Enhanced Recovery after Surgery is Feasible and Beneficial and Should Be the Standard in Major Gynecological Surgeries

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based protocols designed to standardize medical care, improve outcomes, and lower healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation of the ERAS protocol and the effect on recovery during the hospitalization period after gynecological laparotomy surgeries.

METHODS

We compared demographic and clinical data of consecutive patients at a single institute who underwent open gynecological surgeries before (August 2017 to December 2018) and after (January 2019 to March 2020) the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Eighty women were included in each group.

RESULTS

The clinical and demographic characteristics were similar among the women operated before and after implementation of the ERAS protocol. Following implementation of the protocol, decreases were observed in post-surgical hospitalization (from 4.89 ± 2.56 to 4.09 ± 1.65 days, P = 0.01), in patients reporting nausea symptoms (from 18 (22.5%) to 7 (8.8%), P = 0.017), and in the use of postoperative opioids (from 77 (96.3%) to 47 (58.8%), P < 0.001). No significant changes were identified between the two periods regarding vomiting, 30-day re-hospitalization, and postoperative minor and major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the ERAS protocol is feasible and was found to result in less postoperative opioid use, a faster return to normal feeding, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Implementation of the protocol implementation was not associated with an increased rate of complications or with re-admissions.

Functional outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: post-operative functional recovery is superior in infants compared to older children

AIM

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is less popular and considered less successful in infants compared to older children. There are few reports analyzing the functional results of LP in relation to age of surgery. The aim of this paper is to compare the functional results of LP in infants (group 1) with children over 1 year of age (group 2).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of all children undergoing LP between August 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed for patient details and follow-up. Only children (n = 135) with at least 1-year follow-up and completed post-operative ultrasound and diuretic renogram were included. All children underwent pre-operative and post-operative ultrasound and diuretic renogram; pre-operative, operative and post-operative parameters were compared between both groups. Statistical analysis was done using software; Mann-Whitney U test, Student t test, and Fisher's exact test were applied.

RESULTS

There were 71 infants (group 1) and 64 children > 1 year (group 2). Pre-operatively, all kidneys had SFU grade 3 or 4 HDN and 131/135 kidneys had a renal pelvic APD > 20 mm; all kidneys had unequivocal obstruction on DR. At surgery, the preferred drainage method was intra-operative antegrade placement of a JJ stent in 68 (96%) group 1 and 63 (98%) group 2 children. The remaining 4 cases (3 group 1, 1 group 2) had a nephrostomy with trans-anastomotic external stent placement, because the JJ stent could not be negotiated into the bladder. The demographic data and comparison of pre- and post-operative parameters between both groups are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 had significantly more children with antenatal diagnosis of HDN (87% vs 56%, p = 0.0005). The 36 children with antenatal diagnosis in group 2 were initially followed expectantly; the indication for pyeloplasty was deterioration of SRF on serial DR, urinary infection, and pain, in 13, 14, and 9 children, respectively. The operating time was significantly longer in group 2 (p = 0.0001). There was no difference in the success of LP or complication rate in both groups. Group 2 had significantly more children with extrinsic obstruction (1.4% vs 17%, p = 0.001). All children underwent post-operative US and DR; a significant reduction in hydronephrosis (APD) on follow-up was noted in both groups (p = 0.0001). The mean pre-operative SRF in both groups was comparable (p = 0.088). The mean SRF in both groups improved significantly after LP; however, the mean post-operative SRF was significantly higher in group 1 when compared to group 2 (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, group 1 had significantly more kidneys demonstrating > 10% increase in SRF after LP (53% vs 26%, p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile and success of LP in infants was comparable to older children. Infant LP took shorter time to perform, while older children had increased incidence of extrinsic obstruction. Infant kidneys demonstrated better functional improvement than older children after LP. These findings should encourage more surgeons to utilize LP for pyeloplasty even in infants.

Operationalizing Postdischarge Recovery From Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for the Preoperative Consultative Visit

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to establish a threshold for postdischarge surgical recovery from laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the preoperative consultative visit to answer the "what is my recovery time?" question.

METHODS

Study participants (N = 171) with stage 2 or worse pelvic organ prolapse undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy who completed postoperative surveys at 4 time points. Postdischarge Surgical Recovery 13 (PSR13) scores were anchored to a Global Surgical Recovery (GSR) tool (if 100% recovery is back to your usual health, what percentage of recovery are you now?). Weighted mean PSR13 scores were calculated as a sum of the products variable when patients considered themselves 80 to less than 85, 85 to less than 90, 90 to less than 95, or 95 to 100 percent recovered on the GSR tool. The percentage of study participants recovered at postdischarge day 7, 14, 42, and 90 was calculated based on a comparison between the GSR scores and weighted mean PSR13 scores.

