patients with locoregional disease increased from 19 to 34 months (p = 0.0006), whereas median overall survival of patients with metastatic disease remained 4-5 months. Favorable prognostic factors for prolonged survival in locoregional disease, identified by multivariable survival analysis, included age <60 years, tumor stage I or II, diagnosis in 2009-2013, surgical treatment and chemotherapy. Favorable prognostic factors for prolonged survival in metastatic disease were age <50 years, jejunal tumors, surgical treatment and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Small bowel adenocarcinomas are rare tumors with an increasing incidence. The administration of adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy doubled, but median overall survival only increased for patients with locoregional disease. Given the rarity and dismal prognosis, it is important to develop international studies to determine the optimal treatment for these patients.

Early diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

The aim of the present retrospective analysis on the macroscopic appearance and pathological characteristics of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) was to investigate methods for their early diagnosis and treatment. A total of 78 patients were divided into submucosal NET and deeper invasion NET groups, according to the depth of tumor invasion exhibited by the patients. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival time of the NET patients were analyzed and compared. The pathological characteristics of the submucosal NETs group were investigated according to the diameter of the tumor (≤5.0 mm, 5.1-10.0 mm or >10.0 mm). The depth of invasion at diagnosis was observed to significantly correlate with histopathological classification, diameter of the tumor, macroscopic appearance, growth pattern, lymphatic-vascular involvement, lymph node (LN) metastasis and distant metastasis. In the submucosal NETs group, high-grade tumors with lymphatic or venule invasion and distant metastasis were associated with an increased risk of nodal metastases. In patients with minute tumors (≤5.0 mm), no lymphatic-vascular involvement, LN or distant metastasis was observed. By contrast, patients with tumors measuring 5.1-10.0 mm in diameter exhibited high lymphatic-vascular involvement and LN metastasis rates (46.2 and 30.8%, respectively). Survival time was significantly longer in patients with submucosal NETs compared with deeper invasion NETs and in patients with NET G1 and NET G2 compared with NEC. The results of the present study indicate that gastrointestinal submucosal NETs are closely associated with a slightly elevated macroscopic type, low-grade tumors and a small diameter. These features may contribute to early diagnosis of gastrointestinal NETs. Therefore, a tumor diameter of <5.0 mm, with slightly elevated macroscopic appearance may indicate an absolute requirement for endoscopic resection, while tumors measuring 5.1-10.0 mm in diameter must be considered carefully.

Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are rare neoplasms, like all NETs. However, the incidence of GI-NETS has been increasing in recent years. Gastric NETs (G-NETs) and duodenal NETs (D-NETs) are the common types of upper GI-NETs based on tumor location. G-NETs are classified into three distinct subgroups: type I, II, and III. Type I G-NETs, which are the most common subtype (70%-80% of all G-NETs), are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter pylori associated atrophic gastritis. Type II G-NETs (5%-6%) are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1-ZES). Both type I and II G-NETs are related to hypergastrinemia, are small in size, occur in multiple numbers, and are generally benign. In contrast, type III G-NETs (10%-15%) are not associated with hypergastrinemia, are large-sized single tumors, and are usually malignant. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are generally necessary for type III G-NETs, while endoscopic resection and follow-up, which are acceptable for the treatment of most type I and II G-NETs, are only acceptable for small and well differentiated type III G-NETs. D-NETs include gastrinomas (50%-60%), somatostatin-producing tumors (15%), nonfunctional serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (< 3%), and gangliocytic paragangliomas (< 2%). Most D-NETs are located in the first or second part of the duodenum, with 20% occurring in the periampullary region. Therapy for D-NETs is based on tumor size, location, histological grade, stage, and tumor type. While endoscopic resection may be considered for small nonfunctional D-NETs (G1) located in the higher papilla region, surgical resection is necessary for most other D-NETs. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment of D-NETs.

Update on medical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Small intestinal (SI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare tumors. Due to the lack of symptom or specific symptoms, SI-NETs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, making therapy challenging. The management of patients with advanced stage SI-NETS requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgical and medical treatment including novel targeted molecular therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes current strategies for the medical treatment of SI-NETS. Expert commentary: The treatment plan of advanced-stage SI-NETs should be tailored in a case-by-case manner with the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach that combines different treatment options, including biological targeted therapies. In particular, we believe that the identification of the optimal treatment sequence(s), correct treatment timing and the selection of patients eligible to different treatments need specific investigation in controlled clinical trials.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Tumor Biology Rather than Extent of Resection Dictates Prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with poorly defined management. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing resection of duodenal NETs.

