Ascending the Learning Curve of Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Concomitant midline ventral and inguinal hernia repair: can we create an algorithmic approach?

PURPOSE

International guidelines exist for surgical treatment of either ventral or inguinal hernias repair (VHR; IHR). However, approach for managing both of them remains unestablished and is further complicated by newly developed surgical techniques and modalities (namely, robotic). This highlights the need for a tailored, algorithmic strategy to streamline surgical management.

METHODS

An algorithm was developed by the directors of the NYU Langone Abdominal Core Health program of which four treatment groups were described: Group 1: open VHR and either laparoscopic or robotic IHR; Group 2: robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) approach for both VHR and IHR; Group 3: robotic retro-muscular VHR and IHR; and Group 4: open repair for both. Demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes from November 2021 to July 2023 were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included with a median age of 64 years, 90% (n = 83) were white, 85% (n = 78) were male, median BMI was 27 kg/m2, and 73% (n = 67) were ASA class II. Distribution of groups was: 48% (n = 44) in 1A, 8% (n = 7) in 1B, 8% (n = 7) in 2A, 3% (n = 3) in 2B, 23% (n = 21) in 3A, 8% (n = 7) in 3B, and 3% (n = 3) in 4. Ventral hernia size, OR time, and postoperative length of stay varied across groups. Postoperative outcomes at 30 days including emergency consults, readmissions, and complications, showed no differences across groups.

CONCLUSION

Access without guidance to new minimally invasive surgical approaches can be a challenge for the general surgeon. We propose an algorithm for decision-making based on our experience of incorporating robotic surgery, when available, for repair of concomitant VHR and IHR with consistent favorable outcomes within a small sample of patients.

A cost-conscious establishment of a robotic abdominal wall reconstruction program in a publicly funded healthcare system

PURPOSE

Despite reports of better short-term outcomes, the main criticism for the adoption of the robotic surgery platform for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) has been the associated cost, especially in countries with a publicly funded healthcare system such as Canada. We describe our experience in implementation of robotic AWR while ensuring cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with ventral hernias ranging between 5 to 15 cm who underwent either open or robotic AWR between January 2020 to August 2022. We reviewed patient characteristics, operative time, post-operative length of stay (LOS), and average cost of surgery.

RESULTS

45 patients underwent open repair and 28 underwent robotic repair in the study period. There was no difference in major patient characteristics between the two groups. Operative time was shorter for open repairs (233.2 ± 96.6 min vs. 299.3 ± 71.8 min, p < 0.001). LOS was significantly longer for open repairs (5 days (interquartile range = 4-6) vs. 2 days (IQR = 1.75-3), p < 0.001) and there were significantly more patients who underwent robotic repair who left hospital in less than 3 days (13.3 vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001). The average overall hospital-based cost for each open repair was $26,952.18 when the cost for equipment, operative time, inpatient hospital stay, and epidural use are accounted for, compared to $17,447.40 for robotic repair ($9,504.78 saving per case).

CONCLUSION

With proper selection of patients based on size of hernia, we demonstrate cost conscious adaptation of the robotic technology to AWR. Our future studies will continue to explore the benefits and limits of this approach in complex hernia repair.

Towards identifying a learning curve for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction: a cumulative sum analysis

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, an increase has been seen in robotics used for hernia repair, specifically robotic abdominal wall reconstruction (rAWR). However, the learning curve for rAWR can be steep and presently, little is understood regarding the optimal case volume required to achieve proficiency. The aim of our study was to review skill acquisition and describe the learning curve for rAWR.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-surgeon case series of consecutive patients who underwent rAWR from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was operative time, obtained from console time identified through the MyIntutive application. A one-sided cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) curve for the total operative time was derived based on the mean operative time of chronological procedures (207 min).

RESULTS

185 patients underwent rAWR between 2018 and 2022. These patients were more likely to be female, Caucasian, and have undergone two previous hernia repairs. ASA complexity increased over time with ASA 3 being predominant from 2020 onwards. The median hernia length was 15.0 cm and the median width was 7 cm. Average operative time was 207.8 min and decreased over time. The CUSUM analysis identified four phases of skill acquisition with the following case volumes: Initial Learning Curve (0-20), Stabilization Phase (21-55), Second Learning Curve (56-70), 4) Skill Proficiency (> 70).