RESULTS

A PSR13 score of 80 or greater, corresponding to 85% or greater recovery, was seen in 55.6% (42 days) and 50.9% (90 days) of study participants, respectively, establishing this numeric threshold as representing "significant" postdischarge recovery after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. At 14 days after discharge, only 16.4% of the study population achieved this PSR13 score.

CONCLUSIONS

Most study subjects were "significantly" recovered at 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using a PSR13 score of 80 or greater as a numeric threshold. There is a need to determine the population percentage of recovered study subjects at 30, 60, and beyond 90 days from laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

Analysis of hidden blood loss and its influential factors in myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to quantify hidden blood loss (HBL) and explore its influential factors in myomectomy.

METHODS

Two hundred nine patients who underwent myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 were analyzed. Each patient's estimated blood volume and total blood loss (TBL) were calculated by the Nadler formula and Gross formula, respectively. The HBL was calculated by subtracting the visible blood loss (VBL) from the TBL. A multivariate linear stepwise analysis was applied to identify the influential factors of HBL in myomectomy.

RESULTS

The mean perioperative VBL and estimated TBL during myomectomy were 137.81 ±104.43 and 492.24 ± 225.00 mL, respectively. The mean HBL was 354.39 ± 177.69 mL, which accounted for 71.52% ± 15.75% of the TBL and was two to three times higher than the VBL. The duration of surgery, number of removed leiomyomas, and location of removed leiomyomas were independent risk factors for HBL in myomectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBL accounted for a significant percentage of TBL in myomectomy. A full understanding of the HBL in perioperative blood management may improve patients' postoperative rehabilitation.

Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: Insights from a comprehensive cancer center

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the characteristics of procedures for gynecologic cancers conducted with conventional laparoscopy (CL) or robotically assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in the context of an enhanced recovery program (ERP).

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from a cohort study conducted between 2016 (when the ERP was first implemented at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes, a comprehensive cancer center in France) and 2018. We included patients who had undergone minimally invasive surgery for gynecological cancers and followed our ERP. The endpoints were the analysis of postoperative complications, the length of postoperative hospitalization (LPO), and the proportion of combined procedures depending on the approach (RAL or CL). Combined procedures were defined by the association of at least two of the following operative items: hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Results

A total of 362 women underwent either CL (n = 187) or RAL (n = 175) for gynecologic cancers and followed our ERP. The proportion of combined procedures performed by RAL was significantly higher (85/175 [48.6%]) than that performed by CL (23/187 [12.3%]; p < 0.001). The proportions of postoperative complications were similar between the two groups (19.4% versus 17.1%; p = 0.59). Logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically insignificant trend in the association of RAL with a reduced likelihood of an LPO > 3 days after adjusting for predictors of prolonged hospitalization (adjusted OR = 0.573 [0.236–1.388]; p = 0.217).

Conclusion

Experts from our cancer center preferentially choose RAL to perform gynecologic oncological procedures that present elements of complexity. More studies are needed to determine whether this strategy is efficient in managing complex procedures in the framework of an ERP.

Preliminary Results of an Exercise Program After Laparoscopic Resective Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Non-Metastatic Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Control Trial

Background and objectives: Performing physical exercise after a colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with lower mortality related to the tumor itself. In order to improve physical recovery after elective surgery, there are no specific exercise protocols after discharge from the hospital. The purpose of this study is to show the preliminary results of an exercise program after colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Six patients with non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma addressed to respective laparoscopic were randomly assigned to a mixed supervised/home-based exercise program for six months and compared to a control group without exercise. To assess the effectiveness of the program, functional and body composition parameters were evaluated. Results: Three months after surgery, the exercise group increased flexibility (p <0.01, ES = 0.33), strength of lower limbs (p <0.01, ES = 0.42) and aerobic capacity (p <0.01, ES = 0.28). After surgery, the six patients experienced a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) and free fat mass. More specifically, fat mass reached the lowest values, with a concomitant increase in cell mass after six months (p <0.01, ES = 0.33). This did not occur in the control group. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer treatment induces a reduction in physical function, particularly during the first six months after treatment. A mixed exercise approach appears promising in countering this process after colorectal cancer surgery.

Analysis of the Association between Eating Behaviors and Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

SETTING

In a private medical center, 300 patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were classified into 4 groups according to their eating behaviors (EB) preoperatively. During a 3-year postoperative follow-up, dietary changes in relation to weight loss were studied.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the influence of abnormal EB on the outcome of sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND

Patients with morbid obesity often suffer from abnormal EB. After LSG, the outcome depends largely on improvement of the feeding behaviors acquired.

