The effect of the excisional biopsy in the detection of the sentinel lymph node by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe in breast cancer

Validation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Technique Using Dual Tracer Technique in Post Lumpectomy Early Breast Cancer Patients

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for the evaluation of axilla in clinically node-negative early breast cancers. There is limited data on the role and efficacy of the same in the post lumpectomy scenario. This prospective interventional study was conducted over 1 year on 30 post lumpectomy pT1/2 cN0 patients. SLNB was performed by preoperative lymphoscintigram using technetium-labeled human serum albumin followed by intraoperative blue dye injection. Sentinel nodes were identified based on blue dye uptake and gamma probe and sent for intra operative frozen section. Completion axillary nodal dissection was performed in all cases. The primary end point was sentinel node identification rate and accuracy of nodal frozen section. Sentinel node identification rate was 86.7% (n = 26/30) for scintigraphy alone and 96.7% (n = 29/30) using combined method. Average sentinel nodal yield/patient was 3.6 (range 0-7). Maximum yield was seen for hot and blue nodes (1.86). Sensitivity (n = 9/9) and specificity (n = 19/19) of frozen section were 100% with a false negative rate of 0% (0/19). Demographic factors such as age, body mass index, laterality, quadrant, biology, grade, and pathological T stage had no impact on the identification rate. Sentinel lymph node using dual tracer has a high identification rate and a low false negative rate post lumpectomy. Age, body mass index, laterality, quadrant, grade, biology, and pathological T size had no impact on the identification rate.

Clinical study of combined application of indocyanine green and methylene blue for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of combined application of indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue (MB) for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 415 patients who underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection were enrolled. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed in 197 patients with ICG and MB combination method, while, the other 218 patients were detected by MB method alone. During surgery, all SLNs were harvested for pathological examination. Then the detection rate and false negative rate of SLNs were comparatively analyzed between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In the combined ICG and MB group, the detection rate of SLNs was 96.9%, significantly higher than that of MB group, which was 89.7% (P < .05). Similarly, in combined group, the average number of SLNs per patient was 3.0, much higher than that of MB group, which was 2.1 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in false negative rate between combined group and MB alone group, which was 7.3% and 10.5%, respectively (P = .791).

CONCLUSION

The combined application of ICG and MB for SLNB is much more effective than MB alone in detecting SLNs.

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection by 3D Freehand Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Early Stage Breast Cancer

We herein present our first experience obtained by 3D freehand single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (F-SPECT) guidance for sentinel lymph node detection (SLND) in two patients with early stage breast cancer. F-SPECT guidance was carried out using one-day protocol in one case and by the two-day protocol in the other one. SLND was performed successfully in both patients. Histopathologic evaluation showed that the excised nodes were tumor negative. Thus, patients underwent breast-conserving surgery alone.

[Selective biopsy of the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer and previous excisional biopsy: is there a change in the reliability of the technique according to time from surgery?]

AIM

To assess the influence of time on the reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with previous excisional biopsy (EB), analyzing both the sentinel lymph node detection and the lymph node recurrence rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with cT1/T2 N0 breast cancer and previous EB of the lesion underwent a lymphoscintigraphy after subdermal periareolar administration of radiocolloid, the day before SLNB. Patients were classified into two groups, one including 12 patients with up to 29 days elapsed between EB and SLNB (group A), and another with the remaining 24 in which time between both procedures was of 30 days or more (group B). Scintigraphic and surgical detection of the sentinel lymph node, histological status of the sentinel lymph node and of the axillary lymph node dissection, if performed, and lymphatic recurrences during follow-up, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph node visualization at the lymphoscintigraphy and surgical detection were 100% in both groups. Histologically, three patients showed macrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node, one from group A and two from group B. None of the patients, not even those with malignancy of the sentinel lymph node, relapsed after a medium follow-up of 49.5 months (24-75).

CONCLUSION

Time elapsed between EB and SLNB does not influence the reliability of this latter technique as long as a superficial injection of the radiopharmaceutical is performed, proving a very high detection rate of the sentinel lymph node without evidence of lymphatic relapse during follow-up.