CONCLUSION

In the early learning curve of rAWR, operative time decreased consistently after 70 cases, with an initial inflection after 20 cases. We identified varying stages of skill acquisition that are likely typical of a surgeon as they would progress through the learning curve of advanced robotic surgery. Future studies are needed to confirm the optimal case volume for determining the skill level for the performance of rAWR.

Long term outcomes of robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction: a single surgeon experience

INTRODUCTION

Robotic abdominal wall reconstruction (RAWR) is one of the most significant advances in the management of complex abdominal wall hernias. The objective of this study was to evaluate long term outcomes in a cohort of patients that underwent complex RAWR in a single center.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal retrospective review of a cohort of 56 patients who underwent complex RAWR at least 24 months prior by a single surgeon at a tertiary care institution. All patients underwent bilateral retro-rectus release (rRRR) with or without robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR). Data collected include demographics, hernia details, operative and technical details. The prospective analysis included a post-procedure visit of at least 24 months from the index procedure with a physical examination and quality of life survey using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS). Patients with reported symptoms concerning for hernia recurrence underwent radiographic imaging. Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation or median) were calculated for continuous variables. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test as deemed appropriate for categorical variables, and analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data, were performed among the separate operative groups. A total score for the CCS was calculated and analyzed in accordance with the user guidelines.

RESULTS

One-hundred and-forty patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-six patients consented to participate in the study. Mean age was 60.2 years. Mean BMI was 34.0. Ninety percent of patients had at least one comorbidity and 52% of patients were scored ASA 3 or higher. Fifty-nine percent were initial incisional hernias, 19.6% were recurrent incisional hernias and 8.9% were recurrent ventral hernias. The mean defect width was 9 cm for rTAR and 5 cm for rRRR. The mean implanted mesh size was 945.0 cm² for rTAR and 362.5 cm² for rRRR. The mean length of follow-up was 28.1 months. Fifty-seven percent of patients underwent post-op imaging at an average follow-up of 23.5 months. Recurrence rate was 3.6% for all groups. There were no recurrences in patients that underwent solely bilateral rRRR. Two patients (7.7%) that underwent rTAR procedures were found with recurrence. Average time to recurrence was 23 months. Quality of life survey demonstrated an overall CCS score of 6.63 ± 13.95 at 24 months with 12 (21.4%) patients reporting mesh sensation, 20 (35.7%) reporting pain, and 13 (23.2%) reporting movement limitation.

CONCLUSION

Our study contributes to the paucity of literature describing long term outcomes of RAWR. Robotic techniques offer durable repairs with acceptable quality of life metrics.

Description of the Current Da Vinci® Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society

Background: Robot assisted laparoscopic abdominal wall surgery (RAWS) has seen a rapid adoption in recent years. The safe introduction of the robot platform in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias is important to safeguard the patient from harm during the learning curve. The scope of this paper is to describe the current European training curriculum in RAWS. Methods and Analysis: The pathway to competence in RAWS will depend on the robot platform, experience in other abdominal procedures (novice to expert) and experience in the abdominal wall repair techniques. An overview of the learning curve effect in the initial case series of several early adopters in RAWS was reviewed. In European centres, current training for surgeons wanting to adopt RAWS is managed by the specific technology-based training organized by the company providing the robot. It consists of four phases where phases I and II are preclinical, while phases III and IV focus on the introduction of the robotic platform into surgical practice. Conclusion: On behalf of the Robotic Surgery Task Force of the European Hernia Society (EHS) we believe that the EHS should play an important role in the clinical phases III and IV training. Courses organized in collaboration with the robot provider on relevant surgical anatomy of the abdominal wall and procedural steps in complex abdominal wall reconstruction like transversus abdominis release are essential. Whereas the robot provider should be responsible for the preclinical phases I and II to gain familiarity in the specific robot platform.