METHODS

This prospective study includes 300 patients who underwent LSG from 2013 to 2014, divided into the following 4 groups: binge eaters, snack eaters, sweet eaters, and volume eaters.

RESULTS

The average age was 41.65 years, the ratio of male to females was 1 to 2. The average baseline body mass index (BMI) was 42.02. After 3 years, no significant change was found in the number of binge eaters (p = 0.396), but there was an 8.9% increase in snack eaters (p < 0.001), a 12.9% increase in sweet eaters (p < 0.001), and 17.2% increase in healthy eating habits (p < 0.001). Sixty-five (24.8%) patients did not experience changes in their eating patterns. However, after surgery, 24.6% of the patients continued with the same EB and 125 (49.5%) patients changed from one EB to another unhealthy EB. Weight loss, measure as ΔBMI, was similar in each group after 3 years, with a mean BMI of 29.8. When eating habits were related to different features such as gender, sports practice, type of work, smoking, marital status, comorbidities, no influence on the operative results were found.

CONCLUSION

LSG promotes the reduction of overeaters; however, it promotes a switch between other unhealthy EB. The significant increase in snack eaters and sweet eaters is outstanding, although it did not affect weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Worsening of eating habits after LSG is a common fact.

Quality of Life 10 Years after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has recently become the most commonly applied bariatric procedure worldwide. Substantial regaining of weight or severe reflux might compromise quality of life (QOL) after SG in the long-term follow-up. Long-term data on patients' QOL is limited, even though the persistent improvement in QOL is one of the aims of bariatric surgery. The objective of this study was to present patients' QOL 10 years after SG.

METHODS

Of 65 SG patients with a follow-up of ≥10 years after SG who were asked to fill out the Bariatric Quality of Life Index (BQL) and Short Form 36 (SF36) questionnaires, 48 (74%) completed them. This multicenter study was performed in a university hospital setting in Austria.

RESULTS

The BQL score revealed nonsignificant differences between the patients with > 50% or < 50% excess weight loss (EWL). It did show significant differences between patients with and without any symptoms of reflux. Patients with < 50% EWL scored significantly lower in 3/8 categories of SF36. Patients suffering from reflux had significantly lower scores in all categories.

CONCLUSIONS

EWL and symptomatic reflux impair patients' long-term QOL after SG.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program: Experience with 200 cases from a single Italian center

There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive techniques associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce surgery-related stress and promote faster recovery after major colorectal surgery. As a single tertiary referral center for colorectal surgery, our aim was to analyze the effects of our ERAS protocol on a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Prospectively collected data from 283 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, between March 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' adherence to pre-, intra-, and postoperative ERAS protocol items together with surgical short-term outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate was considered.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona (CRINF-1034 CESC).During the study period, 200 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the ERAS protocol. In this series, 34% of patients were aged 70 years or older. Rectal resections represented 26% of all cases, with stoma formation performed in 14.5% of patients. Despite such procedural heterogeneity, good short-term results were obtained: by postoperative day (POD) 2, 58.5% of patients had full return of bowel function, while 63.5% and 88% achieved regular soft diet intake and autonomous walking, respectively. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (2-40) with 71% of patients being discharged by POD 6. No postoperative mortality was recorded, and the rate of major complications was 3.5%. During the study period, 6 patients required redo surgery (3%) and 5 patients required rehospitalization within 30 days (2.5%).This study analyzing the results of the fast-track program in our first 200 cases confirms the feasibility and safety of ERAS protocol application within a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colonic and rectal resection for benign and malignant diseases.

The long-term effects of endometrioma surgery on ovarian reserve: a prospective case-control study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of endometrioma excision on ovarian reserve. This study evaluated the long-term effects of endometrioma excision on ovarian reserve. A total of 63 women were enrolled in this prospective case-control study; 21 women had histories of endometrioma surgery (study group), 21 women had diagnoses of endometrioma, and 21 healthy age-matched women served as controls. Participants were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, between January 2007 and January 2016. The mean follow-up duration after endometrioma surgery was 30.4 ± 18.0 months for the study group. The mean follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels were similar among groups, but the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level was significantly lower in the surgery group than in the control group (p < .001). The mean AMH level was 42% lower in the endometrioma surgery group than in the endometrioma group and 30% lower in the endometrioma group than in the control group (p = .080 and p = .160, respectively). Endometrioma has a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve, and decreased ovarian reserve compared with that in healthy fertile subjects without endometrioma is evident shortly after endometrioma excision. However, the endometrioma excision procedure does not significantly decrease the ovarian reserve in the long term.

