Impact of fellowship training on one-year outcomes of robotic-assisted prostatectomy

A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Unplanned visits (UPV) - re-admissions and emergency room (ER) visits - are markers of healthcare system quality. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a commonly performed cancer procedure, where variation in UPV represents a gap in care for prostate cancer patients. Here, we systematically synthesize the rates, reasons, predictors, and interventions for UPV after RP to inform evidence-based quality improvement (QI) initiatives.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for studies from 2000-2020 using keywords: "re-admission," "emergency room/department," "unplanned visit," and "prostatectomy." Studies that focused on UPV following RP and that reported rates, reasons, predictors, or interventions, were included. Data was extracted via a standardized form. Meta-analysis was completed.

RESULTS

Sixty studies, with 406 107 RP patients, were eligible; 16 028 UPV events (approximately 5%) were analyzed from 317 050 RP patients. UPV rates after RP varied between studies (ER visit range 6-24%; re-admissions range 0-56%). The 30-day and 90-day ER visit rates were 12% and 14%, respectively; the 30-day and 90-day re-admission rates were 4% and 9%, respectively. A total of 55% of all re-admissions after RP are directly due to postoperative genitourinary (GU)-related complications, such as strictures, obstructions, fistula, bladder-related, incontinence, urine leak, renal problems, and other unspecified urinary complications. The next most common re-admission reasons were anastomosis-related, infection-related, cardiovascular/pulmonary events, and wound-related issues. Thirty-four percent of all ER visits after RP are directly due to urine-related issues, such as retention, urinoma, obstruction, leak, and catheter problems. The next most common ER visit reasons were abdominal/gastrointestinal issues, infection-related, venous thromboembolic events, and wound-related issues. Predictors for increased re-admission included: open RP, lymph node dissection, Charlson comorbidity index ≥2, low surgeon/hospital case volume, and socioeconomic determinants of health. Of the 10 interventions evaluated, a 3.4% average reduction in UPV rate was observed, highlighting an approximate two-fold decrease. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant benefit of interventions over controls, with odds ratio 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46-0.84). Interventions that used multidisciplinary, nurse-centered, programs, with patient self-care/empowerment were more beneficial than algorithmic patient care pathways and preoperative patient education.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty years of international, retrospective experience suggests UPV after RP are often related to GU complications and infection- or wound-related factors. QI interventions to reduce UPV should target these factors. While many re-admissions after RP appear to be unavoidable, ER visits have more opportunity for volume reduction by QI. The interventions evaluated herein have the potential to reduce UPV after RP.

Fellowship and Subspecialization in Urology: An Analysis of Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a urologic fellowship on physician case-volume and immediate patient outcomes, and to assess predictors of undergoing a robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy by a fellowship-trained (FT) urologist.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all robotic (ICD-9 17.4) partial nephrectomies (PN; ICD-9 55.4) reported in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems (SPARCS) database of New York State (NYS) from 2009 to 2014. Perioperative outcomes assessed included length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, 90-day readmission rates, and complication rates. Pearson chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables, and unpaired Student t tests were used to assess continuous variables.

RESULTS

FT urologists performed 2199 (56%) RAPN during the study period, and nonfellowship trained (NFT) urologists completed 1700 (44%) RAPN. FT urologists performed more RAPN in teaching hospitals than NFT urologists (23% vs 7%). The average surgical volume per year for a FT urologist conducting RAPN was 9.6 ± 2.2 cases/y. NFT urologists had an average surgical volume of 7.2 ± 1.5 cases/y (P = <.0001). No significant difference was found in length of stay, 30- or 90-day readmission rate, or complication rate between the groups. RAPN conducted at teaching hospitals were more likely to be conducted by FT urologists. Patients who were self-payers were less likely to have a RAPN by FT urologists.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences for RAPN perioperative outcomes between FT urologists and their NFT peers. FT urologists perform a higher case-volume of RAPN in NYS, and this trend is increasing.

Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review is to assess the impact of primary treatments with curative intention in patients with localized prostate cancer, measured with Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and to examine differences among modalities within treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for January 2005-March 2017 following PRISMA guidelines, including longitudinal studies measuring disease-specific PROs in localized prostate cancer patients with a follow-up from pre- to post-treatment (≥1 year). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The study is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42015019747.

