1
|
Adenuga AT, Olakada F, Ojo C, Aniero J. Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Niger J Clin Pract 2024; 27:754-758. [PMID: 38943300 DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_802_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The creation of pneumoperitoneum using higher pressure is believed to be associated with increased postoperative abdominal pain. AIM This study aimed to compare postoperative abdominal pain following low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 54 patients aged between 18 and 56 years with clinical and/or radiologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 26) and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 28). The intra-abdominal pressure was kept in either low pressure (9 mm Hg) or standard pressure (13 mm Hg). Abdominal and shoulder pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at 6 hours and 3 days post procedure. Postoperative analgesia requirement, duration of surgery, complications, and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS Both groups match for the demographic parameters. Three patients required conversion from low to standard pressure. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of abdominal pain (P = 0.86) and shoulder pain (P = 0.33), duration of surgery (P = 0.51), complications (P = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.83). CONCLUSION The use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum did not reduce the incidence of abdominal pain in patients who had laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with acute appendicitis can be treated with either low or normal pressure pneumoperitoneum depending on the experience of the surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Adenuga
- Department of Surgery, Cedarcrest Hospitals, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - F Olakada
- Medical Student, College of Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - C Ojo
- Department of Surgery, Cedarcrest Hospitals, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - J Aniero
- Department of Surgery, Cedarcrest Hospitals, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rustia GM, Baracy MG, Khair E, Hagglund KH, Aslam MF. Pain With Differing Insufflation Pressures During Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:151-159. [PMID: 37348093 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether decreasing insufflation pressure reduces postoperative pain and opioid use in women undergoing robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. METHODS In a single-blinded randomized trial, women with pelvic organ prolapse underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy at either 12 mm Hg (experimental) or 15 mm Hg (standard) insufflation pressure. The primary outcome was pain rating on a visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 1 within 24 hours of surgery. Secondary outcomes included VAS pain rating at outpatient follow-up, inpatient and outpatient use of opioids, operative time, and estimated blood loss. A margin of 15 mm was considered clinically different on the VAS, and at 80% power, a sample size of at least 64 participants was needed to show significance. RESULTS From April 27, 2021, to May 17, 2022, 80 women were enrolled, with 41 in the experimental group and 39 in the standard group. All participants underwent surgery as planned and attended a 2-week postoperative follow-up. Participants in the experimental group had less pain on postoperative day 1 with median VAS of 17.0 mm (interquartile range 26.0) compared with 29.0 mm (interquartile range 32.0, P=.007) in the standard group. No differences were noted in the secondary outcomes of operative time, estimated blood loss, or length of stay. Participants in the experimental group were noted to use fewer opioids while an inpatient (P=.04) and outpatient (P=.02). In multivariable analyses, lower insufflation pressure and increasing age were negatively associated with postoperative VAS scores. CONCLUSION Lowering insufflation pressure (12 mm Hg) during robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy safely reduced postoperative pain and opioid use compared with standard pressure (15 mm Hg). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinialTrials.gov, NCT04858438.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella M Rustia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Department of Biomedical Investigations and Research, and the Division of FPMRS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, and Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuo TC, Chen KY, Lai CW, Wang YC, Lin MT, Chang CH, Wu MH. Synergic evacuation device helps smoke control during endoscopic thyroid surgery. Surgery 2023:S0039-6060(23)00187-3. [PMID: 37202307 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical plumes in small cavities, such as transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery, have never been satisfactorily resolved. We aimed to study the use of a smoke evacuation system and evaluate its efficacy, including the field of view and operating time. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively reviewed 327 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy. They were separated into 2 groups based on whether the smoke evacuation system was used. To reduce the possible experience bias, only patients 4 months before and after implementing the evacuation system were included. Recorded endoscopic videos were evaluated, including the field of view, the incidence of scope clearance, and time spent during air-pocket creation. RESULTS Overall, there were 64 patients with a median age of 43.59 years and a median body mass index of 22.87 kg/m2, including 54 women, 21 thyroid cancers, and 61 hemithyroidectomies. The operative duration was comparable between the groups. The group where the evacuation system was used scored more as good in terms of endoscopic views (8/32, 25% vs 1/32, 3.13%, P = .01), fewer incidences of endoscope lens pull out for clearance (3.5 vs 6.0 times, P < .01), less time for clear view after energy device activation (2.67 vs 5.00 seconds, P < .01), and less time spent (8.67 vs 12.38 minutes, P < .01) during air-pocket creation. CONCLUSION In conjunction with the synergy function of energy devices, evacuators enhance the field of view and optimize the time spent in the real clinical setting of low-pressure and small-space endoscopic thyroid procedures, in addition to the benefit of reducing smoke harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Chun Kuo