[Fast track rehabilitation in perforated duodenal ulcer]

AIM

To analyze the outcomes of fast track rehabilitation program in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For the period 2013-2016 at the Department of Surgery and Endoscopy 206 PDU patients have been treated. Inclusion criterion for the main group (n=77) was duodenal ulcers, their dimension up to 1 cm, laparoscopic suture of perforated ulcer, fast track rehabilitation program implementation. The control group consisted of 129 patients who underwent open suturing of perforated ulcer followed by conventional treatment in postoperative period.

RESULTS

In the main group (n=77) laparoscopic suturing of ulcerative defect with the use of Fast Track program was performed. Postoperative complication i.e. sutures failure was observed in 1 (1.3%) case. There were no lethal outcomes in the main group. Mean length of hospital-stay was 4.8 days. In 129 patients of the control group open suturing of the perforated ulcer and conventional postoperative therapy were applied. Postoperative surgical complications were absent in the control group; mortality rate was 2.3%. Mean length of postoperative hospital-stay was 8.1 days.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcers facilitates application of fast track rehabilitation program in emergency patients. Fast track rehabilitation protocol after laparoscopic suturing of the perforated ulcer creates conditions for early discharge and is followed by good clinical and economic effects. Recurrent peptic ulcers are noted if antiulcer therapy is absent.

Quick rehabilitation nursing improves the recovery of colon cancer patients after laparoscopy

Colon cancer is a common malignant tumor with particularly high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of quick rehabilitation nursing and routine nursing in postoperative recovery of patients with colon cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Two hundred forty patients with colon cancer were classified into four random groups (A, B, C and D, with 60 patients in each group). All patients underwent surgery to remove the colon tumor by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Patients in groups A and B received quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery. In group C patients, local anesthesia associated with quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery was used. Group D was used as control group and the patients were treated based on routine nursing. Time to get out of bed, first bowel movement time and the average time of hospitalisation in group A was lower than group D (p less than 0.05), postoperative leukocyte level as well as the occurrence rate of nausea and vomiting, ankylenteron and pelvic adhesion was decreased in group A compared to group D (p less than 0.05), but the postoperative albumin and total protein level was higher than group D (p less than 0.05). The serum level of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in group A was decreased compared to group D several days after surgery (p less than 0.05); group B had 4 cases of intestinal obstruction after surgery that could be cured through conservative treatment, while group D had 10 cases of intestinal obstruction, 8 of which could be cured through conservative treatment and two needed surgery (p less than 0.05); VAS for pain degree of group C in active state was clearly lower at 1h, 5h, 7h, 15h, 30h and 42h after surgery, and side effects of postoperative analgesia were clearly reduced. Time to get out of bed was obviously decreased, while there was no evident effect on postoperative dosage, chronic pain and complications. Adopting quick rehabilitation nursing can effectively reduce occurrence of complications and postoperative pain, speed up the recovery of gastrointestinal function, shorten the length of stay, and improve patients’ satisfaction.

[A prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcers]

OBJECTIVE

To compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) versus open repair (OR) for perforated peptic ulcers.

METHODS

From January 2010 to June 2014, in Shanghai Tongji Hospital, 119 patients who were diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcers and planned to receive operation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into LR (58 patients) and OR(61 patients) group by computer. Intra-operative and postoperative parameters were compared between two groups. This study was registered as a randomized controlled trial by the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ChiCTR-TRC-11001607).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline data between two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences of operation time, morbidity of postoperative complication, mortality, reoperation probability, decompression time, fluid diet recovery time and hospitalization cost were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to OR group, LR group required less postoperative fentanyl [(0.74±0.33) mg vs. (1.04±0.39) mg, t=-4.519, P=0.000] and had shorter hospital stay [median 7(5 to 9) days vs. 8(7 to 10) days, U=-2.090, P=0.001]. In LR group, 3 patients(5.2%) had leakage in perforation site after surgery. One case received laparotomy on the second day after surgery for diffuse peritonitis. The other two received conservative treatment (total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition). There was no recurrence of perforation in OR group. One patient of each group died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) 22 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

LR may be preferable for treating perforated peptic ulcers than OR, however preventive measures during LR should be taken to avoid postopertive leak in perforation site.

[Comparative effectiveness of Marmar technique and laparoscopic clipping of testicular vein in surgical treatment of varicocele in athletes]

INTRODUCTION

Varicocele is one of the most common diseases among men and a proven cause of male infertility, which is directly proportional to its clinical prominence. The aim To evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of different surgical methods to treat varicocele in athletes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 165 athletes were treated for varicocele. Of them, 82 patients (group 1) underwent varicocele surgery using Marmar technique and 83 patients (group 2) were treated by laparoscopic clipping of testicular vein (endoscopic analogue of Ivanissevitch open surgery).