The first case of robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair for incisional hernia in Japan

Extraperitoneal mesh repair for ventral hernia has garnered attention and its rate has been increasing due to concerns for the potential complications of intraperitoneal mesh repair. Recently, robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is highlighted as a solution to the technically demanding nature of laparoscopic transabdominal or enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retrorectus ventral hernia repair. A 78-year-old man, who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy 10 months earlier, presented with an incisional hernia of European Hernia Society Classification M3W2, length 4 cm, width 5 cm with rectus diastasis. A right single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was performed using a 21 by 14 cm self-gripping mesh and anterior wall reconstruction was done by 0 barbed nonabsorbable running suture. There were no complications and recurrence observed during a 7 months postoperative period. Single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was considered a good option for midline moderate-size incisional hernias from the point of view of the ease of suturing, adequateness of dissection and prevention of bowel injury.

Lateral hernia secondary to colorectal submucosal resection repaired by robotic-assisted approach: Case report

Introduction and importance

Lateral abdominal wall defects are a rare event and commonly result from iatrogenic causes and trauma. We report the first known case of flank hernia after endoscopic submucosal resection of a colonic polyp complicated by colonic perforation.

Case presentation

This is a case of a 50-year-old male who underwent endoscopic colonic resection complicated by perforation of the colon. Eight months later, he presented with an enlarging, asymptomatic left flank bulge. CT showed a large flank hernia which was successfully repaired using a robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAP) approach.

Clinical discussion

The hypothesis is that the endoscopic resection with colonic perforation caused an iatrogenic injury to the abdominal wall creating a lateral abdominal hernia. Injury to abdominal wall musculature may take months to develop into a clinically apparent hernia. Flank hernias can be successfully repaired using a robotic minimally invasive approach.

Conclusion

Flank bulge and hernias must be included or at least be considered as consequence of a potential complication from endoscopic colonic perforation. Surgeons and endoscopists must be aware of this potential complication and its latent presentation. This case stresses the importance of long-term outcomes monitoring, particularly with innovative procedures.

•

Lateral abdominal wall defects are a rare event and commonly occur due to trauma.

•

Lateral hernias seldomly can be resulted from myofascial laxity and denervation injury.

•

Endoscopic resection may lead thermal injury of the abdominal wall and latent hernia.

•

Robotic surgery is a safe and effective platform to repair lateral abdominal hernias.

Robotic transabdominal retromuscular rectus diastasis (r-TARRD) repair: a new approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present our innovative robotic approach for the treatment of rectus diastasis with concurrent primary or incisional ventral hernias.

METHODS

We performed 45 r-TARRD repairs for symptomatic rectus diastasis with concomitant associated ventral/incisional umbilical and/or epigastric hernias between January 2019 and January 2020. Data on patient demographics, type of hernia, operative time, complications, recurrence rate, and hospital stay were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was scheduled at 1, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

45 patients (13 M, 32 F) underwent r-TARRD repair. Mean age was 54.8 years (range 31-68) and mean BMI was 26.74 kg/m² (range 21.1-31). Mean ASA was 2.2 (range 1-3). In all patients we used a polypropylene mesh 25 × 15 cm, properly shaped. Mean operative time was 192 min (range 115-260). Mean hospital stay 4.2 days (range 2-7). No conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery and no major complications occurred. At 1-month follow-up one mesh infection (2.22%) was observed and it was treated conservatively. Four recurrences (8.88%) were reported at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted TARRD repair is conceived as a novel alternative minimally invasive procedure for RD with concurrent midline defects ensuring a primary fascial defect closure and mesh implantation in a sublay position with a wide overlap. It is important to better evaluate the suture that should be used to perform the repair, and multicenter studies with standardization of patient's demographics, RD characteristics, and long-term follow-up outcomes are mandatory to assess the effectiveness and durability of r-TARDD repair.

Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare early postoperative outcomes after transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair with open (oTAR) and robotic (rTAR) approach.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify comparative studies until October 2020. A meta-analysis of postoperative short-term outcomes was performed including complications rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention (SSOPI), systemic complications, readmission, and reoperation rates as measure outcomes.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies were included in the analysis with a total of 831 patients who underwent rTAR (n = 237) and oTAR (n = 594). Robotic TAR was associated with lower risk of complications rate (9.3 vs 20.7%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.218-0.589, p < 0.001), lower risk of developing SSO (5.3 vs 11.5%, OR 0.669, 95% CI 0.307-1.458, p = 0.02), lower risk of developing systemic complications (6.3 vs 26.5%, OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.100-0.433, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD - 4.409, 95% CI - 6.000 to - 2.818, p < 0.001) but longer operative time (SMD 53.115, 95% CI 30.236-75.993, p < 0.01) compared with oTAR. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSION

Robotic TAR improves recovery by adding the benefits of minimally invasive procedures when compared to open surgery. Although postoperative complications appear to decrease with a robotic approach, further studies are needed to support the real long-term and cost-effective advantages.

Learning curve of robotic transversus abdominis release in ventral hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite heightened interest in robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR), concerns over its steep learning curve (LC) and associated challenges may limit its adoption. This study defines the operative time and morbidity-based LC of a single surgeon's experience with rTAR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rTAR over an 8-year period was conducted. Consecutive ventral and incisional hernia repairs were stratified into four sub-categories based on bilaterality and complexity, with complex hernias being defined as those > 10 cm. Cumulative sum analyses (CUSUM) were used to evaluate skin-to-skin time and morbidity LCs.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 156 rTARs with a mean skin-to-skin time of 222.8 min. Mean skin-to-skin times (min) for sub-categories were as follows: unilateral non-complex (137.6), bilateral non-complex (206.8), unilateral complex (241.9), and bilateral complex (298.6). The CUSUM-LC was obtained by summing the differences between each procedure's operative time and its sub-category mean, revealing a quadratic best-fit line maximum at case 49 and a transition point between early and late phases at case 75. Although skin-to-skin times between early and late phases did not differ significantly (235.3 vs 211.2, respectively; p = 0.12), a significant difference was found in console times. Overall postoperative complications also decreased significantly from early to late phases (41.3% vs 25.9%; p = 0.041). Postoperative complications were predicted by a history of wound infection (c = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that the rTAR LC was overcome between 49 and 75 cases, after which, console time and postoperative complications decreased significantly.

Robot-assisted Treatment of Epigastric Hernias With a Suprapubic Approach

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair has shown itself to be feasible and safe in abdominal wall surgery. Presently, the ports are placed laterally to meet the distance from the fascial defect. The aim of our study is to report our experience of epigastric hernia treatment with trocar insertion in the suprapubic region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On a prospectively collected dataset on robot-assisted surgery, patients treated for epigastric hernias with suprapubic approach were identified. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were selected. Median age was 58.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 47.8 to 67.3 y]; 4 patients were male (33.3%) and the median body mass index was 23.9 kg/m2 (IQR: 22.3 to 26.2 kg/m2). All patients were referred to surgery because of pain. The median measure of the hernia defect was 30 mm (IQR: 13.75 to 31.0 mm); median larger mesh diameter was 13.5 cm (IQR: 9.5 to 15.0 cm); and median operative time was 136.5 minutes (IQR: 120.0 to 186.5 min). No intraoperative complication or conversion to open surgery occurred. Postoperatively, 2 patients presented a seroma and median length of hospital stay was 2.0 days (IQR: 1.75 to 3 d). No case of hernia recurrence was recorded at a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (range: 4 to 29 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

In the robot-assisted treatment of hernias of the epigastric region, a suprapubic port placement can be considered instead of a lateral one to have a better field overview, especially in subxiphoid hernias. Further studies are needed to assess the benefits and limitations of such technique.