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional database, 146 patients who underwent resection for duodenal NETs between 1993 and 2015 were identified. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Local surgical resection (LR) was performed in 57 (39.0 %) patients, while 50 (34.3 %) patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 39 (26.7 %) patients an endoscopic resection (ER). Factors associated with worse RFS included advanced tumor grade and metastasis at diagnosis (both P < 0.05) but not procedure type (P > 0.05). Among patients who had at least one lymph node examined (n = 85), 50 (58.8 %) had a metastatic lymph node; lymph node metastasis (P = 0.04) and advanced tumor grade (P = 0.04) were more common among patients with tumors >1.5 cm. Median length-of-stay was longer for PD versus LR (P < 0.001). PD patients were at increased risk for severe postoperative complications (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of duodenal NETs was dependent on tumor biology rather than procedure type. PD was associated with a longer hospital stay and higher risk of perioperative complications. For patients with tumors ≤1.5 cm, LR or ER may be appropriate with PD reserved for larger lesions and those not amenable to a more local approach.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor and the onset of severe diabetes mellitus in a US veteran

Objective:

Neuroendocrine tumors are neoplasms derived from endocrine cells, most commonly occurring in the gastrointestinal tract. Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors are rare tumors averaging 1.2–1.5 cm, and most are asymptomatic. Common presentation is abdominal pain, upper gastrointestinal bleed, constipation, anemia, and jaundice.

Methods:

An adult, Black, male patient with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department with elevated liver function test and fatigue.

Results:

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated a large obstructing mass (3.6 cm × 4.4 cm × 3 cm) within the second and third portions of the duodenum at the ampulla. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated an ulcerated duodenal mass that was biopsied. Immunohistochemical stains were positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin B, and CK7. Chromogranin A was in normal range. Post-Whipple procedure demonstrated a 5.5 cm × 4.1 cm × 2.9 cm duodenal mass with invasion of the subserosal tissue of the small intestine, a mitotic rate of 2 per high-power field, and antigen Ki-67 of 2%–5%.

Conclusion:

This case raises the question as to if the patient developed diabetes mellitus due to the tumor size and location or if the new onset of diabetes was coincidental. This case also demonstrates the importance of a proficient history and physical.

Syndromic versus non-syndromic sporadic gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum: comparison of pathological features and biological behavior

Sporadic gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum present either with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) or with unspecific symptoms. While syndromic gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumors often show metastases at the time of diagnosis, those without a syndrome do not. The aim of the study was to search for clinicopathological features that may distinguish the two categories of gastrin-producing duodenal tumors. In a retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical and pathological data in a series of 41 patients with syndromic (i.e., gastrinomas) or non-syndromic duodenal gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumors (ns-gas-NETs). Twenty-four (59 %) of the 41 patients had tumors that were associated with a ZES and were classified as gastrinomas. These tumors showed a higher Ki-67 index than that of the ns-gas-NETs (1.74 vs. 0.85 %, p = 0.012). In addition, they had more lymph node metastases (75 vs. 6 %, p < 0.001) and showed liver metastases and thus presented much more frequently in TNM stage ≥III (75 vs. 6 %; p < 0.001) than their non-syndromic counterparts. Gastrinomas were removed surgically, ns-gas-NETs endoscopically. We did not observe any significant differences in overall survival or recurrence of disease. Duodenal gastrinomas show no clear morphological features that distinguish them from their non-syndromic counterparts. However, the patients with gastrinomas present in a more advanced stage of disease and need surgical treatment, while non-syndromic gastrin-producing duodenal NETs may be cured by complete endoscopical removal.

Cushing syndrome secondary to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion from a Meckel diverticulum neuroendocrine tumor: case report

BACKGROUND

Ectopic production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by neuroendocrine tumours (NET) is a rare condition, occult presentations often hampering the diagnosis. Although NET are relatively frequent in the ileon and Meckel diverticulum, we describe the first Cushing's syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotropic syndrome (CS-EAS) arising from a Meckel diverticulum.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 44-year-old man was admitted with recent onset of diabetes, myopathy, edema and hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis consistent with Cushing's syndrome. Both basal and dynamic laboratory evaluation suggested CS-EAS. Laboratory testing also showed high serum levels of chromogranin A (CgA) and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). Pituitary and neck/thorax/abdomen/pelvis imaging proved to be normal, while somatostatin analogue ((99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC) scintigraphy revealed increased focalized ileum uptake on the right iliac fossa. Pre-operative ketoconazole and sandostatin treatment controlled the hypercortisolism within a month. Pathological analysis of the resected submucosal 1.8 cm tumour of the Meckel diverticulum and a metastatic local lymph node confirmed a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumour (grade I), whereas immunohistochemistry was positive for ACTH, chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Post-operative clinical and biochemical resolution of Cushing's syndrome was followed by normalization of both CgA and 5HIAA, which were maintained at the 6 month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The identification, characterization and follow-up of this rare cause of ectopic ACTH secretion is important in order to assess the long-term prognostic and management.