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative complications and relapse at 6 months after surgery in groups 1 and 2 was 1.2% and 8.4%, and 4.9 and 14.5%, respectively. The study findings showed a statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in the spermogram parameters in both groups compared with preoperative values.

CONCLUSIONS

The length of hospital stay and postoperative rehabilitation period were shorter in patients after Marmars varicocelectomy than in patients of group 2. Besides, Marmar technique for varicocele was cost-effective and justified.

Safety of fast-track rehabilitation after gastrointestinal surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the safety of fast-track rehabilitation protocols (FT) and conventional care strategies (CC), or FT and laparoscopic surgery (LFT) and FT and open surgery (OFT) after gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, WHO International Trial Register, Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FT and CC or comparing LFT and OFT, with 10 or more randomized participants and about 30 d follow-up. Two reviewers independently extracted data on complications, anastomotic leak, obstruction, wound infection, re-admission between FT and CC or LFT and OFT after gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs of FT vs CC or LFT vs OFT were included. Compared with CC, FT reduced overall complications and wound infection. However, anastomotic leak, obstruction and re-admission were not significantly reduced. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.60-0.78; P < 0.001), pooled RR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.57-0.88; P < 0.001), pooled RR of 0.93 (95%CI: 0.68-1.25; P > 0.05), a pooled RR of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.67-1.15; P > 0.05) and pooled RR of 0.94 (95%CI: 0.73-1.22; P > 0.05) respectively. Compared with OFT, LFT reduced complications, with a pooled RR of 0.66 (95%CI: 0.54-0.81; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: FTs are safe after gastrointestinal surgery. Additional large, prospective RCTs should be conducted to establish further the safety of this approach.

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is generally considered superior to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with regard to postoperative quality-of-life. Differences in postoperative pain may exist due to recent pain control techniques including epidural anesthesia. There is little evidence for this difference. In this article we report the results of our randomized single-blind study in LADG versus ODG. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in postoperative physical activity between LADG and ODG.

METHODS

Forty patients with early gastric cancer (stage IA and IB) were registered in this randomized study. For strict evaluation, patients were not told about the type of operation until postoperative day 7. Postoperative physical activity was evaluated objectively by Active Tracer, which records the cumulative acceleration over a 24 h period to investigate differences in postoperative recovery. Questionnaire and visual analog scale score related to postoperative pain were also investigated.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed with a more favorable outcome noted in the LADG group with respect to intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), total amount of pain rescue (P < 0.001), wound size (P < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001), and inflammatory parameters (C-reactive protein, SaO2, and duration of febrile period) (P < 0.001). Cumulative physical recovery to 70 % of the preoperative level was significantly shorter (by 3 days, P < 0.001) in the LADG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of LADG and ODG for patients with early gastric cancer showed favorable outcome and earlier recovery of physical activity in the LADG group.

Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the fast-track rehabilitation protocol and laparoscopic surgery (LFT) vs conventional care strategies and laparoscopic surgery (LCC).

METHODS: Studies and relevant literature comparing the effects of LFT and LCC for colorectal malignancy were identified in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. The complications and re-admission after approximately 1 mo were assessed.

RESULTS: Six recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis, which related to 655 enrolled patients. These studies demonstrated that compared with LCC, LFT has fewer complications and a similar incidence of re-admission after approximately 1 mo. LFT had a pooled RR of 0.60 (95%CI: 0.46-0.79, P < 0.001) compared with a pooled RR of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.34-1.40, P > 0.5) for LCC.

CONCLUSION: LFT for colorectal malignancy is safe and efficacious. Larger prospective RCTs should be conducted to further compare the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Early rehabilitation programs after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Evidence and criticism

During the past several decades, early rehabilitation programs for the care of patients with colorectal surgery have gained popularity. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the implementation of these evidence-based detailed perioperative care protocols is useful for early recovery of patients after colorectal resection. Patients cared for based on these protocols had a rapid recovery of bowel movement, shortened length of hospital stay, and fewer complications compared with traditional care programs. However, most of the previous evidence was obtained from studies of early rehabilitation programs adapted to open colonic resection. Currently, limited evidence exists on the effects of early rehabilitation after laparoscopic rectal resection, although this procedure seems to be associated with a higher morbidity than that reported with traditional care. In this article, we review previous studies and guidelines on early rehabilitation programs in patients undergoing rectal surgery. We investigated the status of early rehabilitation programs in rectal surgery and analyzed the limitations of these studies. We also summarized indications and detailed protocol components of current early rehabilitation programs after rectal surgery, focusing on laparoscopic resection.

Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis

PURPOSE

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of patients with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for relevant papers published between January 1990 and February 2012. We analyzed 22 outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.