RESULTS

Of 148 identified studies, 60 were included in the meta-analyses. At the 1st year, radical prostatectomy patients showed small urinary irritative-obstructive improvement (0.37SD 95%CI 0.30, 0.45), but large deterioration for sexual function and incontinence with high heterogeneity (I² = 77% and 93%). Moderate worsening in external radiotherapy patients for sexual function (-0.46SD 95%CI -0.55, -0.36), small urinary incontinence (-0.16SD 95%CI -0.23, -0.09) and bowel impairment (-0.31SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.23). Brachytherapy patients presented small deterioration in urinary incontinence (-0.29SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.19), irritative obstructive symptoms (-0.35SD 95%CI -0.47, -0.23), sexual function (-0.12SD 95%CI -0.24, -0.002), and bowel bother (-0.27SD 95%CI -0.42, -0.11). These patterns persisted up to the 5th year. High-intensity focused ultrasound and active surveillance only have results at 1st year, showing no statistically significant worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

No remarkable differences in PRO appeared between modalities within each treatment. Nowadays, available evidence supports brachytherapy as possible alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients seeking an attempted curative treatment limiting the risk for urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction.

Establishing a teaching unit in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: An Australian experience

Objective:

The aim of this project was to examine the role of surgical mentorship on the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) performed by two urologists inexperienced in the procedure.

Methods:

Forty-one (41) consecutive LRP cases were performed for clinically localised prostate cancer between December 2006 and June 2008 at a single centre. The surgical mentor approach was used with an experienced LRP surgeon being present for all cases that were performed by two urologists training in LRP. Data was retrospectively reviewed to assess morbidity and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing LRP by the team of trainees.

Results:

No LRP cases were converted to open and no major intraoperative complications were noted. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 493 ml (range 150–1000 ml) with the mean operative time being 220 minutes (range 100–315 minutes). The overall positive margin rate was only 12% (five out of 41 cases).

Conclusion:

LRP teaching units can be established with appropriate mentor supervision and can result in good oncological outcomes and minimal morbidity that compares favourably to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Impact of Resident Involvement on Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study examines perioperative outcomes of resident involvement during various steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

The RARP procedure was divided into seven steps: bladder takedown (BTD), endopelvic fascia, bladder neck (BN), seminal vesicle/vas deferens, pedicle/nerve sparing, apex, and anastomosis. Three hundred seventy-two RARPs performed by a single surgeon were analyzed. Resident console time during each of the seven steps was recorded. Perioperative variables were compared to surgeon-only cases.

RESULTS

Residents performed on the console for 232 of 372 cases (62.4%). Estimated blood loss (p = 0.09), transfusion (p = 0.11), and complications (p = 0.33) were no different between surgeon-only and resident-involved cases. Mean operating room time (ORT) was less for the surgeon-only cases (190.4 vs 206.4 minutes, p = 0.003). There was no difference in positive margins (p = 0.79), length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.30), catheter days (p = 0.17), readmission (p = 0.33), or reoperation (p = 0.73) when comparing surgeon-only to resident-involved cases. Residents performing the BN step had no effect on BN margins (p = 0.73) or prolonged catheterization (p = 0.62). ORT was significantly prolonged if BTD was performed by a resident (233.0 vs 191.7 minutes, p < 0.0001). Residents performing anastomosis had no effect on prolonged catheter time (p = 0.62) or LOS (p = 0.20). Residents were more likely to be involved in at least one portion of RARP following the purchase of a Mimic simulator (Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) in January 2012.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised resident console involvement in RARP does not affect perioperative outcomes, although, it prolongs ORT, with the BTD step having the most effect on ORT.

Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using a dual versus single-console system in a resident training program using intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative measures.

METHODS

Patients with PCa who underwent RALP prior to and after implementing a dual-console system at an academic institution were reviewed from 2006-2012. All surgeries were performed by a single-faculty surgeon well after the learning curve was established. In all cases, chief residents participated in the surgery and performed progressively more portions. Demographic, intraoperative and pathologic parameters were obtained. Continence and erectile function were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Predictors of outcomes on univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic or linear models.

RESULTS

Of 381 patients, 185 and 196 underwent single- or dual-console RALP, respectively. There was a significant decrease in mean operative time using the dual-console system (222 vs. 171 min, p < 0.0001) as well as in the incidence of intraoperative complications (8.65 vs. 1.53%, p < 0.0001) and postoperative complications (14.1 vs. 6.63%, p = 0.03.) Complications of Clavien grade ≥3a occurred more frequently with a single-console system (7 vs. 1%, p = 0.003.) Differences persisted when controlling for potential confounders by multivariate regression. Postoperative measures of continence, erectile function and the rate of biochemical recurrence were similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

When training resident surgeons to perform RALP, a dual-console system may improve intraoperative and perioperative outcomes. The dual-console may represent a safer, more efficient modality for robotic surgical education as compared to a single-console system.