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Traumatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. https://twitter.com/tinakuo1204
| | - Kuen-Yuan Chen
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Wen Lai
- Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Tsan Lin
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Hao Chang
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital & National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsun Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith RB, Biller E, Hu C, Mahnert ND, Womack AS, Galhotra S, Mourad J. Impact of pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 280:73-77. [PMID: 36434823 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive hysterectomy is a commonly performed gynecologic procedure with associated postoperative pain managed with opioid medications. Uncontrolled postoperative pain leads to increased opioid use/abuse, longer hospital stays, increase in healthcare visits, and may negatively affect patient satisfaction. Current data suggests that reduced pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure during laparoscopic surgery may impact postoperative pain. Given the current opioid epidemic, surgeons are proactively finding ways to reduce postoperative pain. It is unclear how reduced pneumoperitoneum pressure impacts the surgeon. We investigated the impact of reduced pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure on surgeon satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN This was a pilot, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial from March 2020 to July 2021 comparing pneumoperitoneum pressure of 15 mmHg to reduced pressures of 12 mmHg and 10 mmHg during laparoscopic hysterectomy. RESULTS A total of 40 patients were randomized (13 - 15 mmHg, 13 - 12 mmHg, and 14 - 10 mmHg). The primary outcome was surgeon satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, opioid usage, and discharge timing. There were no differences in baseline demographics or perioperative characteristics. Surgeon satisfaction was negatively impacted with lower pneumoperitoneum pressures greatest with 10 mmHg, including overall satisfaction (p =.01), overall effect of the pneumoperitoneum (p =.04), and quality of visualization (p =.01). There was an apparent although not statistically significant difference in operative time (p =.06) and blood loss (p =.054). There was no difference in patient satisfaction, postoperative pain scores, opioid usage, or time to discharge. CONCLUSION(S) Reduced pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy negatively impacted surgeon satisfaction with a trend towards longer operative times and greater blood loss, and did not positively impact patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, opioid demand, or discharge timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael B Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.
| | - Emily Biller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Chengcheng Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Nichole D Mahnert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Ashley S Womack
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Sheena Galhotra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Jamal Mourad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix, 1111 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Madhok B, Nanayakkara K, Mahawar K. Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:1-16. [PMID: 35116095 PMCID: PMC8788169 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over open surgery. At the same time, it is not without its risks. In this review, we discuss steps that could enhance the safety of laparoscopic surgery. Some of the important safety considerations are ruling out pregnancy in women of the childbearing age group; advanced discussion with the patient regarding unexpected intraoperative situations, and ensuring appropriate equipment is available. Important perioperative safety considerations include thromboprophylaxis; antibiotic prophylaxis; patient allergies; proper positioning of the patient, stack, and monitor(s); patient appropriate pneumoperitoneum; ergonomic port placement; use of lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure; use of additional five-millimetre (mm) ports as needed; safe use of energy devices and laparoscopic staplers; low threshold for a second opinion; backing out if unsafe to proceed; avoiding hand-over in the middle of the procedure; ensuring all planned procedures have been performed; inclusion of laparoscopic retrieval bags and specimens in the operating count; avoiding 10-15 mm ports for placement of drains; appropriate port closures; and use of long-acting local anaesthetic agents for analgesia. Important postoperative considerations include adequate analgesia; early ambulation; careful attention to early warning scores; and appropriate discharge advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brij Madhok
- Upper GI Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
| | - Kushan Nanayakkara