RESULTS

We identified 39 papers reporting results from randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for acute appendicitis. Our meta-analysis included 5,896 patients with acute appendicitis; 2,847 had undergone laparoscopic surgery, and 3,049 had undergone open surgery. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery was associated with longer operative time (by 13.12 min). However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis was associated with earlier resumption of liquid and solid intake; shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay; a reduction in dose numbers of parenteral and oral analgesics; earlier return to normal activity, work, and normal life; decreased occurrence of wound infection; a better cosmesis; and similar hospital charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery may now be the standard treatment for acute appendicitis.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Return to work after gynaecological surgery takes much longer than expected, irrespective of the level of invasiveness. In order to empower patients in recovery and return to work, a multidisciplinary care program consisting of an e-health intervention and integrated care management including participatory workplace intervention was developed.

METHODS/DESIGN

We designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of the multidisciplinary care program on full sustainable return to work in patients after gynaecological surgery, compared to usual clinical care. Two hundred twelve women (18-65 years old) undergoing hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery on benign indication in one of the 7 participating (university) hospitals in the Netherlands are expected to take part in this study at baseline. The primary outcome measure is sick leave duration until full sustainable return to work and is measured by a monthly calendar of sickness absence during 26 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcome measures are the effect of the care program on general recovery, quality of life, pain intensity and complications, and are assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2, 6, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery.

DISCUSSION

The discrepancy between expected physical recovery and actual return to work after gynaecological surgery contributes to the relevance of this study. There is strong evidence that long periods of sick leave can result in work disability, poorer general health and increased risk of mental health problems. We expect that this multidisciplinary care program will improve peri-operative care, contribute to a faster return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery and, as a consequence, will reduce societal costs considerably.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2087.

Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Both laparoscopic colectomy and application of enhanced recovery program (ERP) in open colectomy have been demonstrated to enable early recovery and to shorten hospital stay. This study evaluated the impact of ERP on results of laparoscopic colectomy and comparison was made with the outcomes of patients prior to the application of ERP.

METHODS

An ERP was implemented in the authors' center in December 2006. Short-term outcomes of consecutive 84 patients who underwent laparoscopic colonic cancer resection 23 months before (control group) and 96 patients who were operated within 13 months; after application of ERP (ERP group) were compared.

RESULTS

Between the ERP and control groups, there was no statistical difference in patient characteristics, pathology, operating time, blood loss, conversion rate or complications. Compared to the control group, patients in the ERP group had earlier passage of flatus [2 (range: 1-5) versus 2 (range: 1-4) days after operation respectively; p = 0.03)] and a lower incidence of prolonged post-operative ileus (6% versus 0 respectively; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the hospital stay between the two groups [4 (range: 2-34) days in control group and 4 (range: 2-23) days in ERP group; p = 0.4)]. The re-admission rate was also similar (7% in control group and 5% in ERP group; p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In laparoscopic colectomy for cancer, application of ERP was associated with no increase in complication rate but significant improvement of gastrointestinal function. ERP further hastened patient recovery but resulted in no difference in hospital stay.

Are we underutilizing Palmer's point entry in gynecologic laparoscopy?

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience using Palmer's point entry in women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital, London, United Kingdom.

PATIENT(S)

We reviewed all patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under the care of the senior author between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2008.

INTERVENTION(S)

Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Indications, incidence, success, and complications of using Palmer's entry.

RESULT(S)

Three hundred eighty-five patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. We used umbilical entry in 249 (64.6%) and Palmer's entry in 136 (35.4%). In almost three fourths of cases, the indications for using Palmer's point were previous laparotomy or the presence of large uterine fibroids. The next most common reasons for choosing Palmer's point were known documentation of intra-abdominal adhesions from prior laparoscopies, large ovarian cysts, and hernias or hernia repairs. Entry via Palmer's point was successful in all but two cases (98.5%), and there were no entry-related complications.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our experience shows that laparoscopic entry using the left upper quadrant is safe with a low failure rate. Because the vast majority of gynecologic laparoscopies are done using subumbilical entry, it seems that Palmer's entry is underused by many gynecologists, despite it being safer in patients at risk of underlying adhesions and more appropriate in the presence of a large pelvic mass or a nearby hernia.