Robotic-assisted pulley technique for the ventral hernia

When approaching complex abdominal wall hernias at either index operation or a subsequent reoperation for recurrent incarcerated abdominal wall hernias, a majority of surgeons consider mesh placement a key step in the prevention of a future recurrence. While the laparoscopic and open approaches show no significant difference in hernia recurrence, the laparoscopic approach to complex abdominal wall hernias does reduce surgical-site infection, postoperative ileus, improves short-term quality-of-life scores, and reduces hospital length of stay (Davies et al. in Am Surg 78(8):888-892, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500604/ , 2012, McGreevy et al. in Surg Endosc 17(11):1778-1780, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12958679 , 2003, Bittner et al. in Surg Endosc 33:3069-3139, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7 , 2019). In this paper, we describe a robotic approach with a pulley technique to the fixation of polypropylene mesh in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Our primary aim is to offer a new perspective to the re-creation of challenging abdominal walls and to encourage other surgeons to gain proficiency in the robotic approach. Additionally, the material cost to the technique is lower than that of self-expanding or deployable mesh reinforcements used in other laparoscopic approaches. Over time, as an institution breaks even on the cost of a robot with their return on investment, this technique offers potential cost-saving.

The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs-a qualitative review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The management of ventral incisional hernias (VIH) has undergone many iterations over the last 5 years due to evolution in surgical techniques and advancement in robotic surgery. Four general principles have emerged: mesh usage, retromuscular mesh placement, primary fascial closure, and usage of minimally invasive techniques when possible. The application of robotic retromuscular repairs in VIH allow these principles to be applied simultaneously. This qualitative review attempts to answer what robotic retromuscular repairs are described, which patients are selected for these techniques, and what are current outcomes.

METHODS

Using the key words: "robotic retromuscular repair", "robotic Rives Stoppa", and "robotic transversus abdominis release", a PubMed search of articles written up to December 2019 was critically reviewed.

RESULTS

44 articles were encountered, 9 high-quality articles were analyzed for this manuscript. Level of evidence ranged from 2B to 2C. Robotic TAR patients had BMI of 33 kg/m², defect sizes ranging from 7-14 cm wide to 12-19 cm long, longer OR times, no difference in surgical site events, and shorter length of stay (LOS). The techniques to perform robotic Rives Stoppa (RS) were heterogeneous; however, extended totally extraperitoneal (ETEP) approach is most described. Defect width for RS repairs ranged 4-7 cm and LOS was less than 1 day. Complication rates were low, there is no long-term data on hernia recurrence, and information on cost is limited.

CONCLUSION

In short-term follow-up, robotic retromuscular repairs show promise that VIH can be repaired with intramuscular mesh, few complications, and shorter LOS. Data on hernia recurrence, long-term complications, and rigorous cost analysis are needed to demonstrate generalizability.

Short- to Midterm Results After Posterior Component Separation with Transversus Abdominis Release: Initial Experience from India

PURPOSE

Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release is a new procedure and is quickly gaining popularity. It has shown promising results in terms of low recurrence rates for large and complex hernias. However, there are very little Indian data available on this to date. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of the technique at three centers in India.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months who underwent open or minimal access posterior component separation were included.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients (open = 44, minimal access = 25, and hybrid = 3) were included in the analysis. At a follow-up ranging from 3 months to 35 months, there were two recurrences (2.78%). Surgical site occurrences were seen in 23/72 (31.9%), and surgical site infection was seen in 7/72 (9.7%). Surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention was 3/72 (4.2%). There were two (2.78%) mortalities in the open group due to myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release may have advantages in terms of low recurrence in large hernias in the Indian population and can be used in carefully selected patients.

Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Introduction:

Positioning-related neural injuries are an inherent risk in surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction because of unique patient positioning and increased operative times. The implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring should be considered in such cases.

Methods:

This was a two-armed study with one prospective intervention group and one retrospective control group. All patients underwent robotic abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic center. The prospective arm underwent robotic reconstruction from January through July 2019. The retrospective database reviewed patients who underwent the same procedure from August 2015 through July 2018. Factors assessed included: demographics (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities), surgical details (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, procedure, operative time, positioning), outcomes (length of stay, 30-d readmission, reoperation), and any new-onset intraoperative or postoperative neuropathy. Patients were seen in the clinic postoperatively at weeks 1 and 6.

