1
|
Valero-Martínez C, Castillo-Morales V, Gómez-León N, Hernández-Pérez I, Vicente-Rabaneda EF, Uriarte M, Castañeda S. Application of Nuclear Medicine Techniques in Musculoskeletal Infection: Current Trends and Future Prospects. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1058. [PMID: 38398371 PMCID: PMC10889833 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Nuclear medicine has become an indispensable discipline in the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal infections. Radionuclide tests serve as a valuable diagnostic tool for patients suspected of having osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, or prosthetic joint infections. The choice of the most suitable imaging modality depends on various factors, including the affected area, potential extra osseous involvement, or the impact of previous bone/joint conditions. This review provides an update on the use of conventional radionuclide imaging tests and recent advancements in fusion imaging scans for the differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections. Furthermore, it examines the role of radionuclide scans in monitoring treatment responses and explores current trends in their application. We anticipate that this update will be of significant interest to internists, rheumatologists, radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and other specialists involved in musculoskeletal pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Valero-Martínez
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (C.V.-M.); (E.F.V.-R.); (M.U.)
| | - Valentina Castillo-Morales
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (V.C.-M.); (I.H.-P.)
| | - Nieves Gómez-León
- Radiology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Isabel Hernández-Pérez
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (V.C.-M.); (I.H.-P.)
| | - Esther F. Vicente-Rabaneda
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (C.V.-M.); (E.F.V.-R.); (M.U.)
| | - Miren Uriarte
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (C.V.-M.); (E.F.V.-R.); (M.U.)
| | - Santos Castañeda
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (C.V.-M.); (E.F.V.-R.); (M.U.)
- Cathedra UAM-Roche, EPID-Future, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28006 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ceccarelli G, Perciballi B, Russo A, Martini P, Marchetti F, Capparuccia MR, Iaiani G, Fabris S, Ciccozzi M, Villani C, Venditti M, D'Ettorre G, De Meo D. Chronic Suppressive Antibiotic Treatment for Staphylococcal Bone and Joint Implant-Related Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12050937. [PMID: 37237840 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12050937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and fracture-related infection (FRI) are difficult-to-treat conditions in patients with severe comorbidity or significant surgical risk. In cases not eligible for standard strategy, debridement procedures with the retention of prosthesis or internal fixation device, combined with long-term antibiotic treatment and subsequent indefinite chronic oral antimicrobial suppression (COAS), can be the only reasonable choice. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of COAS and its follow-up in the management of these cases. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 16 patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months (mean age 75 yo, 9F, 7M, 11 PJI, 5 FRI). All microbiological isolates were tetracycline-susceptible staphylococci and for this reason a minocycline-based COAS was adopted after debridement and 3 months of antibiogram-guided antibiotic treatment. Patient monitoring was carried out on a clinical basis, with bimonthly execution of the inflammation indices and serial radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy (LS). The overall median time of COAS follow-up was 15 months (min 6-max 30). Moreover, 62.5% of patients were still taking COAS with no relapse after cure at the last evaluation available. Clinical failure with a relapse of the infection was observed in 37.5% of patients; interestingly, 50% of them had previously stopped COAS due to side effects of the antibiotic used. In the COAS follow-up, a combination of clinical, laboratory and LS evaluation seems to monitor the infection properly. COAS can be considered as an interesting approach in patients not suitable for standard treatments of PJI or FRI but it requires careful monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Ceccarelli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Public Health an Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Perciballi
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Musculoskeletal System Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Russo
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Paolo Martini
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Musculoskeletal System Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchetti
- Plastic Surgery Outpatient Clinic, Villa Mafalda Hospital, 00199 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Rivano Capparuccia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Iaiani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Fabris
- National Center for Control and Emergency Against Animal Diseases and Central Crisis Unit, Office III, Directorate General for Animal Health and Veterinary Drugs, Italian Ministry of Health, 00153 Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Ciccozzi
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Ciro Villani
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Musculoskeletal System Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Venditti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Public Health an Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella D'Ettorre
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Public Health an Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele De Meo
- M.I.T.O. (Infections in Traumatology and Orthopedics Surgery) Study Group, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Musculoskeletal System Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhamidipati T, Kumar M, Verma SS, Mohanty SK, Kacar S, Reese D, Martinez MM, Kamocka MM, Dunn KW, Sen CK, Singh K. Epigenetic basis of diabetic vasculopathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:989844. [PMID: 36568089 PMCID: PMC9780391 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.989844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) causes peripheral vascular disease because of which several blood-borne factors, including vital nutrients fail to reach the affected tissue. Tissue epigenome is sensitive to chronic hyperglycemia and is known to cause pathogenesis of micro- and macrovascular complications. These vascular complications of T2DM may perpetuate the onset of organ dysfunction. The burden of diabetes is primarily because of a wide range of complications of which nonhealing diabetic ulcers represent a major component. Thus, it is imperative that current research help recognize more effective methods for the diagnosis and management of early vascular injuries. This review addresses the significance of epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation and histone modifications in the evolution of macrovascular and microvascular complications of T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theja Bhamidipati