- Upper GI Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Department of General Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koo CH, Park I, Ahn S, Lee S, Ryu JH. Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Intraoperative Respiratory Mechanics and Surgical Space Conditions during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215090. [PMID: 34768608 PMCID: PMC8584864 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) may affect intraoperative respiratory mechanics, surgical condition, and recovery profiles in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients were randomly assigned to the moderate or deep NMB groups. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation at 15 mmHg during surgery. The primary outcome was peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) after CO2 insufflation. Mean airway pressure (Pmean) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were also recorded. The surgeon rated the surgical condition and surgical difficulty on a five-point scale (1 = extremely poor; 2 = poor; 3 = acceptable; 4 = good; 5 = optimal). Recovery profiles, such as pulmonary complications, pain scores, and recovery time, were recorded. We included 58 patients in this study. No significant differences were observed regarding intraoperative respiratory mechanics including PIP, Pmean and Cdyn, between the two groups. The number of patients with optimal surgical conditions was significantly higher in the deep than in the moderate NMB group (29 vs. 20, p = 0.014). We found no differences in recovery profiles. In conclusion, deep NMB had no significant effect on the intraoperative respiratory mechanics but resulted in optimal endoscopic surgical conditions during RARP compared with moderate NMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hoon Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (C.-H.K.); (I.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Insun Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (C.-H.K.); (I.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Sungmin Ahn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (C.-H.K.); (I.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea
- Correspondence: (S.L.); (J.-H.R.); Tel.: +82-31-787-7345 (S.L.); +82-31-787-7497 (J.-H.R.)
| | - Jung-Hee Ryu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (C.-H.K.); (I.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
- Correspondence: (S.L.); (J.-H.R.); Tel.: +82-31-787-7345 (S.L.); +82-31-787-7497 (J.-H.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hamer J, Jones E, Chan A, Tahmasebi F. Can We Routinely Employ the Use of Low-Pressure Gynaecological Laparoscopy? A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e15348. [PMID: 34235025 PMCID: PMC8244579 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinicians have learnt valuable lessons throughout the COV-SARS-2 pandemic, many of which have produced solutions that we aim to continue to implement within the foreseeable future. Optimising patients’ surgical pathways to reduce the length of stay and complications is an area of particular importance, both for maximal utilisation of available resources and for reduction of the exposure of inpatient and elective patients to an increased risk of infection within healthcare facilities. The aim of this review was to investigate the possible implications of using low-pressure laparoscopic gynaecological surgery versus standard- or high-pressure pneumoperitoneum surgeries. The primary outcome was postoperative pain, with secondary outcomes including duration of surgery, length of inpatient stay and rate of complications. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 2020. We searched for published randomised control trials comparing low-pressure laparoscopic surgery (≤8 mmHg) to at least one additional standardised pneumoperitoneum pressure (≥12 mmHg and/or ≥15 mmHg). A total of 203 studies were reviewed, five of which were included in this analysis. Studies comparing low-pressure laparoscopic surgery against gasless abdominal cavities were excluded. The meta-analysis of the results was pooled and calculated within RevMan 5.0 software (Cochrane, London, England). Studies using a visual analogue scale (1-10) to compare low versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressures did not display a significant diminution of postoperative pain at ≤ 6 or 24 hours: -0.30 [95% CI -0.63, 0.03] and -0.66 [95% CI -1.35, 0.02], respectively. Studies additionally demonstrated worse visualisation of the surgical field within the low-pressure group (risk ratio 10.31; 95% CI, 1.29-82.38 I2 = 0%). Studies measuring postoperative pain using a numerical rating scale displayed significant pain reduction at all hours measured (p ≤ 0.01). The rate of intraoperative complications was 1% for all groups measured. Cumulative analysis of the duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.99). The pandemic has revealed new issues that must be addressed by clinicians to promote the safety of patients and the efficiency of inpatient stay. This review has paved the way for new possibilities and innovative approaches to address the issue of optimising patient surgical pathways; however, at present, we cannot give a firm justification for the use of low-pressure gynaecological laparoscopy. Reasons for this include the minimal reduction in pain scores between low, standard and high pneumoperitoneum pressures, leading to a mixture of statistically significant results, as well as a reduction in the visualisation of the surgical field and the small population sizes in the reviewed papers. Additional research is required to further explore the potential clinical benefits of gynaecological laparoscopy to ensure its effective ambulatory use within mainstream surgical operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Hamer
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Russells Hall Hospital, The Dudley Group National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Dudley, GBR
| | - Edward Jones