Results:

Ten patients were included in the prospective arm. All received intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. They were compared with 47 patients in the retrospective arm who underwent surgery without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. One position-related neural response from baseline was detected intraoperatively in the prospective arm; however, there were no peripheral neurological symptoms present postoperatively. Two patients in the control group developed transient peripheral neuropathies that resolved within 6 weeks. Demographics, surgical procedures, and length of surgery were similar in both groups. The prospective group had a higher rate of preoperative neuropathy and intraoperative use of vasopressors.

Conclusion:

Incorporation of neurophysiological monitoring in robotic surgery is feasible and may lead to the prevention and reduction in positioning-related injuries.

Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs

BACKGROUND

Building on the principles of eTEP access, described by Dr. Jorge Daes, our group has previously described and standardized a novel minimally invasive approach to restoration of the linea alba and repair of lateral atypical defects of the abdominal wall. The purpose of this report is to present comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robotic eTEP access retrorectus repairs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic eTEP (lap-eRS) and robotic-assisted eTEP (robo-eRS) Rives-Stoppa repairs between September 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographics and the perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Our review identified 206 patients (Lap-eRS 120 vs. robo-eRS 86). The groups were comparable (p > 0.05) in gender distribution (47.6% vs. 53% male) and mean age (53.2 vs. 50.8 years), but different (p < 0.05) in mean BMI (31.3 vs. 34.4 kg/m²) and ASA score (2.1 vs. 2.4). The robo-eRS group had a larger defect size (5.5 vs. 7.1 cm, p < 0.05), a longer mean operative time (120.4 vs. 174.7 min, p < 0.05), and a higher hospitalization cost ($5,091 vs. $6,751, p = 0.005) compared to the lap-eRS group. Average length of stay (0.2 vs. 0.1 days), length of drain placement (5.3 vs. 5.7 days), and reoperations (2.5% vs. 2.3%) were similar between lap-eRS and robo-eRS (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups (lap-eRS vs. robo-eRS) were followed for an average of 5.7 months vs. 5.5 months (p = .735) and showed similar recurrence rates (1.7% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We present the largest series to-date of eTEP access laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia retrorectus repairs. Morbidly obese patients and those with more complex abdominal wall defects were more likely to undergo a robo-eRS. The significantly longer operative time and higher hospital cost associated with the robo-eRS group may be in part due to these factors. Both robotic and laparoscopic eTEP Rives-Stoppa repairs are associated with favorable perioperative outcomes and low recurrence rates.

Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Aim of the present systematic review is to compare the postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive anterior and posterior component separation technique (CST), in terms of postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates.

METHODS

Nine-hundred and fifty-nine articles were identified through Pubmed database. Of these, 444 were eliminated because were duplicates between the searches. Of the remaining 515 articles, 414 were excluded after screening title and abstract. One hundred and one articles were fully analysed, and 73 articles were further excluded, finally including 28 articles. Based on the surgical technique, three groups were created: Group A, endoscopic anterior CST and closure of the abdominal midline by laparotomy; Group B, endoscopic anterior CST and closure of the abdominal midline laparoscopically or robotically; Group C, laparoscopic or robotic posterior CST with transversus abdominal muscle release (TAR).

RESULTS

In group A, B and C, 196, 120 and 236 patients were included, respectively. Surgical and medical complication rates for the three groups were 31.2% and 13.7% in group A, 15.8% and 4.1% in group B, and 17.8% and 25.4% in group C, while recurrence rate was 10.7%, 6.6% and 0.4%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of surgical postoperative complication rate between group A versus B (p = 0.0022) and between group A versus C (p = 0.0015) and of recurrence rate between group A versus C (p = < 0.0001) and B versus C (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior CST with midline closure by laparotomy showed the worst results in terms of postoperative surgical complications and recurrence in comparison to the pure minimally anterior and posterior CST. Posterior CST-TAR showed lowest hospital stay and recurrence rate, although the follow-up is short. However, due to the poor quality of most of the studies, further prospective studies and randomized control trials, with wider sample size and longer follow-up are required to demonstrate which is the best surgical option.