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Jefferson-Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Manishekhar Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Sumit S. Verma
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Sujit K. Mohanty
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Sedat Kacar
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Diamond Reese
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Michelle M. Martinez
- Division of Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Malgorzata M. Kamocka
- Division of Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Kenneth W. Dunn
- Division of Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Chandan K. Sen
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- *Correspondence: Kanhaiya Singh, ; Chandan K. Sen,
| | - Kanhaiya Singh
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- *Correspondence: Kanhaiya Singh, ; Chandan K. Sen,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lauri C, Capriotti G, Uccioli L, Signore A. Gamma-camera imaging of diabetic foot infections. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00165-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
5
|
Llewellyn A, Jones-Diette J, Kraft J, Holton C, Harden M, Simmonds M. Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-128. [PMID: 31670644 DOI: 10.3310/hta23610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone. Medical imaging tests, such as radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are often used to diagnose osteomyelitis. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater reliability and implementation of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception to July 2018. REVIEW METHODS Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 [quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (version 2)]. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using bivariate regression models. Imaging tests were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and nature of the suspected osteomyelitis. Studies of children, inter-rater reliability and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively. RESULTS Eighty-one studies were included (diagnostic accuracy: 77 studies; inter-rater reliability: 11 studies; implementation: one study; some studies were included in two reviews). One-quarter of diagnostic accuracy studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias. In adults, MRI had high diagnostic accuracy [95.6% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4% to 97.5%; 80.7% specificity, 95% CI 70.8% to 87.8%]. PET also had high accuracy (85.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.5% to 92.9%; 92.8% specificity, 95% CI 83.0% to 97.1%), as did SPECT (95.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 87.8% to 98.1%; 82.0% specificity, 95% CI 61.5% to 92.8%). There was similar diagnostic performance with MRI, PET and SPECT. Scintigraphy (83.6% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.8% to 91.1%; 70.6% specificity, 57.7% to 80.8%), computed tomography (69.7% sensitivity, 95% CI 40.1% to 88.7%; 90.2% specificity, 95% CI 57.6% to 98.4%) and radiography (70.4% sensitivity, 95% CI 61.6% to 77.8%; 81.5% specificity, 95% CI 69.6% to 89.5%) all had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime white blood cell scintigraphy (87.3% sensitivity, 95% CI 75.1% to 94.0%; 94.7% specificity, 95% CI 84.9% to 98.3%) had higher diagnostic accuracy, similar to that of PET or MRI. There was no evidence that diagnostic accuracy varied by scan location or cause of osteomyelitis, although data on many scan locations were limited. Diagnostic accuracy in diabetic foot patients was similar to the overall results. Only three studies in children were identified; results were too limited to draw any conclusions. Eleven studies evaluated inter-rater reliability. MRI had acceptable inter-rater reliability. We found only one study on test implementation and no evidence on patient preferences or cost-effectiveness of imaging tests for osteomyelitis. LIMITATIONS Most studies included < 50 participants and were poorly reported. There was limited evidence for children, ultrasonography and on clinical factors other than diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Osteomyelitis is reliably diagnosed by MRI, PET and SPECT. No clear reason to prefer one test over the other in terms of diagnostic accuracy was identified. The wider availability of MRI machines, and the fact that MRI does not expose patients to harmful ionising radiation, may mean that MRI is preferable in most cases. Diagnostic accuracy does not appear to vary with the potential cause of osteomyelitis or with the body part scanned. Considerable uncertainty remains over the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests in children. Studies of diagnostic accuracy in children, particularly using MRI and ultrasound, are needed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068511. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Llewellyn
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chou TH, Stacy MR. Clinical Applications for Radiotracer Imaging of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia. Mol Imaging Biol 2019; 22:245-255. [PMID: 31482412 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01425-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the non-coronary vessels that is characterized by lower extremity tissue ischemia, claudication, increased prevalence of lower extremity wounds and amputations, and impaired quality of life. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the severe stage of PAD and is associated with additional risk for wound formation, amputation, and premature death. Standard clinical tools utilized for assessing PAD and CLI primarily focus on anatomical evaluation of peripheral vascular lesions or hemodynamic assessment of the peripheral circulation. Evaluation of underlying pathophysiology has traditionally been achieved by radiotracer-based imaging, with many clinical investigations focusing on imaging of skeletal muscle perfusion and cases of foot infection/inflammation such as osteomyelitis and Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. As advancements in hybrid imaging systems and radiotracers continue to evolve, opportunities for molecular imaging of PAD and CLI are also emerging that may offer novel insight into associated complications such as peripheral atherosclerosis, alterations in skeletal muscle metabolism, and peripheral neuropathy. This review summarizes the pros and cons of radiotracer-based techniques that have been utilized in the clinical environment for evaluating lower extremity ischemia and common pathologies associated with PAD and CLI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Heng Chou
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 575 Children's Crossroad, WB4131, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA
| | - Mitchel R Stacy