- Anaesthesiology, Russells Hall Hospital, The Dudley Group National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Dudley, GBR
| | - Amy Chan
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Russells Hall Hospital, The Dudley Group National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Dudley, GBR
| | - Farshad Tahmasebi
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Russells Hall Hospital, The Dudley Group National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Dudley, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim JE, Min SK, Ha E, Lee D, Kim JY, Kwak HJ. Effects of deep neuromuscular block with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on respiratory mechanics and biotrauma in a steep Trendelenburg position. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1935. [PMID: 33479442 PMCID: PMC7820615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81582-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We hypothesized that deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (PP) would improve respiratory mechanics and reduce biotrauma compared to moderate NMB with high-pressure PP in a steep Trendelenburg position. Seventy-four women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Moderate NMB group was maintained with a train of four count of 1–2 and PP at 12 mmHg. Deep NMB group was maintained with a post-tetanic count of 1–2 and PP at 8 mmHg. Inflammatory cytokines were measured at baseline, at the end of PP, and 24 h after surgery. Interleukin-6 increased significantly from baseline at the end of PP and 24 h after the surgery in moderate NMB group but not in deep NMB group (Pgroup*time = 0.036). The peak inspiratory, driving, and mean airway pressures were significantly higher in moderate NMB group than in deep NMB group at 15 min and 60 min after PP (Pgroup*time = 0.002, 0.003, and 0.048, respectively). In conclusion, deep NMB with low-pressure PP significantly suppressed the increase in interleukin-6 developed after PP, by significantly improving the respiratory mechanics compared to moderate NMB with high-pressure PP during robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Kee Min
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunji Ha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongchul Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 774, Namdong-daero, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Yeop Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hyun Jeong Kwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 774, Namdong-daero, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Balayssac D, Selvy M, Martelin A, Giroudon C, Cabelguenne D, Armoiry X. Clinical and Organizational Impact of the AIRSEAL ® Insufflation System During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020; 45:705-718. [PMID: 33258023 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05869-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Several low-impact laparoscopic strategies have been developed to improve the safety of pneumoperitoneum. We conducted a systematic review to establish the current evidence base for the use of the AIRSEAL® insufflation device for low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. We searched the literature using several electronic databases, for studies with comparative design published in the English language from January 2010 to April 2020. The population of interest included patients with any type of health condition who underwent laparoscopic surgery using the AIRSEAL® insufflation system or a standard CO2 insufflator. Ten studies (four randomized clinical trials/six non-randomized clinical trials), that enrolled 1394 participants in total who underwent urology, gynaecology or abdominal surgeries, were included. Total complication rates were similar between groups. Only three studies evaluated the impact of the insufflation system on post-operative pain, and showed inconsistent benefit of AIRSEAL® (significant decrease in pain in two studies, no difference in one). The same was observed in the two sole studies in which pain killers consumption was measured (significant decrease in morphine consumption 24 h after surgery in one study, no difference in the other). Operative duration was significantly shorter with AIRSEAL® in three studies. For both post-operative room and total length of stay, there was no difference between groups. No studies reported economic outcomes. Current literature supports the feasibility of the AIRSEAL® system during laparoscopic surgery but more studies are required to establish the added clinical benefit and to explore the preferences of physicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Balayssac
- INSERM, U1107, NEURO-DOL, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. .,Délégation à la Recheche Clinique et à l'Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Marie Selvy
- INSERM, U1107, NEURO-DOL, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Martelin
- Service Pharmacie, Unité des dispositifs médicaux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69000, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Giroudon
- Service de Documentation Centrale, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69000, Lyon, France
| | - Delphine Cabelguenne
- Service Pharmacie, Unité des dispositifs médicaux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69000, Lyon, France
| | - Xavier Armoiry
- Délégation à la Recheche Clinique et à l'Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Faculté de Pharmacie (ISPB), UMR CNRS 5510 MATEIS, Université de Lyon, 69000, Lyon, France.,Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, Park AJ, Ricci S, Rosenfield R, Scheib S, Weston E. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:179-203. [PMID: 32827721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Stone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston).
