Parents as Teachers: Teaching Pediatrics Residents the Art of Engaging in Difficult Conversations

Development and Evaluation of a Child Neurology Resident Curriculum for Communication Around Serious Illness

Background: Communication around serious illness is a core competency for all residencies. One-fifth of neurology residencies have no curriculum. Published curricula use didactics or role-play to assess confidence performing this skill without evaluation in clinical settings. The SPIKES mnemonic (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Empathy, Strategy/Summary) outlines 6 evidence-based steps for communication around serious illness. It is unknown whether child neurology residents can incorporate SPIKES into communication around serious illness in clinical settings. Objective: To develop and evaluate a curriculum on communication around serious illness using SPIKES for child neurology residents that shows long-term skill retention in clinical settings at a single institution. Methods: In 2019, we created a pre-post survey and skills checklist based on SPIKES, with 20 total including 10 core skills. Faculty observed residents' (n  =  7) communication with families and completed both preintervention and postintervention checklists for comparison. Residents underwent training in SPIKES during a 2-hour session using didactic and coached role-play. Results: All (n  =  7) residents completed preintervention surveys, 4 of 6 completed postintervention. All (n  =  6) participated in the training session. Following the training, 75% of residents reported improved confidence in use of SPIKES, though 50% were still unsure about appropriately responding to emotions. There was improvement in all SPIKES skills, with significant improvement in 6 of 20 skills up to 1 year following training. Conclusion: This is the first evaluation of the implementation of a communication around serious illness curriculum for child neurology residents. We identified improved comfort with SPIKES after training. Successful acquisition and utilization of this framework in our program suggests it could be incorporated into any residency program.

Educational Priorities for Providing End-of-Life Care: Parent Perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Partnership with parents is a tenet of pediatric medicine; however, initiatives to include parents in education and research have been limited. Through focus groups, we included parents at the beginning of curriculum development by asking them to identify the priorities, existing supports, and opportunities for improvement in their child's end-of-life (EOL) care.

METHODS

English and Spanish-speaking bereaved parents whose child had been cared for by the palliative care team and had died >18 months before the study initiation were invited to participate. In-person focus groups and a follow-up phone call were used to elicit opinions and capture a diversity of viewpoints. Themes were identified and clustered through an iterative analytic process.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven parents of 17 children participated, with the total sample size determined by thematic saturation. Four themes were identified as important to parents in their child's EOL care: (1) honoring the role of the parent, (2) having confidence in the care team, (3) receiving gestures of love and caring, and (4) navigating logistic challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

We asked parents to be partners in guiding priorities for health care education and professional development to improve pediatric EOL care. In addition to strengthening skills in communication, confidence in the team, and compassion, parents in this study identified a need for hospital staff to anticipate financial and social stressors and provide supportive resources more readily. Additionally, parents described clinical and nonclinical staff as providing support, suggesting that a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary curriculum be developed to improve pediatric EOL care.

Nothing about me without me: a scoping review of how illness experiences inform simulated participants' encounters in health profession education

Background

Person-centred simulation in health professions education requires involvement of the person with illness experience.

Objective

To investigated how real illness experiences inform simulated participants' (SP) portrayals in simulation education using a scoping review to map literature.

Study selection

Arksey and O'Malley's framework was used to search, select, chart and analyse data with the assistance of personal and public involvement. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. A final consultation exercise was conducted using results.

Findings

37 articles were within scope. Reporting and training of SPs are inconsistent. SPs were actors, volunteers or the person with the illness experience. Real illness experience was commonly drawn on in communication interactions. People with illness experience could be directly involved in various ways, such as through conversation with an SP, or indirectly, such as a recording of heart sounds. The impact on the learner was rarely considered.

Conclusion

Authentic illness experiences help create meaningful person-centred simulation education. Patients and SPs may both require support when sharing or portraying illness experience. Patients' voices profoundly enrich the educational contributions made by SPs.

Decisions for Long-Term Ventilation for Children. Perspectives of Family Members

Rationale: The decision whether to initiate or forgo long-term ventilation for children can be difficult and impactful. However, little has been published on the informational and decisional needs of families facing this decision.Objectives: To assess what families with children with chronic respiratory failure and life-limiting conditions need and want for informed decision-making.Methods: English- and Spanish-speaking parents who were facing (contemporaneous decision makers) or had previously faced (former decision makers) a decision regarding invasive or noninvasive long-term ventilation for their children were recruited using convenience sampling. Patients who were older and cognitively capable also were invited to participate. We performed semistructured interviews using an open-ended interview guide developed de novo to assess parents' decisional needs and experiences. Qualitative data analysis used a thematic approach based on framework analysis, and thematic saturation was a goal.Results: A sample of 44 parents and 2 patients from 43 families was interviewed. All contemporaneous decision makers (n = 28) favored or believed that they would choose long-term ventilation. Fifteen of 16 former decision makers chose long-term ventilation. Thematic saturation was achieved from the perspective of parents who favored or chose long-term ventilation. Four domains were identified: parents' emotional and psychological experiences with decision-making, parents' informational needs, parents' communication and decision support needs, and parents' views on the option not to initiate long-term ventilation. For most parents, making a decision regarding long-term ventilation was stressful, even though they articulated goals and values that could/did guide their decision-making. In general, parents wanted comprehensive information, including what life would be like at home for the child and the family. They wanted their medical providers to be honest, tactful, patient, and supportive. Parents reported that they felt being presented with the option not to initiate was acceptable.Conclusions: In this study, we identified specific informational and decision-making needs regarding long-term ventilation that parents facing decisions feel are important. These data suggest that providers should present families with comprehensive, balanced information on the impact of long-term ventilation and, when the child has a profoundly serious and life-limiting condition, explore the option not to initiate long-term ventilation.

Improving Patient- and Family-Centered Communication in Pediatrics: A Review of Simulation-Based Learning

Patient- and family-centered care focuses on relationships among patients, families, and health care providers that are mutually beneficial and improve health care outcomes and provider satisfaction. Building relationships is a key component of the provision of excellent health care and can be taught and enhanced through simulation-based communication skills training. This article reviews the available literature on simulation-based learning as used to improve patient- and family- centered communication in the discipline of pediatrics. In this narrative review, we examine the various methods, theories, and frameworks on which simulation-based learning for communication skills are built with the goal of assisting pediatric providers in using this powerful educational technique. [Pediatr Ann. 2021;50(1):e32-e38.].