Effect of transplant center volume on post-transplant survival in patients listed for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation

Center volume effect on acute cellular rejection and outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is common after lung transplant (LTx). We sought to determine if transplant center volume affected ACR-related outcomes in children after LTx.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried for patients <18-years-of-age who underwent LTx 1987-2020. Cohorts were children who survived the first-year post transplant and were treated for ACR within that first year (ACR group) and those not treated for ACR (non-ACR). LTx center volume was defined as: high volume center (HVC) (>5LTxs/year), medium volume center (MVC) (>1≤5 LTxs/year), and low volume center (LVC) (≤1LTxs/year).

RESULTS

1320 patients were enrolled into the study; 269 (20.4%) did not experience ACR. The ACR cohort was older (median 14 [11-16] vs 13 [7-16] years, p < 0.001), female (65.3% vs 57.3%, p = 0.016), had cystic fibrosis (62.3% vs 45.5%, p < 0.001), and had a higher lung allocation score (37.3 [34.6-47.8] vs 35.8 [33-42.6], p = 0.029). The ACR cohort trended (p = 0.06) towards lower survival at 5-year (37% vs 47%) and 10-year (25% vs 34%) post-LTx. Among children at HVCs, ACR occurred in 17% of recipients (n = 98/574), compared to 18.5% (n = 73/395) at MVCs and 27% (n = 100/369) at LVCs. Children treated for ACR at HVCs had higher survival than LVCs at 5-years (52% vs 29%) and 10-years (36% vs 15%) (p < 0.001) but similar survival to MVCs at 5-years (52% vs 43%) and 10-years (36% vs 24%) (p = 0.081). No survival differences were detected in MVCs vs LVCs (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

ACR treated within the first post-LTx year influence survival of children. ACR incidence was lowest at higher volume centers whereas post-ACR treatment survival outcomes were also superior.

Living donor liver transplant outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: does a decrease in case volume impact the overall outcomes?

Background

High-volume centers (HVCs) are classically associated with better outcomes. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a decrease in the regular liver transplantation (LT) activity at our center. This study analyzed the effect of the decline in LT on posttransplant patient outcomes at our HVC.

Methods

We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent LT during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown (April 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020) with outcomes in the pre-pandemic calendar year (April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020).

Results

During the 6 months of pandemic lockdown, 60 patients underwent LT (43 adults and 17 children) while 228 patients underwent LT (178 adults and 50 children) during the pre-pandemic calendar year. Patients in the pandemic group had significantly higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (24.39±9.55 vs. 21.14±9.17, P=0.034), Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (11.46±2.32 vs. 10.25±2.24, P=0.03), and incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure (30.2% vs. 10.2%, P=0.002). Despite performing LT in sicker patients with COVID-19-related challenges, the 30-day (14% vs. 18.5%, P=0.479), 3-month (16.3% vs. 20.2%, P=0.557), and 6-month mortality rates (23.3% vs. 28.7%, P=0.477) were lower, but not statistically significant when compared to the pre-pandemic cohort.

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown the number of LT procedures performed at our HVC declined by half because prevailing conditions allowed LT in very sick patients only. Despite these changes, outcomes were not inferior during the pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic calendar year. Greater individualization of patient care contributed to non-inferior outcomes in these sick recipients.

Living donor hepatectomy in medium volume liver transplant centre has comparable outcomes to high volume centres: validation of donabedian quality assurance framework

BACKGROUND

Given the complexity of living donor hepatectomy, it is expected that high hospital volume will better outcomes. This study aims to evaluate post-operative outcomes for living donor hepatectomy in a medium volume liver transplant centre and compare to outcomes in high volume centres. Also, it serves as a validation tool for framework of structure-process-outcome model for safe living donor hepatectomy program.

METHODS

204 donors who underwent donor hepatectomy between June 1996 to September 2019 were reviewed retrospectively and compared to outcomes in high volume centres.

RESULTS

At 6 months, overall donor morbidity rate was 20/204 (9.8%). Wound complications were most common at 5/204 (2.5%). Majority of complications were either Clavien grade 1 or 2 and only 3 donors had Clavien grade 3 complications. There was zero donor mortality.

DISCUSSION

Our centre's donor morbidity rate of 9.8% is the one of the lowest reported in the published literature. With increased experience, stringent donor selection and enhanced perioperative care by a multi-disciplinary team, outcomes in a medium volume centre can match the outcomes reported in high volume centres. The framework for quality in terms of structure, process and outcomes is presented which can be adopted for developing programs.

Thirty-day readmission rates, trends and its impact on liver transplantation recipients: a national analysis

Reduction of early hospital readmissions is a declared goal in the United States economic and quality improvement agenda. A retrospective study was performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. Our primary aim was to study the rate of early readmissions and its predictors in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Our secondary aims were to determine the trends of LT, reasons for readmission, costs and predictors of calendar year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. The 30-day readmission rate was 30.6% among a total of 25,054 LTRs. Trends of LT were observed to be increased in patients > 65 years (11.7-17.8%, p < 0.001) and decreased in 40-64 years (78.0-73.5%, p = 0.001) during study period. The majority of 30-day readmissions were due to post transplant complications, with packed red blood cell transfusions being the most common intervention during readmission. Medicaid or Medicare insurance, surgery at low and medium volume centers, infections, hemodialysis, liver biopsy, and length of stay > 10 days were the predictors of 30-day readmission. Moreover, number of early readmission, age > 64 years, non-alcoholic cirrhosis, and length of stay > 10 days were significant predictor of calendar year mortality in LTRs. Approximately one third of patients require early admission after LT. Early readmission not only increases burden on healthcare, but is also associated with calendar year mortality. Strategies should be implemented to reduce readmission in patients with high risk of readmission identified in our study.