| | - Erin Carey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Dr. Carey)
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston)
| | - Jocelyn Fitzgerald
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr. Fitzgerald)
| | - Lee Hammons
- Allegheny Women's Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr. Hammons)
| | - Alysha Nensi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr. Nensi)
| | - Amy J Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs. Park and Ricci)
| | - Stephanie Ricci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs. Park and Ricci)
| | | | - Stacey Scheib
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana (Dr. Scheib)
| | - Erica Weston
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foley CE, Ryan E, Huang JQ. Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:299-307. [PMID: 32572753 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01104-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of decreasing insufflation pressure during robotic gynecologic surgery. The primary outcomes were patient-reported postoperative pain scores and length of stay. Secondary outcomes include surgical time, blood loss, and intraoperative respiratory parameters. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing robotic surgery for benign gynecologic conditions by a single minimally invasive surgeon at an academic hospital between 2014 and 2017. Patients were categorized by the maximum insufflation pressure reached during the surgery as either 15, 12, 10, or 8 mmHg. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance and χ2 test was used for categorical variables. 598 patients were included in this study with no differences in age, BMI, race, prior abdominal surgeries, or specimen weight between the four cohorts. When comparing cohorts, each decrease in insufflation pressure correlated with a significant decrease in initial pain scores (5.9 vs 5.4 vs 4.4 vs. 3.8, p ≤ 0.001), and hospital length of stay (449 vs 467 vs 351 vs. 317 min, p ≤ 0.001). There were no differences in duration of surgery (p = 0.31) or blood loss (p = 0.09). Lower operating pressures were correlated with significantly lower peak inspiratory pressures (p < 0.001) and tidal volumes (p < 0.001). Surgery performed at lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum (≤ 10 mmHg) is associated with lower postoperative pain scores, shorter length of stay, and improved intraoperative respiratory parameters without increased duration of surgery or blood loss. Operating at lower insufflation pressures is a low-cost, reversible intervention that should be implemented during robotic surgery as it results in the improved pain scores and shorter hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Foley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Suite 2300, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Erika Ryan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jian Qun Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wei Y, Li J, Sun F, Zhang D, Li M, Zuo Y. Low intra-abdominal pressure and deep neuromuscular blockade laparoscopic surgery and surgical space conditions: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19323. [PMID: 32118762 PMCID: PMC7478474 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) are frequently used in laparoscopic abdominal surgery to improve surgical space conditions and decrease postoperative pain. The evidence supporting operations using low IAP and deep NMB is open to debate. METHODS The feasibility of the routine use of low IAP +deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery was examined. A meta-analysis is conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the influence of low IAP + deep NMB vs. low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP +deep NMB, and standard IAP + moderate NMB during laparoscopic procedures on surgical space conditions, the duration of surgery and postoperative pain. RCTs were identified using the Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from initiation to June 2019. Our search identified 9 eligible studies on the use of low IAP + deep NMB and surgical space conditions. RESULTS Low IAP + deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery did not improve the surgical space conditions when compared with the use of moderate NMB, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.55-0.37). Subgroup analyses showed improved surgical space conditions with the use of low IAP + deep NMB compared with low IAP + moderate NMB, (MD = 0.63 [95% CI:0.06-1.19]), and slightly worse conditions compared with the use of standard IAP + deep NMB and standard IAP + moderate NMB, with MDs of -1.13(95% CI:-1.47 to 0.79) and -0.87(95% CI:-1.30 to 0.43), respectively. The duration of surgery did not improve with low IAP + deep NMB, (MD = 1.72 [95% CI: -1.69 to 5.14]), and no significant reduction in early postoperative pain was found in the deep-NMB group (MD = -0.14 [95% CI: -0.51 to 0.23]). CONCLUSION Low IAP +deep NMB is not significantly more effective than other IAP +NMB combinations for optimizing surgical space conditions, duration of surgery, or postoperative pain in this meta-analysis. Whether the use of low IAP + deep NMB results in fewer intraoperative complications, enhanced quality of recovery or both after laparoscopic surgery should be studied in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyong Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan
- The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu
| | - Jia Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan
- The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu
| | - Fude Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Penglai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Penglai, Shandong, China
| | - Donghang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan
- The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan
- The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu
| | - Yunxia Zuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan
- The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sao CH, Chan-Tiopianco M, Chung KC, Chen YJ, Horng HC, Lee WL, Wang PH. Pain after laparoscopic surgery: Focus on shoulder-tip pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 2019; 82:819-826. [PMID: 31517775 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy, one of minimally invasive procedures, is a commonly used procedure in diagnosis and management of various kinds of clinical problems, including gynecologic organ-related diseases. Compared with conventional exploratory laparotomy, the benefits of laparoscopic surgery include reduction of surgical wound, decreasing in postoperative pain, shortening hospital stay, rapid recovery, and a better cosmetic result. However, there are still up to 80% of patients after laparoscopic surgery complaining of high levels of pain and needing pain relief. Postlaparoscopic pain can be separated into distinct causes, such as surgical trauma- or incision wound-associated inflammatory change, and pneumoperitoneum (carbon dioxide [CO2])-related morphological and biochemical changes of peritoneum and diaphragm. The latter is secondary to irritation, stretching, and foreign body stimulation, leading to phrenic neuropraxia and subsequent shoulder-tip pain (STP). STP is the most typical unpleasant experience of patients after laparoscopic surgery. There are at least 11 strategies available to attempt to decrease postlaparoscopic STP, including (1) the use of an alternative insufflating gas in place of CO2, (2) the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in place of standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, (3) the use of warmed or warmed and humidified CO2, (4) gasless laparoscopy, (5) subdiaphragmatic intraperitoneal anesthesia, (6) local intraperitoneal anesthesia, (7) actively expelling out of gas, (8) intraperitoneal drainage, (9) fluid instillation, (10) pulmonary recruitment maneuvers, and (11) others and combination. The present article is limited in discussing postlaparoscopic STP. We extensively review published articles to provide a better strategy to reduce postlaparoscopic STP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hsuan Sao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | | | - Kai-Cheng Chung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Huann-Cheng Horng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Ling Lee
- Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Peng-Hui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Neuromuscular blockade (TOF count = 0) can improve tracheal intubation and microlaryngeal surgery. It is also frequently used in many surgical fields including both nonlaparoscopic and laparoscopic surgery to improve surgical conditions and to prevent sudden muscle contractions. Currently there is a controversy regarding the need and the clinical benefits of deep neuromuscular blockade for different surgical procedures. Deep neuromuscular relaxation improves laparoscopic surgical space conditions only marginally when using low intra-abdominal pressure. There is no outcome-relevant advantage of low compared to higher intra-abdominal pressures, but worsen the surgical conditions. Postoperative, residual curarisation can be avoided by algorithm-based pharmacological reversing and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Unterbuchner
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93051, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| | - M Blobner
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Radosa JC, Radosa MP, Schweitzer PA, Radosa CG, Stotz L, Hamza A, Takacs Z, Lepper PM, Wagenpfeil S, Linxweiler M, Morinello E, Solomayer EF. Impact of different intraoperative CO 2 pressure levels (8 and 15 mmHg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy performed due to benign uterine pathologies on postoperative pain and arterial pCO 2 : a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. BJOG 2019; 126:1276-1285. [PMID: 31136069 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of two different intraoperative CO2 pressures (8 and 15 mmHg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies in terms of postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain, laparoscopy-mediated vegetative alterations, pain medication requirement, arterial CO2 pressure (pCO2 ), surgical parameters, and safety. DESIGN Prospective randomised controlled study. SETTING German university hospital. POPULATION Female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies. METHODS Patients were randomised to a standard pressure (SP; 15 mmHg, control) or low-pressure (LP; 8 mmHg, experimental) group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain intensities, measured via numeric rating scale (NRS) and vegetative parameters (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, bloating) at 3, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain medication requirement (mg) and arterial pCO2 (mmHg). Surgical parameters and intra- and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS In total, 178 patients were included. Patients in the LP group (n = 91) showed significantly lower postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain scores, fewer vegetative alterations, lower pain medication requirements, a shorter postoperative hospitalization, and lower intra- and postoperative arterial pCO2 values compared with the SP group (n = 87; P ≤ 0.01). No differences in intra- and postoperative complications were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for the reduction of postoperative pain and laparoscopy-induced metabolic and vegetative alterations following laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for reduction of pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Radosa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - M P Radosa
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P A Schweitzer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - C G Radosa
- Department of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - L Stotz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - A Hamza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Z Takacs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - P M Lepper
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - S Wagenpfeil
- Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology& Medical Informatics, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - M Linxweiler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - E Morinello
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - E-F Solomayer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comparativa entre 2 técnicas de insuflación laparoscópica cerrada con aguja de Veress. Estudio prospectivo multicéntrico de 300 casos. CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gine.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
17
|
López-Torres López J, Piedracoba Cadahía D, Alcántara Noalles MJ, Simó Cortés T, Argente Navarro P. Perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative pain and/or nausea and vomiting in ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 66:189-198. [PMID: 30665796 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Both postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting are major factors that determine the time and quality of recovery in laparoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the perioperative factors that contribute to the appearance of postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in outpatient laparoscopic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective study was conducted on a cohort of 297 patients undergoing laparoscopic ambulatory surgery. A record was made of preoperative factors (usual medication, anaesthetic risk, etc.), intraoperative (surgical and anaesthetic times, drugs, CO2 pressure, etc.), and postoperative factors (major and minor complications, recovery times, etc.). As dependent variables, the postoperative symptoms considered were, nausea, vomiting, and/or postoperative pain. RESULTS Considering as a combined variable the occurrence of níusea, vomiting or moderate/severe pain (4 or more points on a visual analogue scale), one or more of these symptoms occurred in 58.7% of the patients (95% CI: 52.8-64.4). Using a logistic regression, the variables associated with the appearance of symptoms were: female gender (OR: 3.4), waiting time over 45minutes prior to surgery (OR: 4.9) and no anti-emetic prophylaxis (OR: 12.2). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery, one in 4had postoperative nausea and vomiting, and approximately half of moderate-intensity pain before discharge. Considering the overall the occurrence of pain and/or postoperative níusea and vomiting, these symptoms affect more than half of the patients being operated on, and are more frequent in women and in those who have to wait to access the operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J López-Torres López
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
| | | | | | - T Simó Cortés
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - P Argente Navarro
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bruintjes MH, Albers KI, Gurusamy KS, Rovers MM, van Laarhoven CJHM, Warle MC. Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Moira H Bruintjes
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Department of Surgery; Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 Nijmegen Netherlands 6525 GA
| | - Kim I Albers
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Department of Anesthesiology; Nijmegen Netherlands
| | - Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- University College London; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital Rowland Hill Street London UK NW3 2PF
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Department of Operating Rooms; Hp 630, route 631 PO Box 9101 Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
| | - Cornelis JHM van Laarhoven
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Department of Surgery; PO Box 9101 internal code 618 Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
| | - Michiel C Warle
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; Department of Surgery; Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 Nijmegen Netherlands 6525 GA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
De Robertis E, Caprino Miceli A, Colombo GL, Corcione A, Leykin Y, Scudeller L, Vizza E, Scollo P. Effects of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery on Postoperative Pain and Surgical Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7:e131. [PMID: 29986847 PMCID: PMC6056743 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain, especially shoulder pain, is commonly reported after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Some studies suggest that a lower insufflation pressure may reduce the risk of postoperative pain; however, there is no agreement on the optimal pneumoperitoneum pressure during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery or whether lower pressure would lead to clinically significant improvements without increasing operative complications. Questions remain regarding the clinical significance of improvements, safety, and cost-effectiveness of deep neuromuscular blockade with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Objective The primary objective of this study was to assess the superiority of anesthesia with deep neuromuscular blockade with pneumoperitoneum 8 mm Hg over moderate blockade with pneumoperitoneum 12 mm Hg in terms of overall pain 24 hours after surgery in adult women undergoing pelvic surgery for hysterectomy or benign adnexal diseases. Effects on the intensity and timing of postoperative pain in specific locations, surgeon satisfaction, respiratory and hemodynamic stability, operating times, and direct and indirect costs will be assessed. Methods In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a superiority design, 300 patients will be randomly allocated in the ratio 1:1 to moderate neuromuscular blockade with a target insufflation pressure of 12 mm Hg or deep neuromuscular blockade with a target insufflation pressure of 8 mm Hg, with stratification by type of surgery and clinical center. The patient, the statistician, and the nurse who will assess the primary endpoint will be blinded to the allocation. Results Recruitment to this trial is expected to open in June 2018 and is expected to close in June 2019. Conclusions This study is designed to confirm the reported benefits of postoperative pain and provide additional data needed to address questions regarding the effects of this intervention on operating theater management and direct and indirect costs. Strengths of this protocol include the large sample size distributed among diverse institutions across the Italian territory and the collection and analysis of data on numerous secondary objectives. Limitations include the possible introduction of bias because the surgeon and anesthesiologist are not blinded to the intervention. Registered Report Identifier RR1-10.2196/9277