[Recovery and duration of work disability after laparoscopic and conventional appendectomy. A prospective randomized study]

To evaluate whether laparoscopic appendectomy shortens the convalescence and the postoperative period until return to work when compared to conventional appendectomy, a prospective randomized trial was performed. The major endpoint of the study was the time until return to work; minor endpoints were postoperative pain, fatigue, operative time and postoperative morbidity. In all, 54 patients with a mean age of 29.5 +/- 10.1 years were randomized to open (n = 28) or laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 26). Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) rating, job status as well as histologic degree of inflammation of the appendix were comparable in the two groups. Operative time was 59.2 +/- 15.8 min for laparoscopic and 59.8 +/- 24.4 min for conventional appendectomy (P = 0.9). Some 16 laparoscopic appendectomies (62%) were performed by board-certified surgeons, while 23 conventional appendectomies (82%) were performed by residents (P = 0.003). Postoperative morbidity was comparable between the two groups. After laparoscopic appendectomy, pain was rated significantly lower on the first, second and fourth postoperative day when compared to the conventional group. There were no difference in postoperative fatigue between the groups. Time to return to work was 17.0 +/- 6.2 days in the laparoscopic group and 18.2 +/- 6.0 days in the conventional group (p = 0.5). Laparoscopic appendectomy has no advantages in terms of convalescence and time to return to work when compared to open appendectomy and should therefore be limited to selected cases.

Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures undertaken in the NHS. Despite this, no previous work has examined quality of life in this patient group. This study examines quality of life preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively in 140 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair in the context of a randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. Surgery was undertaken on a day case basis, and quality of life was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF36). In the initial phase of the study, 57% of those screened for suitability met the study inclusion criteria and were randomised. No significant differences were found between laparoscopic and open hernia repair in terms of quality of life at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No difference was found between 3 and 6 month scores, suggesting that patients had already made a good recovery by 3 months. A significant improvement was found between preoperative and postoperative scores, with the greatest change arising on dimensions assessing pain, physical function, and role limitation owing to physical restriction. After standardising for age, sex, and social class, a comparison of the hernia patients to population norms for the SF36 was consistent with improvement from preoperative to postoperative assessment. This study has demonstrated the improvement in quality of life in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair by experienced surgeons on a day case basis. It has also demonstrated the feasibility of assessing quality of life using generic measures in this patient group. Further work in this area is required. Ultimately, the priority given to elective inguinal hernia repair will depend on how the demonstrated benefits compare with those derived from other elective surgical procedures.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy

This prospective clinical study was done because our initial retrospective review suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers no significant advantages over open appendectomy (OA) yet is significantly more expensive. From July 1992 to August 1993, 57 patients were approached preoperatively for randomization to either LA (n = 19) or OA (n = 18). There were no statistically significant differences between the LA and OA groups in operative risk: mean age, 28 +/- 2 vs 26 +/- 2 years; percent female, 26% vs 22%; body mass index, 24 +/- 0.8 vs 26 +/- 1.2 kg/m2. All patients were either ASA class I or class II, 78% in each group being class II. The differences between the LA and OA groups in mean operating time required (93 +/- 12 vs 87 +/- 8 minutes), postoperative intramuscular narcotic analgesic usage (24 +/- 6 vs 26 +/- 6 hours), postoperative hospital stay (57 +/- 12 vs 66 +/- 10 hours), and return to normal activity (20 +/- 6 vs 14 +/- 3 days) were also not significant. However, LA was much more expensive because of higher operating room charges. The mean total hospital bill was $4,600 +/- $160 for the LA group and $1,700 +/- $70 for the OA group. This prospective study corroborated our previous analysis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe, effective, and expensive and overall has no greatly significant advantages over open appendectomy.

Laparoscopic hernia repair in Leicester General Hospital: a prospective audit of 94 patients

Conventional hernia repair is effective in terms of cure but is associated with considerable postoperative pain and delay in return to normal activity. Laparoscopic repair has the potential to reduce pain and speed return to normal activity, but there have been few published reports of the outcome of this operation in the UK. We present a prospective audit of 94 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Of the 94 patients, 87 (92.6%) were male and 7 (7.4%) were female. Thirteen of the repairs were bilateral and 12 were recurrent. Two had to be converted to open repair. The mean operating time for unilateral repair was 56 min and for bilateral repair 98 min. Sixty-three patients (67%) were discharged within 24 h and 21 (22.4%) were discharged within 48 h. There were minor complications in 20 patients (21%), eight of whom (8.5%) developed a haematoma. The other minor complications included seromas (2), bruising at the site of the entry port (2), hyperaesthesia in the groin (2), port hernia (1), shoulder tip pain after surgery (3) and postoperative urinary retention (2). Nine (9.5%) patients claimed to have had no pain or discomfort at all; 35 (37.2%) were pain and discomfort free in 2 weeks. Thirty-two (34%) patients returned to normal activities in 2 weeks. With a median follow-up of 8 months 3 (3.2%) recurrences were noted. It is emphasised that this series represents a learning curve and that the operation is developmental. We are now restricting laparoscopic repair to recurrent and bilateral hernias where the technique offers particular advantages.