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 575 Children's Crossroad, WB4131, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA. .,Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sconfienza LM, Signore A, Cassar-Pullicino V, Cataldo MA, Gheysens O, Borens O, Trampuz A, Wörtler K, Petrosillo N, Winkler H, Vanhoenacker FMHM, Jutte PC, Glaudemans AWJM. Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement). Eur Radiol 2019; 29:6425-6438. [PMID: 31250170 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06326-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Peripheral bone infection (PBI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are two different infectious conditions of the musculoskeletal system. They have in common to be quite challenging to be diagnosed and no clear diagnostic flowchart has been established. Thus, a conjoined initiative on these two topics has been initiated by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). The purpose of this work is to provide an overview on the two consensus documents on PBI and PJI that originated by the conjoined work of the ESR, EANM, and EBJIS (with ESCMID endorsement). METHODS AND RESULTS After literature search, a list of 18 statements for PBI and 25 statements for PJI were drafted in consensus on the most debated diagnostic challenges on these two topics, with emphasis on imaging. CONCLUSIONS Overall, white blood cell scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities for the diagnosis of PBI and PJI. However, the choice of which advanced diagnostic modality to use first depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience of imaging specialists, costs, and availability. Since robust, comparative studies among most tests do not exist, the proposed flowcharts are based not only on existing literature but also on the opinion of multiple experts involved on these topics. KEY POINTS • For peripheral bone infection and prosthetic joint infection, white blood cell and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities. • Two evidence- and expert-based diagnostic flowcharts involving variable combination of laboratory tests, biopsy methods, and radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities are proposed by a multi-society expert panel. • Clinical application of these flowcharts depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience, costs, and availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Victor Cassar-Pullicino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
| | - Maria Adriana Cataldo
- Infectious Disease Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Borens
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Septic surgical unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Wörtler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicola Petrosillo
- Infectious Disease Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Heinz Winkler
- Osteitis-Centre, Privatklinik Döbling, Vienna, Austria
| | - Filip M H M Vanhoenacker
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.,AZ Sint-Maarten, Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium.,University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glaudemans AWJM, Jutte PC, Cataldo MA, Cassar-Pullicino V, Gheysens O, Borens O, Trampuz A, Wörtler K, Petrosillo N, Winkler H, Signore A, Sconfienza LM. Consensus document for the diagnosis of peripheral bone infection in adults: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:957-970. [PMID: 30675635 PMCID: PMC6450853 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-4262-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction In adults with a suspicion of peripheral bone infection, evidence-based guidelines in choosing the most accurate diagnostic strategy are lacking. Aim and methods To provide an evidence-based, multidisciplinary consensus document on the diagnostic management of adult patients with PBIs, we performed a systematic review of relevant infectious, microbiological, orthopedic, radiological, and nuclear medicine literature. Delegates from four European societies (European Bone and Joint Infection Society, European Society of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, European Society or Radiology, and European Association of Nuclear Medicine) defined clinical questions to be addressed, thoroughly reviewed the literature pertinent to each of the questions, and thereby evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of each diagnostic technique. Inclusion of the papers per statement was based on a PICO (Population/problem – Intervention/indicator – Comparator – Outcome) question following the strategy reported by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. For each statement, the level of evidence was graded according to the 2011 review of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. All approved statements were addressed taking into consideration the available diagnostic procedures, patient acceptance, tolerability, complications, and costs in Europe. Finally, a commonly agreed-upon diagnostic flowchart was developed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-4262-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Adriana Cataldo
- Clinical and Research Department on of Infectious Diseases, "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS-Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Victor Cassar-Pullicino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Borens
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedicin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Wörtler
- 69 Division Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicola Petrosillo
- Clinical and Research Department on of Infectious Diseases, "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS-Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Heinz Winkler
- Osteitis-Centre, Privatklinik Döbling, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barsanti C, Lenzarini F, Kusmic C. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of non-invasive imaging in diabetes management. World J Diabetes 2015; 6:792-806. [PMID: 26131322 PMCID: PMC4478576 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Revised: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical imaging technologies are acquiring an increasing relevance to assist clinicians in diagnosis and to guide management and therapeutic treatment of patients, thanks to their non invasive and high resolution properties. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography are the most used imaging modalities to provide detailed morphological reconstructions of tissues and organs. In addition, the use of contrast dyes or radionuclide-labeled tracers permits to get functional and quantitative information about tissue physiology and metabolism in normal and disease state. In recent years, the development of multimodal and hydrid imaging techniques is coming to be the new frontier of medical imaging for the possibility to overcome limitations of single modalities and to obtain physiological and pathophysiological measurements within an accurate anatomical framework. Moreover, the employment of molecular probes, such as ligands or antibodies, allows a selective in vivo targeting of biomolecules involved in specific cellular processes, so expanding the potentialities of imaging techniques for clinical and research applications. This review is aimed to give a survey of characteristics of main diagnostic non-invasive imaging techniques. Current clinical appliances and future perspectives of imaging in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of diabetic complications affecting different organ systems will be particularly addressed.
Collapse
|