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo De Robertis
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio L Colombo
- Department of Drug Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pavia, Italy, Milan, Italy.,Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Corcione
- Thoracic Surgery, AORN dei Colli Vincenzo Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Yigal Leykin
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda per l'Assistenza Sanitaria n. 5 - Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Luigia Scudeller
- Scientific Direction, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology, Regina Elena Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Scollo
- Maternity and Early Childhood Department, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Unterbuchner C. Is Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation Beneficial in Laparoscopic, Abdominal Surgery? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2018; 46:81-85. [PMID: 29744240 PMCID: PMC5937468 DOI: 10.5152/tjar.2018.090418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Unterbuchner
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wong M, Morris S, Wang K, Simpson K. Managing Postoperative Pain After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 25:1165-1178. [PMID: 28964926 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In this review, we examine the evidence behind nonopioid medication alternatives, peripheral nerve blocks, surgical techniques, and postoperative recovery protocols that can help minimize and effectively treat postoperative pain after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). Because of the depth and heterogeneity of the data, a narrative review was performed of reported interventions. A comprehensive review was performed of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database with a focus on randomized controlled trials. In the absence of literature specific to benign gynecology, similar specialty or procedural data were reviewed. A variety of nonopioid medications, surgical techniques, and postoperative recovery protocols have shown significant improvements in postoperative pain after gynecologic surgery. Nonopioid medication options that are beneficial include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, and antiepileptics. Incision infiltration with local anesthesia also significantly reduces pain. Surgically, minimally invasive approaches, reducing the laparoscopic trocar size to <10 mm, and evacuating the pneumoperitoneum at the end of the case all have significant benefits. Lastly, enhanced recovery pathways show promise in reducing pain after MIGS. By using a multimodal approach, minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons can help to minimize and manage postoperative pain with less reliance on opioid pain medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marron Wong
- Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
| | - Stephanie Morris
- Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts
| | - Karen Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Khara Simpson
- Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bruintjes M, van Helden E, Braat A, Dahan A, Scheffer G, van Laarhoven C, Warlé M. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118:834-842. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
23
|
Kundu S, Weiss C, Hertel H, Hillemanns P, Klapdor R, Soergel P. Association between intraabdominal pressure during gynaecologic laparoscopy and postoperative pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295:1191-1199. [PMID: 28285427 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4325-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopy is nowadays a well-established surgical method and plays a main role in an ever-increasing range of indications in gynaecology. High-quality studies of surgical techniques are necessary to improve the quality of patient care. The present study aims at evaluating postoperative pain after gynaecological laparoscopy depending on the intraoperative CO2 pressure. METHODS In a prospective, monocentric, randomized single-blind study at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics at the Hannover Medical School, we include patients scheduled for different laparoscopic procedures. Randomization of the intraoperative CO2 pressure was carried out in six groups. Pain was assessed the day after surgery by the blinded nurse using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS 550 patients were included in the period from May 2013 to January 2016. The analysis of the per protocol population PPP (n = 360) showed no statistically significant difference between the six intervention groups with regard to mean postoperative pain perception. In direct comparison between two groups, an intraoperative CO2 pressure of 15 mmHg was associated with a significant higher pain score than a pressure of 12 mmHg. The difference was 7.46 mm on a 10 cm VAS. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study indicate that a CO2 pressure of 12 versus 15 mmHg can be advantageous. However, the clinical relevance remains unclear due to the low difference in pain. The additional benefit of an even lower pressure of 10 or 8 mmHg cannot be reliably assessed; we found signs of poor visibility conditions in these low pressure groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudip Kundu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Clara Weiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hermann Hertel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Klapdor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Soergel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|