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer: the Washington University experience

PURPOSE

The recognized form of therapy for patients with ureteral or renal pelvis transitional cell carcinoma is total nephroureterectomy with excision of the ipsilateral periureteral cuff of bladder mucosa. We report our experience with 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma through July 1994 and compare them to a contemporary group of patients undergoing open nephroureterectomy for the same disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 10 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was evaluated with respect to operative time, surgical specimen weight, pathological stage, postoperative analgesia requirement, interval to resume normal oral intake, postoperative recovery and results of postoperative surveillance. Of the patients 8 who underwent open surgical nephroureterectomy during a contemporary period for the same diagnosis were evaluated for the same parameters and compared to the laparoscopic group.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy averaged twice as long as open nephroureterectomy. However, the laparoscopic patients resumed oral intake sooner, required less postoperative analgesia and had a shorter hospital stay compared to the open surgical group. The laparoscopic nephroureterectomy patients returned to normal activities within less than half the time (2.8 versus 6 weeks) and completely recovered 5 times more rapidly (6 weeks versus 7.4 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is a feasible treatment option for patients with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. However, 2 major drawbacks to the approach persist, that is the lengthy operative time and the need for significant laparoscopic experience on the part of the surgeon.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience and cost implications

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results and cost implications of laparoscopic nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients underwent attempted laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephro-ureterectomy. The cost of the laparoscopic procedures was estimated to allow comparison with that of open surgery.

RESULTS

Two patients required conversion to an open procedure, one for a colonic tear, the other for irretrievable loss of pneumoperitoneum. The median operating time for successful cases was 3 h (range 2.5-4). The mean morphine equivalent of analgesia delivered per patient was 18 mg (range 10-28). There was no mortality. Post-operative complications consisted of one case of prolonged ileus and another of chest infection. The median hospital stay of successful cases was 5 days (range 4-17), and the mean time to return to normal activity was 4 weeks (range 3-6). The cost of the procedure using re-usable instruments was approximately 2000 pounds, comprising 100 pounds for equipment. 900 pounds theatre costs and 1000 pounds for hospital stay. Using disposable equipment adds up to 900 pounds to the cost. In comparison an open nephrectomy typically costs around 2300 pounds.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is associated with lower analgesia requirements, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to work than equivalent open procedures. The cost, particularly when performed with re-usable instruments, is not prohibitive being comparable with that of open nephrectomy. With further experience it should become part of the armamentarium of urological surgeons.

[Adrenalectomy for nonfunctioning adrenal tumors--comparison between open and laparoscopic surgery, and indication for operation]

Since 1977, we have operated on 18 nonfunctioning adrenal tumors. The pathological diagnosis included seven adrenocortical adenomas, three adrenocortical hypeplasias, three ganglioneuromas two adrenal cysts, two myelolipomas and one metastatic cancer. We successfully performed laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 11 of these patients and open surgery in the other 7 patients. In the patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy, post-operative recovery (fist oral intake, first ambulation, and total convalescence) was remarkably rapid. The indication of adrenalectomy for nonfunctioning adrenal tumors is controversial, but we can not exclude the possibility of malignancy even in small tumors. Therefore, because of the minimally invasive nature of laparoscopic surgery, the indications for operating on nonfunctioning adrenal tumors will be widened by introducing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy utilising the contact-tip Nd: YAG laser: a review of 67 cases

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy utilising the contact-tip Nd:YAG (Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet) laser (Surgical Laser Technologies, Oaks, PA). Postoperative activity levels, operative times, blood loss, pain medication use, length of hospital stay, and complications of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy were determined. Sixty-seven women with extensive disease including endometriosis, adenomyosis, adhesions, and multiple fibroids underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). The procedures were performed utilising the contact-tip Nd:YAG laser and a laparoscopic linear stapling device. All patients were operated on for a primary diagnosis of pelvic pain and would have required an abdominal approach for surgery due to extensive adhesions, fibroids, or endometriosis. Sixty-eight cases of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy were attempted. In 67 of these cases, the procedure was completed as planned. One case required conversion to abdominal hysterectomy due to extensive adhesions. Average hospital stay after surgery was 2.7 days with a minimum stay of less than one day. The average operating time for the LAVH was 149 minutes with an estimated blood loss of 220 mL and a haemoglobin drop from surgery to day 1 after surgery of 1.9 g. The complication rate was 11.9% with all of the complications occurring in the first 46 cases. By day 14 after surgery, patients reported their activity level at 8.8 on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being unlimited activities. By day 21, they reported their activity level at 9.5. The majority of the patients were able to return to work within two weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)